Annual statistical report

1

South Carolina Department

of Probation, Parole and

Pardon Services

A

NNUAL

S

TATISTICAL

R

EPORT

FISCAL YEAR 2019

J

ERRY

B.

A

DGER

A

GENCY

D

IRECTOR

2

Proprietary Disclaimer

This document (including all data and statistical information represented herein) was compiled and reported by the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services. Any reproduction or republication of said report, data, or statistics is permitted only if reproduced in its entirety without modification, or omission, and must identify the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services as the source.

Jerry B. Adger, Director

293 Greystone Blvd, Columbia, SC 29210

PO BOX 207 Columbia, SC 29202 803-734-9220

www.dppps.sc.gov

Research and Evaluation

LaQuenta Weldon, Statistical and Research Analyst Marchar Stagg, Senior Statistical and Research Analyst

3

T

O THE

R

EADER

Fiscal Year 2019 (FY 2019) began July 1, 2018 and ended June 30, 2019. This report provides a statistical representation of the work of 679 employees of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services (SCDPPPS). During the fiscal year, 80% of our probationers and 82% of our parolees successfully completed supervision.

The Department operates its offender programs within a clear framework of public safety in supervising the 60,682 offenders under our legal jurisdiction. Legal jurisdiction includes offenders who were transferred out of state, absconded with active warrants, and others who are not under the active day-to-day supervision. At the end of the fiscal year, 28,682 offenders were under active supervision of the Department. The description of active supervision represents only those offenders who had at least one active case on June 30, 2019. Our responses to offender risks and needs in the community are focused to address present or potential problems that may interfere with the successful completion of supervision without compromising public safety. We maintain a fundamental belief that given support, resources, and service interventions, the offender has the ability to make positive changes in his or her life.

The following tables provide a description of the offender population and answer some commonly asked questions regarding the Department's programmatic efforts. Each table is preceded by a short description of its contents. The reader should be aware that there are different ways of reporting units of data depending upon the purpose. Admissions include only those offenders admitted to SCDPPPS who had no other active cases at the time of admission. Closures information reflects only the last order to close during the fiscal year. In addition, due to rounding, some of the totals will not equal 100%. For additional information or clarification, please contact LaQuenta Weldon in Research and Evaluation at 803-734-4057.

E

XPLANATION OF

P

ROGRAM

T

YPES

Probation: Includes Probation, Conditional Discharged to Probation, Probation Terminated

Upon Payment (PTUP), Split Probation (admitted to probation with a split sentence from prison), and Monitor for the Court

Parole: Includes Parole .

Other: Includes YOA, Community Supervision Program, Supervised Furlough-2, Supervised

4

TABLE

OF

CONTENTS

SECTION A---TOTAL POPULATION

TABLE 1-A Total Admissions by Program Type ... 8

TABLE 2-A Total Admissions by Type of Offense ... 9

TABLE 3-A Total Admissions by Age ... 10

TABLE 4-A Total Admissions by Gender & Race ... 11

FIGURE 1 Total Admissions by Gender & Race ... 12

TABLE 5-A Active Offenders by Level of Supervision ... 13

FIGURE 2 Active Offenders by Level of Supervision ... 14

TABLE 6-A Total Closures by Type... 15

SECTION B---PROBATION

TABLE 1-B Probation Admissions by Type of Offense ... 18

TABLE 2-B Probation Admissions by Gender & Race ... 19

TABLE 3-B Probation Admissions by Age ... 20

TABLE 4-B Active Probation Offenders by Level of Supervision ... 21

FIGURE 3 Active Probation Offenders by Level of Supervision ... 22

TABLE 5-B Probation Closures by Type ... 23

SECTION C---PAROLE

TABLE 1-C Parole Admissions by Type of Offense... 26

TABLE 2-C Parole Admissions by Gender & Race ... 27

TABLE 3-C Parole Admissions by Age ... 28

TABLE 4-C Active Parole Offenders by Level of Supervision ... 29

FIGURE 4 Active Parole Offenders by Level of Supervision ... 30

TABLE 5-C Parole Closures by Type ... 31

SECTION D---OTHER

TABLE 1-D Other Admissions by Type of Offense ... 34

TABLE 2-D Other Admissions by Gender & Race ... 35

TABLE 3-D Other Admissions by Age ... 36

TABLE 4-D Active Other Offenders by Level of Supervision ... 37

FIGURE 5 Active Other Offenders by Level of Supervision ... 38

5

SECTION E---SEX OFFENDERS

TABLE 1-E Active Sex Offenders ... 42

FUGURE 6 Sex Offenders by Supervision Status ... 43

SECTION F---VIOLATIONS

TABLE 1-F Violations by County ... 46

TABLE 2-F Closures by Type ... 47

TABLE 3-F Administrative Hearing Collections ... 48

SECTION G---ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE

FIGURE 7 Offenders on Active GPS ... 51

SECTION H---SUMMARY

FIGURE 8 Monthly DNA Collections ... 54

TABLE 1-H Offender Drug Testing ... 55

TABLE 2-H Population Characteristics ... 56

6

SECTION A

T

OTAL

P

OPULATION

7

T

OTAL

P

OPULATION

Tables 1-A through 4-A and Figure 1 represent the total admissions to the SCDPPPS during FY 2019. These tables count admissions to a particular sanction, and include only those offenders admitted to SCDPPPS who had no other active cases at the time of admission. These tables also include only the main case even though an offender may have been admitted with more than one case. In FY 2019, there were 17,869 admissions. A state and county total is provided for each category of admission. Within the racial categories, due to the small number of offenders classified as "Asian, Hispanic, Native American, or Other", they have been grouped together and classified as “Other”.

 Table 1-A provides information on total admissions by program type. Charleston, Greenville, York and Spartanburg counties had the greatest number of total admissions, together accounting for 32.5% of all admissions.

 Table 2-A presents information on total admissions by type of offense. Violent refers to those offenses as defined by the Omnibus Crime Act, Section 16-1-60. Total admissions during the fiscal year were predominately non-violent with only 9% admissions for violent offenses.

 Table 3-A describes offender admissions by age category. Majority of those admitted during FY 2019 (81%) were 25 years or older at time of admission.

 Table 4-A and Figure 1 illustrate total admissions by gender and race. Admissions overall continue to be predominately male at 78%, with a racial composition of 45% black, 53% white, and 2% of other races.

Table 5-A and Figure 2 describe all active offenders by level of supervision on June 30, 2019. This total does not include indirect supervision offenders, such as thoseincarcerated on split sentences. The level of supervision determines how often the Agent has contact with the offender. Standard risk supervision accounted for 57% of the active population, 13% were medium risk, and 22% were high-risk offenders. Intensive supervision represented only 1% and sex offender supervision accounted for 3% while domestic violence supervision accounted for 4% of all active offenders.

Table 6-A shows total closures by type (successful or unsuccessful). Closures include only those offenders in which all cases have completely closed out from SCDPPPS. Only the last order to close during FY 2019 and within that order only the main case, even though an offender may have had more than one case, was included. The overall success rate for all offenders closing during FY 2019 was 82%. The unsuccessful rate, 18%, is defined as those offenders whose supervision was revoked due to a technical violation or new offense.

8

COUNTY PROBATION PERCENT

PROBATION PAROLE PERCENT PAROLE OTHER PERCENT OTHER TOTAL ABBEVILLE 100 89% 6 5% 6 5% 112 AIKEN 502 79% 90 14% 42 7% 634 ALLENDALE 22 79% 4 14% 2 7% 28 ANDERSON 643 88% 44 6% 44 6% 731 BAMBERG 25 81% 2 6% 4 13% 31 BARNWELL 62 79% 11 14% 5 6% 78 BEAUFORT 243 82% 25 8% 28 9% 296 BERKELEY 601 88% 46 7% 39 6% 686 CALHOUN 62 90% 3 4% 4 6% 69 CHARLESTON 1047 83% 91 7% 127 10% 1,265 CHEROKEE 487 90% 29 5% 25 5% 541 CHESTER 153 81% 21 11% 15 8% 189 CHESTERFIELD 85 86% 8 8% 6 6% 99 CLARENDON 157 87% 11 6% 12 7% 180 COLLETON 145 90% 8 5% 8 5% 161 DARLINGTON 167 82% 18 9% 18 9% 203 DILLON 73 74% 14 14% 12 12% 99 DORCHESTER 325 86% 30 8% 23 6% 378 EDGEFIELD 106 85% 9 7% 9 7% 124 FAIRFIELD 95 86% 3 3% 13 12% 111 FLORENCE 347 70% 87 17% 65 13% 499 GEORGETOWN 96 68% 30 21% 15 11% 141 GREENVILLE 1874 88% 128 6% 118 6% 2,120 GREENWOOD 253 83% 32 10% 20 7% 305 HAMPTON 53 91% 4 7% 1 2% 58 HORRY 623 76% 117 14% 81 10% 821 JASPER 109 89% 7 6% 7 6% 123 KERSHAW 153 85% 17 9% 11 6% 181 LANCASTER 277 88% 25 8% 14 4% 316 LAURENS 362 87% 34 8% 20 5% 416 LEE 56 81% 7 10% 6 9% 69 LEXINGTON 576 82% 62 9% 65 9% 703 McCORMICK 56 92% 0 0% 5 8% 61 MARION 100 78% 10 8% 18 14% 128 MARLBORO 76 79% 8 8% 12 13% 96 NEWBERRY 138 86% 10 6% 13 8% 161 OCONEE 281 89% 21 7% 15 5% 317 ORANGEBURG 421 90% 30 6% 18 4% 469 PICKENS 561 92% 29 5% 20 3% 610 RICHLAND 672 72% 113 12% 145 16% 930 SALUDA 61 90% 4 6% 3 4% 68 SPARTANBURG 1214 84% 103 7% 136 9% 1,453 SUMTER 346 77% 67 15% 36 8% 449 UNION 155 82% 19 10% 14 7% 188 WILLIAMSBURG 84 83% 10 10% 7 7% 101 YORK 807 84% 82 9% 75 8% 964 TRANSITIONAL 33 31% 37 35% 37 35% 107 STATE TOTAL 14,884 83% 1,566 9% 1,419 8% 17,869 Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

