Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works
Theses
Thesis/Dissertation Collections
5-1-2001
Between
Aya Takashima
Follow this and additional works at:
http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please [email protected].
Recommended Citation
BETWEEN
Graduate Thesis
Master of Fine
Arts
School of Photographic Arts and Sciences
Rochester Institute of Technology
Aya Takashima
May 2001
Thesis Board Committee:
!:::.~ I~~{)(
d a t e
-Jeff Weiss, Thesis Chair / Associate Professor, SPAS - Fine Art Photography
d,~4
Elaine O'Neil/Professor, SPAS - Fine Art Photography
date
@-/o/
7
7
Dan Larkin / Visiting Assistant Professor, SPAS - Fine Art Photography
BETWEEN
Permission from Author Required
I, Aya Takashima, prefer to be contacted each time a request
for reproduction is made.
If
permission is granted, any
reproduction will not be for commercial use or profit. I can
be reached at the following address:
4-17-14 Nishinarusawa-cho,
flitachi,Ibaragi.316-0032
Japan
Email: [email protected]
date
f·
I
f
rt/ /
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Itiswithmuch gratitudethatIwouldliketo
acknowledgethe
following
peoplefortheirhelp
and supportoverthepastthreeyears.My
thesiscommittee:ElaineO'Neil
Dan Larkin
Jeff Weiss
YoshieTakashima
KyokoTakashima
Ihsuan Lin
LynnWalz
Judy Levy
DavidAkiba
HajimeIshiyama
HiroyukiMorooka
AndrewMcPherson
and
My
cat,Keicontents:
Introduction
Background
The Mirror
Examination
RTT
/
FirstYear/
FirstQuarterInnerscape- Thedreamof an unborn
baby
or geneticmemorySecond Quarter
Colorscape
Third Quarter
Five WhitePhotographs,Wrinkled Fabric
SecondYear
Pre-thesis
Thesis
/
BETWEEN InstallationTHELINE,THE BULB,THE UMBRELLA
BETWEEN
Conclusion
Morning Song Sung by
aClownEndnotes
ListofPlates
INTRODUCTION
Dowereallyseeanything?Welookateverythingaround us and supposethat
wereally knowwhat we observe.As my life'sworkIhaveembraced an exploration
of that aspect of human perception through which I organize and interpret the
world-vision.
One's vision is thought to provide reliable information, hence the saying
"seeing
isbelieving."Nothing
wouldbesureifone startedtosuspecttheexistence ofwhat was perceived andtheway itwas perceived. It isnaturaltobelievethatwhat
oneseesis infactwhat exists andthatitexists as perceived.
However,
Ioften findmyself questioning the differences and relationshipsbetween what I perceive and
whatIconceive.
Thisthesiswill presenttheprogress ofmy thoughts,and theprocess ofmy
art-making from1997 to 2001. Istarted as aphotographer, yet
during
this timemymain interest has shifted to utilizing space and objects to create illusion. The
enchantment ofillusion isthatitgivestheviewerfalseinformation
by
deceiving
thesenses. As anillusion progresses, questions about perceptual understanding arise.
Whatweknow ischallenged
by
what wesee,andslowlybelieving
becomesseeing.Theworld seemstohidesomethingwithin whatappearstobe. Ifoneaccepts
what appears to be without questioning, then the hidden is never revealed.
Background
My
fatheralways reminds me nottoforgetthatIamJapanese.Since Ihavebeen
living
in the United States for almost five years, he thinks I will forget myheritage. Anadmonition made more
interesting
by
thefactthatone ofthereasonsmyparents named meAyawastomakemynameeasyenoughtobepronouncedwhenI
traveledoutside ofJapan.I hadneverthoughtabout
being
JapaneseuntilIcametothe United States because everything around me was Japanese. Iknew there were
differentcultures outside ofJapan;yet, Ididnotthink that those differenceswould
affect me. To my surprise
being
in a place in which all I seeis not Japanese hasheightened myconsciousness about
being
Japanese inspiteofmy father'sconcern.Iworkedin thefieldofphotography fortenyearsbefore enteringthemasters
degreeprogram attheRochesterInstituteofTechnology.Variousexperiences
during
thoseyears ledme to apply to this program. I studied photography at the Osaka
University
ofArts in Japan. Aftergraduating from college, I started working foraprofessional photography
lab,
assisting commercial photographers anddoing
freelancephotography.Through working inthe "realworld,"
Igained experiencein
the
highly
commercial aspects ofphotography;however,
IrealizedthatIwas moreinterested in self-fulfillment as an artist. In preparation for entering an M.F.A.
programin theUnitedStates,IattendedtheNew England School Of
Photography
inBoston in 1997.
The experience at the New England School Of
Photography
was veryimportantforme.Oneoftheaspects in my photographythatInoticed atthat time
quality.
My
teachers and classmates at the school, also, acknowledged that myphotographshad a certain qualitywhich
they
defined as"Japanese."
Iunderstood
their acknowledgement as a notion of me as
being
Japanese and thus makinginherently
Japanese images. Itwas aheightened awareness ofhow Iperceivedmysurroundings which made methinkmore about whoIwas andfromwheremywork
The Mirror
Itakephotographs of myselffrom timeto time inordertosee myself. It is
importantformetoreally lookat myselfinaphotograph;toexamine
it,
analyze whoIam anddeterminewhereIam.However,thequestionformewas,if Icould never
reallyseemyself,howcouldI knowwhatI knowaboutmycorporeal self?
One
day
inBoston, I waslooking
atmyface ina mirrorpreparingtomake a self-portrait
and suddenly realized thatI had never seen my
face. I knew that since my eyes are part of my
face,
I would never see my face. This was asurprising revelation in spite of the fact that I
knewthemirror reflects whatis in frontofit.What
Ithoughtof asmy facewas a mirrored
image,
atwodimensional,
fullsize,reversedrepresentationand notmyactualfaceat all.Thisrealization made me wonder whatI
hadseen andhow Ihadseenupto thatmomentinmy life. Ihave seen unrnirrored
versions of my face in photographs or video, but
they
too, are representations.Mirroredimages and photographs are similar inthat
they
seem perfect copies. AsOliver Wendell Holmes calledDaguerreotypes "the mirror with a
memory1,"
they
seem so accuratethatoften people accept them and donot question thenature of
whatisphotographed.
InBoston,Istartedmyprojectquestioningrealitythrough theuse of mirrors.
Looking
at a mirror and thereflections in it made me feel as if there was another"inside"
andthe"outside."This deceptive quality
thatmirrors createledmeto thequestion,howcan
oneknowthat theworld perceived as occupiedis
the "real" one?
Extending
this project, Iincorporatedwindow frames and picture frames
in addition to the mirrors.
Framing
separates ascene from its surroundings, and creates a world
within it. To me, mirrors question reality and
windows and/orframescreate a separationfrom fig-2 the
world, contradicting John Szarkowski's2 definitionof mirrors as reflections of one'sinner-scapeand windows as openingsto
thereal world.
