• No results found

New Operations over Interval Value Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets of Cube Root Type

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "New Operations over Interval Value Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets of Cube Root Type"

Copied!
13
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

New Operations over Interval Value Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets of

Cube Root Type

U. Rizwan Department of Mathematics,Islamiah College(Autonomous),India and email:[email protected]

Mohammed Nabeel I∗Department of General Studies,Jubail Industrial College,Saudi Arabia email:[email protected]

Abstract

In this paper, we defined arithmetic mean operation and geometric mean operation over In-terval Value of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets of Cube Root Type(IVIFSCRT) were proposed and few theorem are proved. In addition, some of the basic properties of the new operations were discussed

Keyword

Interval Value of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets of Cube Root Type(IVIFSCRT),Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (IFS),Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set(IVIFS),arthimetic mean operation, geomet-ric mean operation

1

Introduction

In 1965, Fuzzy sets theory was proposed by L. A. Zadeh[1]. In 1986, the concept of intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs), as a generalization of fuzzy set were introduced by K. Atanassov[2]. After the introduction of IFS, many researchers have shown interest in the IFS theory and applied in numerous fields, such as pattern recognition, machine learning, image processing, decision making and etc.In 1989, the notion of Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets which is a generalization of both Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Interval-Valued Fuzzy Sets were proposed by K.T Atanassov and G.Gargov [3]. After the introduction of IVIFS, many researchers have shown interest in the IVIFS theory and applied it to the various field.

In this paper, our aim is to propose two new operations @ and $ over IVIFSCRT and we will discuss their properties and propose a multi-criteria group decision making method based on the new operations.

2

Preliminaries

For completeness, some operators and definition on IVIFSCRT are reviewed in this section.Let X be non empty set.

Definition 2.1(L.A.Zadeh,1965)Let X be an nonempty set.A fuzzy set A is defined as

A={hx, µA(x)i:x∈X}

(2)

where the functions µA(x) :X → [0,1] is the membership function of the fuzzy set A.Fuzzy set is a collection of objects with graded membership i.e having degree of membership.

Definition 2.2(K.T.Atanassov,1986)An IFS A in X is defined as an object of the form

A={hx, µA(x), νA(x)i:x∈X}

where the functions µA(x) : X → [0,1] and νA(x) : X → [0,1] denote the membership and non-membership function of A respectively, and

0≤µA(x) +νA(x)≤1 for eachx∈X

Furthermore,we have πA(x) = 1−µA(x)−νA(x) called the intuitionistic fuzzy set index or hesitation margin of x in A. πA(x) is the degree of indeterminacy of x ∈ X to the IFS A and πA(x) ∈ [0,1] i.e πA(x) :X → [0,1] and 0 ≤ πA(x) ≤1 for each x ∈ X.πA(x) expresses the lack of knowledge of whether x belongs to IFS A or not.

Remark 2.3

1. Every fuzzy set is an intuitionistic fuzzy set, but the reverse is not true.

2. µA(x) +νA(x) +πA(x) = 1.

Definition 2.4 (K.T.Atanassov,1986)Let X be a non empty set. An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set of Second Type(IFSST) A in X is defined as an object of the form

A={hx, µA(x), νA(x)i:x∈X}

where the functions µA(x) :X →[0,1] andνA(x) :X →[0,1] denote the membership and non-membership function of A respectively, and

0≤[µA(x)]2+ [νA(x)]2 ≤1 for each x∈X

Remark: 2.5 It is obvious that for all real numbers a, b ∈ [0,1]if 0 ≤ a+b ≤ 1 then 0≤a2+b2 ≤1

Definition 2.6 (Srinivasan R and Palaniappan N, 2006)Let X be a non empty set. An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set of Root Type(IFSRT) A in X is defined as an object of the form

A={hx, µA(x), νA(x)i:x∈X}

where the functions µA(x) :X →[0,1] andνA(x) :X →[0,1] denote the membership and non-membership function of A respectively, and

0≤ p

µA(x)

2 +

p νA(x)

2 ≤1 for eachx∈X

Definition 2.7(U Rizwan and Nabeel, 2015) An Intuitionistic fuzzy set of cube root type(IFSCRT) A in X, is defined as an object of the form

(3)

where the functions µA(x) : X → [0,1] and νA(x) : X → [0,1] denotes the degree of membership and non-membership function of A, respectively and where

