• No results found

May June 1996 cattle population survey 1996 14

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "May June 1996 cattle population survey 1996 14"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

• ■*■•

* + •

*

=

J

-L

STATISTICS IN FOCUS

Agriculture, forestry and fisheries

eurostat

1996 D 14

ISSN 1024-4263

May-June 1996 cattle population survey

Modest growth in the cattle population but meat supply on the market

would appear to have dropped by 5% as a result of culling

At Community level, the results of the cattle population survey reflect a

continuation of the trend observed for the past two years, even though the survey was

carried out at the height of the BSE (bovine spongiform encephalopathy) crisis. The dairy

herd continued to shrink slowly (- 0.8%) and the rearing of bull calves showed a further

decline (-2%) offset by the more extensive meat production resulting from greater

numbers of suckler cows (+1.8%). In overall terms, the cattle population increased

slightly (+0.7%). However, the supply of meat for human consumption appeared to have

dropped in 1996 by 5% in relation to 1995 as a result of the health measures designed to

remove from the food chain any animal likely to pass on the disease.

The cattle population survey of May-June

1996 was carried out between the sixth and the

fourteenth week following the outbreak of "mad

cow disease", at a point in time when beef and

veal consumption had already started to recover in

many countries after falls sometimes exceeding

30%.

Semi-annual evolution of the gross

indigenous production of cattle in the EU

16000

1000 head

The Community intervention measures

aimed at supporting demand via the public

purchase and storage of bovine carcases were

already in place. In the United Kingdom a start

had been made on implementing the slaughter

programmes for animals likely to be affected by

-or pass on - the disease, and the results of this

survey have to be seen in this context. The level of

livestock in this phase of the crisis represents a

snapshot view which perhaps reflects momentary

effects as much as underlying trends.

Manuscript completed on = 13.11.1996

15000

^ v ^

14000

13000

12000

11000

10000

Forecasts for 1996 and 1997

eurostat

For further information please contact: D.Wahl

Eurostat, L-2920 Luxembourg, tel. 4301-37115 Fax:4301-37318

Price (excl. VAT) In Luxembourg: Subscription ECU 240.

(2)

eurostat

25000

20000

15000

10000

5000

0

The cattle livestock in the EU in May-June 1996

1000 Head

LLEL

_D η Π

Β DK D GR E F IRL I L NL Α Ρ FIN

UK

However, it is worth noting that according

to the surveys carried out previously, the cattle

population at Union level stabilised in 1994

after a period of extended decline. In 1995, this

stabilisation was confirmed but there were no

signs of an increase in the Community herd.

Despite the scale of the crisis in the beef

and veal sector, the results of the survey of May

-June 1996 are pretty much in line with the

pattern of the previous surveys. Compared with

June 1995, total livestock numbers in the Union

rose slightly (+0.7%) while the number of

cows

remained almost stable. To comply with the

quota regulation the downward trend in dairy

cows continued compensating for the milk yield

increase. Meanwhile the herd of suckler cows

for extensive beef meat production is going up.

Less

bull calves

As

far as

animals for slaughter aged

under 2 years

(excluding calves) are concer­

ned, the trends observed since 1994 continued.

This was the case both for male bovines, whose

number fell still further by some 270 000

(-2%) after a fall of 200 000 between June 1994

and June 1995, and for heifers for slaughter,

whose number dropped by a further 1%.

By contrast,

bovines for slaughter

aged over 2 years

increased fairly substantially

in number, with the number of both bulls and

bullocks rising by 4.6 and 5.5% respectively.

This therefore points to slaughter deferrals, with

certain breeders apparently preferring to

postpone the sale of animals for slaughter until

the market rates increased. It is worth noting the

increase in the number of calves

for slaughter (+4.4%), which

was almost entirely attributable

to Belgium and Germany, while

in the main calf-producing coun­

tries (France, the Netherlands

and Italy) trends remained.

Country-specific overview

Livestock numbers rose most

sharply in

Ireland

(almost 4%),

with almost all categories

affected. This marked a continuation of the

uninterrupted growth of Ireland's bovine herd

from its 1988 level of 6.45 million to its current

level of 7.4 million. The sharp increase in

numbers in relation to December 1995

(+900.000 head of cattle) should not come as a

surprise, since this is a regular feature in this

country where extensive meat production means

that large numbers of animals are removed from

pasture in the autumn. In

Greece,

the trend is

inverse, since livestock - which barely exceeds

540 000 head of cattle - would once again

appear be in decline after a respite in 1995. This

trend is probably attributable to animal-health

problems (other than BSE) affecting certain

regions. Some ten years ago Greece's bovine

herd stood at approximately 800 000.

Other noteworthy trends include a very

substantial drop in the number of bull calves in

Belgium, Denmark, Germany

and the

Netherlands

and the development of an

export-flow from Denmark to Germany of calves no

longer fattened on the spot. It would seem that

^ a

Evolution of the dairy herd

in the United Kingdom

r— 1000 head

2600

2550

2500

2450

2400

CD

—>

OJ

en o ω

Q

co en

-3

η en

o

ω

Q

cn

—3

^r cn o ω

Q

un en

—>

LO

en o

Φ

Q

CD

en c

ZJ

(3)

German breeders, like their Belgian

counterparts, are to some extent focusing on the

rearing of calves for slaughter, which would

explain the very pronounced increases in this

category (33% and 48% respectively). As

regards dairy cows, numbers fell in Belgium

(-5.3%) and the Netherlands (-3.5%), as well as

in the three countries which acceded to the

Union in 1995. In

Austria,

this trend (-4.8%)

was more than offset by an increase in the

number of suckler cows, so that today one in

four of Austria's cows is classed as a suckler

compared with one in ten at the time of

Austrian accession.