:-*<a^rifi t.St^RiM waJ
fig.4
Around the same time I was introduced to Duane Michals' work. I was
fascinatedwiththeplayful,humorous wayhetoldstories with photography. Most
important, hechallenged viewerstoconsider anotherdimensionto theworld,which
interestedme.Forexample,in THINGSAREQUEER3,Michalsplays withframesand
scale.Inthefirstofthenine photographsin
the sequence are a
bathtub,
a sink and atoilet in what appears to be an ordinary
bathroom.
However,
in the nextphotograph, a gigantic
leg
suddenlyfig.5 appears into the frame. One realizes that
thosethingsinthebathroom were miniatures.In everyphotograph,Michalsshows
new surprises and opens up another dimension which influences how the next
photographin thesequenceis known. Intheend, thephotographs returntowhere
they
started asifnoneofthestorythatMichalspresentedhadeverbeenshown.MHMMB
~
1 < i
fig. 7
In ALICE'S MIRROR*, Michals
plays with mirrors as well as frames and
scale. Through the images in ALICE'S
MIRROR,what seemed realturnsouttobe
fis10 a rnirrored image of
reality inside the
mirror. Theuse ofmirrors and frames in
Michals'
work made me thinkabouthow
one's vision works.One eitherconsciouslyorunconsciouslyselects whattosee. To
me,hiswork seemed anintensifiedversion ofhowone sees.
fig. 12
Michals'
photographsmade methinkmore abouttherelationshipbetween
fictionand reality.His writingunderscoredmyquestions.
A FAILED ATTEMPT TO PHOTOGRAPHREALITY5
How foolish ofmetobelievethatitwouldbethateasy.
I hadconfusedtheappearancesoftreesandautomobiles,
and peoplewithreality
itself,
andbelievedthata photographoftheseappearancestobea photograph
of it. It isamelancholytruth thatIwill
neverbeabletophotograph itand canonly fail.
lamareflectionphotographingother reflections
withina reflection. Tophotographreality
istophotograph nothing.
As Iworked withmirrors, therecame a point whenitseemeditwasactually
themirrorthatwasmaking myimagery.Imade
formal,
compositionaldecisionsandtookthepicturesbut Iwasoverwhelmed
by
thefactthatmirrorsalways reflect objectsas perfect copies. Insteadofusingthemirror,Ifeltasif Iwas
being
usedby
it. Thetechniquesmade possible
by
theuse of a mirrorbecamethe work and Ifelt Iwasmerely
tricking
viewers withmyimages.Iwas nottruly
experiencingwhat wasinfrontof a
lens,
ratherIwasjusttrying
tomakeimagesup.TheFebruary
6th entry in7am lost now. I need to start all over again. I
have been
thinking
how Igothereand how Igot lost. Ifoundthat
by
usingmirrors,whatthemirrordoes becamedominanttomymind. Themirrorisnow what makesthe
image,
and not me. I realized otherwise that the mirrorshouldbe justawayand a tool, which supposedtobea
help
tomy images.I wanted to create an illusive quality in my
pictures. I have been
thinking
why Iam stuck with thisidea of illusivequality.When
thinking
aboutillusiveness,
Iwouldthinkof myexistence,whyandhowIhappen to
be here in thisworld. Itis amazingthatI reallyexist.It
fascinatesmethatmy DNAcarriesthememory ofwhich
my blood inherited fromthe
beginning
ofthisworld. AmI goingtoofar?
After a two month hiatus from making pictures, I began again
by
taking
snapshots. I shot whatever I saw around me and tried to be conscious about
perceiving my surroundings. The process was completely intuitive, I did not
compose,andtherewas nohesitationtoreleasetheshutter whether or notIthought
a scene would make a good image. This attitude towards photography is what I
fig. 14
Nobuyoshi Araki has
been an influential figure since I
first saw his
book,
Kukei/Kinkei{Skyscape/Close-range6),
which waspublishedjustafterhiswife,
Yoko,
died. Maybe itwasmy sentiment
thatwasmovedthemostbecause
theimages inthebookandthefirst
line,
"After mywife'sdeath,
Itookpictures ofthesky from my
room,"
werefilledwithhispain andtheemptiness withoutYoko.
In the
book,
SentimentalJourney7,
along with photographs from hishoneymoon,
he announced: I cannot stand it anymore . . . There arefalse pictureseverywhere. False
faces,
falsenudes,falsesnapshots, andfalse senses inphotographs. This"SentimentalJourney"
is notfalse likethosefalsepicturesinthepublic. Thisis my loveand
my determination to be a photographer. . . . The photographsin thebooklook like a
document of his honeymoon and look real.
However,
through his other work, Irealized through his use of both photographs and text that he plays with the
borderline between fiction and reality. Fiction and reality merge into one which
challenges the viewers to question a photographic reality. In other words, a
photographis alwaysfalse because it isjusta copyofreality, and itis always real
because his action of
taking
pictures coupled with thefeeling
he has towards hissubject andtheexperience are captured.
For
Araki,
photography is about instinct not plans or intentions. Hisphilosophy iswhereI always comebacktorefresh myself.Hiscommentaboutthe
work made aroundYoko's deathwas real.Hestated,
Deathisa truereality.Icannotsay deathcanbe
fiction. I had to takepictures of her death to really see
myselfandtocompletemy love to Yoko.I thoughtitwas
not right to ask viewersfor grief
by
showing thiswork.Deep
down, Iwanted to show life through my picturesafterYoko'sdeath. Butevery time Iclicked theshutter,I
wasgettingcloseto death.I didnotintend toexpressmy
griefwhenItook thosepictures.That kind ofthingscomes
unconsciously.
By
looking
atthosepicturesafterwards,Icould
deeply
understand my grief and I had to takepicturestofindtheanswer8.
fig. 15
fig.16
EXAMINATION
fig.18
Shortly
thereafter, I started to make a series of photographs which weredifferent from anything I hadphotographed previously. Ratherthanrecordings of
what wasin frontof a
lens,
they
were abstract andhada senseoflight,
depthandtactility.
Believing
Ishould notbetooconscious about whatIwastrying
todo,
Ididnot wanttotranslatemyphotographstowords.
Intuitiveness,
honesty
tomyself,andfaith in myeye were stilltheimportantfactors for makingphotographs.Iallowedmy
selftoflowwithmynewwork andtoexperiencethisnewwayof seeing.Idescribed
thisprocess as:
Areasoncanbe destroyed
by
another reason.Anexplanation canbe justaplay ofwords.
However,feelings alongan experience remain.
Do Ineedto
justify
myselftoothers?Ialwayswantsomething verysuretomyself.
February
10th,1998Itwas wintertime.Irememberitwasverycold andIdidnotwanttogoout.
I began to observe everything in my one bedroom apartmentin Boston. I set up
neither objects nor lights to take pictures. Rather, with my camera in my
hand,
Iwalked around in my apartment
day
and night, sometimeslaying
on a floor orstandingon adeskor akitchencounter
discovering
manythingsin my everyday lifewhichhadpreviouslygone unattended.