TABLE 1-A

9 COUNTY OMNIBUS VIOLENT PERCENT VIOLENT NONVIOLENT PERCENT NONVIOLENT TOTAL ADMISSIONS ABBEVILLE 13 12% 99 88% 112 AIKEN 47 7% 587 93% 634 ALLENDALE 2 7% 26 93% 28 ANDERSON 69 9% 662 91% 731 BAMBERG 6 19% 25 81% 31 BARNWELL 6 8% 72 92% 78 BEAUFORT 32 11% 264 89% 296 BERKELEY 49 7% 637 93% 686 CALHOUN 9 13% 60 87% 69 CHARLESTON 152 12% 1113 88% 1265 CHEROKEE 37 7% 504 93% 541 CHESTER 12 6% 177 94% 189 CHESTERFIELD 7 7% 92 93% 99 CLARENDON 10 6% 170 94% 180 COLLETON 10 6% 151 94% 161 DARLINGTON 13 6% 190 94% 203 DILLON 2 2% 97 98% 99 DORCHESTER 33 9% 345 91% 378 EDGEFIELD 8 6% 116 94% 124 FAIRFIELD 9 8% 102 92% 111 FLORENCE 48 10% 451 90% 499 GEORGETOWN 19 13% 122 87% 141 GREENVILLE 164 8% 1956 92% 2120 GREENWOOD 31 10% 274 90% 305 HAMPTON 2 3% 56 97% 58 HORRY 94 11% 727 89% 821 JASPER 11 9% 112 91% 123 KERSHAW 13 7% 168 93% 181 LANCASTER 22 7% 294 93% 316 LAURENS 20 5% 396 95% 416 LEE 4 6% 65 94% 69 LEXINGTON 79 11% 624 89% 703 McCORMICK 4 7% 57 93% 61 MARION 10 8% 118 92% 128 MARLBORO 10 10% 86 90% 96 NEWBERRY 12 7% 149 93% 161 OCONEE 32 10% 285 90% 317 ORANGEBURG 36 8% 433 92% 469 PICKENS 42 7% 568 93% 610 RICHLAND 148 16% 782 84% 930 SALUDA 7 10% 61 90% 68 SPARTANBURG 166 11% 1287 89% 1453 SUMTER 26 6% 423 94% 449 UNION 10 5% 178 95% 188 WILLIAMSBURG 11 11% 90 89% 101 YORK 100 10% 864 90% 964 TRANSITIONAL 33 31% 74 69% 107 STATE TOTAL 1,680 9% 16,189 91% 17,869 Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

TOTAL ADMISSIONS BY TYPE OF OFFENSE TABLE 2-A

10 COUNTY Age 24 & Under Percent 24 & Under Age 25 & Over Percent 25 & Over ABBEVILLE 21 19% 91 81% AIKEN 104 16% 530 84% ALLENDALE 8 29% 20 71% ANDERSON 122 17% 609 83% BAMBERG 9 29% 22 71% BARNWELL 19 24% 59 76% BEAUFORT 64 22% 232 78% BERKELEY 114 17% 572 83% CALHOUN 12 17% 57 83% CHARLESTON 256 20% 1009 80% CHEROKEE 100 18% 441 82% CHESTER 18 10% 171 90% CHESTERFIELD 19 19% 80 81% CLARENDON 29 16% 151 84% COLLETON 39 24% 122 76% DARLINGTON 50 25% 153 75% DILLON 27 27% 72 73% DORCHESTER 88 23% 290 77% EDGEFIELD 29 23% 95 77% FAIRFIELD 14 13% 97 87% FLORENCE 86 17% 413 83% GEORGETOWN 25 18% 116 82% GREENVILLE 342 16% 1778 84% GREENWOOD 65 21% 240 79% HAMPTON 15 26% 43 74% HORRY 195 24% 626 76% JASPER 28 23% 95 77% KERSHAW 38 21% 143 79% LANCASTER 77 24% 239 76% LAURENS 64 15% 352 85% LEE 11 16% 58 84% LEXINGTON 122 17% 581 83% McCORMICK 24 39% 37 61% MARION 38 30% 90 70% MARLBORO 25 26% 71 74% NEWBERRY 27 17% 134 83% OCONEE 35 11% 282 89% ORANGEBURG 121 26% 348 74% PICKENS 107 18% 503 82% RICHLAND 232 25% 698 75% SALUDA 15 22% 53 78% SPARTANBURG 232 16% 1221 84% SUMTER 102 23% 347 77% UNION 27 14% 161 86% WILLIAMSBURG 11 11% 90 89% YORK 214 22% 750 78% TRANSITIONAL 11 10% 96 90% STATE TOTAL 3,431 19% 14,438 81% Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

TOTAL ADMISSIONS BY AGE TABLE 3-A

11

COUNTY PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT

ABBEVILLE 81% 19% 38% 0% 62% AIKEN 76% 24% 38% 1% 62% ALLENDALE 79% 21% 89% 0% 11% ANDERSON 78% 22% 29% 2% 68% BAMBERG 94% 6% 65% 0% 35% BARNWELL 83% 17% 67% 0% 33% BEAUFORT 79% 21% 50% 6% 45% BERKELEY 75% 25% 34% 2% 64% CALHOUN 74% 26% 54% 0% 46% CHARLESTON 83% 17% 62% 1% 37% CHEROKEE 69% 31% 29% 1% 70% CHESTER 76% 24% 45% 1% 54% CHESTERFIELD 77% 23% 42% 0% 58% CLARENDON 78% 22% 64% 4% 31% COLLETON 71% 29% 52% 1% 47% DARLINGTON 76% 24% 55% 0% 45% DILLON 94% 6% 71% 7% 22% DORCHESTER 83% 17% 44% 2% 54% EDGEFIELD 81% 19% 40% 0% 60% FAIRFIELD 75% 25% 65% 1% 34% FLORENCE 85% 15% 66% 1% 34% GEORGETOWN 87% 13% 52% 4% 44% GREENVILLE 74% 26% 38% 4% 58% GREENWOOD 81% 19% 51% 0% 49% HAMPTON 84% 16% 78% 2% 21% HORRY 79% 21% 36% 3% 62% JASPER 79% 21% 61% 2% 37% KERSHAW 80% 20% 44% 1% 55% LANCASTER 78% 22% 40% 1% 59% LAURENS 78% 22% 35% 2% 63% LEE 90% 10% 88% 0% 12% LEXINGTON 77% 23% 28% 3% 69% McCORMICK 84% 16% 66% 2% 33% MARION 77% 23% 75% 0% 25% MARLBORO 88% 13% 67% 4% 29% NEWBERRY 80% 20% 58% 1% 41% OCONEE 70% 30% 13% 1% 86% ORANGEBURG 81% 19% 73% 0% 26% PICKENS 71% 29% 12% 2% 86% RICHLAND 85% 15% 78% 2% 21% SALUDA 88% 12% 53% 6% 41% SPARTANBURG 76% 24% 36% 3% 61% SUMTER 81% 19% 69% 1% 31% UNION 77% 23% 38% 0% 62% WILLIAMSBURG 88% 12% 70% 0% 30% YORK 78% 22% 38% 2% 60% TRANSITIONAL 86% 14% 46% 3% 51% STATE TOTAL 78% 22% 45% 2% 53% Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

TABLE 4-A

12

FIGURE 1

TOTAL ADMISSIONS BY GENDER AND RACE

FISCAL YEAR 2019

6,661 37% 6,981 39% 321 2% 2,824 16% 1,035 6% 47 0%

WHITE MALES BLACK MALES OTHER MALES WHITE FEMALES BLACK FEMALES OTHER FEMALES

13

COUNTY STANDARD MEDIUM HIGH INTENSIVE SEX

OFFENDER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE MENTAL HEALTH TOTAL ABBEVILLE 75% 11% 13% 0% 1% 0% 0% 179 AIKEN 75% 8% 13% 2% 2% 0% 0% 1,174 ALLENDALE 88% 6% 2% 0% 3% 2% 0% 65 ANDERSON 55% 8% 28% 1% 2% 7% 0% 1,614 BAMBERG 73% 6% 13% 0% 8% 0% 0% 78 BARNWELL 64% 6% 19% 5% 6% 0% 0% 103 BEAUFORT 81% 10% 6% 0% 2% 0% 0% 279 BERKELEY 58% 10% 27% 1% 3% 0% 0% 1,344 CALHOUN 73% 12% 7% 1% 4% 3% 0% 107 CHARLESTON 47% 15% 29% 1% 3% 5% 0% 2,073 CHEROKEE 44% 20% 21% 2% 3% 11% 0% 597 CHESTER 63% 16% 18% 0% 3% 0% 0% 223 CHESTERFIELD 67% 13% 17% 1% 3% 0% 0% 163 CLARENDON 60% 14% 23% 0% 2% 0% 0% 216 COLLETON 63% 7% 26% 1% 3% 1% 0% 318 DARLINGTON 69% 10% 17% 0% 4% 0% 0% 328 DILLON 87% 6% 3% 1% 4% 0% 0% 141 DORCHESTER 61% 13% 13% 1% 5% 7% 0% 643 EDGEFIELD 73% 11% 11% 1% 3% 0% 0% 175 FAIRFIELD 64% 9% 22% 2% 4% 0% 0% 195 FLORENCE 66% 14% 15% 1% 4% 0% 0% 782 GEORGETOWN 66% 6% 26% 0% 2% 0% 0% 245 GREENVILLE 37% 21% 33% 0% 2% 6% 0% 3,090 GREENWOOD 61% 12% 16% 1% 1% 8% 0% 547 HAMPTON 66% 12% 15% 3% 3% 0% 0% 118 HORRY 75% 10% 9% 1% 5% 0% 0% 1,197 JASPER 71% 12% 17% 0% 0% 0% 0% 207 KERSHAW 60% 14% 21% 1% 4% 0% 0% 305 LANCASTER 66% 13% 17% 1% 3% 0% 0% 358 LAURENS 61% 11% 19% 0% 2% 7% 0% 624 LEE 73% 13% 11% 0% 4% 0% 0% 111 LEXINGTON 57% 14% 19% 2% 2% 6% 0% 1,335 McCORMICK 84% 9% 4% 0% 3% 0% 0% 74 MARION 90% 5% 2% 0% 3% 0% 0% 152 MARLBORO 62% 15% 21% 1% 3% 0% 0% 117 NEWBERRY 68% 12% 16% 2% 2% 0% 0% 194 OCONEE 69% 8% 20% 0% 3% 0% 0% 617 ORANGEBURG 57% 7% 23% 1% 2% 10% 0% 957 PICKENS 47% 16% 34% 1% 2% 0% 0% 961 RICHLAND 46% 14% 30% 2% 2% 4% 2% 1,624 SALUDA 64% 10% 18% 5% 2% 1% 0% 101 SPARTANBURG 50% 13% 25% 0% 3% 9% 0% 2,534 SUMTER 68% 14% 14% 1% 3% 0% 0% 703 UNION 60% 13% 23% 0% 3% 0% 0% 232 WILLIAMSBURG 67% 8% 24% 0% 2% 0% 0% 255 YORK 66% 10% 13% 1% 2% 9% 0% 1,198 TRANSITIONAL 31% 10% 55% 3% 0% 0% 0% 29 STATE TOTAL 57% 13% 22% 1% 3% 4% 0% ACTIVE OFFENDERS 16,365 3,670 6,380 270 772 1,194 31 28,682 Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