UK livestock deserves a special mention

due to the ban on beef and veal from the

United

Kingdom

and to the culling programmes set up

to eradicate the disease. One such programme

covers calves and the other adult bovines aged

over 30 months regarded as unsuitable for

consumption and destroyed after slaughter. Up

to the end of June, 240 000 animals were

affected by these measures. Since the

introduction of these programmes only really

took effect as from May, it was not possible to

make up all the delays in slaughter. This

explains the fairly marked increases in

livestock, particularly as regards animals for

slaughter aged over 2 years (+12%). It is also

probable that under normal circumstances the

number of dairy cows would have fallen further

as part of the decapitalization of the dairy herd

started in 1994.

Apparent drop of 5% in gross domestic

production of bovine animals in 1996

The current crisis in the bovine sector

makes production forecasting even more

difficult than usual. Bearing in mind livestock

levels and currently available statistics on

slaughtering, a fall of 5.5% in beef and veal

production at Community level (assessed in

terms of head of cattle) can be expected in

relation to 1995. In tonnage terms the fall will

probably be less pronounced, since the

anticipated drop is likely to affect calves more

than adult bovines (-8.1% and -4.8%

respecti-vely). Also, since slaughtering was subject to

many deferrals at the height of the crisis, the

final weight of animals slaughtered was higher

(possibly up to 4 kg for adult bovines.

A^A

Carcasse weigh of adult cattle I

Hirostat I

290

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996

Overall, the drop in production would

seem to amount to 1.6 million head of cattle, of

which 1.4 million for the United Kingdom

alone. It should also be noted that in no other

country of the Union is the fall likely to exceed

3%, while in some countries an increase is

expected. Falls in, production of between 2 and

3% are anticipated in Ireland, Italy, Portugal

and Sweden, while in Germany and the

Netherlands a fall of between 1 and 2% is

expected. In Belgium and Austria the

indica-tions are that there will be an increase of about

6%. Elsewhere the results are likely to show

that production has remained stable overall,

al-though no recent estimate for Spain is available.

1997 looks set to see a stabilisation of

beef meat production in most of the countries.

The decrease of -1.2% in terms of head at EU

level might be offset by a further increase of

carcasse weights. As in 1996 the production of

1997 for human consumption is likely to be

down some 5% on 1985 level. At the same

time, the large-scale health-related culling

programmes, which are not included in

production accounting since they are outside the

food chain, are likely to continue.

Methodology

In Spain

the collected data have not yet

been

completely processed and the final results of the survey

might be different. Furthermore no estimation of the

cattle GIP is available for Spain at the moment.

(4)

RINDERBESTAND IM MAI-JUNI

1000 STÜCK

BOVINE LIVESTOCK IN MA Y-JUNE

1000 HEAD

Version 30 oct 1996

EFFECTIFS BOVINS EN MAI-JUIN

1000 TETES

EUR 15 EUR 12 Β DK GR IRL NL FIN UK

1 INSGESAMT (Büffel einbegriffen) TOTAL (buffaloes included)

1995 1996

% 96/95

1995

1996

% 96/95

1995

1996

% 96/95

1995 1996 % 96/95

1995 1996

% 96/95

1995 1996

% 96/95

1995 1996 % 96/95

1995 1996 % 96/95

1995 1996

% 96795

86553 81282 87115* 81822*

0.7 * 0.7 *

1.1 R i n d e r v o n w e n i g e r

2 5 6 0 5 2 3 9 2 5 2 5 7 5 7 * 2 4 0 6 3 *

0.6 * 0.6 *

1.1.1 Schiachkälber

3835 3 5 0 2 4 0 0 5 * 3 6 5 8 *

4.4 * 4.4 *

1.1.2 A n d e r e m ä n n l i c h e 9677 9096 9549 ! 8975 !

-1.3 ! -1.3 !

