MEASURED CROP PERFORMANCE
Wheet • Oats - Barley
1953
By
.:..
M. G. McKenzIe, Jr.~ Research Instructor
w.
H. Rankin~ Research Associate Professor,In Charge Crop Variety Testing
This release presents the report of the North Carolina Officiaj Small Grain
Variety Tests for the
1952-1953
season.The objective of these tests is to obtain performance information on
com-mercially avai table varieties and to evaluate newer strains and varieties that may have possibi Ilties of replacing those now in general production.
Test Locations
Five field tests were conducted to represent the different soi land cl imatic conditions and these locations are shown on a map of the state. From simi lar tests conducted for severaJ seasons it is possibJe to predict which varieties are most
likely to produce consistently high yields in a given area. Such a I ist, better
known as "recommended varieties", is shown directly under the map for the three
geographic regions.
These tests were carried out on privately operated farms and branch experi-ment stations as fol lows:
I. Mountain Branch Experiment Station~ Haywood County, Waynesvil Ie.
11. Farm of W. J. McAteer, Union County, Monroe.
Ill. Farm of G. D~ Pearson, Rockingham County, Reidsvil Ie. IV. Tobacco Research Farm, Columbus County~ Whitevil Ie.
Agencies Sponsoring Entries
Coker Pedigreed Seed
Co.,
Hartsvi Ile~s.
c.
T. W. Wood and Son, Inc.J Rlchmond~ Va.
Marrett Farm and Seed Co.~ Westminste~, s~ C~
North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh, N. C.
Management of Te_~~~~:.:.
CulturaL practices such as seed bed preparation~ date of seeding. ferti liza-tionJ and amount and time of applying nitrogen top dressing were in accord with good farm practice and findings of the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment
Sta-tion.
The pJanting and harvesting were directly supervised by personnel of North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station.
SeG5')1"t8I Conditions
_
..~_.---In general the 1952-J953 season was fevoreble for the production of smelI grains throughout the state. The losses caused by dIseases were at a mtn.irnum
and the average yields were about the same as those produced in
.1951
andJ952.
The yieLd records of the
1953
smal! grain tests are given for each Qf ~ethree crops at each of the five locations. Since a single year's record at ~
single Jocntion may not protray the true performance of a variety the performance
r ecor-ds of comm~~;lJJly ava!l.ttblt=! verlet les ere surmar lz od and IncJude three y-ears,
1951,
1952 and1953
at a l l IocerIons within a geographIc region.Even though a ver Jety may pr-oduce a superior ytel d 1t mEJy possess
character-Is t Ics that make It Jess desi-rable for a specIfic condition or purpose.
To further characterize the varieties a table listing qualifications ~f those
~-DIfferences In YIeld
Small differences In yield between varieties should be considered cautiously since it is not possible to det~m'ne the absolute performIng ability- The size of difference that may have been due to chance has been computed and listed at the
end of each table of the 1953 data as "least significant difference (l.S.D)". A similar value is not listed for the average of two or more years' data, but the
level of significance in such instances wIll be somewhat smalJer than that for
Individual years. These measures of chance difference should be used to remind
LOCATION OF TESTS AND
RECOMMENDED SMALL GRAIN VARIETIES 1953
COAST AL PLAI N
Arlington Anderson * Victorgrain 49-93 Atlas.50 **
Fulgrain Atlas 66 Fulwood Coker 47-27 BARLEY
Colonial 2
MOUNTAINS
OATS
Forkedeer
Arlington ****
WHEAT
Thorne
BARLEY
Colonial 2
Davie
PIEDMONT
OATS
Arl ington
Victorgrain 49-93
Fulgroin Fulwood
Anderson Atlas 50
Atlas66
Coker47-27
Taylor '***
Chancellor} Mosai c Thor ne ) I and
BARLEY
Colonial 2
OATS WHEAT
* Should be harvested as early as possible to prevent excess weather damage to groin.
*..* Atlas SO under heavy mildew conditions may be expected to excel.