0≤ 3 p

µA(x) + 3 p

νA(x) √

3 ≤1 for eachx∈X

Figure 1: Geometrical representation of IFSCRT

Definition 2.8(Atanassov and Gargov,1989)Let X be a non empty set. Interval Value Intuitionistic fuzzy sets(IVIFS) A in X, is defined as an object of the form

A={hx, MA(x), NA(x)i:x∈X}

where the functions MA :X →[I] and NA :X →[I] denotes the degree of membership and non-membership function of A respectively

where

MA(x) = [MAL(x), MAU(x)]

NA(x) = [NAL(x), NAU(x)]

0≤MAU(x) +NAL(x)≤1 for eachx∈X

Definition 2.9Let [I] be the set of all closed subintervals of the interval [0,1] and

MA(x) = [MAL(x), MAU(x)]∈[I]

and

NA(x) = [NAL(x), NAU(x)]∈[I]

thenNA(x)≤MA(x) if and only if NAL(x)≤MAL(x) and NAU(x)≤MAU(x)

Definition 2.10(U Rizwan and Nabeel, 2016)Let X be a non empty set, Interval value of Intuitionistic fuzzy set of cube root type (IVIFSCRT) A in X, is defined as an object of the form

A={hx, MA(x), NA(x)i:x∈X}

where the functions MA :X →[I] and NA :X →[I] denotes the degree of membership and non-membership function of A respectively

and

MA(x) = [MAL(x), MAU(x)]

(4)

where

0≤ 3 p

MAU(x) +p3

NAU(x) √

3 ≤1 for each x∈X

A IVIFSCRT value is denoted byA= ([MAL(x), MAU(x)],[NAL(x), NAU(x)]) for convenience

Definition 2.11 The degree of non-determinacy (uncertainty) of an element x ∈ X to the IVIFSCRT A is defined by

πA(x) = [πAL(x), πAU(x)]

= [(1−MAU(x)1/3−NAU(x)1/3)3,(1−MAL(x)1/3−NAL(x)1/3)3]

Definition 2.12For every IVIFSCRTA={hx, MA(x), NA(x)i:x∈X},we define the modal logic operators ”neccessity” and ”possibility”.

The Neccesity Measure on A

A= n

hx,[MAL(x), MAU(x)],[(1−MAU(x)1/3)3,(1−MAL(x)1/3)3]i:x∈X o

The Possibility measure on A

♦A= n

hx,[(1−NAU(x)1/3)3,(1−NAL(x)1/3)3],[NAL(x), NAU(x)]i:x∈X o

3

Main Results

Here we will introduce new operations over the IVIFSCRT which extend two operations in the literature related to IVIFS.Let X is a non empty finite set

Definition 3.1For every IVIFSCRTs as

A={hx, MA(x), NA(x)i:x∈X}

B ={hx, MB(x), NB(x)i:x∈X}

we define the arthimetic mean operation and geometric mean operation as follows (i)A@B ={hx, MA@B(x), NA@B(x)i:x∈X}

MA@B(x) = [( 1

2(MAL(x)

1/3+M

BL(x)1/3))3,( 1

2(MAU(x)

1/3+M

BU(x)1/3))3]

NA@B(x) = [( 1

2(NAL(x)

1/3+NBL(x)1/3))3,(1

2(NAU(x)

1/3+NBU(x)1/3))3]

(ii)A$B={hx, MA$B(x), NA$B(x)i:x∈X}

MA$B(x) = [ p

MAL(x).MBL(x), p

MAU(x).MBU(x)]

NA$B(x) = [ p

NAL(x).NBL(x),pNAU(x).NBU(x)]

Example 3.2ItA={hx,[0.2,0.3],[0.3,0.4]i:x∈X},B ={hx,[0.3,0.4],[0.2,0.4]i:x∈X}then the arithmetic mean operation and geometric mean operation as follows

Soluiton

(i)A@B ={hx,[(1 2(0.2

1/3+ 0.31/3))3,(1

2(0.3

1/3+ 0.41/3))3],

[(1 2(0.3

1/3+ 0.21/3))3,(1

2(0.4

(5)