1.1.3 Andere weibliche

12094 1 1 3 2 7 12204 * 11431 *

0.9 * 0.9 * 3 2 8 6 3 3 0 3 *

0.5 *

als 1 jähr 1043 1091 *

4.6 *

171

2 2 6 *

32.6 *

334

326 *

-2.3 *

538

5 3 9 *

0.1

2.2 Rinder v o n 1 bis unter 2 Jahren 18656 17362

18726 * 17428 *

0.4 * 0.4 *

2.2.1 Männliche 7094 6536 6955 * 6408 *

-2.0 * -2.0 *

699

699 *

-0.1 *

225

204 *

-9.3 *

2.2.2 Weibliche Schlachttiere 2211 2 1 3 2

2 1 9 4 * 2 1 1 6 *

-0.7 * -0.7 *

2.2.3 A n d e r e weibliche 9351 8 6 9 4 9 5 7 7 * 8 9 0 4 *

2.4 * 2.4 *

65

70 *

8.2 *

410

425 *

3.7 * 2 0 8 9 2 0 5 3 *

-1.7 *

755

735 * -2.6 *

6

6 *

0.0 *

336

3 0 8 *

-8.3 *

413

421 *

1.9

405

383 *

-5.4 *

52

30 *

-42.3 *

14

14 *

0.0 *

339

3 3 9 *

0.0 * 16098 15965 *

-0.8 *

5216

5152 * -1.2 *

153

227 *

47.8 *

2390

2278 *

-4.7 *

2 6 7 3 2 6 4 7 *

-1.0

3 8 1 8 3 7 7 3 *

-1.2 *

1523

1467 * -3.6 *

266

272 * 2.2 *

2 0 2 9 2 0 3 4 *

0.2 *

573

546 *

-4.7 *

182

159 * -Í2.6 *

60

60 *

0.0 *

61

46 * -24.6 *

61

53*

-13.1

87

89 *

2.3 *

48

48 *

0.0 *

6

8 *

33.3 *

33

33 *

0.0 * 5724 5811

1.5 !

1782

1844 3.5 .'

1214 1248 2.8 !

155

155

0.1 !

414

441 ! 6.6 /

2 1 2 4 2 7 1 2 2 2 1 3 9 4 * 7 4 0 3 *

0.7 * 3.9 *

7 2 0 7 7 3 6 3 *

2.2 *

Bovines less than 1 year old

5694 1748 * 5749 * 1848 *

1.0 * 5.7 *

Calves for slaughte 819 0 806 * 0 *

-1.6 * 0.0 *

Other male 2 0 5 2 9 1 0 2 0 7 7 * 9 6 3 *

1.2 * 5.8 * Other female 2 8 2 3 8 3 8 2 8 6 6 * 885 *

1.5 5.5

2 1 8 0 2 2 1 5 *

Í.6 *

r

330

342 *

3.6 *

934

947 * 1.4 *

916

9 2 6 * 1.1

Bovines aged between 1 and 2 years

631

641 ! 1.6 !

109

109 ! 0.4 !

41

41 ! 0.5 ;

481

491 ! 2.0 !

4244 1750 4198 * 1810 *

-1.1 * 3.5 *

Males

1459 995

1364 * 1035 * -6.5 * 4.0 *

1571 1639 *

4.3 *

708

753 * 6.4 *

Female for slaughter 326 380 324 * 369 *

-0.6 * -2.8 * Other female 2459 374 2510 * 406 *

2.1 * 8.4 *

154

157 * 1.9 *

709

7 2 9 * 2.8 *

214

2 1 7 * 1.4 *

58

59 * 2.2 *

2

2 * 3.3 *

21

21 *

3.2 *

35

36*

1.6

48

49 * 1.4 *

15

16 * 5.6 *

4

3 * -19.2 *

29

30 * 2.0 *

4657 4552 *

-2.3 *

1656 1642 *

-0.8 *

669

678 * 1.3 *

233

205 * -12.0 *

754

7 5 9 *

0.7

953

917 * -3.8 *

203

177 * -12.8 *

67

60 * -10.4 *

683

680 * -0.4 *

2 3 1 8 2 3 2 0

0.1

702

691

-1.6

59

58

-1.9

319

308

-3.4

323

324

0.3

556

555

-0.1

262

254

-3.1

33

33

-0.5

261

269

2.8

1337 !

375

63

157

156 !

232

112 !

25 !

96 !

TOTAL (buffles compris) 1150 1802 11733 1151 * 1782 * 11911 *

0.0 * -1.1 * 1.5 *

Bovins de m o i n s d'un an

423 555 3236

425 * 535 * 3235 * 0.4 * -3.5 * 0.0 *

Veaux de boucherie

248 25 16

248 * 23 * 16 * -0.1 * -9.2 * 0.0 *

Autres mâles

3 259 1514

3 * 230 * 1526 ! 6.9 * -11.1 * 0.8 !

Autres femelles

172 271 1706

1 7 4 * 2 8 3 * 1694 * 0.9 4.2 -0.7 *

Bovins de moins de 2 ans

273 465 2924

275 * 472 * 2993 * 0.7 * 1.6 * 2.4 *

106

106 *

-0.2 *

190

177 *

-6.8 *

Mâles

1087

1104 *

1.6 *

Femelles de boucherie

19 27 785

19 * 18 * 782 * -1.0 * -32.6 * -0.4 *

148

150 1 6

Autres femelles 248 1052 277 * 1107 * 11.7 * 5.2 *

1995 1996 % 96/95

1995 1996 % 96/95

1995 1996 % 96/95

1995 1996 % 96/95

1995 1996 % 96/95

1995 1996 % 96/95

1995 1996 % 96/95

1995 1996 % 96/95

(5)