By
theend ofthisproject,I knew every detailsuch aslight coming incertaintimesofthe
day
castinginteresting
shapesofshadows,thedelicatepale shadows cast
by
unevenwalls,theshape ofstains ontheceilingandfloor,
orthewrinkles ofthesofa cover.Ihadaformulawhenmakingthisseries of photographs.At
first,
Ifoundanobjectthatinterestedme and examineditanditssurroundings.Thenwithmycamera
in frontofmy eye,I tooka closerlook. Thistime Iwould slowly changethe focus
plane of thelensor move myselftowardoraway fromtheobject.The lensallowed
me tosee thingsina completely different waythanIhadwithbareeyes.
My
deskbecame an ocean with the
horizon,
a curtainbecame waves and the sofa becamedesert. Asaresult,thephotographsbecametheabsence of what was photographed
(itwasthere), which nowemphasizingthepresence ofthe absence(was itthere?). I
knewthesephotographs wouldleadmeina newdirectionandItrusted theprocess
fig.19
Atthe same time I beganto define art formyself. I had thought of art as
purelyself-expression.Now Iquestionedifart couldonly beaboutself-expression.
Photographs thatI take and myselfare always
connected.
Yet,
Iwonderif
myphotographs are about whoIam.Iwould
immediately
said yesto thisquestionbeforebecause myphotographs were, I thought,about my
self-expression. Iwonder
if
myphotographs arethereflectionof myselfor reflectionoftheworld. Perhapsboth. Ihave
been realizingthatmy interest isnotonputting mywords
andmythoughtson other people orshowingoff myselfto
others. Ijustwant to makesomething I haveneverseen
andsomething I havenever experienced.
Feb.20th, 1998
Ihadideasaboutmyphotography.However,Ineeded experiencein solving
visual problems and
developing
a more critical eye. It was important for me toimprove theseskillsbecause I knew Iwantedtoworkinthe fieldofphotographyas
an artist.Graduateschool seemed an optionthatwould give me opportunitiestoboth
create more work and
develop
theideas behind it. In addition, an M.F.A. wouldRIT
/
First
year/
First Quarter
work/
Innerscape
-The
dream of an unborn babyor genetic memory
InAugust
1998,
I cametotheRochester InstituteofTechnology
tostartmygraduate study.Thefirstquarter atRITwasthehardestone forme.
Adjusting
toanew environment always takes a lot of effort, in addition, I was not sure which
direction Iwantedmyworkto take.
I wasthinking aboutcontinuing toexploretheabstract photographs thatI
madebefore IcametoRTT.
However,
inthevery firstclass, theprofessor challengedmetostart a new project.AsalwaysIstarted
by
makingself-portraits todeterminewhereIwas going.
Whatisthisunexplainablefeelings?
Itis similarto the
feeling
offear,
but not quite.Something
so elementalthatIcan't eventhinkofany wayto articulate it. It is almost like the memory inherited
through my blood is
telling
me something. It is just afeeling,
yetit issomehowveryphysical andveryreal.Sep.26th,1999.
Ourgeneticmemorycontains allmemory ofthe
evolutionof human beings. This interestsmeverymuch.
Icamefrom mymother's womb.While Iwasin herwomb,
I must have experienced the evolution which human
beingscamethrough,
by being
one cellto two cells,fourcells toeight cells andso on to became ahuman being.
This iswhatIand allhuman beingswentthough, butwe
are notrememberinganythingaboutit. Ibelieve,
however,
that thememory of
being
ina wombandexperiencingtheevolutionmustbesomewhere inan unconscious level of
our mind.
Oct.2nd. 1999.
I tried to articulate this idea of genetic memory
by
making abstractphotographs andcombiningthemwith self-portraits.SinceIassumed unbornbabies
didnotsee,Ithoughtabstract
imagery
wouldrepresenttheirvisualexperience.Itriedtomakeimages which contained nolanguageor readable signs.Anunbornbaby's
world,Iassumed,mustbe dominated
by
physical senses ratherthanintellectualones.Self-portraitswereincludedto
identify
thisprojectas a searchfor myorigin.Forthe finalreview ofthequarter, Ipresented six40" x60"blackand white
self-portraits,posed asif Iwasinawomb,
hung
fromtheceiling.Iusedinfraredfilmfortheself-portraitstocreatethesurrealisticqualityof me
being
ina womb.Infrontof each self-portrait were a number of abstractimages
hung
tocreateDNApatterns.Since the abstract images were transparent, viewers could see the self-portraits
In myartiststatement,Iwrote,
"An unborn
baby
ishaving
an unimaginabledreamwhilegrowing ina womb.Thedreamisabout the
evolution of
life,
whichstartsfromlong
beforeahumanbeing
wasformed. The dreamcontains notonlya physicalsideofevolution,butalso a mental andemotional sideof
evolution which includes all kinds ofthe strugglefor
existence and survival. An unborn
baby
is actuallyexperiencingthewhole evolutionoflife in his/hermother's
womb. "
By
Hisasaku Yumeno9Once Iwasin mymother's womb,experiencing
thewhole evolutionof life. This iswhereIcamefrom. Now
Iam nolonger in herwomb.
My
memory ofbeing
in herwomb and aboutthedream has beengone.Inaway,Ilost
my memorywhichkeeps myselfto
identify
whoIam.Of
course,Iremembermy name, mygender, my career, my
age, my nationality, my education, myexperiences, etc.
though Iwonder
if
those obvious and visiblefacts canreallytellwhoIam. Thosefactsseparate mefromothers
butstilldoesnottellenough about whoIam.
Inthefinal critique, viewers wereinterested in the ideaof geneticmemory
and
they
likedthepresentation.However,
onegroupof professors pointed outthatthey
did not understand what I wastrying
to do.This,
I thought, should be theresponseto theworkbecause intheend, IdidnotknowifIwasreally interested in
makingthiswork.
Reflecting
backonthequarter,IrealizedIhadchangedmynormal process atthe
beginning
ofthequarter.My
art startsfrom experiencingwhatis aroundmebutin thisquarter, a concept wasthestartingpoint ofmywork.Thisprocessabsolutely
Second Quarter
work/
Colorscape
fig.22
In the second quarter, I returned to earlier ideas to re-examine how my
thoughtsmightbe realized. Thefirstabstract photographs were the
discovery
of anewwayof seeing.Theclose examination of anobject,thelight
falling
ontheobject,itscastshadow,andthesurroundings wereimportantfactors. Throughphotographs
of unrecognizable objects, viewers thought of the original objects that mighthave
beenphotographed, as well asperceiving imagesofsomethingunseen.The process
of seeing and examining an object was the
key
to theprevious work and was thestartingplacefor mynew project. Overtime, theimagesbecamemore colorful and
more abstract.Mostofthemdidnothavea plane offocusand
they
becamemorelikepaintings.
Iamnot
trying
topresentwhatisvisible. Whatis thisinvisible
thing
thatIwanttopresentthen?Is thissomething I can see when my eyes are closed? Is it
memory or some sorts? Between unconsciousness and
consciousness?
Unreality
in reality?Something
that isfuzzy
and uneasy? What is this something?Something
like that appears and disappears time to time in my
consciousness and memory.
