• No results found

A third order nonlocal problem with nonlocal conditions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "A third order nonlocal problem with nonlocal conditions"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

PII. S0161171204303017 http://ijmms.hindawi.com © Hindawi Publishing Corp.

A THIRD-ORDER NONLOCAL PROBLEM

WITH NONLOCAL CONDITIONS

LAZHAR BOUGOFFA

Received 1 March 2003

We study an equation with dominated lower-order terms and nonlocal conditions. Using the Riesz representation theorem and the Schauder fixed-point theorem, we prove the existence and uniqueness of a generalized solution.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 35K35, 35B30, 35D05.

1. Introduction. Various problems arising in heat conduction, chemical engineering, plasma physics, thermoelasticity, and so forth, can be reduced to the nonlocal prob-lems with integral conditions. This type of nonlocal boundary value probprob-lems has been investigated in [1,2,3,4,5,6,8] for parabolic equations and in [7,10] for hyperbolic equations. However, some partial differential equations of higher order with dominated low terms and nonlocal conditions are encountered when studying models for certain natural and physical processes. An example of such type of equations is the equation of longitudinal waves in a thin elastic stem taking into account the effects of transversal inertia [9]:

2u ∂t2

2u ∂x2

4u

∂t2∂x2=0. (1.1)

Another example is the equation of moisture transfer:

∂u ∂t =

∂x

D∂u ∂x+A

2u ∂x∂t

, (1.2)

whereuis the concentration of moisture per unit,Dis the coefficient of diffusivity, andA >0 is the varying coefficient of Hallaire. Motivated by this, we study the equation

lu= 3u

∂t∂x2 ∂u

∂t +a(t,x) 2u

∂x2+b(t,x) ∂u

∂x+c(t,x)u=f (t,x) (1.3)

in the rectangular domainΩ=(0,T )×(0,1). To (1.3), we attach the nonlocal conditions

T

0 u(t,x)dt=

0, ∀x∈(0,1),

u(t,0)=0,

1

0u(t,x)dx=

0, ∀t∈(0,T ).

(2)

We assume that the coefficients oflare smooth and bounded onΩ:

0< a(t,x)≤a0, 0< b(t,x)≤b0σ (x)√

2 , 0< c(t,x)≤c0,

∀x∈(0,1), ∀t∈(0,T ), whereσ (x)=1−x.

(1.5)

2. Generalized solution. Define the operatorl1by

l1u= −∂u

∂t +a(t,x) 2u

∂x2+b(t,x) ∂u

∂x+c(t,x)u, (2.1)

and

F(t,x,u)=f (t,x)−l1u. (2.2)

Then (1.3) can be assumed to have the form

3u

∂t∂x2=F(t,x,u). (2.3)

We introduce the function space

V=

v:v∈L2(), σ (x)√ 2

∂v

∂x∈L2(), ∂v

∂t ∈L2(), 2v

∂x2∈L2(),

T

0v(t,x)dt=

0, v(t,0)= 1

0v(t,x)dx= 0

.

(2.4)

The completion of this space, with respect to the norm

v2 1,2,σ=

v2+σ (x)2 2

∂v ∂x

2

+

∂v ∂t

2

+

2v ∂x2

2

dt dx, (2.5)

is denoted by1,2(). Notice that1,2()is a Hilbert space with

(u,v)Hσ1,2()=

uv+ σ2(x)

2 ∂u ∂x

∂v ∂x+

2u ∂x2

2v ∂x2

dt dx. (2.6)

Forv∈Hσ1,2(), define the operatorMby

Mv=(1−x)

t

0

x

0v(τ,ξ)dξ dτ−

t

0 2v

∂x2(τ,x)dτ+

(x−1)2 2

t

0v(τ,x)dτ

+ x

0 Jv(t,ξ)dξ,

whereJv= x

0 ∂v

∂t(t,ξ)dξ.

(2.7)

Definition2.1. A functionu∈Hσ1,2()is called a generalized solution to problem

(1.3)-(1.4) if

(u,v)H1σ,2()=

F(t,x,u),MvL2() for everyv∈H 1,2

(3)

...

