• No results found

Isonipecotate chloride

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Isonipecotate chloride"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

organic papers

o1250

Ma and Li C

6H12NO2+Cl doi:10.1107/S1600536806007252 Acta Cryst.(2006). E62, o1250–o1251 Acta Crystallographica Section E

Structure Reports

Online

ISSN 1600-5368

Isonipecotate chloride

Zhi-Cheng Ma and Xin-Hua Li*

School of Chemistry and Materials Science, Wenzhou Normal College, Zhejiang, Wenzhou 325027, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Key indicators

Single-crystal X-ray study

T= 298 K

Mean(C–C) = 0.005 A˚

Rfactor = 0.046

wRfactor = 0.123

Data-to-parameter ratio = 15.5

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

Received 3 January 2006 Accepted 28 February 2006

#2006 International Union of Crystallography

All rights reserved

The structure of the title compound, C6H12NO2 +

Cl, consists of an isonipecotate cation and a Cl anion linked by intermolecular O—H Cl and N—H Cl interactions into a three-dimensional network structure.

Comment

In the synthesis of crystal structures by design, the assembly of molecular units in predefined arrangements is a key goal (Desiraju, 1995, 1997; Braga et al., 1998). Directional inter-molecular interactions are the primary tools in achieving this goal (Zaworotko, 1997; Braga & Grepioni, 2000).

The title compound, (I), consists of a isonipecotate cation and a Clanion (Fig. 1). The bond lengths and angles (Table 1) are within normal ranges (Allenet al., 1987). The ring (N1/ C1–C5) is not planar, having a total puckering amplitudeQT= 0.571 (2) A˚ (Cremer & Pople, 1975) and a distorted chair form [’ = 157.9 (3) and = 177.9 (3)]. It has a pseudo-mirror

plane passing through atoms N1 and C3, as can be deduced from the torsion angles (Table 1).

[image:1.610.220.443.317.424.2] [image:1.610.209.458.601.713.2]

In the crystal structure of (I), there are multiple inter-molecular interactions, such as O—H Cl and N—H Cl (Table 2, Fig. 2), generating a three-dimensional network structure (Fig. 2).

Figure 1

(2)

Experimental

The title compound was synthesized by the hydrothermal method from a mixture of isonipecotic acid (0.04 g, 0.3 mmol), 2,20-bipyridine

(0.05 g, 0.3 mmol), copper(II) chloride dihydrate (0.05 g, 0.3 mmol) and water (8.0 ml) in a Teflon-lined stainless steel reactor (15.0 ml). The solution was heated at 423 K for 4 d. After reaction, the vessel was slowly cooled to room temperature to give colourless crystals of (I) (yield 0.012 g, 30%; m.p. 521–522 K).

Crystal data

C6H12NO2+Cl

Mr= 165.62

Orthorhombic,P212121

a= 7.0405 (7) A˚

b= 7.4902 (7) A˚

c= 15.2806 (15) A˚

V= 805.82 (14) A˚3

Z= 4

Dx= 1.365 Mg m

3

MoKradiation Cell parameters from 352

reflections

= 2.7–25.1 = 0.42 mm1

T= 298 (2) K Block, colourless 0.360.310.18 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

!scans

Absorption correction: numerical (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)

Tmin= 0.86,Tmax= 0.93

3980 measured reflections

1426 independent reflections 1394 reflections withI> 2(I)

Rint= 0.016 max= 25.1

h=6!8

k=8!8

l=18!18

Refinement

Refinement onF2

R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.046

wR(F2) = 0.123

S= 1.20 1426 reflections 92 parameters

H-atom parameters constrained

w= 1/[2(F

o2) + (0.0636P)2

+ 0.4526P]

whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3

(/)max< 0.001

max= 0.76 e A˚3 min=0.22 e A˚3

Absolute structure: Flack (1983), with 568 Friedel pairs Flack parameter: 0.40 (13)

Table 1

Selected geometric parameters (A˚ ,).

O1—C6 1.293 (4)

N1—C5 1.486 (5)

C2—C1 1.511 (5)

C3—C6 1.511 (4)

O2—C6 1.202 (4)

C5—N1—C1 111.8 (3)

C1—C2—C3 110.9 (3)

N1—C1—C2 110.6 (3)

C6—C3—C4 110.5 (3)

C6—C3—C2 113.8 (3)

C4—C3—C2 110.9 (3)

O2—C6—O1 120.8 (3)

O2—C6—C3 122.7 (3)

O1—C6—C3 116.0 (3)

C5—N1—C1—C2 58.6 (4)

C3—C2—C1—N1 55.4 (4)

C1—C2—C3—C4 53.9 (4)

C1—N1—C5—C4 58.7 (4) C2—C3—C4—C5 54.8 (4)

N1—C5—C4—C3 56.8 (4)

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (A˚ ,).