I have been
trying
to understand why myphotographsbecameso abstract.Icouldsay,it istheworld
that Iamperceiving through a
lens,
itis aboutfeelingsthatIgetfromwhatisaroundme,Iam
trying
tocapturesomething that Icannot explain with words, Iam just
trying
tobeintuitive,
Iamlooking
inside of myself inthedifferent way from which I normally see things outside
me,1ammakingtheseabstract color photographsbecause
Ijust like how
they
look, or Iam abstractingtheworldaround mebecause I donot wanttoseerealityand cannot
standlook-like-realpresentationsthatphotography hasas
its nature, and so on. I can
keep
writing theseforever.Theseexplanations arenot made up.
They
are true inasensebut
they
arenot whatmyworkisabout.fig. 23
The
inability
to explain my work actually explained my work. I unconsciouslyexcluded visual clues or
language,
which would have had particular meaningstoallowtheviewertocreate aninnerlanguage. Iwantedmyworktobe feltinsteadof
read
intellectually
Iused35mmtransparency
film,
cross processedit, and enlargedtheslides to30"
x48" printsin order to maximize the grain. The large sizeprints
created and emphasizedtheirphysicality,
forcing
theviewertoperceiveemotionallyinsteadofintellectually.
In myartiststatementIwrote,
7wanttoseesomethinginvisible,andIwantto
feel something untouchable, like mind,
time,
air, sound,smell, and temperature, but not necessarily something
spiritual.
If
Ididnothave myeyes,Iwouldstilltry
tosee.I reallywantto seesomethingthatIcannotseewithmy
eyes.
Abstract photography and paintings are often
associatedwith aspectsofspirituality. Becausethereisno
recognizable object inabstract photography, it is easyto
think that theworkisnot about a representationalworld,
butrather a spiritual one.
This work,
however,
is not about spirituality.Itis, instead,
about color,granularity and emptiness. Thecolor gives temperature to the images. Close up, the
images are filled with granularity. From a distance,
however,
granularity disappears and the images becomefull ofemptiness.
fig. 25
The invisible and untouchable are important even if
they
cannot beperceived. If there were no silences or intervals, then music would not exist.
My
motheris a music therapistand Ihelped herinherwork with patients
by
creatingimprovisationsonthepiano. Forexample, Iplayedthe pianoforagroupof people
who had emotional difficulties either at school or at workbecause
they
could notexpress themselves naturally. At the
therapy
session, each client chose oneinstrument,such as a
drum,
atambourine,or a xylophone.What I didwaslistentotheirsounds
including
the silences and played thepiano with them as ifwe werehaving
a conversation with music. Mostimportant, Itriednottousemylogic,
butratherIused intelligence andintuition; Itried tosensetheair aroundus,more asI
imagine a wild animal senses its surroundings. It was through this experience of
creatinga musicallanguagetounlocktherealityof
histories,
that Ibegantoformulatemy ideaabouttheinvisibleandtheuntouchable.
Inthissecond quarterwork,viewers almost always wantedtoknowwhatI
had photographed. The same
thing
happenedwhen Imadethefirst generation ofabstractphotographs, butatthattime thequestion seemed a natural response.This
timethequestionreally botheredme. It isquite naturalthatviewerswould askthis
question because of the media that I was using. Unlike painting and music,
photography generally impliesan objectin frontof a camerainordertobecompleted.
Since my work didnot showtheidea ofinvisible to theviewers
they
struggledtofigure out what was photographed. In addition to my idea of invisibility, a new
questionarose;howcouldImakeaphotographthatdidnot representanything,but
Third
Quarter Work
Five White
Photographs,
The
Wrinkled
Fabric
r
fig. 26
Inone ofthevery firstclassesin thethirdquarter,Ihadan
interesting
critiquefromtheclass andtheprofessor.Ishowed some work prints andtwo30"x 48"
prints,
which were an extension ofmysecond quarter work.
They
started to tellme howbeautiful myphotographs were.AprofessortoldmethatIwasreadytograduate now
because Icould make suchprettyphotographs.Irealizedthat
they
weretrying
to tellmemywork was"too"
beautiful,
buttherewasnothingmore withinit. Thishitmehardand made me re-examineeverything Ihaddonepreviously.Aesthetic qualityis
obviouslyanimportantaspectof animage.
However,
mycore concernhadbeentomakeimagesthatutilizedtheessence ofphotography,nottomake photographsthat
werejustpretty.
Atthat
time,
in additionto the question of making anon representationalphotographmanifestingtheessence ofphotographyitself,Iquestionedthepossibility
of meaningfulbeauty.
Again,
being
too real is a problem inphotography.
Photography
is believedas representationofsomething.Peoplegetconfusedwith what a photographis
of and the photograph itself. A photograph as a
photograph, and nottherepresentationof somethingelse
iswhatIwantmyphotographstobe.
My
photographs arenotofsomething.Iameliminatingcluesandhints ofwhat
a photograph is of in order toshow a photograph itself.
Whenanimage disappearsfromaphotograph,it becomes
a photograph itself. It is no longer the representationof
something. Itiswhatit is.
April19th,1999
Througha process ofsubtractingwhatwasunnecessaryto theimages,
they
gradually becamequieterin termsofcolor,lineand movement.
Showing
justenough,was what I thought of as an approach to the answer. Throughsimplification, the
photograph wouldbecomeelemental ratherthana representational.
The idea of
invisibility
arose again as myphotographs became seeminglyempty.Eventhough theimage isminimized,a photographitselfexists as an object or
Invisible and visible just seem opposite but I
think
they
are contained within each other. Maybeinvisible is ina visiblething. Inorder tosee
"invisible",
visiblehastobepresentedbecauseonecannotseeinvisible
things.
Only
one can see the invisible through visible.This iswhatillusionandimagination isabout. Thereisa
difference between seeing what is not there and seeing
what onedoesnotknowwhat s/heis
looking
at.April26,1999
fig.27
Finally,
my photographs became almost white and at first glance, lookedempty.Thesubtleties would appear after
long
andthoughtfulobservation. However,sight was contradicted asthe
imagery
begantoemerge,andtheviewerwonderediftherewasreally somethinginthewhite photographs orif thebrainwas
filling
a whitespace with animage.
Oneofmy favorite books
from my childhood talks about
somethingsimilar.The titleofthe
book is Tooru ga tooru10, which
means Tooru (the boy's name)
Passes By. There are several
stories in the book but I only
remember one ofthem.The story
starts with Tooru asking his
fig. 28 mother for a piece of
big
whitepaper.Shethinksheis goingtodrawor paint a picture onit.Aftera while she goes
toTooru'sroom andfindshim
looking
atthebig
blankwhite paperhung
onthewallinfrontofhim.Sheaskshimwhatheis
doing
andToorutellshismotherthatheislooking
at pictures ofthesky, mountains,thesun andmanyothers,ontheblankwhitepaper.This story isaboutimagination.Asa childI probably likedthestory because I
usedtodosimilarthings.After25years,Iagain startedtodo somethingsimilar,but
thistimewith alittlemoreinformation.
The invisible contained within the visible as illusion led me to create an
installation to show with theFive White Photographs. The moreI thought aboutthe
invisible,themorethe ideaofillusionseemedtoplayanimportantrole.Takeshi
Yoro,
aJapaneseanatomist, saysinhisbook TheCerebralismn
that thebrain isan organfor
knowing.Therefore,onlytheinformation already inthebraincanberecognized.For
example,if the informationabout"A"isnotin the
brain,
then theideaabout"A"doesnot exist.