*** Has fair mosaic resistance.
Characteristics of Recommended Wheat Varieties
5.
VarIety
Leaf RustResistance
Mi ldew
Re-sistance
Mosaic Re~ Maturity sistance
Cold Toler-ance
Lodging
Resist-ance
Height of Straw
Test
Weight Per Bus.
2
3
4
5
6
7
Medium Fair to
At las
50
FaIr GoodPoor
early Fair good Medium FairMedi urn Fa ir t.
At las 66 Good Fair Poor early Fair good Medi um Fair
Medium Medium
Ccker
47-27
Good FairPoor
early Fair Good tal J GoodMedium
Anderson Good Fair Poor early Good Good Tall Good
Medium
Teyl or Good Poor Fair earJy Good Good Tall Fair
Medium Very
Thorne Poor Poor Good Late Good FaIr Medi urn Good
Very
..:\.
Chancellor
FaIr
Poor Good Early Good Fair Medium Fair
..6-Characteristics of Recommended Oat Varieties.
Variety Rust
Re-sistance
Smut
Re-sistance
81 Ight Re-sistance
Mosaic
Re-sistance
Maturity Cold Tot .. erance Lodging Resist.. ance Amount of
Straw
Test WeightPer Bus.
2 ~4
5
MGdlumAr11ngton Good Good
Poor
Goo~ early Good Fair Heavy GoodVictorgrain
48-93
Good Good Poor Good Early Fair Good Medium GoodFulgraln Good Good Poor Good Early Fair Good Light Good
Very
~ulwood
••
**
Poor
GoodMedium
earty FaIr .!~Good Light GoodJ:orkedeer Poor Poor Good Good late Excellent . Fair Medium Good
Characteristics of Recommended Barley Varieties*
Variety Loose
Smut Re-sistance
Mi Idew Re-sistance Rust Re-sistance Lodging Re-sistance Cold Tol-erance
IA6turlty Amount of Straw
Test Weight Per Bushel
2
Medium
ColonIal Poor Poor Poor Good Fair oarly Light Fair
Medium
DavIe Poor Good Good Good Fair eerly Light Fair
Performance of Wheat Varieties
3
Years (1951~1952,
and1953)
Mountain7·
48
J
40
16 8
o
Atlas 66
Variety Yield
~/A ")
Ky.
53*
5300
I
---Ky.
37*
50·3
I
Purcam 48eO
I
Anderson 47u9
I
Thorne
47.5
I
Taylor
46.0
I
Chancellor
44.9
I
At las 50
43.6
I
Bus./A
Piedmont
Coker
47-27
Anderson PurcamTaylor
Atlas
50
ChanceJ lorKy.
35*
Atlas 66Ky.
37*
48.7
47.2
-. ..(
47.2
1
45.9
I
45.8
I
45.8
(
45.6
I
44.7
I
42.0
I
o
8 1624
Bus./A
40
48
Performance of Wheat Varieties
3 Years (J95',
1952~ and1953)
Coastal
.
PI;:},,,Variety Yield
Bus./A
At Ias
50
47.•
1I
Coker
47-27
45.7
I
Anderson
45.5
I
I
Taylor 45.,5
I
Atlas 66
45·0
Purcam
4301
I
Chancellor 42~8
I
8.
o
8 16Bus./A
Table I
Performence of Wheat Varieties In Mountain North Carolina
1953
Locaiion
Entries
Commercially available varieties:
Anderson
Thorne Taylor Atlas
50
At las 66 ChanceI lor
Purcam
Experimental Entries -Not Commercially available:
A3848-2-4
x396
0- 1- 200 1 Ky.37
(Mal x
P
44-3)
xCJ.
12457-13
1 Ky..35
A3848--2..
4
x 3960-1-74Y2375·..
49
Gab 806
3960-1 x 3816-5--96 Leap x Atlas
66 -
3
85IndC' 29-4.,8
R l85 x P~.
Gal) 815
5461+
x Hard ired3
855L .5.0. (~05)
Haywood County
Bushels per Acre
33·7
33·3
31.8
29·3
28.9 26.3
25.4
33·7
~
32.6
31.5
29.