TABLE 5-A

14

FIGURE 2

ACTIVE OFFENDERS BY LEVEL OF SUPERVISION

JUNE 30, 2019

CONTACT STANDARDS

STANDARD MEDIUM HIGH INTENSIVE

 One Progress Report every quarter  Following the initial

home contact,

additional field contacts will be conducted in the event of community complaints or a violation investigation

 One Progress report every other month  One additional progress

report must be conducted every six months as a Field Visit or Home Visit

 One Progress Report Every Other Month  An additional progress

report must be conducted as a Field Visit or Home Visit every quarter

 Two Progress Reports per Month

 One of the two progress reports must be conducted as a Field Visit or Home Visit

2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000

STANDARD MEDIUM HIGH IINTENSIVE SEX

OFFENDER DOMESTICVIOLENCE MENTALHEALTH 16,365

3,670

6,380

270 772 1,194

15

COUNTY SUCCESSFUL SUCCESSFUL

RATE UNSUCCESSFUL UNSUCCESSFUL RATE ABBEVILLE 109 92% 10 8% AIKEN 313 70% 134 30% ALLENDALE 49 89% 6 11% ANDERSON 552 81% 126 19% BAMBERG 31 79% 8 21% BARNWELL 56 86% 9 14% BEAUFORT 197 83% 41 17% BERKELEY 536 87% 79 13% CALHOUN 40 85% 7 15% CHARLESTON 1003 83% 199 17% CHEROKEE 369 74% 129 26% CHESTER 122 83% 25 17% CHESTERFIELD 91 95% 5 5% CLARENDON 103 77% 31 23% COLLETON 131 77% 40 23% DARLINGTON 169 80% 41 20% DILLON 59 80% 15 20% DORCHESTER 276 80% 67 20% EDGEFIELD 62 86% 10 14% FAIRFIELD 90 89% 11 11% FLORENCE 411 80% 100 20% GEORGETOWN 108 72% 43 28% GREENVILLE 1647 81% 376 19% GREENWOOD 307 86% 48 14% HAMPTON 54 77% 16 23% HORRY 626 77% 189 23% JASPER 92 82% 20 18% KERSHAW 176 76% 55 24% LANCASTER 233 88% 33 12% LAURENS 253 81% 60 19% LEE 65 87% 10 13% LEXINGTON 563 78% 156 22% MCCORMICK 38 88% 5 12% MARION 123 96% 5 4% MARLBORO 62 83% 13 17% NEWBERRY 122 85% 21 15% OCONEE 246 84% 46 16% ORANGEBURG 329 89% 41 11% PICKENS 441 80% 110 20% RICHLAND 781 74% 272 26% SALUDA 63 83% 13 17% SPARTANBURG 1165 78% 332 22% SUMTER 390 85% 70 15% UNION 160 85% 28 15% WILLIAMSBURG 107 81% 25 19% YORK 735 89% 95 11% TRANSITIONAL 463 99% 3 1% STATE TOTAL 14,118 82% 3,178 18% Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

TABLE 6-A

16

SECTION B

P

ROBATION

FISCAL YEAR

2019

17

P

ROBATION

The Department is charged with the responsibility of supervising those offenders placed on probation by the Court. Probation is a court-ordered community sanction which suspends the imposition of all or part of the original sentence of incarceration. It requires the offender, under SCDPPPS supervision in the community, to adhere to a set of conditions which limit the offender’s freedom, to make reparation to victims if so ordered, and to provide for judicial revocation for violation of those conditions.

Tables 1-B through 3-B represents all probation admissions during FY 2019. Probation includes Probation, PTUP (Probation Terminated upon Payment), Split Probation admitted to probation with a split sentence from prison, and Monitor for the Court.

 Table 1-B shows probation admissions in terms of offense type, violent or non-violent. Violent refers to those offenses as defined by the Omnibus Crime Act, Section 16-1-60. For FY 2019, 4% of all probation admissions were for violent offenses.

 Table 2-B provides information on probation admissions by gender and race. Probation admissions were predominately male (76%) with a racial composition of 55% white, 43% black, and 2% other.

 Table 3-B reflects probation admissions by age category. Majority (79%) of offenders were 25 years or older at time of admission.

Table 4-B and Figure 3 describe active probation offenders by level of supervision on June 30, 2019. This total does not include indirect supervision offenders, such as thoseincarcerated on split sentences. Standard risk supervision accounted for 57% of the active population, 13% were medium risk, and 23% were high-risk offenders. Intensive supervision represented only 1%, sex offender supervision accounted for 2%, and domestic violence supervision accounted for 5% of all active probation offenders.

Table 5-B provides data for probation closures by type (successful or unsuccessful). Closures include only those offenders in which all cases have completely closed out from SCDPPPS. Only the last order to close during FY 2019 and within that order only the main case, even though an offender may have had more than one case, was included. The overall success rate for probationers was 80%, slightly lower than the total offender population success rate of 82%.

18 COUNTY OMNIBUS VIOLENT PERCENT VIOLENT NONVIOLENT PERCENT NONVIOLENT TOTAL ADMISSIONS ABBEVILLE 6 6% 94 94% 100 AIKEN 9 2% 493 98% 502 ALLENDALE 1 5% 21 95% 22 ANDERSON 21 3% 622 97% 643 BAMBERG 3 12% 22 88% 25 BARNWELL 2 3% 60 97% 62 BEAUFORT 8 3% 235 97% 243 BERKELEY 17 3% 584 97% 601 CALHOUN 6 10% 56 90% 62 CHARLESTON 50 5% 997 95% 1047 CHEROKEE 15 3% 472 97% 487 CHESTER 7 5% 146 95% 153 CHESTERFIELD 4 5% 81 95% 85 CLARENDON 3 2% 154 98% 157 COLLETON 4 3% 141 97% 145 DARLINGTON 3 2% 164 98% 167 DILLON 0 0% 73 100% 73 DORCHESTER 16 5% 309 95% 325 EDGEFIELD 4 4% 102 96% 106 FAIRFIELD 2 2% 93 98% 95 FLORENCE 13 4% 334 96% 347 GEORGETOWN 9 9% 87 91% 96 GREENVILLE 68 4% 1806 96% 1874 GREENWOOD 16 6% 237 94% 253 HAMPTON 1 2% 52 98% 53 HORRY 26 4% 597 96% 623 JASPER 4 4% 105 96% 109 KERSHAW 6 4% 147 96% 153 LANCASTER 7 3% 270 97% 277 LAURENS 6 2% 356 98% 362 LEE 2 4% 54 96% 56 LEXINGTON 34 6% 542 94% 576 McCORMICK 3 5% 53 95% 56 MARION 1 1% 99 99% 100 MARLBORO 2 3% 74 97% 76 NEWBERRY 1 1% 137 99% 138 OCONEE 15 5% 266 95% 281 ORANGEBURG 19 5% 402 95% 421 PICKENS 23 4% 538 96% 561 RICHLAND 40 6% 632 94% 672 SALUDA 4 7% 57 93% 61 SPARTANBURG 60 5% 1154 95% 1214 SUMTER 7 2% 339 98% 346 UNION 2 1% 153 99% 155 WILLIAMSBURG 5 6% 79 94% 84 YORK 38 5% 769 95% 807 TRANSITIONAL 2 6% 31 94% 33 STATE TOTAL 595 4% 14,289 96% 14,884 Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

PROBATION ADMISSIONS BY TYPE OF OFFENSE TABLE 1-B

19 COUNTY PERCENT MALE PERCENT FEMALE PERCENT BLACK PERCENT OTHER PERCENT WHITE ABBEVILLE 80% 20% 35% 0% 65% AIKEN 72% 28% 36% 1% 63% ALLENDALE 77% 23% 86% 0% 14% ANDERSON 76% 24% 28% 2% 70% BAMBERG 92% 8% 56% 0% 44% BARNWELL 81% 19% 68% 0% 32% BEAUFORT 76% 24% 47% 6% 47% BERKELEY 73% 27% 32% 2% 66% CALHOUN 74% 26% 56% 0% 44% CHARLESTON 81% 19% 59% 1% 40% CHEROKEE 67% 33% 27% 1% 72% CHESTER 76% 24% 45% 1% 54% CHESTERFIELD 75% 25% 41% 0% 59% CLARENDON 76% 24% 66% 4% 30% COLLETON 70% 30% 51% 1% 48% DARLINGTON 73% 27% 53% 1% 47% DILLON 92% 8% 74% 7% 19% DORCHESTER 82% 18% 43% 2% 55% EDGEFIELD 81% 19% 39% 0% 61% FAIRFIELD 75% 25% 64% 1% 35% FLORENCE 83% 17% 63% 1% 36% GEORGETOWN 83% 17% 48% 4% 48% GREENVILLE 72% 28% 36% 4% 60% GREENWOOD 80% 20% 49% 0% 50% HAMPTON 87% 13% 77% 2% 21% HORRY 75% 25% 33% 2% 65% JASPER 76% 24% 59% 3% 39% KERSHAW 78% 22% 41% 1% 58% LANCASTER 76% 24% 39% 1% 60% LAURENS 76% 24% 34% 1% 64% LEE 88% 13% 89% 0% 11% LEXINGTON 75% 25% 26% 3% 71% McCORMICK 82% 18% 64% 2% 34% MARION 75% 25% 72% 0% 28% MARLBORO 86% 14% 64% 5% 30% NEWBERRY 80% 20% 57% 1% 43% OCONEE 68% 32% 12% 1% 88% ORANGEBURG 79% 21% 73% 0% 27% PICKENS 70% 30% 11% 2% 87% RICHLAND 82% 18% 76% 1% 23% SALUDA 89% 11% 49% 5% 46% SPARTANBURG 73% 27% 35% 3% 63% SUMTER 78% 22% 66% 1% 34% UNION 72% 28% 34% 0% 66% WILLIAMSBURG 87% 13% 70% 0% 30% YORK 75% 25% 36% 2% 63% TRANSITIONAL 88% 12% 55% 0% 45% STATE TOTAL 76% 24% 43% 2% 55% Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