"Invisible"
conceiveoftheinvisibleas visualinformation. Illusion iseithersomethingreceived as
misinformationorsomethingthatcannotbeunderstood withknown facts.Perhaps,
thebrain does not process theinformation properly, orthe brain does process the
information properly but there is a gap between the information received and the
information already existing inthebrain. It is inthatgapthatillusionexists.Ibegan
toimaginethatwhat one seesiswhatisalready intheirbrainandseeing something
is actually seeingoneself;memoryand experience are storedintheirbrain.
Itookaphotographof a wrinkled curtaininmyapartment.ThenIprojected
thatphotographon alargepiece offabric suspendingadarkenedcorner ofthestudio.
I illuminatedthefabric from behindsotherewouldbeno obvious cluethatthefabric
was altered
by
a projectedimage.Thefabricappearedtobewrinkled;however,
onlywhen theviewer walked close to it, did the factthat fabric itselfwas flatand the
In myartiststatementforthisquarterIwrote,
Seeing
isbelieving;
is itreally?Seeing
isnolonger believing.Then why dowe still
keep
seeing?Isit becausewehaveeyes?
No,we stillseethingswhen our eyesare closed.
Perhaps,
what we areseeing isallillusion.Everything
maybeimaginary,
createdinourbrain.Five White Photographs
Whiteisthemost neutralandthecleanest colorthatI
canfind. Whiteseems notto
belong
toanycolor,yetitcontainseverycolorof light. Itappearstobe nothingand
empty,
however,
it actuallycontains all.WrinkledFabric
Iwantedtoseesomething
invisible,
andIwantedtofeelsomethinguntouchable,likemind,time,air, sound, smell,and
temperature.I havebeenrealizing,
however,
that thereis nothingthatcanbecalledinvisible. Thehumaneye canonlysee whatis
visibletoit. Itisthebrain thatcreatessomething invisible
Both Five White PhotographsandWrinkled Fabricquestionhowweknowwhat
we see.Theexperienceofmaking bothtwoandthreedimensionalworkforcedmeto
consider thedifferences betweenthe two.Iused photography as a mediumforthe
two dimensional workbecause thereis aninherentdualism in photographywhich
effectstheinterpretation. Thefirstexperience of animage iswhenit is recorded on
the
film,
thisis myinterpretation.Theviewershavea second generation experienceofseeingwhen
they
are askedtodecipherthe seeming realitypresentedin thepictureinfrontofthem.
Thus,
twodimensionalimages tend tobereadintellectually
insteadof
being
experiencedphysically, particularlyin the case ofphotography, where animagehasalready beeninterpreted
by
theartistbeforeit isexperiencedby
theviewer.Aninstallation isa realtimeoccurrencefortheviewersand afirsthandexperience of
itsspaceandtime.It isthisdirectphysical experience whichIwanttocreate.
Robert
Irwin,
theinstallationartist,states"Tobean
artist is not a matter of making
paintings or objects at all. What
we arereally
dealing
withis ourstate of consciousness and the
shape of our
perception12."
His
philosophy and his work
fig.30 fascinated me and helped me
understand my growing awareness. His earlier concerns and approaches to his
concerns were whatIwasstrugglingwithinmyabstractphotographs.Inlate50s', he
started to recognize that the gestures he made with paint were always read as
imagery,
notexperienced aspaintingitself.Irwincomments onthis that"Ibegantorecognizethedifferencebetween
imagery
and physicality,andfurthermorethatforme,the momentapaintingtookonany kindofimage,theminuteIcould recognize
itas
having
any relationshiptonature,ofanykind,
tomethepaintingwentflat.Now,
I don't know where I got this
idea,
but there itwas.Imagery
for me constitutedrepresentation,
're-presentation',
a second order ofreality,where asIwas after afirstorder of
presence13."
H
^^^^^^^H .'Jasja tt^* ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^H *
^^^^^^^^H _^.
M
m i_
9 H
B
"-3
UL.~.
BfefTT
^^^^^^^fc
- ^~~~.J&Second
Year
/
Pre-thesis
AfterthethirdquarterIwentbacktoJapan forabouttwomonths.
During
mystay I thought aboutmy thesis, realizing that I was satisfied
by
the third quarterexhibitionandfelt myexplorationofthoseideaswascomplete.Itrustedmyprocess,
knowing
that inspiration usuallycomestomefrom workingintuitively
andthroughthecombinationofthe artmakingandexperiencewithlife. Once Igive myself over
tomyprocessIstarttoformnewideas.
Still,
inspirations onlycome whenmymindisclear and
free,
andatthetimemymind wasfilledwithfearand anxiety.Whenever I finishawork with whichIamvery
happy,
Ihaveavery difficulttime
beginning
a new project.I havealwaysfearedthatIwould notbeabletomakeworkthatwentbeyondwhatImade previously.It isasifIamsqueezing the last bit
of toothpaste out of the tube every time I make work and there is nothing left
afterward.IwishIcould
buy
anothertubebut mytoothpasteisone of akindandisunfortunately irreplaceable. ThistimeIhopedtorefillit
by
goingouttosee what wasoutthere inJapan.
At
first,
I wentto galleries and museums such as the Tokyo MetropolitanMuseum of
Photography,
the Museum ofContemporary
Art,
and the NationalMuseumofModern Artbut nothing reallymoved me.
Instead,
itwas a smallthing,thefireworksthatIsaw at a summer
festival,
thatfascinatedmethemost.Thedisplay
included about 13,000 fireworks at a seaside and lasted for an hour.
Sitting
withfriendsontheroofof a
building,
Iwatchedthefireworksrise,explode andfade awayone after anotherin thedarksky.Theexperience was notonlyvisual.The sound of
the
fireworks,
which would come after the fireworksexplodeddepending
ontheirdistancetous,andthesmell of powderfilledthevibratingatmospherearound us.I
was fascinated
by
thefact that although eachindividual firework lasted only fewseconds,eachhadastrongindividualpresence.Thisephemeral,yet,overwhelmingly
definitepresencemoved me.
Life isephemeral anditsmomentsare never repeated.
However,
becauseofits ephemerality, the moments become
distinct,
and the separationbetween thembecomes eternity.Thesame
thing
applies tophotography.Amoment,not anobject,captured
by
a camerabecomesdistinct,
andiseternally fixedas animage.It istime,instead of thephysicality of an object thatgives one a sense of presence. For me
photographyisabouttime,not subject matter.
Thefirsttaskofmysecond year wastowritea proposal for mythesis.As I
reviewed what I had accomplished, I began to clarify the investigation I would
undertake.
My
concern, whichbeganwith how a photograph canbe perceptuallyexperiencedinsteadof
intellectually
read,hadevolvedintohowonesees what onesees.Later,questions aboutvisibilityandsubstantialityemerged;if therewasnothing
tosee,what would stillbepossibleto see,and wastheinvisibletheresult ofthebrain
perceivinga"reality" that theeye could not capture?