028.1 28.2 26.4 25·8 25.1
24.9
23.0
Table 2
Performance of Wheat Varieties
In Piedmont North Carolina
1953
i
10.
Locations
Union County Rockingham County Average
Entries Southern
Pledmonf
~orthern Piedmont: Two TestsBus.!A Bus./A Bus./A
Commercially available varieties:
Purcam 40.8
40.4
40.6
Atlas
50
37.8
3409
36.4
Atlas 66
39·5
32.2 35.9Chance] lor
37.6
32.034.8
Anderson
39.9
29·3
34.6TayJor
36.5
3°·0
33·3
Coker
47-27
BRS38.7
27.3
33.
0Thorne
25·5
29.827.7
Experimental Entries -Not commercially available:
5464
x Hardired 385543.0
41.0 42.0Ind.
29-4-8
40.5
38·9
39.7
Ga. 806
43.8
33·3
38.6
Ga. 815 40.8 32.8
36·8
Coker 52..7
43.4
28·536.0
Coker 51-2
38.9
32.635.8
4 0 Coker
52-6
39.
631.4
35-5Ky.
35
38.231.4
34.8
Coker 52--9
39.3
29.5
34-4
Coker 52...8
3
8.4
3°.2
34.3
Coker
52-5
38.5
29.934.2
Coker 52~4
36.7
29.933·3
R.
185 xp.s.
34-9
31.5
33·2
Y2375-49
32.232·5
32.4
Coker
51-3
37.7
25·5
31.6
Leap x Atlas
66 - 385
36.0
27.031·5
3960
~I
x3817-5-96
31.9
27.4
29.7
Ky.
37
29.7
29.4
29.6
(Mal. x PJ.,4-3)xCI 12457-131
27.8
3
0.3 ~.lA
3848-2-4
x3960-1-14
31.1
2~8 28.3A3848-2-4
x 2960-1-2001 21.83°·2
26.0T8ble
3
rerformanee
ofWheet
Varieties In Coastal Plein North Carolina1953
11.
Locati ons Entries
Erlgecombe
Coontl
Columbus CountyNorthern Coasta S.uthern Coasta
1
AveragePlain Plain Two Tests
Bu,,.7~
.
Bt!$7~ -.~"!yslk;Commercially available varieties:
Chancellor
49.3
36.4
42.9
Coker
47-27
BRS48.4
37.4
42.9
raylor
45·6
39.8
42.7
Atlas 50
!jJ.6
34.7
40.7
Anderson
45.1
33.5
39·3
At las 66
39.8
38·5
39·2
Purcam
37·9
23.5
3°·7
Experimental Entries
-Not Commercially avat (able:
Coker 52--6
51
.1 40.245·7
Coker
52-7
49.140.3
44.7
Coker
52-4
48.040·9
44.5
Coker
52-5
47·5
41·3
l.t4.4
Coker
52-9
46.5
41.143.8
Coker
5
1-341.0
40.[43·6
Coker
52..
846.8
38.5
42.1
Y237S-49
44.7
39.1
4l.,
Coker 51~
44.5
39.('
41.8Leap x Atlas 66-385 40.1!
36.6
48.4
5464
x Hardired3855
44.7
31.3
38.012.
Performance of Oat Varieties
3
Years
('951~1952
and1953)
Mouni"ain
Var iety Yield ....- Bus./A
Artington 113·0
1
Forkedeer 113·0
j
Atlant ic .
107.7
j
-Le Conte 98.0
j
o
2040
60
Bus./A
80 100 120
Piedmont
.ArI tngton l~8.7 Victorgrain
}02.7
48-.93
A-tranttc ~~8.5 . FuLgrain
95.