PROBATION ADMISSIONS BY GENDER AND RACE TABLE 2-B

20 COUNTY Age 24 & Under Percent 24 & Under Age 25 & Over Percent 25 & Over ABBEVILLE 19 19% 81 81% AIKEN 95 19% 407 81% ALLENDALE 8 36% 14 64% ANDERSON 117 18% 526 82% BAMBERG 9 36% 16 64% BARNWELL 19 31% 43 69% BEAUFORT 59 24% 184 76% BERKELEY 103 17% 498 83% CALHOUN 11 18% 51 82% CHARLESTON 239 23% 808 77% CHEROKEE 96 20% 391 80% CHESTER 15 10% 138 90% CHESTERFIELD 18 21% 67 79% CLARENDON 28 18% 129 82% COLLETON 36 25% 109 75% DARLINGTON 46 28% 121 72% DILLON 20 27% 53 73% DORCHESTER 79 24% 246 76% EDGEFIELD 26 25% 80 75% FAIRFIELD 13 14% 82 86% FLORENCE 67 19% 280 81% GEORGETOWN 22 23% 74 77% GREENVILLE 318 17% 1556 83% GREENWOOD 52 21% 201 79% HAMPTON 14 26% 39 74% HORRY 162 26% 461 74% JASPER 27 25% 82 75% KERSHAW 35 23% 118 77% LANCASTER 73 26% 204 74% LAURENS 61 17% 301 83% LEE 8 14% 48 86% LEXINGTON 111 19% 465 81% McCORMICK 23 41% 33 59% MARION 30 30% 70 70% MARLBORO 22 29% 54 71% NEWBERRY 24 17% 114 83% OCONEE 32 11% 249 89% ORANGEBURG 115 27% 306 73% PICKENS 99 18% 462 82% RICHLAND 197 29% 475 71% SALUDA 12 20% 49 80% SPARTANBURG 219 18% 995 82% SUMTER 80 23% 266 77% UNION 24 15% 131 85% WILLIAMSBURG 11 13% 73 87% YORK 196 24% 611 76% TRANSITIONAL 5 15% 28 85% STATE TOTAL 3,095 21% 11,789 79% Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

PROBATION ADMISSIONS BY AGE TABLE 3-B

21

COUNTY STANDARD MEDIUM HIGH INTENSIVE SEX

OFFENDER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE MENTAL HEALTH TOTAL ABBEVILLE 77% 12% 11% 0% 1% 0% 0% 156 AIKEN 76% 8% 13% 2% 1% 0% 0% 983 ALLENDALE 88% 7% 2% 0% 2% 2% 0% 59 ANDERSON 54% 8% 28% 1% 2% 7% 0% 1,473 BAMBERG 76% 6% 14% 0% 5% 0% 0% 66 BARNWELL 64% 7% 18% 5% 7% 0% 0% 88 BEAUFORT 80% 11% 8% 0% 2% 0% 0% 225 BERKELEY 59% 10% 27% 1% 3% 0% 0% 1,198 CALHOUN 74% 12% 7% 1% 3% 3% 0% 95 CHARLESTON 46% 15% 29% 1% 2% 6% 0% 1,767 CHEROKEE 44% 20% 22% 2% 2% 11% 0% 530 CHESTER 63% 16% 18% 1% 3% 0% 0% 182 CHESTERFIELD 69% 14% 15% 1% 1% 0% 0% 137 CLARENDON 61% 14% 23% 1% 2% 0% 0% 188 COLLETON 64% 7% 26% 1% 2% 1% 0% 289 DARLINGTON 69% 10% 18% 0% 3% 0% 0% 273 DILLON 91% 5% 1% 0% 3% 0% 0% 101 DORCHESTER 60% 14% 13% 1% 3% 8% 0% 552 EDGEFIELD 73% 12% 12% 1% 2% 0% 0% 153 FAIRFIELD 65% 9% 22% 1% 4% 0% 0% 168 FLORENCE 69% 13% 14% 1% 3% 0% 0% 594 GEORGETOWN 67% 6% 26% 0% 1% 0% 0% 192 GREENVILLE 36% 21% 34% 0% 2% 6% 0% 2,746 GREENWOOD 61% 11% 16% 1% 1% 9% 0% 481 HAMPTON 67% 10% 17% 3% 3% 0% 0% 106 HORRY 77% 9% 9% 0% 4% 0% 0% 948 JASPER 68% 13% 18% 0% 1% 0% 0% 179 KERSHAW 60% 14% 22% 1% 2% 0% 0% 260 LANCASTER 68% 12% 16% 2% 2% 0% 0% 294 LAURENS 61% 10% 19% 1% 1% 8% 0% 538 LEE 75% 11% 10% 0% 3% 0% 0% 96 LEXINGTON 57% 14% 19% 2% 2% 6% 0% 1,149 McCORMICK 85% 9% 5% 0% 2% 0% 0% 65 MARION 91% 6% 2% 0% 1% 0% 0% 112 MARLBORO 62% 13% 23% 0% 2% 0% 0% 94 NEWBERRY 68% 13% 15% 2% 2% 0% 0% 171 OCONEE 70% 8% 19% 0% 2% 1% 0% 565 ORANGEBURG 57% 7% 23% 1% 1% 11% 0% 871 PICKENS 48% 16% 35% 1% 1% 0% 0% 890 RICHLAND 45% 14% 30% 2% 2% 6% 2% 1,251 SALUDA 68% 8% 17% 5% 1% 1% 0% 84 SPARTANBURG 49% 12% 25% 0% 2% 11% 0% 2,157 SUMTER 69% 14% 14% 1% 2% 0% 0% 560 UNION 63% 14% 21% 0% 3% 0% 0% 195 WILLIAMSBURG 70% 7% 22% 0% 1% 0% 0% 209 YORK 64% 10% 13% 1% 2% 10% 0% 991 TRANSITIONAL 36% 8% 52% 4% 0% 0% 0% 25 STATE TOTAL 57% 13% 23% 1% 2% 5% 0% ACTIVE OFFENDERS 13,946 3,091 5,540 216 510 1,180 23 24,506

Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

TABLE 4-B

22

FIGURE 3

ACTIVE PROBATION OFFENDERS BY LEVEL OF SUPERVISION

JUNE 30, 2019

23

COUNTY SUCCESSFUL SUCCESSFUL

RATE UNSUCCESSFUL UNSUCCESSFUL RATE ABBEVILLE 97 91% 10 9% AIKEN 230 64% 132 36% ALLENDALE 44 88% 6 12% ANDERSON 499 80% 122 20% BAMBERG 24 77% 7 23% BARNWELL 41 84% 8 16% BEAUFORT 165 81% 39 19% BERKELEY 477 86% 76 14% CALHOUN 32 84% 6 16% CHARLESTON 858 84% 163 16% CHEROKEE 315 72% 124 28% CHESTER 99 82% 22 18% CHESTERFIELD 76 99% 1 1% CLARENDON 93 75% 31 25% COLLETON 121 77% 37 23% DARLINGTON 134 80% 34 20% DILLON 40 78% 11 22% DORCHESTER 246 80% 61 20% EDGEFIELD 48 83% 10 17% FAIRFIELD 78 89% 10 11% FLORENCE 305 78% 84 22% GEORGETOWN 78 67% 39 33% GREENVILLE 1449 80% 364 20% GREENWOOD 263 85% 45 15% HAMPTON 45 78% 13 22% HORRY 497 74% 177 26% JASPER 77 80% 19 20% KERSHAW 144 73% 54 27% LANCASTER 209 87% 31 13% LAURENS 216 81% 50 19% LEE 59 87% 9 13% LEXINGTON 454 76% 144 24% MCCORMICK 32 86% 5 14% MARION 101 96% 4 4% MARLBORO 48 84% 9 16% NEWBERRY 104 85% 18 15% OCONEE 224 83% 45 17% ORANGEBURG 276 88% 38 12% PICKENS 408 79% 106 21% RICHLAND 601 71% 243 29% SALUDA 56 84% 11 16% SPARTANBURG 954 75% 319 25% SUMTER 300 84% 58 16% UNION 131 83% 26 17% WILLIAMSBURG 88 80% 22 20% YORK 612 88% 86 12% TRANSITIONAL 344 99% 3 1% STATE TOTAL 11,792 80% 2,932 20% Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

PROBATION CLOSURES BY TYPE TABLE 5-B

24

SECTION C

P

AROLE

FISCAL YEAR

2019

25

P

AROLE

The Department is charged with the responsibility of supervising those offenders paroled by the South Carolina Board of Paroles and Pardons. Parole is the conditional release of an individual from imprisonment, but not from the legal custody of the state, to complete his or her sentence outside a correctional institution under conditions and provisions of supervision determined by the Board. Should an individual be granted parole, he or she must agree to abide by certain conditions of community supervision. The violation of any of these conditions is sufficient grounds for revocation of parole by the Board, and the imposition of the remainder of the original sentence of incarceration.

Tables 1-C through 3-C represents all parole admissions during FY 2019.

 Table 1-C shows parole admissions by type of offense. Violent refers to those offenses as defined by the Omnibus Crime Act, Section 16-1-60. A larger percent of parole admissions, 15%, fall into the violent category, as compared to 4% for probation admissions (see Table 1-B).