Inthepractical component ofmythesis,Idecidedtocreate aspace,designed
tomaketheviewer conscious of
being
ina space.Itwasthephysical experience of aspace, instead of the presentation of a two dimensional representation of an
intellectually
understood space which was critical.By
forcing
viewers to beself-conscious about their sense of seeing, their seeingwould become more innocent.
WithinthefabricatedspaceIintendedaninstallationutilizingopticalillusionwhich
exploretherelationshipofthevisibletotheinvisible.
My
taskwouldbe visualizingtheconcept of theinvisible without contradicting itsnothingness. As soon as the
invisible is
imaged,
theinvisible has become visible. How then can a visual artistexplorethenature ofseeingthroughan exploration ofitsopposite,the invisible?This
constantquestioningwas whatIwantedtheviewerstohavethroughmywork.Ihad
a semi formed idea of whatIwas goingtodo for my thesis butI didnot want to
repeat the illusion of the third quarter. I was determined to use the ideas of the
wrinkledfabricpiece asonlyastartingpoint.
I began
by
making 3Dmodels using autodessys's
"formZ", a 3D synthesizer
software.
Using
a computertomakework was not new to me. I had
made collages and manipulated
images with a computer, yet the
experience,likethatof a painterinfrontof ablankcanvas,was
totally
new.Starting
something new excited me and I felt like a child playing with a newtoy. I made
models ofhousesandgalleryspaces, none of which were overfinished, and played
with the
lighting
andtexturing
options availablein theprogram.As Iacquired moreskill withthesoftware,Ibegan tomake a model of anumbrella.
Inordertobeabletomake a model of anobject,theobjecthastobeexamined
thoroughly.I hadanumbrella, whichIbelievewasarather genericone,nexttomy
computerasI carefullyimitated itsshape.Idecided tomake an umbrellabecauseof
its
interesting
shape andbecause itis a very familiar object whichhas been givenu
fig.32extraordinaryqualities.Thiscommon object usedtoprotect onefromrainisimagined
asafantasticobject with which one canfly.
Having
such opposite qualities within oneobjectinterestsme. Oppositequalitiessuch asinvisiblenessandvisibleness,illusion
and reality, absence and presence, and false and truth arealmost always contained
within each other and cannotbeseparated without
destroying
both. Between seemingoppositesliesthepointwhere
they
merge andbecomeone.Thatiswhere, Ibelieve,
oneperceivestheinvisible.
The Surrealistpainter, Rene Magrittestatedthat"whatone seesinan object
is another,
hidden,
object14."
Magritte used familiar objects in his paintings to
communicate surrealistic ideas. The
relationship among the familiar objects
in his paintings is so mysterious and
imaginative that each of those familiar
objects begins to have extraordinary
qualities.
Particularly
relevant to mywork is Magritte's notion of familiar
objects evoking mysterious qualities as
expressed in his comment on his
painting, Time Transfixed.
...,7 decidedtopaint theimage ofalocomotive.
Starting
fromthe possibility, theproblem presenteditself
asfollows: howtopaintthisimagesothatitwouldevoke
mystery- that
is,
themysterytowhich weareforbiddento give a meaning, lest we utter naive or scientific
absurdities; mystery that has no meaningbut that must
notbeconfusedwith the "non-sense"
that madmenwho
are
trying
hardtobefunny
findso gratifying.The image of a locomotive is
immediately
familiar;
itsmysteryisnot perceived.In orderfor its mystery to be evoked, another
immediately
familiar imagewithoutmystery- theimageofa
dining
roomfireplace-wasjoinedwiththeimage of
thelocomotive (thus I didnotjoinafamiliar imagewitha
so-called mysteriousimagesuch as a
Martian,
anangel,adragon,
or some other creatureerroneouslythoughtofas"mysterious."
In
fact,
there are neither mysterious norunmysterious creatures. The power of thought is
demonstrated
by
unveiling or evoking the mystery increatures that seem familiar to use [out of error or
habit])....
....The word idea is not the most precise
designationforwhatIthoughtwhenIunitedalocomotive
andfireplace. I didn't haveanidea;I only thoughtofan
image.... Aftertheimage has beenpainted,we can think
oftherelation it may bear toideasor words. Thisis not
improper,
sinceimages, ideas,
and words are differentinterpretations ofthesamething: thought.
However, in order to state what is
truly
necessaryaboutanimage, one must refer exclusivelyto
thatimage...
-Rene
Magritte15
fig. 34
The umbrella thatI made in the computer
did not really speak about the umbrella as it
truly
was. It was just a model of an umbrella at first. I
playedaround withit,changedthe
lighting
andthetexture of each material, and moved it around to
changeitsangle;the
beauty
ofusinga computer wasthat,unlikemakingan actualobject,theimagecould
be easilymodified and reexamined.Then Imade an
illustrationof a
floating
umbrella which cast a shadow on afloor. This image hadanundefinablequalitywhichbecamethecore ofmyinvestigations.
The perfect balance suggested
by
afloating
object fascinates me. In thephysical world, an object is substantial and has its own weight. An object is
influenced
by
gravity, thereforeit sits on somethingand does notusually floatby
itself. The
floating
umbrella was something that could not happen in a normalfig. 35
clothfromtheumbrella,exposingitsribs,but lefttheshadowoftheoriginalumbrella
intact. Less did become more, and thisimagebecame theprototype forone ofmy
thesisinstallations.
I printed out the illustration on
photographicpaper,and realizedthatIhad
made a photograph without capturing an
actual object with a camera. As I wrote
earlier, Ihada problem withthefactthata
photograph is assumed to be a
representation of something.
However,
withthis"photograph,"viewersdidnot question
reality; because the object seemed to be
clearly there, and assumed the umbrella
musthaveexisted.Theumbrellainthephotograph was recognized as an umbrella
justbecause it looked likean umbrella. This umbrella didnot actually existbutas
soon asitbecamewhatseemedtobeaphotograph,theunrealbecamereal.
Meanwhile, Iwas
trying
tomakeblackphotographs.I startedtomaketheblack photographs as an extension of the white photographs whose seeming
emptiness challengedtheviewers'
experience. Thiswas not a repetitionoftheearlier
work,rathertheblackphotographs gaveme a newopportunitytoexplore aspects of
perception,differentfromthoseofthewhite photographs.
Theprocess was simple. I photographed something black tomakea black
photograph. However, when Ilooked atthephotograph, Ifeltthatsomethingwas
missing eventhough theresultingphotograph was
definitely
what I hadintended.Althoughthephotographshad a slighthintoflinearimagery, a sense ofdepthwas
missing.
7knowwhatIdidwithmywhitephotographs.Ipresented
those asbrightness of light insteadofthecolorofwhite.
Theconditionofthatit'ssobrightthatyoudon'tseewas
capturedinthephotographs. AndIshouldn't
try
tomakeblack photographs now. Instead, I should make dark
photographs. So dark that you almost see nothing. See
something hidden in darknessand yourimaginationwill
cometoplay.
February
5th,2000Tome,thereisadifference between blackand dark. If something isblack,it
impliesthatit isblackincolorand callsthesurface oftheobjecttoquestion. Onthe
other
hand,
if something isdark,
it implies a lack oflight,
therefore the objectishiddeninapoorlyilluminatedspace.The questionbecameone about photography.