0/- 0 20
40
60
Bus./A
80 JOO ._ .120
Coastel Pia
in-l
i 12.6
I
111·5
.108.2
I
107.2
I
96.4
- -._
..._---
. JVic torgrain
48--93
~LIngton
Fulwood
Fulgraln StraIn
7
Fulgrain
o
2040
60
Buso/A
80 100 120
Performance of Oat Varieties Spring Seeded*
In Mountains
3
Years(1951,
J952 and1953)
Variety
Ar Iington
Victorgrain
48-93
FulgrainLbs. Hay
fA
56114980
5100
--2000
40
Bus./A
:-4000
Bus./A
60
806000.
*Long time records show that spring seeded oats usually produce about haJf the yield of fal I seeded oats. In seasons of very
'Table
4
Performance of Oats Varieties In Mountain North Carolina
1953
Entries
Commercially avaIlable varieties:
l.ocatiens
---Ha-yvK~0a Cou~ty
Bus/A Lbso Hay
jA
Le Conte Ar1ington Forkedeer Atlantic Lee
9906
95~7 87.8 84~2 80.48794
9J207759
9256
8304
Experimental Entries - Not Commercially available:
2
CI
4658
x Cl SoF.,6583
2CJ
4658
x CI S.F.,6576
Cl 5106Wintock x Cl - S.F. x Forkedeer R
2387
CI 6571 (Fulwin x
(L.V.)
L.S.O.
(.05)
=
98~5 8J68 87~2 7623 86.0
7133
83.7
7569
81.97759
(N~S.) 1305 Table5
Performance of Spring Oats In Mountain. North Carol ina
1953 Entries Fu!greln"Strain
4
Ar'lington Victorgrain48-93
FulgrainBus/A
~80435·7
32.
J2909
=' 11·3 Location HaY\rvood Count yTable 6 15 •
Performance of Oats Varieties In Piedmont NOrth Carolina
1953
...",,'
LocatIons
Entriec
Union Cou nty : Rockinghom County Average : Southern Piedmont ----t~(l'-·I·hern piedmont Two Tests
: Bus ../A Lbs.Hay :Bus./A l.bs , Hay Bus·fA lbs.Hay
fA
/A
/A
Com~ercially available varieties:
Fulwood··..
125·1
9937
81.86725
'.0608
8331
FuIgrain Strain
7
11404
9583
88.2
6942
101·3 8263FuIglta.in BRS 111.2
9583
BO.r)5853
'95.61718
vtctorgrain
48-93
116.910421
73·6
6044
95.3
8236ArIington 115·8 10618 72.1
7432
9405
9025Lee 110.8 11211
75-5
699793.
2 9107Forkedeer 112.J 10699 71.8
7133
92.0 8916Le Conte
89.9
10972
91.67677
90.89325
Atlantic
1°3·9
1080870·9
735187.4
9080Experimental Entries -Not Commercially available:
Coker 52-22 12002 10536 81~O
6616
100.6 8576Coker 52-29 123.6 10019 74.~6
5636
99·1 7828Coke.,
52-31
116.79747
79.9
6044
98·3
7896
Coker
52-44
112.3 10019 81.2 61269
6•
88073
2 Cl
4658
x CI S.F.~7160
96.5
9461CI
6575
113·1 11761 79092 CJ
4658
x CI S.F.~7487
96·3Cl
6583
110·9 12115 81.19801
Coker
52-30
122.810346
68.9
5772
95-9 8059Coker
52-34-
J15.99855
74.6
571795·3
7786
Coker
52-31
116.7
9747
73·4
5636
95.