 Table 2-C describes all parole admissions by gender and race. Parole admissions consisted primarily of males (86%) with a racial composition of 51% black, 48% white, and 1% other.

 Table 3-C reflects parole admissions by age category. Majority (85%) of offenders were 25 years or older at time of admission.

Table 4-C and Figure 4 describe active parolees by level of supervision on June 30, 2019. This total does not include indirect supervision offenders, such as those incarcerated on split sentences. Standard risk supervision accounted for 61% of the active population, 14% were medium risk, and 19% were high-risk offenders. Intensive supervision represented only 1% and sex offender supervision accounted for 4% of all active parole offenders. Less than 1% of the active parole population were under domestic violence supervision or mental health supervision. Table 5-C provides data for parole closures by type (successful or unsuccessful). Closures include only those offenders in which all cases have completely closed out from SCDPPPS. Only the last order to close during FY 2019 and within that order only the main case, even though an offender may have had more than one case, was included. The overall success rate for parolees (82%) was higher than that of probationers (80%, see Table 5-B).

26 COUNTY OMNIBUS VIOLENT PERCENT VIOLENT NONVIOLENT PERCENT NONVIOLENT TOTAL ADMISSIONS ABBEVILLE 2 33% 4 67% 6 AIKEN 14 16% 76 84% 90 ALLENDALE 0 0% 4 100% 4 ANDERSON 15 34% 29 66% 44 BAMBERG 0 0% 2 100% 2 BARNWELL 2 18% 9 82% 11 BEAUFORT 6 24% 19 76% 25 BERKELEY 9 20% 37 80% 46 CALHOUN 0 0% 3 100% 3 CHARLESTON 20 22% 71 78% 91 CHEROKEE 4 14% 25 86% 29 CHESTER 0 0% 21 100% 21 CHESTERFIELD 0 0% 8 100% 8 CLARENDON 1 9% 10 91% 11 COLLETON 1 13% 7 88% 8 DARLINGTON 2 11% 16 89% 18 DILLON 1 7% 13 93% 14 DORCHESTER 3 10% 27 90% 30 EDGEFIELD 1 11% 8 89% 9 FAIRFIELD 0 0% 3 100% 3 FLORENCE 5 6% 82 94% 87 GEORGETOWN 2 7% 28 93% 30 GREENVILLE 20 16% 108 84% 128 GREENWOOD 4 13% 28 88% 32 HAMPTON 1 25% 3 75% 4 HORRY 18 15% 99 85% 117 JASPER 3 43% 4 57% 7 KERSHAW 2 12% 15 88% 17 LANCASTER 4 16% 21 84% 25 LAURENS 4 12% 30 88% 34 LEE 0 0% 7 100% 7 LEXINGTON 8 13% 54 87% 62 McCORMICK --- --- --- --- ---MARION 0 0% 10 100% 10 MARLBORO 1 13% 7 88% 8 NEWBERRY 2 20% 8 80% 10 OCONEE 6 29% 15 71% 21 ORANGEBURG 8 27% 22 73% 30 PICKENS 3 10% 26 90% 29 RICHLAND 10 9% 103 91% 113 SALUDA 1 25% 3 75% 4 SPARTANBURG 19 18% 84 82% 103 SUMTER 6 9% 61 91% 67 UNION 1 5% 18 95% 19 WILLIAMSBURG 1 10% 9 90% 10 YORK 16 20% 66 80% 82 TRANSITIONAL 6 16% 31 84% 37 STATE TOTAL 232 15% 1,334 85% 1,566 Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

PAROLE ADMISSIONS BY TYPE OF OFFENSE TABLE 1-C

27 COUNTY PERCENT MALE PERCENT FEMALE PERCENT BLACK PERCENT OTHER PERCENT WHITE ABBEVILLE 83% 17% 67% 0% 33% AIKEN 88% 12% 41% 0% 59% ALLENDALE 75% 25% 100% 0% 0% ANDERSON 82% 18% 30% 2% 68% BAMBERG 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% BARNWELL 91% 9% 64% 0% 36% BEAUFORT 88% 12% 56% 0% 44% BERKELEY 83% 17% 39% 0% 61% CALHOUN 67% 33% 33% 0% 67% CHARLESTON 93% 7% 70% 2% 27% CHEROKEE 79% 21% 34% 3% 62% CHESTER 57% 43% 33% 0% 67% CHESTERFIELD 75% 25% 50% 0% 50% CLARENDON 82% 18% 64% 0% 36% COLLETON 100% 0% 63% 0% 38% DARLINGTON 89% 11% 61% 0% 39% DILLON 100% 0% 57% 14% 29% DORCHESTER 90% 10% 40% 3% 57% EDGEFIELD 89% 11% 56% 0% 44% FAIRFIELD 67% 33% 67% 0% 33% FLORENCE 89% 11% 69% 0% 31% GEORGETOWN 93% 7% 63% 0% 37% GREENVILLE 85% 15% 47% 3% 50% GREENWOOD 75% 25% 44% 0% 56% HAMPTON 50% 50% 75% 0% 25% HORRY 87% 13% 39% 3% 58% JASPER 100% 0% 86% 0% 14% KERSHAW 88% 12% 53% 0% 47% LANCASTER 96% 4% 36% 0% 64% LAURENS 94% 6% 41% 0% 59% LEE 100% 0% 71% 0% 29% LEXINGTON 77% 23% 34% 2% 65% McCORMICK --- --- --- --- ---MARION 80% 20% 90% 0% 10% MARLBORO 88% 13% 63% 0% 38% NEWBERRY 70% 30% 70% 0% 30% OCONEE 81% 19% 19% 5% 76% ORANGEBURG 97% 3% 70% 0% 30% PICKENS 83% 17% 10% 0% 90% RICHLAND 87% 13% 78% 1% 21% SALUDA 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% SPARTANBURG 84% 16% 36% 2% 62% SUMTER 91% 9% 76% 1% 22% UNION 95% 5% 53% 0% 47% WILLIAMSBURG 90% 10% 60% 0% 40% YORK 84% 16% 39% 1% 60% TRANSITIONAL 79% 15% 36% 3% 62% STATE TOTAL 86% 14% 51% 1% 48% Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

PAROLE ADMISSIONS BY GENDER AND RACE TABLE 2-C

28 COUNTY Age 24 & Under Percent 24 & Under Age 25 & Over Percent 25 & Over ABBEVILLE 2 33% 4 67% AIKEN 8 9% 82 91% ALLENDALE 0 0% 4 100% ANDERSON 2 5% 42 95% BAMBERG 0 0% 2 100% BARNWELL 0 0% 11 100% BEAUFORT 2 8% 23 92% BERKELEY 9 20% 37 80% CALHOUN 1 33% 2 67% CHARLESTON 13 14% 78 86% CHEROKEE 3 10% 26 90% CHESTER 3 14% 18 86% CHESTERFIELD 1 13% 7 88% CLARENDON 0 0% 11 100% COLLETON 3 38% 5 63% DARLINGTON 1 6% 17 94% DILLON 4 29% 10 71% DORCHESTER 6 20% 24 80% EDGEFIELD 1 11% 8 89% FAIRFIELD 0 0% 3 100% FLORENCE 14 16% 73 84% GEORGETOWN 2 7% 28 93% GREENVILLE 16 13% 112 88% GREENWOOD 9 28% 23 72% HAMPTON 1 25% 3 75% HORRY 24 21% 93 79% JASPER 1 14% 6 86% KERSHAW 3 18% 14 82% LANCASTER 4 16% 21 84% LAURENS 3 9% 31 91% LEE 3 43% 4 57% LEXINGTON 8 13% 54 87% McCORMICK 0 --- 0 ---MARION 3 30% 7 70% MARLBORO 2 25% 6 75% NEWBERRY 2 20% 8 80% OCONEE 2 10% 19 90% ORANGEBURG 5 17% 25 83% PICKENS 7 24% 22 76% RICHLAND 18 16% 95 84% SALUDA 3 75% 1 25% SPARTANBURG 7 7% 96 93% SUMTER 18 27% 49 73% UNION 2 11% 17 89% WILLIAMSBURG 0 0% 10 100% YORK 8 10% 74 90% TRANSITIONAL 5 14% 32 86% STATE TOTAL 229 15% 1,337 85% Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

PAROLE ADMISSIONS BY AGE TABLE 3-C

29

COUNTY STANDARD MEDIUM HIGH INTENSIVE SEX

OFFENDER DV OFFENDER MENTAL HEALTH TOTAL ABBEVILLE 71% 12% 18% 0% 0% 0% 0% 17 AIKEN 70% 9% 14% 3% 4% 0% 0% 151 ALLENDALE 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3 ANDERSON 63% 9% 26% 0% 0% 1% 0% 76 BAMBERG 71% 14% 0% 0% 14% 0% 0% 7 BARNWELL 69% 0% 23% 8% 0% 0% 0% 13 BEAUFORT 89% 11% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 36 BERKELEY 59% 13% 25% 0% 3% 0% 0% 87 CALHOUN 70% 20% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 10 CHARLESTON 55% 17% 25% 1% 2% 0% 0% 188 CHEROKEE 49% 21% 19% 5% 7% 0% 0% 43 CHESTER 64% 11% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 28 CHESTERFIELD 61% 11% 22% 0% 6% 0% 0% 18 CLARENDON 53% 12% 29% 0% 6% 0% 0% 17 COLLETON 53% 11% 32% 0% 5% 0% 0% 19 DARLINGTON 70% 9% 16% 0% 5% 0% 0% 43 DILLON 77% 7% 10% 3% 3% 0% 0% 30 DORCHESTER 72% 11% 13% 2% 2% 0% 0% 61 EDGEFIELD 79% 5% 11% 0% 5% 0% 0% 19 FAIRFIELD 72% 6% 11% 11% 0% 0% 0% 18 FLORENCE 55% 22% 18% 1% 4% 0% 0% 134 GEORGETOWN 71% 5% 16% 0% 8% 0% 0% 38 GREENVILLE 48% 18% 29% 1% 4% 0% 0% 219 GREENWOOD 54% 17% 17% 2% 7% 2% 0% 46 HAMPTON 58% 25% 0% 8% 8% 0% 0% 12 HORRY 66% 13% 8% 2% 10% 0% 0% 191 JASPER 86% 9% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 22 KERSHAW 59% 16% 9% 3% 13% 0% 0% 32 LANCASTER 56% 17% 21% 0% 6% 0% 0% 48 LAURENS 65% 18% 15% 0% 0% 2% 0% 65 LEE 58% 25% 8% 0% 8% 0% 0% 12 LEXINGTON 60% 16% 17% 2% 4% 1% 0% 129 McCORMICK 83% 0% 0% 0% 17% 0% 0% 6 MARION 92% 0% 4% 0% 4% 0% 0% 24 MARLBORO 53% 20% 13% 7% 7% 0% 0% 15 NEWBERRY 71% 6% 24% 0% 0% 0% 0% 17 OCONEE 58% 8% 28% 0% 6% 0% 0% 36 ORANGEBURG 58% 12% 28% 0% 2% 0% 0% 65 PICKENS 34% 30% 26% 2% 8% 0% 0% 50 RICHLAND 57% 13% 24% 1% 2% 0% 3% 214 SALUDA 36% 18% 36% 9% 0% 0% 0% 11 SPARTANBURG 62% 16% 21% 0% 0% 0% 0% 215 SUMTER 59% 17% 17% 2% 5% 0% 0% 111 UNION 52% 10% 34% 0% 3% 0% 0% 29 WILLIAMSBURG 58% 6% 29% 0% 6% 0% 0% 31 YORK 74% 12% 10% 1% 3% 0% 0% 147 TRANSITIONAL 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 STATE TOTAL 61% 14% 19% 1% 4% 0% 0% ACTIVE OFFENDERS 1,716 403 534 36 105 4 6 2,804

Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

TABLE 4-C

30

FIGURE 4

ACTIVE PAROLE OFFENDERS BY LEVEL OF SUPERVISION

JUNE 30, 2019

31

COUNTY SUCCESSFUL SUCCESSFUL

RATE UNSUCCESSFUL UNSUCCESSFUL RATE ABBEVILLE 7 100% 0 0% AIKEN 34 94% 2 6% ALLENDALE 1 100% 0 0% ANDERSON 18 86% 3 14% BAMBERG 3 100% 0 0% BARNWELL 6 86% 1 14% BEAUFORT 14 88% 2 13% BERKELEY 16 84% 3 16% CALHOUN 2 100% 0 0% CHARLESTON 37 59% 26 41% CHEROKEE 30 86% 5 14% CHESTER 8 73% 3 27% CHESTERFIELD 8 67% 4 33% CLARENDON 1 100% 0 0% COLLETON 5 71% 2 29% DARLINGTON 10 63% 6 38% DILLON 7 70% 3 30% DORCHESTER 13 72% 5 28% EDGEFIELD 5 100% 0 0% FAIRFIELD 4 80% 1 20% FLORENCE 41 76% 13 24% GEORGETOWN 12 75% 4 25% GREENVILLE 68 89% 8 11% GREENWOOD 15 94% 1 6% HAMPTON 4 57% 3 43% HORRY 54 84% 10 16% JASPER 3 75% 1 25% KERSHAW 15 100% 0 0% LANCASTER 11 92% 1 8% LAURENS 14 58% 10 42% LEE 2 100% 0 0% LEXINGTON 34 79% 9 21% MCCORMICK 1 100% 0 0% MARION 8 100% 0 0% MARLBORO 3 50% 3 50% NEWBERRY 7 88% 1 13% OCONEE 8 100% 0 0% ORANGEBURG 10 77% 3 23% PICKENS 12 80% 3 20% RICHLAND 53 74% 19 26% SALUDA 3 75% 1 25% SPARTANBURG 85 91% 8 9% SUMTER 43 84% 8 16% UNION 12 86% 2 14% WILLIAMSBURG 8 73% 3 27% YORK 45 85% 8 15% TRANSITIONAL 36 100% 0 0% STATE TOTAL 836 82% 185 18% Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

PAROLE CLOSURES BY TYPE TABLE 5-C

32

SECTION

D

O

THER

FISCAL YEAR

2019

33

O

THER

The “other” category includes YOA, Community Supervision Program, Supervised Furlough-2 (SF-2), Supervised Furlough-2A (SF-2A), Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ), and Supervised Reentry Program (SRP) cases.

 YOA refers to inmates aged 17 through 24, sentenced under the South Carolina Youthful Offender

Act (YOA) to an indeterminate period of incarceration, not to exceed six years, within the South Carolina Department of Corrections (SCDC). This program is being taken over by the South Carolina Department of Corrections. SCDPPPS will no longer receive admissions to this program.

 Community Supervision Program (CSP) is a mandatory release program for offenders who have

been sentenced to a “No Parole” offense and have served 85% of their sentence at SCDC. Offenders released to the Community Supervision Program have a two-year period of supervision. If at any time they violate the terms of supervision, a Circuit Court Judge may revoke any part of the remaining incarcerative portion of the sentence for up to one year at a time.

 SF-2 is an early release program which allows certain inmates to be released into the community

to serve the last six months of their sentence. The difference between SF2 and SF-2A is most are required to be on Electronic Monitoring for the duration of their furlough under SF-2A.

 DJJ is a program where SCDPPPS supervises offenders who are at least 17 years of age, but less

than 21, who have been adjudicated delinquent by a Family Court and who have been conditionally released from SCDC by the Juvenile Parole Board.

 SRP refers to an inmate not required to participate in CSP. Inmates who have been incarcerated

for a minimum of two years shall be released to reentry supervision 180 before their release date. Tables 1-D through 3-D represents all other admissions during FY 2019.

 Table 1-D displays other admissions by type of offense. Violent refers to those offenses as defined by the Omnibus Crime Act, Section 16-1-60. Sixty percent (60%) of all admission in ‘other’ category were violent.

 Table 2-D describes other admissions by gender and race. Admissions were predominately male (93%) and black (63%).

 Table 3-D describes other admissions by age category. Majority (92%) of offenders were 25 years or older at time of admission.

Table 4-D and Figure 5 describe the active population for other release offenders in terms of level of supervision on June 30, 2019. Of the total active other population, 51% were supervised at standard level, 13% at medium, 22% at high, 1% at intensive, 11% at the sex offender supervision level, and 1% at the domestic violence supervision level. Less than 1% were under mental health supervision.

Table 5-D shows 96% of other offenders closing successfully compared to 82% of the parole population (See Table 5-C) and 80% of the probation population (See Table 5-B).

34 COUNTY OMNIBUS VIOLENT PERCENT VIOLENT NONVIOLENT PERCENT NONVIOLENT TOTAL ADMISSIONS ABBEVILLE 5 83% 1 17% 6 AIKEN 24 57% 18 43% 42 ALLENDALE 1 50% 1 50% 2 ANDERSON 33 75% 11 25% 44 BAMBERG 3 75% 1 25% 4 BARNWELL 2 40% 3 60% 5 BEAUFORT 18 64% 10 36% 28 BERKELEY 23 59% 16 41% 39 CALHOUN 3 75% 1 25% 4 CHARLESTON 82 65% 45 35% 127 CHEROKEE 18 72% 7 28% 25 CHESTER 5 33% 10 67% 15 CHESTERFIELD 3 50% 3 50% 6 CLARENDON 6 50% 6 50% 12 COLLETON 5 63% 3 38% 8 DARLINGTON 8 44% 10 56% 18 DILLON 1 8% 11 92% 12 DORCHESTER 14 61% 9 39% 23 EDGEFIELD 3 33% 6 67% 9 FAIRFIELD 7 54% 6 46% 13 FLORENCE 30 46% 35 54% 65 GEORGETOWN 8 53% 7 47% 15 GREENVILLE 76 64% 42 36% 118 GREENWOOD 11 55% 9 45% 20 HAMPTON 0 0% 1 100% 1 HORRY 50 62% 31 38% 81 JASPER 4 57% 3 43% 7 KERSHAW 5 45% 6 55% 11 LANCASTER 11 79% 3 21% 14 LAURENS 10 50% 10 50% 20 LEE 2 33% 4 67% 6 LEXINGTON 37 57% 28 43% 65 McCORMICK 1 20% 4 80% 5 MARION 9 50% 9 50% 18 MARLBORO 7 58% 5 42% 12 NEWBERRY 9 69% 4 31% 13 OCONEE 11 73% 4 27% 15 ORANGEBURG 9 50% 9 50% 18 PICKENS 16 80% 4 20% 20 RICHLAND 98 68% 47 32% 145 SALUDA 2 67% 1 33% 3 SPARTANBURG 87 64% 49 36% 136 SUMTER 13 36% 23 64% 36 UNION 7 50% 7 50% 14 WILLIAMSBURG 5 71% 2 29% 7 YORK 46 61% 29 39% 75 TRANSITIONAL 25 68% 12 32% 37 STATE TOTAL 853 60% 566 40% 1,419 Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

OTHER ADMISSIONS BY TYPE OF OFFENSE TABLE 1-D

35 COUNTY PERCENT MALE PERCENT FEMALE PERCENT BLACK PERCENT OTHER PERCENT WHITE ABBEVILLE 100% 0% 67% 0% 33% AIKEN 95% 5% 50% 0% 50% ALLENDALE 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% ANDERSON 98% 2% 50% 2% 48% BAMBERG 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% BARNWELL 100% 0% 60% 0% 40% BEAUFORT 96% 4% 64% 7% 29% BERKELEY 97% 3% 51% 5% 44% CALHOUN 75% 25% 25% 0% 75% CHARLESTON 97% 3% 80% 2% 18% CHEROKEE 100% 0% 56% 4% 40% CHESTER 100% 0% 60% 0% 40% CHESTERFIELD 100% 0% 50% 0% 50% CLARENDON 92% 8% 50% 8% 42% COLLETON 75% 25% 50% 0% 50% DARLINGTON 94% 6% 67% 0% 33% DILLON 100% 0% 67% 0% 33% DORCHESTER 100% 0% 57% 0% 43% EDGEFIELD 78% 22% 44% 0% 56% FAIRFIELD 77% 23% 69% 0% 31% FLORENCE 92% 8% 74% 2% 25% GEORGETOWN 93% 7% 60% 7% 33% GREENVILLE 92% 8% 55% 6% 39% GREENWOOD 100% 0% 85% 0% 15% HAMPTON 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% HORRY 91% 9% 53% 6% 41% JASPER 100% 0% 71% 0% 29% KERSHAW 91% 9% 73% 0% 27% LANCASTER 93% 7% 64% 0% 36% LAURENS 95% 5% 35% 15% 50% LEE 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% LEXINGTON 92% 8% 38% 5% 57% McCORMICK 100% 0% 80% 0% 20% MARION 89% 11% 83% 0% 17% MARLBORO 100% 0% 83% 0% 17% NEWBERRY 92% 8% 69% 0% 31% OCONEE 87% 13% 27% 0% 73% ORANGEBURG 94% 6% 89% 0% 11% PICKENS 95% 5% 30% 5% 65% RICHLAND 93% 7% 84% 3% 12% SALUDA 67% 33% 67% 33% 0% SPARTANBURG 91% 9% 52% 3% 45% SUMTER 92% 8% 83% 0% 17% UNION 100% 0% 64% 0% 36% WILLIAMSBURG 100% 0% 86% 0% 14% YORK 93% 7% 67% 4% 29% TRANSITIONAL 86% 14% 51% 5% 43% STATE TOTAL 93% 7% 63% 3% 34% Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