={hx,[0.2466,0.3476],[0.2466,0.4]i:x∈X}

(ii)A$B=nDx,[√0.2X0.3,√0.3X0.4],[√0.3X0.2,√0.4X0.4]E:x∈Xo

={hx,[0.2449,0.3446],[0.2449,0.4]i:x∈X}

Theorem 3.3 For every two IVIFSCRTs A and B, we have

(i)A@Bis a IVIFSCRT

(ii)A$B is a IVIFSCRT

Proof

(i)MA@B(x)1/3+NA@B(x)1/3= 12[MAU(x)1/3+MBU(x)1/3] +12[NAU(x)1/3+NBU(x)1/3]

= 1

2[MAU(x)

1/3+N

AU(x)1/3] + 1

2[MBU(x)

1/3+N

BU(x)1/3]

≤ 1

2 +

1 2 = 1 therefore it can be concluded thatA@B ∈IVIFSCRT

(ii) By using defintion 2.11 and √

a1/3.b1/3 1

2(a1/3+b1/3) we have

M(A$B)U(x)1/3+N(A$B)U(x)1/3= [p[MAU(x).MBU(x)]1/3+ p

[NAU(x).NBU(x)]1/3]

≤ 1

2[MAU(x)

1/3+MBU(x)1/3] + 1

2[NAU(x)

1/3+NBU(x)1/3]

≤ 1 2 +

1 2 ≤1

Finally,it can be concluded that A$B ∈ IVIFSCRT

Theorem 3.4 For every two IVIFSCRTs A,B(Commutative laws)

(i)A@B =B@A

(ii)A$B=B$A

Proof: (i) By using Definition 3.1,we have

(i)MA@B(x) = [(12[MAL(x)1/3+MBL(x)1/3])3,(12[MAU(x)1/3+MBU(x)1/3])3]

= [(1

2[MBL(x)

1/3+M

AL(x)1/3])3,( 1

2[MBU(x)

1/3+M

AU(x)1/3])3]

=MB@A(x)

(6)

= [(1

2[NBL(x)

1/3+NAL(x)1/3])3,(1

2[NBU(x)

1/3+NAU(x)1/3])3]

=NB@A(x)

the proof is completed. Proof(ii) is similar to that of (i)

Theorem 3.5 For every two IVIFSCRTs A and B (Idempotent Law)

(i)A@A=A

(ii)A$A=A

Proof: the proof is true from Defintion 3.1

Theorem 3.6 For every two IVIFSCRTs A and B (Complementary Law)

(i)A@B =A@B

(ii)A$B=A$B

Proof:

(i)SinceA={hx, NA(x), MA(x)i:x∈X},B={hx, NB(x), MB(x)i:x∈X}

we have A@B =x, MA@B(x), NA@B(x):x∈X

A@B =

x, NA@B(x), MA@B(x)

:x∈X since

MA@B(x) = [(12[NAL(x)1/3+NBL(x)1/3])3,(12[NAU(x)1/3+NBU(x)1/3])3]

=NA@B(x)

NA@B(x) = [(12[MAL(x)1/3+MBL(x)1/3])3,(12[MAU(x)1/3+MBU(x)1/3])3]

=MA@B(x)

A@B ={hx, MA@B(x), NA@B(x)i:x∈X}

=A@B

this proof is completed

Proof of (ii) is similiar to that of (i)

(7)

(i)(A@B)@C = (A@C)@(B@C)

(ii)(A$B)$C= (A$C)$(B$C)

Proof

(i)M(A@B)@C(x) = [[12(M(A@B)L(x)1/3+MCL(x)1/3)]3,[12(M(A@B)U(x)1/3+MCU(x)1/3)]3]

= [[12(12[MAL(x)1/3+MBL(x)1/3]+MCL(x)1/3)]3,[12(12[MAU(x)1/3+MBU(x)1/3]+MCU(x)1/3)]3]

= [[1 2(

1

2[MAL(x)

1/3+M

CL(x)1/3] + 1

2[MBL(x)

1/3+M

CL(x)1/3])]3,

[1 2(

1

2[MAU(x)

1/3+MCU(x)1/3] +1

2[MBU(x)

1/3+MCU(x)1/3])]3]

=M(A@C)@(B@C(x)

N(A@B)@C(x) = [[12(N(A@B)L(x)1/3+NCL(x)1/3)]3,[12(N(A@B)U(x)1/3+NCU(x)1/3)]3]

= [[12(12[NAL(x)1/3+NBL(x)1/3]+NCL(x)1/3)]3,[12(12[NAU(x)1/3+NBU(x)1/3]+NCU(x)1/3)]3]