After something isphotographed,itlosesits threedimensional
form,
andtheoriginalobjectis
dismissed,
thus theissueof surface or spaceis irrelevant.When Iwasworkingonthisproject,Itried toexperience whatitwasliketo
be in total darkness. I closed my eyes and spent time in my apartment. At the
beginning,
Itriedtousemyvisualmemorytoreplacemyvision.However,
itdidnotwork asIthoughtandIrealizedhowunreliablemyvisualmemorywas.IthoughtI
wasobservingthe thingsinmyapartmenteveryday but Iwas not.Thelonger Iclosed
myeyesthemoreIstartedtoperceivemysurroundings throughmyother senses.
Afterthis experiment,IknewthatIneededtomakeadarkspaceinsteadof
dark photographs.
Photography
cannot escape its two dimensionality.Viewing
implies
being
in frontof something.Instead,
the experience ofentering a physicalspace of darkness was more critical than a two dimensional presentation of dark
which wouldbeviewedinawelllitgallery.
Between /
Installation
There were three pieces in my thesis show, THE LINE, THE BULB and the
umbrella.Thecore of each pieceisa manifestation oftheconcept of
between,
whichbecamethetitleofmythesisshow, and which willbe discussed in detail ina later
section.
Therelationships oftheindividualinstallationswereenhanced
by
thelay
outof the rooms in the gallery. Asviewers enter the firstpiece, the une, their vision
startedtoadjustto thelimitedamount oflight. Thespace ofthe linewastoprepare
theviewerstoenterthenextpiece, the bulb.Inthis very dimspace, vision adapted
completelytothedarkness. The darknessofthe bulbspace andtheblacknessofthe
hallway
after the bulb intensified thewhiteness and thebrightness of thelast
piece, THEUMBRELLA.
THE
Entrance
bU
.36
t
THE UMBRELLA
1
THE LINETHE BULB
1
THE LINE
Astheviewers walkedinthe entrance,
they
confronted a windowlikescreen,approximately
40"
x 65". A glow oflightcamefrom white fabricilluminatedfrom
behind. Projectedontothefabricwas athinhorizontal
line,
approximately1/
16of aninch wide,which subtly but constantlymoved.It couldbe interpreted forwhat it
appeared to
be,
a line or a stringdancing,
but for some itbecame thehorizon,
alandscapeor a waterline asitconnected with memoriesinone'sbrain.
fig.38
The linepiecewas an extension ofthe WrinkledFabricpiecefromthethird
quarter of the first year. After completing the Wrinkled Fabric piece, I was still
intrigued with the possibilities of projection as an
interesting
medium. Projectionbasically
adds animage layeronto whatever surfaceisused asthescreen.Thislayerdoesnothaveitsownthree dimensionalphysicality.Itcanbeseen andfeltas wefeel
temperature but does not have its own form/shape. It can touch but cannot be
touchedsothatI believeit isnot physical.Thisaspect of
being
seenbutnot physicalintriguedme andIknew Iwould explore moreofthepossibilitiesofprojectionas a
medium.
My
firstexperiments were with materials such asfabrics,
water,themirrorandsmoke,etc.,none of which were satisfactory.One
day
whenIwasexperimentingwith aprojector, itfailedtowork.Iwas almostreadytogiveuptheideaofusinga
projector. Itook a slide out and saw what wasin frontof me. Thereonthe
loosely
hung
fabric I wasusing forascreen wasthesharp shadowofthethinstring Ihadstretched as alevel. Asthefabricmoved,theshadowlookedlike itwasdancing.After
afewadjustments,Ihadcompletedthefirstpiece, THELINE.
the line presented the shadow of what was behind the screen. Shadow,
defined
by
OED16,
is "atractofpartialdarknessproducedby
abody
intercepting
thedirectrays ofthesun or other
luminary."
Ashadowindicates thepresenceof whatis
castingtheshadow.Intheline,a viewer could not see what wascastingtheshadow,
and theshadowbecame literalpresence.
Iwas attracted
by
thequalities which mimickedmyearlier photographs.Thispiece hadthe simplicity, minimalism and abstractnessof my abstract photographs.
The importantdifferences werethe movement and the three
dimensionality
of theimage.I begantounderstandthatthelinepiece was not an abstraction of something.
Justbecauseanimage isnotrecognizable,itdoesnot meanthatitcanbecategorized
inabstract art.Asa matter of
fact,
I didnot abstractanything inthelinepiecedespitethefactthatitlookedabstract.Unlike myabstractphotographs, the linewas
literally
THE BULB
Totheright ofthelinewas a curtain which markedtheentrancetomysecond
installation,
THEbulb.Thisspace wasdarksothat theonlything
theviewers saw wasalight bulbon a wall astheyfirstwalkedintotheroom.Asthe viewers approached
theimageofthelight
bulb,
they
recognizedthatitwas a reflectionina mirror andtheoriginal was mounted onthewall
facing
themirror.Overthecourse ofthreeminutesTHE BULBbegan toglow andthenfaded away, changingthelevelsofiUumination in
theroom. It was so slowthat unless viewers stayed
long
enough,they
would notrealize that the bulb was actually changing and not a still image. Upon close
examination,the viewer would also realizethattherewassomethingstrange about
thelight
bulb;
wasitadocumentof alight bulborsomethingelse?Asthe bulbslowlylit up, the dark space as well as
viewers'
perception of the space became more
defined. The longertheviewersstayedintheroomthemore
they
startedtoseebutthe BULBnever
fully
lit up and soon wentback into darkness. Theviewersthoughtthey
sawthingsbutwere never sure.fig.39
thebulbwas an extension ofmy darkphotographs.After
deciding
tomake adarkspace instead of dark photographs, I started to wonder what would make a
spacedark. It sounds obvious thatnolightwouldmake a space dark.
However,
iftherewere nolight inthisworld,thentheconceptofdarknesswould not exist either.
It is lightthatmakes one aware ofdarkness. Thelight bulb
imagery
wasfabricatedtoemphasizedarkness inthespace and vice versa.
Theimageofthelight bulb was created
digitally
ratherthanphotographingorvideotapingan actuallight bulb. As Iwroteinthesectiontitled,Second Year
/
Pre-thesis,I becameinterested intheideaof computergenerated objectsandimagesasI
worked onmaking 3D digitalmodels.Whatinterestsme themost aboutthemisthe
abilitytomimic reality. Fromtheinventionofphotography,or eventheinventionof
the Renaissance system of perspective, humans have tried to recreate reality. The
Renaissanceperspective was used as awayofmimicking realityandphotography is
usedtocapture reality.Nowinthedigitalage,humans havestartedtocreate reality.
One
day
whenIwasmakingthebulb,a new questionarose;wasI simulatingthe"reality"
of alight
bulb,
ormaking somethingtotally
newthatlooked likealightbulb? Whatwasthedifference between my bulband a"real"light bulb? Intheactual
production ofthebulb,Imimickedtheformof a60-wattclearlight bulbandclosely
examinedhowan actuallight bulbwouldslowly lightup. thebulbdidnotlight up
thewaya "real"
one
does,
ratherItransformeda crescent moonintoalight bulb,thebulb"lookedreal"
enough,but didnotexistin thereal worldas anobject, yet,itwas
real sinceitcouldbeseenand perceived even thoughit onlyexisted astheonesand
zeros of adigital file.THEbulbwasinfactnot a simulation of a "real"
light bulb.