OTHER ADMISSIONS BY GENDER AND RACE TABLE 2-D

36 COUNTY Age 24 & Under Percent 24 & Under Age 25 & Over Percent 25 & Over ABBEVILLE 0 0% 6 100% AIKEN 1 2% 41 98% ALLENDALE 0 0% 2 100% ANDERSON 3 7% 41 93% BAMBERG 0 0% 4 100% BARNWELL 0 0% 5 100% BEAUFORT 3 11% 25 89% BERKELEY 2 5% 37 95% CALHOUN 0 0% 4 100% CHARLESTON 4 3% 123 97% CHEROKEE 1 4% 24 96% CHESTER 0 0% 15 100% CHESTERFIELD 0 0% 6 100% CLARENDON 1 8% 11 92% COLLETON 0 0% 8 100% DARLINGTON 3 17% 15 83% DILLON 3 25% 9 75% DORCHESTER 3 13% 20 87% EDGEFIELD 2 22% 7 78% FAIRFIELD 1 8% 12 92% FLORENCE 5 8% 60 92% GEORGETOWN 1 7% 14 93% GREENVILLE 8 7% 110 93% GREENWOOD 4 20% 16 80% HAMPTON 0 0% 1 100% HORRY 9 11% 72 89% JASPER 0 0% 7 100% KERSHAW 0 0% 11 100% LANCASTER 0 0% 14 100% LAURENS 0 0% 20 100% LEE 0 0% 6 100% LEXINGTON 3 5% 62 95% McCORMICK 1 20% 4 80% MARION 5 28% 13 72% MARLBORO 1 8% 11 92% NEWBERRY 1 8% 12 92% OCONEE 1 7% 14 93% ORANGEBURG 1 6% 17 94% PICKENS 1 5% 19 95% RICHLAND 17 12% 128 88% SALUDA 0 0% 3 100% SPARTANBURG 6 4% 130 96% SUMTER 4 11% 32 89% UNION 1 7% 13 93% WILLIAMSBURG 0 0% 7 100% YORK 10 13% 65 87% TRANSITIONAL 1 3% 36 97% STATE TOTAL 107 8% 1,312 92% Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

OTHER ADMISSIONS BY AGE TABLE 3-D

37

COUNTY STANDARD MEDIUM HIGH INTENSIVE SEX

OFFENDER DV OFFENDER MENTAL HEALTH TOTAL ABBEVILLE 33% 0% 50% 0% 17% 0% 0% 6 AIKEN 63% 13% 15% 0% 10% 0% 0% 40 ALLENDALE 67% 0% 0% 0% 33% 0% 0% 3 ANDERSON 49% 8% 18% 3% 22% 0% 0% 65 BAMBERG 40% 0% 20% 0% 40% 0% 0% 5 BARNWELL 50% 0% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 BEAUFORT 89% 6% 0% 0% 6% 0% 0% 18 BERKELEY 44% 14% 29% 3% 10% 0% 0% 59 CALHOUN 50% 0% 0% 0% 50% 0% 0% 2 CHARLESTON 39% 19% 29% 1% 12% 0% 0% 118 CHEROKEE 50% 17% 0% 0% 21% 13% 0% 24 CHESTER 62% 23% 8% 0% 8% 0% 0% 13 CHESTERFIELD 50% 0% 25% 0% 25% 0% 0% 8 CLARENDON 64% 18% 9% 0% 9% 0% 0% 11 COLLETON 50% 0% 30% 0% 20% 0% 0% 10 DARLINGTON 50% 8% 8% 0% 33% 0% 0% 12 DILLON 70% 10% 0% 10% 10% 0% 0% 10 DORCHESTER 53% 7% 7% 0% 33% 0% 0% 30 EDGEFIELD 33% 0% 0% 0% 67% 0% 0% 3 FAIRFIELD 33% 11% 44% 0% 11% 0% 0% 9 FLORENCE 61% 13% 13% 0% 13% 0% 0% 54 GEORGETOWN 40% 7% 47% 0% 7% 0% 0% 15 GREENVILLE 41% 19% 31% 0% 6% 2% 0% 125 GREENWOOD 65% 10% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20 HAMPTON --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 0 HORRY 9% 0% 2% 2% 14% 0% 0% 58 JASPER 117% 17% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6 KERSHAW 69% 23% 23% 8% 15% 0% 0% 13 LANCASTER 88% 13% 19% 0% 6% 0% 0% 16 LAURENS 10% 0% 5% 0% 10% 0% 0% 21 LEE 967% 200% 433% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3 LEXINGTON 4% 2% 0% 4% 7% 5% 0% 57 McCORMICK 433% 33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3 MARION 38% 13% 0% 0% 13% 0% 0% 16 MARLBORO 38% 0% 38% 0% 0% 0% 0% 8 NEWBERRY 117% 67% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6 OCONEE 63% 0% 44% 0% 13% 0% 0% 16 ORANGEBURG 48% 10% 14% 5% 14% 0% 0% 21 PICKENS 319% 95% 290% 10% 19% 0% 0% 21 RICHLAND 3% 1% 0% 2% 4% 0% 1% 159 SALUDA 1383% 333% 517% 0% 17% 0% 0% 6 SPARTANBURG 12% 2% 2% 0% 17% 1% 0% 162 SUMTER 9% 0% 9% 6% 9% 0% 0% 32 UNION 75% 38% 75% 0% 25% 0% 0% 8 WILLIAMSBURG 293% 47% 53% 0% 0% 0% 0% 15 YORK 73% 0% 5% 0% 2% 0% 0% 60 TRANSITIONAL 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3 STATE TOTAL 51% 13% 22% 1% 11% 1% 0% ACTIVE OFFENDERS 703 176 306 18 157 10 2 1,372

Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

TABLE 4-D

38

FIGURE 5

ACTIVE OTHER OFFENDERS BY LEVEL OF SUPERVISION

JUNE 30, 2019

STANDARD 703 51% MEDIUM 176 13% HIGH 306 22% INTENSIVE 18 1% SEX OFFENDER 157 12% DV 10 1% MH 2 0%

39

COUNTY SUCCESSFUL SUCCESSFUL

RATE UNSUCCESSFUL UNSUCCESSFUL RATE ABBEVILLE 5 100% 0 0% AIKEN 49 100% 0 0% ALLENDALE 4 100% 0 0% ANDERSON 35 97% 1 3% BAMBERG 4 80% 1 20% BARNWELL 9 100% 0 0% BEAUFORT 18 100% 0 0% BERKELEY 43 100% 0 0% CALHOUN 6 86% 1 14% CHARLESTON 108 92% 10 8% CHEROKEE 24 100% 0 0% CHESTER 15 100% 0 0% CHESTERFIELD 7 100% 0 0% CLARENDON 9 100% 0 0% COLLETON 5 83% 1 17% DARLINGTON 25 96% 1 4% DILLON 12 92% 1 8% DORCHESTER 17 94% 1 6% EDGEFIELD 9 100% 0 0% FAIRFIELD 8 100% 0 0% FLORENCE 65 96% 3 4% GEORGETOWN 18 100% 0 0% GREENVILLE 130 97% 4 3% GREENWOOD 29 94% 2 6% HAMPTON 5 100% 0 0% HORRY 75 97% 2 3% JASPER 12 100% 0 0% KERSHAW 17 94% 1 6% LANCASTER 13 93% 1 7% LAURENS 23 100% 0 0% LEE 4 80% 1 20% LEXINGTON 75 96% 3 4% MCCORMICK 5 100% 0 0% MARION 14 93% 1 7% MARLBORO 11 92% 1 8% NEWBERRY 11 85% 2 15% OCONEE 14 93% 1 7% ORANGEBURG 43 100% 0 0% PICKENS 21 95% 1 5% RICHLAND 127 93% 10 7% SALUDA 4 80% 1 20% SPARTANBURG 126 96% 5 4% SUMTER 47 92% 4 8% UNION 17 100% 0 0% WILLIAMSBURG 11 100% 0 0% YORK 78 99% 1 1% TRANSITIONAL 83 1 0 0 STATE TOTAL 1,490 96% 61 4% Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

TABLE 5-D

40

SECTION E

S

EX

O

FFENDERS

41

S

EX

O

FFENDERS

The Department is responsible for supervising those offenders sentenced to community supervision by the Court of General Sessions or released from incarceration on other supervision programs who have been convicted of sex offenses.

SCDPPPS utilizes the Sex Offender Management Program to supervise those sex offenders who are currently serving an active sentence for a sex offense. For those offenders currently under supervision for an offense that is not a sex offense but who are required to register as a sex offender for a previous offense, SCDPPPS provides general supervision according to the offender’s risk assessment score. Table 1-E and Figure 6 compares the number of sex offenders supervised under general supervision (23%) with those in the Sex Offender Management Program (77%).

A male sex offender’s level of supervision is determined by his score on the Static-99 risk assessment. The three levels of male sex offender (SO) supervision are SO-High, SO-Intensive, and SO-Containment. Female sex offenders are supervised at the SO-High level of supervision for the entirety of their supervision period.