J7692
Coker
52-39
113.0 96107508
620794-4
79(1)Coker
52-43
102.88494
77.7
5663
90·3
7079
Table
7
16.Performance of Oats Varieties In Coastal Plain North CarolIna
1953
.-Locations
Edgecombe County
·
·
COll!mDI}S CountyEntr ies Northern Coastal
·
·
- Sou t hern Coasta1 Average: Plain Plain TV/o Tests
: Bus./A Lbs.Hay :Bus.!A lbs.Hay
: Bus./A
Cbs.HayfA
jA
[A
Commercially avaIlable varieties:
FuI1wood 119.0 9039 J03.0
7078
11 J.0 8059ArIington 120.4 115J6 99.4 9610 109·9 10563
Fulgrain Strain 7
1154
912099·7
72&:;107.6
8195Victorgrain 48*93 116.0 9801
9°..9
7'($61°3.5
8549Atlantic 104.2
JC1972
102.& 9801 103.2 J0386Fulgraln BRS 96·3 8031
79.6
6452 88.07242
Experimental Entries
-Not Comnercially avai (able:
Coker
52-29
120.8 9937 9}·.27568
107.0 8753Coker 52-34 119.2 10155
92.7
7160 106.0 86582
Cl
4658
x CI S.F.,CJ
6575
1f1.9 10427 92.8 8848 102.4 9638f)
Coker
52-37
115.6 ~947lj ~7.a7432
101.7 8453Coker
52-31
107.·19251
94·57568
100.8 8413Coker
52-30
114.9
9747
86.1 7568 100·5 8658Coker 52-22 l18.8
9665
81-1
6997 100·3 8331Coker
52-44
10.4.78385
8J.6 647993.2
7432
Coker
52-39
99·3
8516
86.86751
93·1 76642
Cl
465e
x CI S.F.,Col
6583
Joo·3 10128 80.1 80319°·2
9080Coker
52-43
97.28494
19.16452
88.27473
Variety IYield
Performance of Barley Varieties
3 Years
(1951#
1952 and1953)
Mountain
17.
Bus/A
Hudson
75·7
-Colonial 2 73·1
J
Wong 69('2
I
Davie
65.0
I
Calhoun
59.8
J
Sunrise 52..
4
(]
o
16 ~2Bus./A
PIedmont
48
72
8016
32
Bus./A
Coasta1 PI a in
72
80Colonial 2
Cal houn
Davie Wong Sunrise
74.3
I
59.6
I
55-4
I
I
52.1
I
51·5
o
16 32Bus./A
Table 8
Performance of Barley Varieties In Mounta in North Caro I ina
1953
Locat ion
HaYW00d County
Bus./A
Commercially avai table varieties:
18.
Colonial 2
Hudson
Marconee Kenbar
Wontd
Davie
Sunrise Calhoun
Experimental Entries -Not Commercially avai lable:
Early Wong
Beltsvi IJe Y11
L.S.D.
(.05)
69.0
67.1
64.5
58.8
58.5
56.3
47.5
39.8
55·5
5°·3
Table
9
Performance of Barley Varieties Piedmont North Carolina
1953
Locat ions
En tries
Union Count"
~___ I
Southern Piedmont Bus/A
Rockinaham County Nor-trh?rn Pi
edmon·P--Bus/A
Avera ge Two Tests
Bus/A
Commercially avai lable varieties:
Davie
65.6
75·0
70·3f~arconee
53·7
72.162.9
Colonial 2 63.2
56.0
59.6
Early Wong
42.0
75·1
5
8.6Vvong
54.5
61.2 57.9Calhoun 47.1
53·5
5°·3
Sunrise
43·2
53·9
48.6
Experimental Entries -Not commercial fy avai lable:
Bel tsvi J1e y
71
53·3
Kenbar 41.7
Hudson
43.2
LoS.D • (.05 ) = 12.6
5,8.6 45·5
41 e3
Table 10
Performance of BarlGY Varieties In Coastal Plain North Carol ina
1953
Locat ions
Entries
Edgecombe County .e~~ County
Northern CoasfaI -'Southern - CoastaI
Plain Plain
Bus/A
Bus/A
Average
Two Tests
Bus/A
Commercially available varieties: Colonial 2
Davie Calhoun Marconee
Sunrise
Ear IY 'Hong Wong
Experimental Entries -Not Commercially avai lable:
46.5
34.5
42 ..
3
26.9
25.9
14~310.7
730
I55.2
42.4
47.3
40.7
23·3
25.4
59.8
1.44.9
42-4
37.1
33.3
18.8 18.1
Bel tsvi lie Y 71
L.S.D.
(.05)
=30.1