EUR 15 EUR 12 DK GR IRL NL FIN UK

1.3 Rinder von 2 Jahren und darüber Bovines of 2 years and over 1995

1996 % 96795

1995 1996 % 96/95

1995 1996 % 96/95

1995 1996 % 96795

1995 1996 % 96/95

1995 1996 % 96795

1995 1996 % 96/95

1995 1996 % 96/95

• VORLÄUFK -: NICHT VEF ! EUROSTAT

42251 39955 42590 * 40289 *

0.8 * 0.8 *

1.3.1 Männliche 2302 2251 2409 * 2355 *

4.6 * 4.6 *

1.3.2 Färsen 6046 5780 6246 * 5972 *

3.3 * 3.3 * 1544 1513 *

-2.0 *

50 49 * -2.3 *

319 326 * 2.3 *

1.3.2.1 Färsen z u m schlachten

999 985

1055 * 1040 * 5,5 * 5.5 *

1.3.2.2 A n d e r e Färsen 5046 4795 5191 * 4932 *

2.9 * 2.9 *

1.3.3 Kühe

33903 31923 33936 * 31961 *

0.1 * 0.1 *

1.3.3.1 Milchkühe 22264 20654 22089 * 20492 *

-0.8 * -0.8 *

1.3.3.2 Andere Kühe 11639 11269 1 1 8 4 6 * 1 1 4 7 0 *

1.8 * 1.8 *

3E ODER GESCHÄTZTE ANGABE FÜGBAR

SCHÄTZUNG

82 79 * -4.4 *

237 248 *

4.6 *

1175 1138 *

-3.2 *

673 637 * -5.3 *

503 501 * -0.3 *

929 935 * 0.6 *

9 9 * 0.0 *

96 92 * -4.2 *

6 6 * 0.0 *

90 86 * -4.4 *

824 834 *

1.2 *

702 712 *

1.4 *

122 122 * 0.0 *

7064 7040 *

-0.3 *

176 168 * -4.2 *

993 998 *

0.5 *

59 67 * 14.4 *

934 930 * -0.4 *

5896 5874 *

-0.4 *

5233 5194 *

-0.7 *

663 680 *

2.6 * 304 298 * -2.0 *

6 7 * 76.7 *

19 18 * -5.3 *

0 2 * 0.0 *

19 16 * -75.8 *

279 273 * -2.2 *

180 177 * -1.7 *

99 96 * -3.0 *

3310 3326 0.5 /

99 99 ! 0.3 !

173 177 ! 2.8 !

6 9 ! 34.9 !

166 169 !

1.6 !

3039 3050 !

0.4 !

1247 1285 !

3.1 !

1793 1765 !

-1.5 !

11304 11447 *

1.3 *

592 611 *

3.2 *

2176 2276 *

4.6 * 3624 3745 *

3.3 *

Male 768 800 * 4.1 *

Heifers 534 537 *

0.7 * 3416 3467 *

7.5 *

85 95 * 77.δ *

465 471 *

7.3 *

Heifers for slaughter 330

345 * 4.5 *

212 208 * -7.8 *

Other heifers 1846

1931 * 4.6 *

8536 8560 *

0.3 *

4389 4337 *

-1.2 * 322 329 * 2.3 *

Cows 2323 2408 *

3.7 *

Dairy 1298 1317 *

1.4 *

Other cows 4147

4223 * 7.8 *

1025 1091 *

6.5 * 30 32 * 6.7 *

435 439 *

0.9 *

2866 2901 * ■ 7.2 *

2150 2180 *

1.4 *

716 721 *

0.7 *

* PROVISIONAL OR ESTIMATED DATA -:NON AVAILABLE

! ESTIMATED BY EUROSTAT

108 109 *

7.0 *

5 5 * 2.4 *

24 25 * 3.5 *

3 3 * 11.6 *

21 22 * 2.5 *

80 80 * 0.7 *

49 48 * -2.2 *

31 32 * 3.8 *

2048 1993 *

-2.7 *

20 20 * 0.0 *

173 179 * 3.5 *

48 54 * 72.5 *

125 125 *

0.0 *

1855 1794 *

-3.3 *

1764 1702 *

-3.5 *

91 92 * 7.7 *

1061 1074 7.3

26 28 9.3

132 136 3.0

6 6 9.3

127 130 2.7

902 910 0.8

725 690 -4.8

178 220 23.6

730 !

32 !

54 !

9 !

45 !

644

368

276 !

Bovins de 2 ans et plus

454

782

5573

451 *

774 *

5683 *

-0.7 * -1.0 * 2.0 *

Males

1995

1996

% 96/95

3 5 * 67.3 *

23 24 * 4.3 *

22 19 * -73.6 *

110 122 * 70.9 *

411 461 * 72.2 *

Génisses 755 808 *

7.0 *

Génisses de boucherie 1

2 * 53.8 *

22 22 * 1.4 *

428 422 * -1.4 *

399 391 * -2.0 *

29 31 * 6.5 *

7 5 * -37.4 *

Autres 103 117 * 73.8 *

650 633 * -2.6 *

200 227 * 73.5 *

génisses 555 581 * 4.7 *

Vaches 4407 4414 *

0.2 *

Vaches laitières 487

468 * -3.9 *

2602 2587 *

-0.6 *

Autres vaches 163

165 * 7.2 *

1805 1827 *

7.2 * 1995 1996 % 96Æ5

1995 1996 % 96795

1995 1996 % 96/95

1995 1996 % 96795

1995 1996 % 96795

1995 1996 % 96/95

1995 1996 % 96/95

• DONNEE PROVISOIRE OU ESTIMEE -: NON DISPONIBLE

! ESTIMATION EUROSTAT

ΉΔ

(6)

en

BRUTTOBGENERZEUGUNG AN RINDERN

GROSS INDIGENOUS PRODUCTION OF CATTLE

1000 HEAD

Version 30 oct 1996

PRODUCTION INDIGENE BRUTE DE BOVINS

1000 TETES

1 06

7-12 1995

1 06

7-12 1996

% 1-06

%7-12 %96/95

1 06 7-12 1997

% 1-06 %7-12

%97/96

1 06 7-12 1995

1 06 7-12 1996

% 1-06 "A7-12 'Λ96/95

1 06

7-12 1997

% 1-06 % 7-12 %97/96

EUR 15 EUR12

1 INSGESAMT

14479 " 15327" 29806 *

13484 ! 14697 I 28181 I

-6.9 .' -4.7 ! -5.5

13219 ! 14384 ! 27602 I

-0.2 ! -2.1 ! -1.2

1.1 Kälber

2991 * 3102* 6093*

2767 I 2832 5598 !

-7.5 !