SEX OFFENDER CONTACT STANDARDS

SO-HIGH SO-INTENSIVE SO-CONTAINMENT

1 Home Visit Every Other Month 1 Employment Verification per Month 1 Field, Home, or Office Visit per Month 1 Treatment Provider Contact per Month

1 Computer Search Every Six Months, if Applicable

1 Home Visit per Month

1 Employment Verification per Month 1 Field, Home, or Office Visit per Month 1 Treatment Provider Contact per Month

1 Computer Search Every Other Month, if Applicable

2 Home Visits per Month

1 Employment Verification per Month 1 Field, Home or Office Visit per Month 1 Treatment Provider Contact per Month 1 Computer Search per Month, if

42 COUNTY TOTAL SEX OFFENDERS ABBEVILLE 2 100% 0 0% 2 AIKEN 24 65% 13 35% 37 ALLENDALE 2 67% 1 33% 3 ANDERSON 39 70% 17 30% 56 BAMBERG 6 75% 2 25% 8 BARNWELL 6 67% 3 33% 9 BEAUFORT 5 83% 1 17% 6 BERKELEY 43 98% 1 2% 44 CALHOUN 4 67% 2 33% 6 CHARLESTON 53 66% 27 34% 80 CHEROKEE 16 64% 9 36% 25 CHESTER 6 100% 0 0% 6 CHESTERFIELD 4 100% 0 0% 4 CLARENDON 5 56% 4 44% 9 COLLETON 10 67% 5 33% 15 DARLINGTON 14 100% 0 0% 14 DILLON 5 83% 1 17% 6 DORCHESTER 30 88% 4 12% 34 EDGEFIELD 6 75% 2 25% 8 FAIRFIELD 5 100% 0 0% 5 FLORENCE 28 100% 0 0% 28 GEORGETOWN 5 83% 1 17% 6 GREENVILLE 73 78% 21 22% 94 GREENWOOD 8 67% 4 33% 12 HAMPTON 4 80% 1 20% 5 HORRY 65 98% 1 2% 66 JASPER 1 100% 0 0% 1 KERSHAW 12 63% 7 37% 19 LANCASTER 11 69% 5 31% 16 LAURENS 10 63% 6 38% 16 LEE 4 67% 2 33% 6 LEXINGTON 33 75% 11 25% 44 McCORMICK 2 100% 0 0% 2 MARION 4 67% 2 33% 6 MARLBORO 3 43% 4 57% 7 NEWBERRY 3 75% 1 25% 4 OCONEE 16 80% 4 20% 20 ORANGEBURG 16 100% 0 0% 16 PICKENS 19 68% 9 32% 28 RICHLAND 32 71% 13 29% 45 SALUDA 2 67% 1 33% 3 SPARTANBURG 79 75% 26 25% 105 SUMTER 20 74% 7 26% 27 UNION 8 80% 2 20% 10 WILLIAMSBURG 4 44% 5 56% 9 YORK 21 81% 5 19% 26 TRANSITIONAL 0 --- 0 --- 0 STATE TOTAL 768 77% 230 23% 998 Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

TABLE 1-E

ACTIVE SEX OFFENDERS UNDER SUPERVISION

GENERAL SUPERVISION SEX OFFENDER

43

FIGURE 6

ACTIVE SEX OFFENDERS UNDER SUPERVISION

JUNE 30, 2019

Sex Offender Management Supervision 77% General Supervision 23% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%

44

SECTION F

V

IOLATIONS

45

V

IOLATIONS

&

C

LOSURES

Offenders charged by their supervising Agents with violations of the conditions of supervision are reviewed through a violations matrix to determine the most appropriate response, while ensuring a consistent application of sanctions statewide.

Table 1-F provides data by county on the violation process. Statewide, 5,481 violation hearings were held during the fiscal year. At those hearings, 2,521 cases were continued or recommended for continuation, while 2,960 cases were revoked or recommended for revocation.

Table 2-F shows fees collected in FY 2019 as a result of the Administrative Hearing Process. Offenders pay restitution, supervision fees and fines just prior to their Administrative Hearing to avoid incarceration. During the year, $163,610.97 was collected in delinquent restitution payments, $195,480.32 in supervision fees and $41,765.25 in court ordered fines and fees. The total to $400,856.54 collected demonstrates the effectiveness of the administrative hearing process in bringing offenders who have the means to become compliant with their monetary obligations.

Table 3-F provides a comparison of changes in active population and the types of closure for FY 2014 to FY 2019. Of the 17,296 closures during FY 2019, 82% closed successfully. Majority (72%) of unsuccessful closures resulted in compliance revocations.

46

COUNTY Cases Heard

Cases Revoked or Recommended for Revocation Cases Continued or Recommended for Continuation ABBEVILLE 0 0 0 AIKEN 57 23 34 ALLENDALE 13 2 11 ANDERSON 367 162 205 BAMBERG 10 8 2 BARNWELL 30 19 11 BEAUFORT 16 7 9 BERKELEY 122 67 55 CALHOUN 8 1 7 CHARLESTON 507 348 159 CHEROKEE 325 86 239 CHESTER 31 18 13 CHESTERFIELD 6 4 2 CLARENDON 35 8 27 COLLETON 73 41 32 DARLINGTON 55 26 29 DILLON 12 7 5 DORCHESTER 170 97 73 EDGEFIELD 32 0 32 FAIRFIELD 6 2 4 FLORENCE 242 93 149 GEORGETOWN 25 15 10 GREENVILLE 750 305 445 GREENWOOD 28 15 13 HAMPTON 31 20 11 HORRY 139 74 65 JASPER 56 39 17 KERSHAW 61 35 26 LANCASTER 39 29 10 LAURENS 54 20 34 LEE 9 5 4 LEXINGTON 409 126 283 McCORMICK 7 4 3 MARION 11 6 5 MARLBORO 1 0 1 NEWBERRY 62 28 34 OCONEE 124 52 72 ORANGEBURG 138 18 120 PICKENS 160 75 85 RICHLAND 242 121 121 SALUDA 55 31 24 SPARTANBURG 497 275 222 SUMTER 86 40 46 UNION 86 37 49 WILLIAMSBURG 7 1 6 YORK 287 131 156 TRANSITIONAL STATE TOTAL 5,481 2,521 2,960 TABLE 1-F VIOLATIONS BY COUNTY

47

Month Supervision Fee Fine/Court Cost Restitution Total

July 2018 $11,251.11 $3,362.70 $11,350.27 $25,964.08 August $14,951.00 $2,612.00 $18,945.00 $ 36,508.00 September $16,684.00 $1,970.73 $11,464.85 $ 30,119.58 October $17,352.00 $5,428.15 $20,370.20 $ 43,150.35 November $15,116.31 $2,912.88 $6,475.69 $ 24,504.88 December $10,313.40 $528.25 $11,928.40 $ 22,770.05 January 2018 $12,670.05 $5,241.85 $3,450.55 $ 21,362.45 February $17,823.42 $2,776.89 $11,109.72 $ 31,710.03 March $19,494.02 $6,901.40 $18,476.46 $ 44,871.88 April $22,294.07 $3,151.75 $31,586.06 $ 57,031.88 May $15,436.69 $4,126.00 $11,037.27 $ 30,599.96 June 2018 $22,094.25 $2,752.65 $7,416.50 $ 32,263.40 Total $ 195,480.32 $ 41,765.25 $ 163,610.97 $ 400,856.54 TABLE 2-F

48

Active Total

FY 2019 Population Successful Exp-I JC-I Rev-C Rev-T Ret-CD 6 Unsuccessful

Probation 24,506 11,792 10 1 427 1,983 511 2,932 Parole 2,804 836 5 0 21 159 0 185 Other Releases 1,372 1,490 27 0 1 33 0 61 Total 28,682 14,118 42 1 449 2,175 511 3,178 % Unsuccessful 1.3% 0.0% 14.1% 68.4% 16.1% Active Total

FY 2018 Population Successful Exp-I JC-I Rev-C Rev-T Ret-CD 6 Unsuccessful

Probation 25,039 11,871 13 3 423 1,783 599 2,821 Parole 2,637 675 6 0 28 101 0 135 Other Releases 1,495 1,609 33 0 3 42 0 78 Total 29,171 14,155 52 3 454 1,926 599 3,034 % Unsuccessful 1.7% 0.1% 15.0% 63.5% 19.7% Active Total

FY 2017 Population Successful Exp-I JC-I Rev-C Rev-T Ret-CD 6 Unsuccessful

Probation 25,776 10,783 13 2 478 2,207 480 3,180 Parole 2,271 511 5 0 18 96 0 119 Other Releases 1,597 1,571 36 0 2 46 0 84 Total 29,644 12,865 54 2 498 2,349 480 3,383 % Unsuccessful 1.6% 0.1% 14.7% 69.4% 14.2% Active Total

FY 2016 Population Successful Exp-I JC-I Rev-C Rev-T Ret-CD 6 Unsuccessful

Probation 25,132 11,051 20 3 549 2,922 387 3,881 Parole 2,030 490 4 0 20 71 0 95 YOA 240 499 0 0 18 80 0 98 Other Releases 1,341 1,575 108 0 0 24 0 132 Total 28,743 13,615 132 3 587 3,097 387 4,206 % Unsuccessful 3.1% 0.1% 14.0% 73.6% 9.2% Active Total

FY 2015 Population Successful Exp-I JC-I Rev-C Rev-T Ret-CD 6 Unsuccessful

Probation 26,806 10,987 13 3 504 2,374 311 3,205 Parole 2,007 409 7 0 11 45 0 63 YOA 591 397 7 0 45 168 0 220 Other Releases 1,525 1,414 32 0 2 11 0 45 Total 30,929 13,207 59 3 562 2,598 311 3,533 % Unsuccessful 1.7% 0.1% 15.9% 73.5% 8.8% Footnotes:

1 Exp-I - Expired Offender in Institution 4 Rev-T - Revoke, Technical Charges

2 JC-I - Judicial Closure in Institution 5 Rev TC - Revoke, Technical Charges & New Charges Pending 3 Rev-C - Revoke, New Conviction 6 Ret-CD Returned - Conditional Discharge

Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

CLOSURES BY TYPE TABLE 3-F

49

SECTION G

E

LECTRONIC

S

URVEILLANCE