= [[1 2(

1

2[NAL(x)

1/3+N

CL(x)1/3] + 1

2[NBL(x)

1/3+N

CL(x)1/3])]3,

[1 2(

1

2[NAU(x)

1/3+N

CU(x)1/3] + 1

2[NBU(x)

1/3+N

CU(x)1/3])]3]

=N(A@C)@(B@C(x)

This completes the proof

(ii)M(A$B)$C(x) = [ q

M(A$B)L(x)MCL(x), q

M(A$B)U(x)MCU(x)]

= [ q

p

MAL(x)MBL(x)MCL(x), q

p

MAU(x)MBU(x)MCU(x)]

= [ q

p

MAL(x)MCL(x). p

MBL(x)MCL(x), q

p

MAU(x)MCU(x). p

MBU(x)MCU(x)]

=M(A$B)$(B$C)(x)

N(A$B)$C(x) = [ q

N(A$B)L(x)NCL(x), q

N(A$B)U(x)NCU(x)]

= [ q

p

NAL(x)NBL(x)NCL(x), q

p

NAU(x)NBU(x)NCU(x)]

= [ q

p

NAL(x)NCL(x).pNBL(x)NCL(x), q

p

NAU(x)NCU(x).pNBU(x)NCU(x)]

=N(A$B)$(B$C)(x)

(8)

Theorem 3.8 For every three IVIFSCRTs A,B and C (Distributive Laws)

(i)(A∪B)@C= (A@C)∪(B@C)

(ii)(A∩B)@C = (A@C)∩(B@C)

(iii)(A∪B)$C = (A$C)∪(B$C)

(iv)(A∩B)$C= (A$C)∩(B$C)

Proof

(i)SinceA∪B ={hx, max(MA(x), MB(x)), min(NA(x), NB(x))i:x∈X}

we have

M(A∪B)@C(x) = [[ 1

2(max(MAL(x), MBL(x))

1/3+M

CL(x)1/3)]3,

[1

2(max(MAU(x), MBU(x))

1/3+MCU(x)1/3)]3]

= [[12(max(MAL(x)1/3, MBL(x)1/3)+MCL(x)1/3)]3,[12(max(MAU(x)1/3, MBU(x)1/3)+MCU(x)1/3)]3]

= [[max(1

2(MAL(x)

1/3+M

CL(x)1/3), 1

2(MBL(x)

1/3+M

CL(x)1/3))]3,

[max(1

2(MAU(x)

1/3+M

CU(x)1/3), 1

2(MBU(x)

1/3+M

CU(x)1/3))]3]

=M(A@C)∪(B@C)(x)

N(A∪B)@C(x) = [[12(min(NAL(x), NBL(x)) 1/3+N

CL(x)1/3)],[12(min(NAU(x), NBU(x))1/3+ NCU(x)1/3)]]

= [[12(min(NAL(x)1/3, NBL(x)1/3)+NCL(x)1/3)]3,[12(min(NAU(x)1/3, NBU(x)1/3)+NCU(x)1/3)]3]

= [[min(1

2(NAL(x)

1/3+N

CL(x)1/3), 1

2(NBL(x)

1/3+N

CL(x)1/3))]3,

[min(1

2(NAU(x)

1/3+N

CU(x)1/3), 1

2(NBU(x)

1/3+N

CU(x)1/3))]3]

=N(A@C)∪(B@C)(x)

Proof is complete.Proof of (ii) is similiar to that of (i)

(iii)M(A∪B)$C = [ p

max(MAL(x), MBL(x)).MCL(x),pmax(MAU(x), MBU(x)).MCU(x)]

= [pmax(MAL(x)MCL(x), MBL(x)MCL(x)), p

max(MAU(x)MCU(x), MBU(x)MCU(x))]

(9)

And N(A∪B)$C = [ p

min(NAL(x), NBL(x)).NCL(x),pmin(NAU(x), NBU(x)).NCU(x)]

= [pmin(NAL(x)NCL(x), NBL(x)NCL(x)), p

min(NAU(x)NCU(x), NBU(x)NCU(x))]

=N(A$C)∪(B$C)

Proof is complete.Proof of (iv) is similiar to that of (iii)

Theorem 3.9 For every two IVIFSCRTs A and B we have (inclusion laws)