-8.7 / -8.1

2725 2822 5547 I

-7.5 -0.3 -0.9 I

13676* 14459 * 28134 *

12734 ! 13865 !

26599 I

-6.9 ! -4.1 ! -5.5

12481 ! 13571 ! 26051 I

-0.2 ! -2.1 !

-1.2 2883* 2991 5874 2667 2731 5397 !

-7.5 -8.7 -8.1

2626 ! 2721 5348 I

-1.5 .' -0.3 ! -0.9

Β

516 6 2 5 * 1141 *

601 * 6 0 5 * 1206*

16.5 -3.2 5.7

5 7 5 * 5 9 9 * 1174* -4.3 -1.0 -2.7 170 205 375

2 1 5 * 2 0 8 * 423

26.5 Í.5 72.8

212 2 1 4 *

426* -1.4 2.9 0.7* DK 395 383 778 371 4 0 6 *

7 7 7 *

-6.7 6.0 -0.1

3 8 2 * 391 * 7 7 3 *

3.0 -3.7 -0.5 43 40 83 47 4 6 * 93

9.3

15.0 12.0

47 4 8 * 9 5 *

0.0 4.3 2.2" D 2544 2817* 5361 * 2525* 2755* 5280* -0.7 -2.2 -f.5 2545* 2715* 5260* 0.8 -7.5 -0.4

3 6 3 " 334 697

370* 3 6 5 " 735 7.9 9.3 5.5 385 375" 760" 4.7 2.7 3.4'

GR E

137* 918 1 5 2 * 1041 289 * 1959

135 - : 155 - :

290 - :

-7.5 7.6 0.2

136 * - :

152* - :

288 * - :

0.6 -7.4

-0.4

26 7

30 6

56 13

21 - :

29

50 - :

-79.2 -2.0

■10.0

21 2 9 * 5 0 *

0.0 0.0

0.0"

-F 3520 3749 7269 3474* 3800* 7274* -7.3 1.4 0.1 3457* 3790* 7247* -0.5 -0.3 -0.4 1289 1404 2693

1211 * 1405" 2616 -6.0 0.1 ■2.9 1176 1394' 2570' -2.9 -0.8 -1.8' IRL TOTAL 922

9 4 9 * 1871 *

8 1 5 " 1002* 1817*

-17.6 5.6 -2.9

8 7 2 * 1012* 1884* 7.0 1.0 3.7 Calves 46 5 51

1 8 ' 5 · 23 -60.9 0.0 -54.9 45 10" 55" 150.0 100.0 139.1 '

I 1739 1580 3319 1524 1714 3238 -12.4 8.5 -2.4 1580* 1557* 3137* 3.7 -9.2 -3.1 293 130 423 250 142 392 -74.7 9.2 -7.3 270 135" 405" 8.0 -4.9 3.3 L 12 15 * 2 7 *

1 2 * 15* 2 7 *

0.0 0.0 0.0

1 2 * 1 5 * 2 7 *

0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1 2

1 · 1 · 2

0.0 0.0 0.0

1

1 " 2" 0.0 0.0 0.0 NL 913 1024 1938

9 2 9 * 982 " 1911 *

1.7 -4.1

-1.4

9 0 4 * 9 7 5 * 1879* -2.7 -0.7 -1.7 410 481 891 413* 4 5 3 ' 866

0.6 -5.8 -2.9

410 4 4 5 ' 855" -0.6 -1.8 -1.2 A 360 384 743 385 4 0 5 * 7 9 0 *

7.2 5.6 6.4

3 8 2 * 3 8 8 *

7 7 0 *

-0.9 -4.2 -2.6 88 89 177 85 9 0 " 175 -3.0 1.0 -1.0 85 85 1 7 0 '

-0.5 -5.6 -3.1

Ρ

178* 2 0 7 * 385*

171 * 2 0 5 * 376*

-3.9 -1.0 -2.3

175* 2 0 9 * 3 8 4 *

2.3 2.0 2.1

3 0 · 40 70

3 5 ·

4 4 ' 79

Í6.7 70.0 12.9

34 4 3 ' 7 7 '

-2.9 -2.3 -2.5 FIN 183 214 396 191 * 2 0 7 * 3 9 7 *

4.5 -3.3 0.3

191 * 2 0 2 * 3 9 3 *

-0.1 -2.1 -1.1 5 7 11 6 ' 8 ' 14 22.9 75.2 18.4 7 8 15 10.2 7.9 8.9 S 261 271 532

2 4 8 * 2 7 3 *

5 2 1 *

-5.0 0.7 -2.1

2 5 4 * 2 7 0 * 524* 2.4 -7.Í 0.6 15 15 30

1 5 ' 1 5 ' 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 15 14 29 0.0 -6.7 -3.3 UK TOTAL 1881 1917 3798

1252 I 1152 I 2404 I

-33.4 ; -39.9 !

