• No results found

Soft semiseparated sets via operations

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Soft semiseparated sets via operations"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

https://doi.org/10.26637/MJM0801/0008

Soft semiseparated sets via operations

B. Jaya Bharathi

1

* and P. Gomathi sundari

2

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce the notionγ-soft semiseparated sets and study some of their basic properties.

Keywords

Soft topological spaces,γ-soft semiseparated set,γ-soft semiconnected space.

AMS Subject Classification 54D05, 54C08, 54B05.

1,2Department of Mathematics, Rajah Serfoji Government College, Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu-613005, India.

*Corresponding author:1[email protected];2[email protected]

Article History: Received13August2019; Accepted22November2019 2020 MJM.c

Contents

1 Introduction. . . 42

2 Preliminaries. . . 42

3 On operation-soft semiseparated sets. . . 43

4 Operation-soft semiconnected spaces. . . .44

References. . . 46

1. Introduction

The concept of soft sets was first introduced by Molodtsov [11]. After the introduction of the definition of a soft sets by Molodtsov, a large number of topologists have turned their attention to the generalization of different concepts of a clas-sical sets in this sets. Recently, the concept of soft topological spaces was introduced and studied by Shabir and Naz [17]. A Good number of results are studied in this paper. The study of topological properties via operations was introduced and studied by Biswas and Prasannan in [2]. In this paper, we introduce the notionγ-soft semiseparated sets and study

some of their basic properties. Also the concept ofγ-soft

semiconnected spaces are also introduced and studied in this paper.

2. Preliminaries

LetUbe an initial universe set andEUbe a collection of

all possible parameters with respect toU, where parameters are the characteristics or properties of objects inU. We will callEUthe universe set of parameters with respect toU.

Definition 2.1. [11] A pair(F,A)is called a soft set over U if A⊂EU and F:A→P(U), where P(U)is the set of all

subsets of U .

Definition 2.2. [6] Let U be an initial universe set and EU

be a universe set of parameters. Let(F,A)and(G,B)be soft sets over a common universe set U and A,B⊂E. Then(F,A)

is a subset of(G,B), denoted by(F,A)⊂(e G,B), if A⊂B and

for all e∈A,F(e)⊂G(e). Also(F,A)equals(G,B), denoted by(F,A) = (G,B), if(F,A)⊂(e G,B)and(G,B)⊂(e F,A).

Definition 2.3. [12] A soft set(F,A)over U is called a null soft set, denoted bye/0, if e∈A, F(e) =/0.

Definition 2.4. [12] A soft set (F,A)over U is called an absolute soft set, denoted byA, if ee ∈A, F(e) =U .

Definition 2.5. [12] The union of two soft sets(F,A)and

(G,B)over a common universe U is the soft set(H,C), where C=A∪B, and for all e∈C,

H(e) =  

F(e) if e∈A\B, G(e) if e∈B\A, F(e)∪G(e) if e∈B∩A.

We write(F,A)∪(G,B) = (H,C).

Definition 2.6. [6] The intersection of two soft sets of(F,A)

and(G,B)over a common universe U is the soft set(H,C), where C=A∩B, and for all e∈C, H(e) =F(e)∩G(e). We write(F,A)∩(G,B) = (H,C).

(2)

Definition 2.7. For a soft set (F,A) over U , the relative complement of(F,A)is denoted by(F,A)0and is defined by

(F,A)0= (F0,A), where F0:A→P(U)is a mapping given by F0(e) =U\F(e)for all e∈A.

Definition 2.8. Let τ be the collection of soft sets over X , thenτis called a soft topology on X ifτsatisfies the following axioms.

1. e/0,X belong toe τ.

2. The union of any number of soft sets inτbelongs toτ.

3. The intersection of any two soft sets inτbelongs toτ.

The triplet(X,τ,E)is called a soft topological space.

Definition 2.9. Let(X,τ,E)be a soft topological space, then

the members ofτare said to be soft open sets in X .

Definition 2.10. Let(X,τ,E)be a soft topological space. A soft set(F,E)over X is said to be a soft closed set in X , if its relative complement(F,E)0belongs toτ.

Proposition 2.11. Let(X,τ,E)be a soft topological space.

Then one has the following

1. e/0,X are soft closed sets over X .e

2. The intersection of any number of soft closed sets is a soft closed set over X .

3. The union of any two soft closed sets is a soft closed set over X .

Definition 2.12. Let(X,τ,E)be a soft topological space and

(A,E)a soft set over X .