(i) IfA⊂B thenA@B ⊂B

(ii) If A⊂B thenA$B ⊂B

Proof: (i) If a≤b thena≤(12(a1/3+b1/3))3 ≤b

In this case,proof is clear

(ii)Ifa≤bthen a≤√ab≤b

In this case,proof is clear

Corollary 3.10 For every two IVIFSCRTs A and B we have (Absorption laws)

(i)A@(A∪B)⊂A∪B

(ii)A$(A∪B)⊂A∪B

(iii)A@(A∩B)⊂A

(iv)A$(A∩B)⊂A

Proof: since A⊂A∪B,A∩B ⊂A,proof are clear using theorem 3.9

Theorem 3.11 For every three IVIFSCRTs A,B and C

(i)2(A@B) =2A@2B

(ii)2(A$B)⊂2A$2B

(iii)♦(A@B) =♦A@♦B

(iv)♦(A$B)⊃A$♦B

(10)

(i)By using Definition 3.1 and definition of Neccesity measure we have

2(A@B) =

x, M2(A@B)(x), N2(A@B)(x)

:x∈X

sinceM2(A@B)= [(12(MAL(x)1/3+MBL(x)1/3))3,(12(MAU(x)1/3+MBU(x)1/3))3]

=M2A@2B

N2(A@B)= [(1−1

2(MAU(x)

1/3+M

BU(x)1/3))3,(1− 12(MAL(x)1/3+MBL(x)1/3))3]

= [(12((1−MAU(x)1/3) + (1−MBU(x)1/3)))3,(12((1−MAL(x)1/3) + (1−MBL(x)1/3)))3]

=N2A@2B

2(A@B) =2A@2B . Proof is complete

(ii)By using Definition 3.1 and defintion of Necessity measure, we have

2(A$B) =x, M2(A$B)(x), N2(A$B)(x)

:x∈X

={hx,[pMAL(x)MBL(x),pMAU(x)MBU(x)],

[(1−(pMAU(x)MBU(x))1/3)3,(1−( p

MAL(x)MBL(x))1/3)3]i:x∈X}

={hx, M2A$2B(x), N2A$2B(x)i:x∈X}

={hx,[pMAL(x)MBL(x),pMAU(x)MBU(x)],

[ q

(1−MAU(x)1/3)3(1MBU(x)1/3)3,

q

(1−MAL(x)1/3)3(1MBL(x)1/3)3]i:xX}

To prove2A$B ⊂2A$2B, it is enough to prove N2(A$B)≥N2A$2B. It is clear

0≤( √

a1/3+b1/3)2,therefore

0≤a1/3+b1/3−2(√ab)1/3

0≤a1/3+b1/3+ [1 + (ab)1/3]−[1 + (ab)1/3]−2(√ab)1/3

0≤a1/3+b1/31(ab)1/3+ 1 + (ab)1/32(ab)1/3

0≤ −1(1−a1/3) +b1/3(1−a1/3) + [1−(√ab)1/3]2

0≤ −(1−a1/3)(1−b1/3) + [1−(√ab)1/3]2

p

(1−a1/3)(1b1/3)[1(ab)1/3]

(11)

(iii) By using the definition of possibility measure,we have

♦(A@B) =

x, M(A@B)(x), N(A@B)(x)

:x∈X

sinceM(A@B)= [(1−12(NAU(x)1/3+NBU(x)1/3))3,(1−12(NAL(x)1/3+NBL(x)1/3))3]

= [(12((1−NAU(x)1/3) + (1−NBU(x)1/3)))3,(12((1−NAL(x)1/3) + (1−NBL(x)1/3)))3]

=MA@♦B

♦A=x,[(1−NAU(x)1/3)3,(1−NAL(x)1/3)3],[NAL(x), NAU(x)]

:x∈X

N(A@B)= [(12(NAL(x)1/3+NBL(x)1/3))3,( 1

2(NAL(x)1/3+NBL(x)1/3))3]

=NA@♦B

♦(A@B) =♦A@♦B

proof is complete.proof (iv) are similiar to that of (ii)

Theorem 3.12 For every two IVIFSCRTs A and B(Distribution laws)

(i)(A@B) +C = (A+C)@(B+C)

(ii)(A@B).C = (A.C)@(B.C)

Proof

(i)M(A@B)+C(x) = [1

2(MAL(x)

1/3+M

BL(x)1/3)+MCL(x)1/3− 1

2(MAL(x)

1/3+M

BL(x)1/3)MCL(x)1/3, 1

2(MAU(x)