-36.7

1142 I 1205 ! 2348 I

-8.8 !

4.6 !

-2.3

Veaux

206 315 521

74 ! 15 I 89 !

-64.1 -95.2

-83.0

11 ! 15 ! 26 1

-85.7 !

0.0 ! -70.7 !

1 06

7-12 1995

1 06 7-12 1996

% Í-06 %7-12 %96/95 1 06 7-12 1997 %1-06 %7-12 'Á97/96

1 06 7-12 1995

1 06

7-12 1996

% 1 - 0 6

"A7-12

%96/95

1 06 7-12 1997

(7)

1-6 7-12 1995 1-6 7-12 1996

% 1-06 % 7-12 %96/95

1-6 7-12 1997

% 1-6 % 7-12 V. 97/96 1-6 7-12 1995 1-6 7-12 1996

% 1-06 % 7-12 'Λ96/95

1-6 7-12 1997

% 1-6 % 7-12 ·/. 97/96

■ V/fìIJI ΔΙ IF I d i VUM l.M\.iΓ ΙΟΙ

- NICHT VERF ! EUROSTAT E

EUR 15 EUR12

1.2 Grossrinder

11488 ' 12225 * 23713 *

10717 I 11866 ! 22583 I

-6.7 I -2.9 I -4.8 I

10494 I 11561 I

22055 1

0.2 1 -2.6 1 ■1.3 I

10793 11468 22260

10067 I 11134 I 21202 I

-6.7 ! -2.9 ! -4.8 I

9854 ! 10849 I 20703 l

0.2 ! -2.6 ! -1.3 I

1.2.1 Färsen

2184 * 2243 * 4427 *

1964 ! 2242 ! 4206 1

-10.1 ! 0.0 ! -5.0 1

1808 ! 2254 ! 4062 1

4.3 ! 0.6 ! 2.3 1

Kühe. Dullen

2088 2142 4230

1877 ! 2141 ! 4019 I

-10.1 ! 0.0 ! -5.0 1

1728 ! 2153 ! 3881 I

4.3 .' 0.6 ! 2.3 !

und Ochsen:

n O F I l r . F ^ P H A T Ï T C AMICAMI!

UGDAR CHATZUNG Β 3-16 420 766

386 * 397 " 783

11.6 •5.5 2.2

363 385 * 748 "

-6.0 *

-3.0 · -4.5 *

34 40 * 74 *

33 * 33 * 66 *

-2.9 * -77.5 * -10.8 * 33 * 33 · 66 *

0.0 * 0.0 * 0.0 *

Beile 8 DK 352 343 695 324 360 · 684

-8.0 5.0

-1.6

335 343 * 678 *

3.4 ' -4.7 " -0.9 *

33 23 56

27 30 * 57 *

-7S.2 30.4 *

1.8 " 30 * 27 " 57 *

11.1 ' -10.0 ' 0.0 '

D

2181 2483 4664

2155 * 2390 ' 4545

-1.2 -3.7 -2.6

2160 2340 ' 4500 *

0.2 * -2.7 " -1.0 *

335 401 * 736 *

345 * 390 * 735 *

3.0 * -2.7 * ■0.1 '

360 * 400 * 760 *

4.3 * 2.6 * 3.4 *

GR

111 * 122 233 114 125 239 2.7 2.5 2.6 115 123 " 238 *

0.7 * -1.7 * -0.5 *

15 * 15 * 30 *

15 17 32

-7.3 * 75.3 * 7.0 *

15 " 14 * 29 *

0.0 * -17.3 * -9.3 *

E 911 '1035 1946

- :

- :

- :

. ;

- :

- :

- ;

- :

- :

- ;

- :

284 307 591

;

:

:

.

-:

:

.

-F IRL

Adult cattle

2232 2345 4576

2263 " 2395 " 4658

1.4 2.1 1.8

2281 2396 · 4677 "

0.8 * 0.0 * 0.4 *

334 351 685

349 * 393 * 742 *

4.4 ' 12.0 ' 8.3 *

347 * 404 * 751 *

-0.6 * 2.8 * 1.2 *

876 944 1820

797 " 997 * 1794

-9 0 5.6 -1.4

827 1002 * 1829 "

3.8 -0.5 *

2.0 *

Heifers

261 268 * 529 *

212 * 260 * 472 *

-18.8 ' -3.0 * -10.8 *

230 ' 260 * 490 *

8.5 * 0.0 * 3.8 *

I 1446 1450 2896 1274 1572 2846 -11.9 8.4 -1.7 1310 1422 * 2732 "

2.8 · -9.5

■4.0 *

247 201 448 196 225 421 -20.6 11.9 -6.0

200 * 200 * 400 *

2.0 * -11.1 * -5.0 *

Cows, bulls and bullocks: page Β

' PROVISIONAL OR E S T I MÛ T F n ΓΊΔΤΔ

-:NON AVAILABLE I ESTIMATED BY EUROSTAT

L 11 14 25 11 " 14 ' 25 0.0 0.0 0.0 11 14 ' 25 " 00 '

o.o ·

0.0 *

3 4 * 7 * 3 * 4 * 7 * 0.0 " 0.0 ' 0.0 ' 3 · Λ ' 7 * 0.0 ' 0.0 * 0.0 * NL 503 543 1047 516 * 529 ' 1045 2 6 -2 6 -0.1 494 530