1. The soft interior of(A,E)is the soft setInt(A,E) = ∪{(O,E):(O,E)is soft open and(O,E)⊂(e A,E)}.

2. The soft closure of (A,E)is the soft set Cl(A,E) = ∩{(F,E):(F,E)is soft closed and(A,E)⊂(e F,E)}.

Definition 2.13. Let(F,E)be a soft set over X and x∈X . We say that x∈(F,E)read as x belongs to the soft set(F,E), whenever x∈F(α)for allα∈E. Note that for x∈X , x∈/ (F,E)if x∈/F(α)forα∈E.

Definition 2.14. Let x∈X , then(x,E)denotes the soft set over X for which x(α) ={x}for allα∈E.

Definition 2.15. [2] An operation on a soft topologyτover

X is called aγ-operation if a mapping fromτto the set P(X)E

and defined byγ:τ→P(X)E such that for each(V,E)∈τ, (V,E)⊂γ(e V,E).

Definition 2.16. [2] A soft set(P,E)is said to beγ-soft open set if for each x∈(e P,E), there exists a soft open set(V,E)such

that x∈(e V,E)⊂γ(e V,E)⊂(e P,E). The complement of aγ-soft

open set is called aγ-soft closed set. The family of allγ-soft

open sets of(X,τ,E,γ)is denoted byτγ.

Definition 2.17. [2] Let(X,τ,E,γ)be an operation-soft topo-logical space and(A,E)a soft set over X . Then

1. theτγ-soft interior of(A,E)is the soft setτγ-Int(A,E) =

∪{(O,E):(O,E)isγ-soft open and(O,E)⊂(e A,E)}.

2. theτγ-soft closure of(A,E)is the soft setτγ-Cl(A,E) =

∩{(F,E):(F,E)isγ-soft closed and(A,E)⊂(e F,E)}.

Lemma 2.18. Let(X,τ,E,γ)be an operation-soft

topologi-cal space. Then

1. for every γ-soft open set(G,E) and every soft sub-set(A,E)over X we haveτγ-Cl((A,E))∩(G,E)⊂τ γ-Cl((A,E)∩(G,E)),

2. for every γ-soft closed set (F,E)and every soft sub-set(A,E)over X we haveτγ-Int((A,E)∩(F,E)⊂τγ -Int((A,E))∩(F,E).

Definition 2.19. A subset(A,E)of an operation-soft topo-logical space(X,τ,E,γ)is said to beγ-soft semiopen [7] if

(A,E)⊂τγ-Cl(τγ-Int((A,E))).

The complement of aγ-soft semiopen set is called aγ

-soft semiclosed set. The family of allγ-soft semiopen sets of (X,τ,E,γ)is denoted byγ-SSO(X).

Definition 2.20. [7] Let(X,τ,E,γ)be an operation-soft

topo-logical space and(A,E)a soft set over X . Then

1. τγ-sInt(A,E) =∪{(O,E):(O,E) isγ-soft semiopen and(O,E)⊂(e A,E)}.

2. τγ-sCl(A,E) =∩{(F,E):(F,E)isγ-soft semiclosed and(A,E)⊂(e F,E)}.

3. On operation-soft semiseparated sets

Definition 3.1. Two nonempty soft subsets(A,E)and(B,E)

of an operation-soft topological space(X,τ,E,γ)are said to be γ-soft semiseparated if (A,E)∩τe γ-sCl((B,E)) = τ

γ-sCl((A,E))e∩(B,E) =e/0. IfXe= (A,E)∪(e B,E)such that(A,E)

and(B,E)areγ-soft semiseparated sets, then we say that (A,E)and(B,E)form aγ-soft semiseparation ofX .e

Remark 3.2. Each twoγ-soft semiseparated sets are always disjoint, since(A,E)∩(e B,E)⊂(e A,E)∩τe γ-sCl((B,E)) =e/0.

Theorem 3.3. For the soft subsets(A,E)and(B,E)of an operation-soft topological space(X,τ,E,γ), the following

statements are equivalent:

1. (A,E)and(B,E)areγ-soft semiseparated.

2. There existγ-soft semiclosed sets(F1,E),(F2,E) satis-fying(A,E)⊂(e F1,E)⊂eeX\(B,E)and(B,E)⊂(e F2,E)

e

(3)

3. There existγ-soft semiopen sets(G1,E)and(G2,E) satisfying(A,E)⊂(e G1,E)

e

⊂(Xe\(B,E))and(B,E)⊂(e G2,E)⊂eXe\(A,E).