3. Existence and uniqueness theorem. In this section, we prove the existence and uniqueness of a generalized solution for the problem (1.3)-(1.4). For this, we first study the subsidiary problem

l0u≡ 3u

∂t∂x2=F(t,x,0) (3.1)

with integral conditions (1.4), where

F(t,x,0)=f (t,x). (3.2)

Theorem3.1. LetF(t,x,0)∈L2(). Then there exists one and only one generalized solutionu0of the subsidiary problem

l0u≡ 3u

∂t∂x2=F(t,x,0),

T

0 u(t,x)dt=

0, ∀x∈(0,1),

u(t,0)=0,

1

0u(t,x)dx=0, ∀t∈(0,T ),

(3.3)

such that

c1u01,2,σ≤ FL2(), (3.4)

wherec1is a positive constant.

Proof. ForF(t,x,0)∈L2()(v)=(F,Mv)L2()is a bounded linear functional on

1,2().

Indeed,

F,Mv)

L2()≤ FL2()MvL2(). (3.5) By substituting the expression ofMvin (3.5) and using the Poincaré estimates

v 2

(t,x)dt dx≤4

(1−x) 2∂v

∂x

2

dt dx, v(t,0)=0,

t

0v(τ,x)dτ

2

dt dx≤4

(1−x) 2

v2(t,x)dt dx,

(3.6)

we find that|Ψ(v)| ≤4 max{2T2,4}F

L2()v1,2. Consider the scalar product(l0,Mv)L2()=

l0u·Mv dt dx; employing integration by parts and taking account ofv∈Hσ1,2(), we obtain

3u ∂t∂x2,Mv

L2()

=(u,v)H1σ,2(). (3.7)

Thus, by the Riesz representation theorem, there exists a unique solution

u0∈Hσ1,2()(v)=(F,Mv)L2()=

u0,vHσ1,2(), ∀v∈H

1,2

(4)

Hence,(u,v)Hσ1,2()=(u0,v)Hσ1,2(), that is,u0is a generalized solution. Letting 1/c1=

4 max{2T2,4}, we obtain inequality (3.4).

Lemma 3.2. The operatorl1:1,2()→ L2() is bounded, that is, there exists a

positive constantc2such thatl1uL2()≤c2u1,2,σ.

Proof. By using conditions (1.5), we directly obtain

l1u2

L2()≤4

∂u∂t

2

L2

+a2 0

∂x2u2

2

L2

+b2 0

∂u∂x2

L2 +c2

0u2L2

, (3.9)

where∂u/∂x2

L2,σ=

2(x)/2)(∂u/∂x)2dt dx. Hence,l1u2

L2()≤c 2

2u21,2, wherec22=4 max{1,a20,b20,c02}. Sincel1is linear, thenl1(√2µu)=√2µl1(u)for an arbitraryµ. Letl1,µ(w)=l1(

2µw)forµ >1/c1.

Now, consider the general case. The idea in the proof is to derive the results for the equationlu=f with integral conditions (1.4).

Theorem3.3. Letf (t,x)∈L2()and|f (t,x)| ≤λ/√2, whereλis a constant. Then there exists at least one generalized solutionu0∈Hσ1,2()to problem (1.3)-(1.4).

Further-more, the solution is uniquely determined ifc2< c1.

Proof. LetW= {l1,µw:l1,µw∈L2(),l1u2L2()≤λ

2T /κ2}be a closed ball, where κ2=c2

112. It is clear that

F(t,x,w)f (t,x)+c12−k2

2 l1,µ(w), (3.10)

and we haveF(t,x,w)2L2()≤c 2

1λ2T /κ2for alll

1,µw∈W.

FromTheorem 3.1, there exists a unique generalized solution of the problem

3u

∂t∂x2=F(t,x,w) (3.11)

with integral conditions (1.4), so that

(u,v)Hσ1,2()=(F,Mv)L2(). (3.12)

Define an operatorS:l1w∈W→u=Sl1w∈Hσ1,2(),S(W )⊂W.

Notice thatS is completely continuous. To show this, let(l1w)n,(l1w)0∈W and

(l1w)n−(l1w)02L2()→0, asn→ ∞.

Then, forun=S(l1w)n,u0=S(l1w)0, we have

un−u0,v

1,2()=

Ft,x,(w)n

−Ft,x,(w)0,Mv

=l1wn−

l1w0,MvL

2() for everyv∈

H1,2

σ ().

(5)

...