-1024 ' -4.3 * 02 * -2.0 * 44 44 88

41 * 44 *

85 *

-6.6 * -0.5 * -3.5 '

42 " 45 ·

87 " 7.7 " 2.3 * 2.0 * A 272 294 566 300 315 * 615 105 7.0 8.7 297 303 ' 600 " -to · -3.8 ' -2.4 * 45 47 93 51 55 *

106 *

13.2 15.8 ·

14.5 *

52 ' 55 '

107 *

f.3 ' 0.0 ' 0.6 ' Ρ 148 * 167 315 136 " 161 * 297 -8.1 -3.6 -5.7 141 166 * 307 " 3.7 * 3. J " 3.4 * 26 * 25 * 51 * 24 * 24 *

48 *

■7.7 '

-4.0 * -5.9 *

25 ' 25 * 50 '

4.2 ' 4.2 ·

4.2 '

FIN

178 207 385

185 " 199 " 384

4.1 -3.9 -0.2

184 194 ' 378 "

-0.4 * -2.5 " -1.5 "

24 28 52

25 * 27 * 52 *

4.6 * -5.3 *

-0.8 *

24 ' 26 · 50 "

-2.8 ' -3.7 ' -3.3 '

S

G

246 256

502

233 " 258 " 491

-5.3 0 8 -2.2

239

256 ' 495 "

2.6 · -0.8 ·

0.8 *

27 25 52

26 * 26 " 52 *

-3.7 *

4.0 "

0.0 '

26 ' 26 ' 52 "

0.0 ' 0.0 · 0.0 '

UK

ros bovins

1676 1602

3277

1179 ! 1137 ! 2315 !

-29.7 ! -29.0 !

-29.4 !

1131 ! 1190 ! 2322 I

-4.0 i 4.7 !

0.3 I

Génisses

471

463 934

361 I

407 !

768 I -23.3 /

■12.1 !

-17.8 I

394 ! 427 !

821 I

9.1 ! 4.8 ! 6.9 1

Vaches, taureaux et boeufs: page 8

!

DONNEE PROVISOIRE OU PRTIMPP : NON DISPORR' F

ESTIMATION EUROSTAT

1-6 7-12 1995 1-6 7-12 1996

% 1-06 % 7-12 %96/95

1-6 7-12 1997

% 7-6 % 7-72 '/. 97/96

1 06 7-12 1995 1 06 7-12 1996

% 1-06 % 7-12 'Á96/95

1 06

7-12

1997

% 1-06 % 7-12 %97/96

(8)

BRUTTOBGENERZEUGUNG

AN RINDERN

1000 S T Ü C K

1-6 7-12

1995

1-6 7-12

1996

% 7-06

% 7-72

'Λ96/95

1-6

7-12 1997

% Í - 6

% 7-12

% 97/96

GROSS INDIGENOUS PRODUCTION OF CATTLE

1000 H E A D EUR 15 EUR12 Β DK

1.2.2 K ü h e

3626 * 3875 " 7501 * 3450 I 3460 I 6910 I

-4 9 I -10.7 I -7.9 I

3290 I 3451 I 6741 I

-4.6 !

-0 3 I

-2.4 I

3414 ' 3602 * 7 0 1 6 "

3248 I 3216 I 6464 !

-4 9 I -10.7 1 -7.9 1

3097 1 3208 1 6305 1

-4.6 ! -0.3 !

-2.5 1 159 187 * 346 " 193 ' 163 * 356 * 21.4 · -12 Β ' 2.9 * 160 · 166 * 326 " -77.1 1.8 -8.4 " 138 149 287 131 158 ' 289 " -5,1 6.0 · 0.7 " 140 * 157 ' 2 9 7 *

6 3 -0,6 2.8 " 759 849 1608 800 825 1625 54 -2 8 1.1 820 820 1640 2.5 -0.6 0.9 GR 16 18 34 16 17 33 0.6

- 3 9

-1.8 16 17 33 0.0 0.0 0.0

Version 30 oct 1996

PRODUCTION INDIGENE BRUTE DE BOVINS

1000 T E T E S

IRL I NL FIN

Cows 187 212 398

.

-.

-.

929 912 1841 938 " 931 * 1869 " 1.0* 2.1 * 1.5'

9 4 6 " 946 * 1 8 9 2 *

0.9 7.6 1.2* 170 167 337 139 186 325 -18.2 11 4 -3.6 151 181 332 8.6 -2.7 2.2 325 341 666 294 347 641 •9.5

1 8 -3.8

315 ' 3 5 2 '

667 '

7.1 1.4 ' 4.1 '

3 5 · 8 ' 3 ' 5 ■ 8 ' 0.0 '

o.o

·

0.0 "

3 · 5

-8 " 0.0 0.0 0.0 * 313 344 657 318 ' 330 * 648 " 1.3 ' -4.0 · -1.5 *

3 1 2 * 330 ' 6 4 2 *

-1 8

0.0 -0.9* 65 75 139 78 85 * 1 6 3 *

21.0 13.8 ' 17.1 *

8 0 * 83*

1 6 3 *

2.4

-2.4

-0.1 *

26 *

2 5 "

51 "

2 3 "

24 '

4 7 *

- 1 1 5 ' -4.0 * -7.8"

24 *

2 5 " 4 9 "

4.3 4.2 4.3" 56 81 137 6 2 *

75 * 1 3 7 *

10.5 *

-6 9 * 0.2*

63 * 73 " 1 3 7 *

2.3 -2 9 -0.6" 92 117 209 87 " 124 ' 211 * -5.4 * 6.0 · 1.0* 91 · 1 2 3 " 2 1 4 "

4.6 -0.8

1.4*

UK

Vaches

389 393 782 191 !