Proof. The proof is clear.

Proposition 3.4. Let (A,E) and (B,E) be soft subsets of an operation-soft topological space (X,τ,E,γ). If (A,E)

and(B,E)areγ-soft semiseparated,e/06= (C,E)⊂(e A,E)and

e/06= (D,E)⊂(e B,E), then(C,E)and(D,E)areγ-soft

semisep-arated.

Proof. Since(A,E)and(B,E)areγ-soft semiseparated sets, (A,E)∩τe γ-sCl((B,E)) =e/0 and τγ-sCl((A,E))e∩(B,E) =e/0.

Then(C,E)⊂(e A,E),τγ-sCl((C,E))∩(e D,E) =e/0. Similarly,

we have(C,E)∩τe γ-sCl((D,E)) =e/0. Therefore,(C,E)and (D,E)areγ-soft semiseparated sets.

Theorem 3.5. If(A,E)and(B,E)areγ-soft semiseparated sets and(S,E)is aγ-soft semiclosed subset of an operation-soft topological space such that(S,E) = (A,E)∪(e B,E), then (A,E)and(B,E)areγ-soft semiclosed sets.

Proof. Let(S,E) = (A,E)∪(e B,E), whereτγ-sCl((A,E))e∩ (B,E) =e/0= (A,E)∩τe γ-sCl((B,E)). It is clear that(S,E)∩τe γ -sCl((A,E)) = ((A,E)∪(e B,E))∩τe γ-sCl((A,E)) = (A,E). As the intersection ofγ-soft semiclosed sets isγ-soft semiclosed,

(A,E)isγ-soft semiclosed. Similarly(B,E)isγ-soft semi-closed.

Theorem 3.6. Let(A,E)and(B,E)be nonempty soft sub-sets in an operation-soft topological space(X,τ,E,γ). The

following statements hold:

1. If(A,E)and(B,E)areγ-soft semiseparated such that

(A1,E)⊂(e A,E),(B1,E)⊂(e B,E), then(A1,E),(B1,E)

are so.

2. If(A,E)∩(e B,E) =e/0such that(A,E)and(B,E) are γ-soft semiclosed (γ-soft semiopen), then(A,E)and (B,E)areγ-soft semiseparated.

3. If(A,E),(B,E)areγ-soft semiclosed(γ-soft semiopen)

and(H,E) = (A,E)∩(Xe\(B,E))and(G,E) = (B,E)∩ (eX\(A,E)), then(H,E)and(G,E)areγ-soft semisep-arated.

Proof. (1). Since(A1,E)⊂(e A,E), we haveτγ-sCl((A1,E))⊂e

τγ-sCl((A,E)). Then(B,E)∩τe γ-sCl((A,E)) =e/0 implies that (B1,E)∩τe γ-sCl((A,E)) =e/0 and(B1,E)e∩τγ-sCl((A1,E)) =

e/0. Similarly(A1,E)∩τe γ-sCl((B1,E)) =e/0. Hence(A1,E)and (B1,E)areγ-soft semiseparated.

(2). Since(A,E) =τγ-sCl((A,E)),(B,E) =τγ-sCl((B,E)) and (A,E)∩(e B,E) =e/0, τγ-sCl((A,E))∩(e B,E) =e/0 and τ

γ-sCl((B,E))∩(e A,E) =e/0. Hence(A,E)and(B,E)areγ-soft

semiseparated sets. If(A,E)and(B,E)areγ-soft semiopen,

then their complements areγ-soft semiclosed.

(3). If(A,E)and(B,E)areγ-soft semiopen, thenXe\(A,E)

andXe\(B,E)areγ-soft semiclosed. Since(H,E)⊂eeX\(B,E), τγ-sCl((H,E))⊂τe γ-sCl(Xe\(B,E)) =Xe\(B,E)and henceτγ -sCl((H,E))∩(e B,E) =e/0. Thus(G,E)∩τe γ-sCl((H,E)) =e/0.

Similarly, (H,E)e∩τγ-sCl((G,E)) =e/0. Hence(H,E) and (G,E)areγ-soft semiseparated sets.