Now, fromTheorem 3.1,

c1un−u01,2 ≤l1w

n−

l1w0L2() 0 asn → ∞. (3.14)

Again, taking a sequence{(l1w)n} ⊂W,(l1w)n2L2()≤λ

2T /κ2. Foru

n=S(l1w)n, we

haveun2L2()≤λ

2T /κ2, so a sequence{u

n}is bounded inH1σ,2(); therefore there

exists a subsequence weakly convergent in1,2().

Since any bounded set in1,2()is compact inL2(), then there exists a

subse-quence, which we also denote by{un}, strongly convergent inL2()tou0, asn→ ∞.

As l1 is a bounded operator, S is completely continuous, and so Sl1 is completely continuous. Thus, from Schauder’s fixed-point theorem, there exists at least one fixed pointu0∈Wsuch thatu0=Sl1u0and(u0,v)H1,2

σ ()=(F(t,x,u0),Mv)L2()for every

v∈Hσ1,2().

Now, assume thatu1,u2are distinct generalized solutions, then(u1−u2,v)Hσ1,2()=

(F(t,x,u1)−F(t,x,u2),Mv)L2()for allv∈H 1,2

σ ().

From (3.4) andLemma 3.2, we have

u1u21,2 1

c1l1u1−l1u2≤ c2

c1u1−u21,2,σ. (3.15)

Thus, ifc2< c1, then it gives a contradiction; thereforeu1=u2.

References

[1] G. W. Batten Jr.,Second-order correct boundary conditions for the numerical solution of the mixed boundary problem for parabolic equations, Math. Comp.17(1963), 405–413. [2] A. Bouziani and N.-E. Benouar,Mixed problem with integral conditions for a third order

parabolic equation, Kobe J. Math.15(1998), no. 1, 47–58.

[3] B. Cahlon, D. M. Kulkarni, and P. Shi,Stepwise stability for the heat equation with a nonlocal constraint, SIAM J. Numer. Anal.32(1995), no. 2, 571–593.

[4] J. R. Cannon,The solution of the heat equation subject to the specification of energy, Quart. Appl. Math.21(1963), 155–160.

[5] Y. S. Choi and K.-Y. Chan,A parabolic equation with nonlocal boundary conditions arising from electrochemistry, Nonlinear Anal.18(1992), no. 4, 317–331.

[6] L. I. Kamynin,A boundary value problem in the theory of heat conduction with a nonclassical boundary condition, U.S.S.R. Comput. Math. and Math. Phys.4(1964), no. 6, 33–59. [7] L. S. Pulkina,A non-local problem with integral conditions for hyperbolic equations, Electron.

J. Differential Equations1999(1999), no. 45, 1–6.

[8] P. Shi,Weak solution to an evolution problem with a nonlocal constraint, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 24(1993), no. 1, 46–58.

[9] M. Kh. Shkhanukov,A method for solving boundary value problems for third-order equa-tions, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR265(1982), no. 6, 1327–1330 (Russian).

[10] V. F. Volkodavov and V. E. Zhukov,Two problems for the string vibration equation with integral conditions and special matching conditions on the characteristic, Differ. Equ. 34(1998), no. 4, 501–505.

Lazhar Bougoffa: Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, P. O. Box 9004, Abha, Saudi Arabia

References

Related documents

The factor analysis identi fi ed six dimensions of perceived customer value toward shopping clothes on-line: three factors (web site appearance, shipping and product

To be specific, with today’s current economy where contemporary lenders are somewhat reluctant to inject capital to the hospitality businesses, forming a joint

The purpose of this study was to explore whether there is a relation between, on the one hand, the number of brand mentions, or to put it differently, buzz,

three irrigation intervals (10, 20 and 30 days after sowing) on three varieties of alfalfa (Supersonic, Sultana and Lucerne 2002) were used to study its effect on

The interaction effect between cultivars, antioxidants and salinity levels on germination stress tolerance index, shoot length stress index, Root length stress index, shoot

Econometric Modeling: To explore the true picture of the effective interaction of personality and institutional variable with respect to nascent entrepreneurship rate, new

The comparison of the cumulative return on stock market series and their respective individual cycles and trends allows us to infer that during the period of relative

Previous work explicitly models the discontinuous motion estimation problem in the frequency domain where the motions parameters are estimated using a harmonic