0 I 191 I

1 06 7-12

1995

1 06 7-12

1996

-51.0 !

%

1-06

0 0 I % 7-12

-75.6 I % 9 6 / 9 5

0.0 ! 0.0 !

0.0 I

0 I 0 ! 0 I

1 0 6 7-12

1997

% 1-06 % 7-12

%97/96

Bullen und Ochsen

Bulls and bullocks

Taureaux et boeufs

1-6 7-12

1995

1-6 7-12 1996

% 1-06 % 7-12 'Λ96/95

1-6

7-12 1997

% 1-6 % 7-12 % 97/96

5678 · 6107 ' 11785 " 5303 I 6164 I 11467 I

-6 6 I 0 9 I -2.7 I

5397 I 5856 ! 11253 I

(.8 ! -5 0 I -7.9 I

5291 ' 5724 · 11015 * 4942 I 5777 I 10719 I

■6 6 I 0.9 I -2.7 I

5029 I 5488 I 10518 I

1.8 ! -5 0 !

-1.9 I 153 193 ' 346 " 160 ' 201 * 361 " 4.6 ' 4.1 * 4.3 * 170 " 186 * 356 *

6.3

-75 -1.4* 181 171 352 166 172 * 338 ' -8 3

0 6 '

-4.0*

165 * 159 * 3 2 4 "

-0.6 -7.6 -4.1 " 1087 1233 2320 1010 1175 2185 -7.1 •4.7 -5.8 980 1120 2100 -3.0 -4.7 -3.9 80 89 169 83 91 174 3.9 1.7 2.7 84 91 175 1.0 1.0 1.0 440 516 957

_ ;

- :

-:

- :

- :

-:

- ;

- :

-:

. ;

969 1081 2050 976 * 1071 * 2047 * 0.7 " -1.0 * -0.2 * 988 * 1 0 4 6 " 2 0 3 4 *

Í.2 -2.3

-0.6 *

445

5 0 9 " 9 5 4 *

446 * 551 " 997 * 0.2 ' 8.3 * 4.5 * 446 ' 561 * 1007 *

0 0

1.8 1.0* 874 908 1782 784 1000 17B4 -10.3 10.1 0.1 795 870 1665 1.4 -13.0 -6.7 5

5 '

10 '

5 ' 5 ' 10 '

0.0 ' 0.0 ' 0.0 '

5 '

5 ' 10 '

00 00 0.0' 146 155 301

157 ' 155 ' 3 1 2 '

B0 -0.2 3.8 '

140

155 2 9 5 '

-11.0 0.0 -5.5 162 172 334 171 175 * 346 * 5 5 1.6 · 3.5 ' 165 " 165 * 330 * -3.3 -5.7 -4.5* 96 ' 117* 213* 89 ' 113 * 202 * -7.3 * -3.4 * -5.2* 92 * 116 ' 208 " 3.4 2.7 3.0* 98 98 195 98 * 97 * 195 * 0.2 '

-0 9 *

-0.4 "

97 "

9 5 '

1 9 2 "

-7.5 -Í.8 -1.6* 127 114 241 120 ' 108 ' 228 "

-5 5 * -5.3 ' -5.4* 122 * 107 * 229 * 1.7 -0.9 0.4* 816 745 1561

627 I 730 I 1357 l

-23.1 ! -2.1 ! -13.1 I

737 ! 763 ! 1501 I

17.6 ; 4.6.' 10.6 I 1 06 7-12

1995

1 06 7-12 1996

% 1-06 % 7-12 %96/95

1 06 7-12

1997

% 1-06 % 7-12 %97/96

VORLAUFIGE ODER GESCHÄTZTE ANGABE . NICHT VERFÜGBAR

I EUROSTAT SCHÄTZUNG

• PROVISIONAL OR ESTIMATED DATA -:NON AVAILABLE

I ESTIMATED BY EUROSTAT

• DONNEE PROVISOIRE OU ESTIMEE -: NON DISPONIBLE

! ESTIMATION EUROSTAT

References

Related documents

In this study, fatty acid composition of the muscle lipids of Salmo trutta macrostigma (wild brown trout) and Oncorhynchus mykiss (cultured rainbow trout) in

The results from the present investigation do not only indi- cate that the affected side of children with congenital upper-limb reductions showed a significantly higher

Commodification of women was evidenced by Morrissey (1989, p. 147) when she affirmed that the Caribbean was deemed “as a land of sexual opportunity for European males” where

The article and research presented comprise test of concrete slab followed by calculation of total load capacity in options based on existing design model code EC2 and

Interest under section 234A is levied on the amount of tax as determined under section 143(1) and where regular assessment is made, the tax on total income as determined under

Para este autor, las características del heavy metal se relacionan con la autenticidad (no solo de las bandas sino también de la audiencia, ya que no se trata de

Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effects of treadmill exercise and Flutter® therapy, compared to resting breathing (con- trol), on respiratory flow

The weight of the evidence currently suggests that the most likely explanation for the occurrence of VADS fol- lowing CMT is that a patient with neck pain and/or headache arising