Theorem 3.7. The soft sets(A,E)and(B,E)of an operation-soft topological space areγ-soft semiseparated if, and only if there exist(U,E),(V,E)∈γSSO(X)such that(A,E)⊂(e U,E),

(B,E)⊂(e V,E),(A,E)e∩(V,E) =e/0and(B,E)∩(e U,E) =e/0.

Proof. Suppose that(V,E) =Xe\τγ-sCl((A,E))and(U,E) =

e

X\τγ-sCl((B,E)). Then(U,E),(V,E)∈γSSO(X)such that

(A,E)⊂(e U,E),(B,E)⊂(e V,E),(A,E)∩(e V,E) =e/0 and(B,E)

e

∩(V,E) =e/0. On the other hand, let(U,E),(V,E)∈γSSO(X)

such that(A,E)⊂(e U,E), (B,E)⊂(e V,E), (A,E)e∩(V,E) =e/0

and(B,E)∩(e U,E) =e/0. SinceXe\(V,E)and Xe\(U,E)are γ-soft semiclosed sets,τγ-sCl((A,E))⊂eXe\(V,E)⊂eeX\(B,E)

andτγ-sCl((B,E))⊂eXe\(U,E)⊂eeX\(A,E). It follows thatτγ -sCl((A,E))e∩(B,E) =e/0 andτγ-sCl((B,E))∩(e A,E) =e/0.

Theorem 3.8. Let(A,E)and(B,E)be nonempty disjoint soft subsets of an operation-soft topological space(X,τ,E,γ)and

(G,E) = (A,E)∪(e B,E). Then(A,E)and(B,E)areγ-soft

semiseparated if and only if each of(A,E)and(B,E)are

γ-soft semiclosed (γ-soft semiopen) in(G,E).

Proof. Let (A,E)and(B,E) areγ-soft semiseparated sets.

By Definition3.1,(A,E)contains noγ-soft semilimit points

of(B,E). Then(B,E)contains allγ-soft semilimit points of (B,E)which are in(A,E)∪(e B,E)and(B,E)isγ-soft

semi-closed in(A,E)∪(e B,E). Therefore(B,E)isγ-soft semiclosed

in(G,E). Similarly(A,E)isγ-soft semiclosed in(G,E).

Theorem 3.9. Let(X,τ,E,γ)be an operation-soft

topologi-cal space. If(A,E)and(B,E)areγ-soft semiseparation of

e

X itself, then(A,E)and(B,E)areγ-soft semiclosed sets of (X,τ,E,γ).

Proof. Since(A,E)and(B,E)areγ-soft semiseparated, we

have(A,E)∩τe γ-sCl((B,E)) =τγ-sCl((A,E))∩(e B,E) =e/0.

Then(A,E)∩τe γ-sCl((B,E)) =e/0 if, and only if(B,E)isγ-soft

semiclosed in(A,E)∪(e B,E) =Xe. Similarly, we can show that (A,E)isγ-soft semiclosed inXe.

4. Operation-soft semiconnected spaces

Definition 4.1. A subset(A,E)of an operation-soft topologi-cal space(X,τ,E,γ)is said to beγ-soft semiconnected if it cannot be expressed as the union of twoγ-soft semiseparated

sets. Otherwise, the set(A,E)is calledγ-soft

(4)

Lemma 4.2. Let(A,E)⊂(e B,E)∪(e C,E)such that(A,E)be a

nonemptyγ-soft semiconnected set in an operation-soft topo-logical space(X,τ,E,γ)and(B,E),(C,E)beγ-soft

semisep-arated sets. Then only one of the following conditions holds:

1. (A,E)⊂(e B,E)and(A,E)∩(e C,E) =e/0.

2. (A,E)⊂(e C,E)and(A,E)e∩(B,E) =e/0.

Proof. Since(A,E)e∩(C,E) =e/0, we have(A,E)⊂(e B,E). If (A,E)∩(e B,E) =e/0, then(A,E)⊂(e C,E). Since(A,E)⊂(e B,E)

e

∩(C,E), then both(A,E)∩(e B,E) =e/0 and(A,E)∩(e C,E) =e/0

cannot hold. Similarly, suppose that(A,E)∩(e B,E)6=e/0 and (A,E)∩(e C,E)6=e/0, then by Theorem3.6(1),(A,E)∩(e B,E)

and (A,E)∩(e C,E) are γ-soft semiseparated sets such that (A,E) = ((A,E)∩(e B,E))∪((e A,E)∩(e C,E))which contradicts

with theγ-soft semiconnectedness of(A,E). Hence one of

the conditions (1) and (2) must be hold.