Yet,
one couldonly knowwhat was seen
by
namingthe bulbalight bulbandrespondingTHE UMBRELLA
Astheviewers passedthrougha curtainto theright ofthebulb,theyentered
theblackhallway.Aftertheexperience of
blackness,
thebrillianceofthewhite spacethat theviewers wereenteringwasintensified.Inthiswhite room wastheskeleton of
theumbrellaapparently
levitating
andcastinga shadow of what was notthere.fig.40
Thisumbrella evolvedfromthecomputer-generated modelImadein Formz.
After
finishing
thedigitalmodel,Iprinteditouton photographic paper.Looking
atthephotograph,I beganto think that itwouldbe
interesting
if itwas aninstallationinstead of a two dimensional representation. There were not enough
illusionary
mysterious qualities that I was
looking
forin the photograph because the digitalmanipulationisincommon use.Instead, a three dimensionalrepresentation would
create anillusion
by
presenting theactual.Thesaying"seeing
isbelieving"
indicates
peopletendtobelievein somethingonlywhentheyseeitinreallife. I knewtheonly
waytopresentthe illusionwasthroughaninstallationwhich would call perception
andknowledge intoquestion.
>
First of all, in order to
make the skeleton of the
umbrella,Ialteredan umbrella
by
removing thefabric andcurving
each rib so thatit looked as ifit
was coveredinaninvisiblefabric.
Figuring
out how to make theshadow was interesting. I tried
many waystomakethe shadow;
yet, onlyone worked.
By
usingamirror and aprojector, Iwas able
to create a shadow on the floor.
The umbrella and the shadow
fig.41
were placedin thewhite room so
thattwoobjects related each other and createdtheillusion.
Attheshow,most viewerstried tofigureouttheillusionbetweentheshadow
andtheumbrella.Theviewers were cognizant oftheumbrellaasan umbrella without
fabric
floating
inair andtheshadow as a shadow oftheshapeof an umbrella castby
the skeleton of the umbrella.
However,
since the relationship between the twoconceived objects did notfit exactly with the viewers'"pre-conceived(perceived)"
notion astowhatshouldexist, thequestion aroseto theviewers;whatis itthatIam
BETWEEN
Between,prep. Ofsimple position:Theproper wordexpressingthelocalrelation of a pointto twoother pointsinoppositedirections from it (i.e.ifa pointhastwoother points on opposite sides ofit,it issaidtobe betweenthem):Inthespace which separatestwo points;inthe direct linewhichjoinstwo points;hence, inanylineof communication which passes from one point, place, or object, to another. Oftime: in the interval
followingone event or point oftimeandprecedinganother.
- OED17
My
thesisstarted with my question of what one really sees.Seeing
canberepresented
by
a schema.However,
seeing becomespossible when visualinformationthrougheye's retina reachesthebrain.
Seeing
alwaysinvolves interpretationsof whatis infrontof a viewer asJohnBergerstates"the wayweseethingsisaffected
by
whatweknowor what webelieve18." Inotherwords,oneassumesthattheworld existsthe
way it is perceived. For example, when there is a sound of
drip-drip,
one wouldassumethatafaucetwasturnedoffloosely. Whenthereisafrontside,a
top
side anda leftside of a
house,
then one would assume that there shouldbe a backside, abottom side and a right side of the house as well without actually seeing them.
Putting
it inextreme,theworldexistsbasedon our assumptions.Yet,sometimesthereisagap betweena perceivedrealityand conceived reality.Inthissituation,a question
about whatisseen arises.Asexperiencedintheumbrella,Iwanttocontinuetopose
thequestions about seeing.
Therearemany literal
"betweens"
thatviewers couldfindinmythesisshow:
lightandshadow,blackandwhite,onandoff,ceilingand
floor,
theumbrella andtheshadow and so on.However,Iusedthe termforthe titleofmythesisshowtodefine
one's perception of space and/or time.
Any
given space or time existsby
itselfwithout
being
perceived or conceived.Forinstance,if therewere eternalemptiness,one would recognizeitasonly thevoid.
However,
as soon asthereisa pointA inthevoid, then thevoid,forthefirst time,isrealized as a space.Morespecifically,because
of thenotion of the distance between point Aand the viewer, the space becomes
defined.
Also,
as soon asthespaceisdefined,
specific meanings areformedby
theonewhodefinesit.The same
thing
is truefor time as well. WithoutpointA,
whatliesbetweencannotbe recognizedthereforeitseems not existent.
Illusion,
in mythesis,playstheroll of apoint
A,
sothatthevoidthatisperceivedbecomes somethingthattheviewerisconscious of.
Thereis,also,another sensethat"between"liesinmywork.InTHEumbrella,
asIstated earlierin thissection, a viewer would questionthatwhatitwasthatwas
seen.Thishappensbecausetheviewer encountersthegap betweenwhatisperceived
and what wasalreadyconceived as aknown fact. Asaresult, theviewers would go
through theprocess of reduction:questioningthemselves about whatis
happening
and
trying
tofigureoutwhythiswashappening.Having
theanswerfor "howto"
is
not as critical asaskingthequestion"what is itthatIam
seeing?"
"WhatisitthatI
am
seeing?"
becomes a
key
pointto recognize and re-understand what was onceConclusion
Howwe perceive canbequestioned,yet we cannot undothefactthatwe
perceive.Perception itself isalwaysdefinite.
Very
often one's vision isdirectly
connected to the evidence of one'sexistence.One believes thepresence of whatis visuallyperceived. It isthrough
perceptionthatone woulddistinguishand
identify
theself.Toquestion one'sseeingis toquestion one's existence.
Morning
Song Sung
by aClown
Isuspectthatitexists;thatit really is something.
Noonehasever stateditscontoursbut Ithink
they
areclear.Idon'tthinkif11 stayin thesame position
forever,
but right now I think ifs reflecting a little
light,
evencastinga shadow.Itcan't not
be,
and somehowit islikesomething.
But if ifs something, it cannot, I think, be thought
unimportant evenifno one usesit.Forsome reasonIfeel
as thoughIwantit tobe something. Iwonder whether
ifs impossible for it not to be something. If ifs not
something,what in the world canit be? It can be that
thereisn't anythingexceptsomething,can'tit?
Since ifs not at allindistinct,ifssomethingafterall,
isn't it? It ifssomething,don'twethink thatitshouldbe
something about which we can't ask what it is?
Something
which we can't answer is nothing? Somesomethingwhichisnot something?
Becauseifstooeasy, for
instance,
to sayshellfish orrope or
dizziness,
I pray that it be something to thedegreethatifsnothingotherthan something.Just
lying
thereorfloating.
(I
honestly
wishtheworld wouldbeginthere- 1 don'tthinkI'dmindifitended.)
Endnotes
1
Holmes,
OliverWendell.Sun-Painting