D—H A D—H H A D A D—H A

N1—H1B Cl1i

0.90 2.26 3.157 (3) 178

N1—H1A Cl1ii

0.90 2.34 3.184 (3) 156

O1—H1 Cl1 0.82 2.20 3.016 (3) 172

Symmetry codes: (i)xþ1;yþ1;zþ3; (ii)xþ3;yþ1;z1.

H atoms were positioned geometrically, with O—H = 0.82 A˚ , N— H = 0.90 A˚ , and C—H = 0.97 and 0.98 A˚ for methylene and methine H, respectively, and constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with

Uiso(H) =xUeq(C,N,O), wherex= 1.5 for hydroxyl H andx= 1.2 for all other H. The value of the Flack parameter suggests inversion twinning.

Data collection:SMART(Bruker, 2002); cell refinement:SAINT

(Bruker, 2002); data reduction:SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure:SHELXS97(Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics:

ORTEPIII (Johnson & Burnett, 1996); software used to prepare material for publication:SHELXTL(Bruker, 2002).

The authors acknowledge financial support by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. Y404294), and the ‘151’ Distinguished Person Foundation of Zhejiang Province.

References

Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987).J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1–19.

Braga, D. & Grepioni, F. (2000).Acc. Chem. Res.33, 601–608.

Braga, D., Grepioni, F. & Desiraju, G. R. (1998).Chem. Rev.98, 1375–1405. Bruker (2002).SMART,SAINTandSHELXTL. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison,

Wisconsin, USA.

Cremer, D. & Pople, J. A. (1975).J. Am. Chem. Soc.97, 1354–1358. Desiraju, G. R. (1995).Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.34, 2311–2327. Desiraju, G. R. (1997).J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun.pp. 1475–1482. Flack, H. D. (1983).Acta Cryst.A39, 876–881.

Johnson, C. K. & Burnett, M. N. (1996).ORTEPIII. Report ORNL-6895. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1996).SADABS. University of Go¨ttingen, Germany. Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of

Go¨ttingen, Germany.

[image:2.610.324.555.74.278.2]

Zaworotko, M. J. (1997).Nature (London),386, 220–221.

Figure 2

(3)

supporting information

sup-1 Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, o1250–o1251

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, o1250–o1251 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536806007252]

Isonipecotate chloride

Zhi-Cheng Ma and Xin-Hua Li

Isonipecotate chloride

Crystal data

C6H12NO2+·Cl

Mr = 165.62

Orthorhombic, P212121 Hall symbol: P 2ac 2ab

a = 7.0405 (7) Å

b = 7.4902 (7) Å

c = 15.2806 (15) Å

V = 805.82 (14) Å3

Z = 4

F(000) = 352

Dx = 1.365 Mg m−3

Mo radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 352 reflections

θ = 2.7–25.1°

µ = 0.42 mm−1

T = 298 K Block, colourless 0.36 × 0.31 × 0.18 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator

ω scans

Absorption correction: numerical (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)

Tmin = 0.86, Tmax = 0.93

3980 measured reflections 1426 independent reflections 1394 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Rint = 0.016

θmax = 25.1°, θmin = 2.7°

h = −6→8

k = −8→8

l = −18→18

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Least-squares matrix: full

R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046

wR(F2) = 0.123

S = 1.20 1426 reflections 92 parameters 0 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites

H-atom parameters constrained

w = 1/[σ2(F

o2) + (0.0636P)2 + 0.4526P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

(Δ/σ)max < 0.001 Δρmax = 0.76 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.22 e Å−3

Absolute structure: Flack (1983), with 568 Friedel pairs

Absolute structure parameter: 0.40 (13)

Special details

(4)

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

Cl1 0.19967 (11) 0.45733 (11) 0.92845 (5) 0.0365 (2) O1 0.4268 (4) 0.4291 (6) 0.76164 (17) 0.0674 (10) H1 0.3722 0.4460 0.8083 0.101* N1 0.9303 (4) 0.5567 (4) 0.54806 (18) 0.0394 (7) H1A 1.0082 0.5493 0.5015 0.047* H1B 0.8922 0.6710 0.5530 0.047* C2 0.6281 (5) 0.4490 (6) 0.6107 (2) 0.0403 (8) H2A 0.5235 0.3668 0.6017 0.048* H2B 0.5760 0.5685 0.6155 0.048* C1 0.7613 (5) 0.4404 (5) 0.5333 (2) 0.0434 (8) H1C 0.8024 0.3181 0.5245 0.052* H1D 0.6950 0.4790 0.4810 0.052* C3 0.7313 (4) 0.4012 (4) 0.69518 (19) 0.0333 (7) H3 0.7748 0.2775 0.6894 0.040* C5 1.0363 (5) 0.5047 (6) 0.6282 (2) 0.0479 (10) H5A 1.1442 0.5835 0.6362 0.057* H5B 1.0836 0.3837 0.6220 0.057* C4 0.9062 (5) 0.5162 (6) 0.7071 (2) 0.0442 (9) H4A 0.9745 0.4776 0.7589 0.053* H4B 0.8679 0.6393 0.7159 0.053* O2 0.6659 (4) 0.3805 (7) 0.84800 (16) 0.0873 (13) C6 0.6068 (5) 0.4097 (5) 0.7756 (2) 0.0405 (9)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