Theorem 4.3. If aγ-soft semiconnected soft set(S,E)of an

operation-soft topological space(X,τ,E,γ)is contained in (A,E)∪(e B,E), where(A,E)and(B,E)areγ-soft

semisepa-rated sets, then either(S,E)⊂(e A,E)or(S,E)⊂(e B,E).

Proof. Let(S,E) = ((S,E)e∩(A,E))∪((e S,E)∪(e B,E))where (S,E)e∩(A,E)and(S,E)∩(e B,E)areγ-soft semiseparated sets.

So either(S,E)∩(e A,E) =e/0 or(S,E)e∩(B,E) =e/0 and hence

either(S,E)⊂(e B,E)or(S,E)⊂(e A,E).

Theorem 4.4. A soft subset(M,E)of an operation-soft topo-logical space(X,τ,E,γ)is aγ-soft semiconnected if there ex-ists aγ-soft semiconnected set(C,E)such that(C,E)⊂(e M,E)

e

⊂τγ-sCl((C,E)).

Proof. Let(M,E) = (A,E)e∪(B,E), where(A,E)and(B,E)

areγ-soft semiseparated sets. Then either(C,E)⊂(e A,E)and (C,E)⊂(e B,E)and hence either(M,E)⊂τγ-sCl((C,E))⊂τγ -sCl((A,E))⊂(ee X\(B,E))or(M,E)⊂(e Xe\(A,E)). Therefore

either(B,E) =e/0 or(A,E) =e/0.

Corollary 4.5. If (C,E)is aγ-soft semiconnected soft set

of an operation-soft topological space(X,τ,E,γ), thenτγ -sCl((C,E))is so.

Proof. Follows from Theorem4.4.

Theorem 4.6. If {(Mα,E):α ∈∆} is a family of γ-soft semiconnected sets of an operation-soft topological space

(X,τ,E,γ)satisfying the property that any two of which are notγ-soft semiseparated, then(M,E) = ∪

α∈∆

(Mα,E)isγ-soft

semiconnected.

Proof. Let(M,E) = (A,E)e∪(B,E), where(A,E)and(B,E)

areγ-soft semiseparated sets. Then for each α∈∆ either

(Mα,E)⊂(e A,E)or(Mα,E)⊂(e B,E). Since any two members

of the family{(Mα,E):α∈∆}are notγ-soft semiseparated, either(Mα,E)⊂(e A,E)for eachα∈∆or(Mα,E)⊂(e B,E)for

eachα∈∆. So either(B,E) =e/0 or(A,E) =e/0.

Corollary 4.7. If(M,E) = ∪

α∈∆

(Mα,E), where each(Mα,E)

isγ-soft semiconnected set in an operation-soft topological space(X,τ,E,γ)and also(Mα,E)∩(e Mα0,E)6=e/0forα,α0∈ ∆, then(M,E)isγ-soft semiconnected.

Proof. Follows from Theorem4.6.

Corollary 4.8. If(M,E) = ∪

α∈∆

(Mα,E), where each(Mα,E)

isγ-soft semiconnected in an operation-soft topological space (X,τ,E,γ)and ∩

α∈∆

(Mα,E)6=e/0for eachα∈∆, then(M,E)

isγ-soft semiconnected.

Proof. Suppose that ∪

α∈∆

(Mα,E)is notγ-soft semiconnected.

Then ∪

α∈∆

(Mα,E) = (H,E)∪(e G,E), where(H,E)and(G,E)

areγ-soft semiseparated sets inX. Sincee ∩

α∈∆

(Mα,E)6=e/0, we

have a soft pointeM∈ ∩e

α∈∆

(Mα,E). SinceeM∈ ∪

α∈∆

(Mα,E),

eithereM∈(G,E)oreM∈(H,E). Suppose thateM∈(H,E).

SinceeM∈(Mα,E)for eachα∈∆, then(Mα,E)and(H,E) intersect for eachα ∈∆. By Theorem4.3,(Mα,E)⊂(e H,E)

or(Mα,E)⊂(e G,E). Since (H,E) and (G,E) are disjoint, (Mα,E)⊂(e H,E)for allα∈∆and hence ∪

α∈∆

(Mα,E)⊂(e H,E).