1/3+M

BU(x)1/3) +MCU(x)1/3− 1

2(MAU(x)

1/3+M

BU(x)1/3)MCU(x)1/3]

Since f(A@B)+C = 12(a1/3+b1/3) +c1/3− 1

2(a1/3+b1/3).c1/3

= 12((a1/3+c1/3) + (b1/3+c1/3))−1 2(a

1/3c1/3+b1/3.c1/3)

= 12((a1/3+c1/3−a1/3c1/3) + (b1/3+c1/3−b1/3.c1/3))

=f(A+C)@(B+C)

therefore M(A@B)+C =M(A+C)@(B+C)

N(A@B)+C(x) = [12(NAL(x)1/3+NBL(x)1/3)NCL(x)1/3, 1

2(NAU(x)1/3+NBU(x)1/3)NCU(x)1/3]

sinceg(A@B)+C = 12(a1/3+b1/3)c1/3

(12)

=g(A+C)@(B+C)

therefore N(A@B)+C =N(A+C)@(B+C)

Proof (ii) is similiar to that of (i)

4

Conclusion

In this paper, we have defined two new operations over Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets of Cube Root Type and their relationships are proved. We have studied some desirable properties of the proposed operations, such as idempotent laws, complementary law, commu-tative laws, distributive laws and etc.

References

[1] L.A.Zadeh(1965)Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control, Vol.8, pp. 338-353.

[2] Atanassov, K.T.(1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 20, 87-96.

[3] Atanassov K T and Gargov,G(1989),Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets,Fuzzy sets and Systems31,343-349.

[4] K.T.Atanassov(1989) More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 33, 1989, pp. 37-46

[5] H. Bustine and P. Burillo, Vague sets are intuitionistic fuzzy sets,Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 79, (1996), pp. 403- 405.

[6] E. Szmidt, J. Kacprzyk, measuring distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets,Notes on IFS3 (4) (1997) 1-3.

[7] K.T.Atanassov(1999)Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set, Theory and Applications, Springer Verlag, New York.

[8] De, S. K., Biswas R. and Roy A. R. (2000) Some operations on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems,114 (4), 477-484.

[9] Atanassov.K.T.(2001)Remark on two operations over intuitionistic fuzzy sets,Int.Journal of Uncertainty,Fuzziness and Knowledge Syst, 9(1), 71-75.

[10] Liu Q., Ma C. and Zhou X. (2008) On properties of some IFS operators and opera-tions,Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, 14(3), 17-24.

[11] Zhang Z., Yang J., Ye Y., Zhang Q. S. (2011)A generalized interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets theory, Procedia Engineering 15, 2037-2041

(13)

[13] Parvathi R., Riecan B. and Atanassov K. T.(2012) Properties of some operations defined over intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, 18 (1), 14.

[14] Hui W. (2013) Some operations on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, (2013)Fifth International Conference on Computational and Information Sciences (ICCIS),832-834.

[15] Eulalia Szmidt(2013),Distance and Similiarities in intuitionistic fuzzy sets,Springer Ver-lag,Newyork

[16] E. Szmidt, Distances and similarities in intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Springer (2014).

[17] Baloui Jamkhaneh E., Nadarajah S. (2015) A new generalized intuitionistic fuzzy sets,

References

Related documents

The first attempts to develop emulsion polymerization of main diene monomers such as butadiene were undertaken to reduce dependence on natural resources, i.e. The

Excessive daytime sleepiness, decrease in school perfor- mance, abnormal daytime behavior, recent enuresis, morning headache, abnormal weight, and progressive devel- opment

Task-oriented strategies used in stressful situations did not depend on gender and was predominant both in the national team of persons who practice combat sports and among

contraceptive choice and switching patterns. The second and third chapters evaluate the fertility timing patterns associated with natural method use – specifically the effect

case 4: startActivity(new Intent(this, HelpActivity.class)); break; } } } Temperature.java package com.domotics; import java.util.ArrayList; import Pachube.Data; import

Data mapping error on member DDLMAST.. Data mapping error on

We have used the EEG technique gives better results of EEG for signal acquisition, ICA for signal enhancement, Kernel Density Function (KDE) in feature extraction and finally

GS1 has developed these verification templates on the basis of ISO/IEC 15416 Information technology – Automatic identification and data capture techniques, Barcode Print Quality Test