(5)

supporting information

sup-3 Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, o1250–o1251

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

O1—C6 1.293 (4) C1—H1D 0.9700 O1—H1 0.8200 C3—C6 1.511 (4) N1—C5 1.486 (5) C3—C4 1.514 (5) N1—C1 1.492 (5) C3—H3 0.9800 N1—H1A 0.9000 C5—C4 1.517 (5) N1—H1B 0.9000 C5—H5A 0.9700 C2—C1 1.511 (5) C5—H5B 0.9700 C2—C3 1.524 (4) C4—H4A 0.9700 C2—H2A 0.9700 C4—H4B 0.9700 C2—H2B 0.9700 O2—C6 1.202 (4) C1—H1C 0.9700

C6—O1—H1 109.5 C6—C3—C2 113.8 (3) C5—N1—C1 111.8 (3) C4—C3—C2 110.9 (3) C5—N1—H1A 109.3 C6—C3—H3 107.1 C1—N1—H1A 109.3 C4—C3—H3 107.1 C5—N1—H1B 109.3 C2—C3—H3 107.1 C1—N1—H1B 109.3 N1—C5—C4 109.7 (3) H1A—N1—H1B 107.9 N1—C5—H5A 109.7 C1—C2—C3 110.9 (3) C4—C5—H5A 109.7 C1—C2—H2A 109.5 N1—C5—H5B 109.7 C3—C2—H2A 109.5 C4—C5—H5B 109.7 C1—C2—H2B 109.5 H5A—C5—H5B 108.2 C3—C2—H2B 109.5 C3—C4—C5 111.3 (3) H2A—C2—H2B 108.0 C3—C4—H4A 109.4 N1—C1—C2 110.6 (3) C5—C4—H4A 109.4 N1—C1—H1C 109.5 C3—C4—H4B 109.4 C2—C1—H1C 109.5 C5—C4—H4B 109.4 N1—C1—H1D 109.5 H4A—C4—H4B 108.0 C2—C1—H1D 109.5 O2—C6—O1 120.8 (3) H1C—C1—H1D 108.1 O2—C6—C3 122.7 (3) C6—C3—C4 110.5 (3) O1—C6—C3 116.0 (3)

C5—N1—C1—C2 58.6 (4) C2—C3—C4—C5 −54.8 (4) C3—C2—C1—N1 −55.4 (4) N1—C5—C4—C3 56.8 (4) C1—C2—C3—C6 179.2 (3) C4—C3—C6—O2 −52.7 (5) C1—C2—C3—C4 53.9 (4) C2—C3—C6—O2 −178.1 (4) C1—N1—C5—C4 −58.7 (4) C4—C3—C6—O1 135.4 (4) C6—C3—C4—C5 178.1 (3) C2—C3—C6—O1 9.9 (5)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A

(6)

N1—H1A···Cl1ii 0.90 2.34 3.184 (3) 156 O1—H1···Cl1 0.82 2.20 3.016 (3) 172

Figure

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

Related documents

This section describes how to effectively opti- mize neural network detection models via dy- namic cost-sensitive learning. Specifically, we first propose a marginal utility

To test the performance of DFG, we use a similar recurrent architecture to Memory Fusion Network (MFN). MFN is a recurrent neural model with three main components 1) System of LSTMs:

Samples were analysed for 119 disorders including amino acid disorders, fatty acid disorders, organic acid disorders, carbohydrate disorders, peroxisomal disorders

We wish to express our gratitude to CJK Institute (Japan), Institute for Infocomm Research (Singapore), National University of Singapore (NUS), Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at

Each row reports the coefficients from separate regressions of the effect of the corresponding treatment on natives’ average test scores.Controls for grade-level

In this study, almost half of the sample showed statistically significant relations between electricity consumption and exports income resembling economic growth

In addition, the causality test shows that South Africa, India and China induce Brazil’s economic growth.. The results of this study carry implications for future world

In this paper, we have presented a neural model for POS tagging and language identification on CS data. The neural network is a state-of-the- art bidirectional LSTM with prefix,