Then (G,E) =e/0, which is a contradiction. Suppose that

eM∈(G,E). By similar way, we have(H,E) =e/0, which is a

contradiction. Thus ∪

α∈∆

(Mα,E)isγ-soft semiconnected.

Theorem 4.9. The following statements are equivalent for an operation-soft topological space(X,τ,E,γ):

1. X ise γ-soft semiconnected.

2. X can not be expressed as the union of two nonemptye

disjointγ-soft semiopen sets.

3. X contains no nonempty soft subset which is bothe γ-soft

semiopen andγ-soft semiclosed.

Proof. (1)⇒(2): Suppose thatXeisγ-soft semiconnected and

ifXecan be expressed as the union of two nonempty disjoint

sets(A,E)and(B,E)such that(A,E)and(B,E)areγ-soft

semiopen sets. Consequently(A,E) ⊂e Xe \ (B,E). Then τγ-sCl((A,E))⊂e τγ-sCl(Xe \ (B,E))=Xe \ (B,E).

There-fore, τγ-sCl((A,E))∩e (B,E)=e/0. Similarly we can prove (A,E)∩τe γ-sCl((B,E)) =e/0. This is a contradiction to the fact

thatXisγ-soft semiconnected. ThenXecannot be expressed

as the union of two nonempty disjointγ-soft semiopen sets. (2)⇒(3): Suppose thatXecannot be expressed as the union of

two nonempty disjoint sets(A,E)and(B,E)such that(A,E)

and(B,E)areγ-soft semiopen sets. IfXecontains a nonempty

proper subset(A,E)which is bothγ-soft semiopen andγ-soft semiclosed. ThenXe= (A,E)∪(ee X\(A,E)). Hence(A,E)and

e

X\(A,E)are disjointγ-soft semiopen sets whose union isXe.

This is the contradiction to our assumption. HenceXecontains

(5)

(3)⇒(1): Suppose thatXecontains no nonempty soft subset

which isγ-soft semiopen andγ-soft semiclosed andXeis not γ-soft semiconnected. ThenXecan be expressed as the union

of two nonempty disjoint soft sets(A,E)and(B,E)such that

((A,E)∩τe γ-sCl((B,E)))∪(τe γ-sCl((A,E))∩(e B,E)) =e/0. Since (A,E)∩(e B,E) =e/0,(A,E) =Xe\(B,E)and(B,E) =Xe\(A,E).

Sinceτγ-sCl((A,E))∩(e B,E) =e/0,τγ-sCl((A,E))⊂eeX\(B,E).

Hence τγ-sCl((A,E))⊂(e A,E). Therefore, (A,E) is γ-soft

semiclosed. Similarly, (B,E) is γ-soft semiclosed. Since (A,E) =Xe\(B,E),(A,E)isγ-soft semiopen. Therefore, there

exists a nonempty set(A,E)which is bothγ-soft semiopen

andγ-soft semiclosed. This is a contradiction to our

assump-tion. Therefore,Xeisγ-soft semiconnected.

Theorem 4.10. An operation-soft topological space isγ-soft semiconnected if, and only ifX is not the union of any twoe γ-soft semiseparated sets.

Proof. Let(A,E)and(B,E)be any twoγ-soft semiseparated sets such thatXe=(A,E)e∪(B,E). Thereforeτγ-sCl((A,E))

e

∩(B,E)=(A,E)∩e τγ-sCl((B,E))=e/0. Since(A,E)⊂e τγ -sCl((A,E))and(B,E)⊂e τγ-sCl((B,E)),(A,E)∩(e B,E) =e/0.

Nowτγ-sCl((A,E))⊂eeX\(B,E) = (A,E). Soτγ-sCl((A,E)) =

(A,E). Then(A,E)isγ-soft semiclosed. By the same way we

can show that(B,E)isγ-soft semiclosed which contradicts

with Theorem4.9(2). Conversely, let(A,E)and(B,E)be any two disjoint nonempty andγ-soft semiclosed sets overX

such thatXe= (A,E)∪(e B,E). Thenτγ-sCl((A,E))∩(e B,E) = (A,E)∩τe γ-sCl((B,E)) = (A,E)∩(e B,E) =e/0, which

contra-dicts with the hypothesis.

Theorem 4.11. An operation-soft topological space isγ-soft

semiconnected if, and only if for every pair of soft points xα,yβ in X , there is aγ-soft semiconnected subset of X which contains both xα and yβ.

Proof. The necessity is immediate since theγ-soft semicon-nected space itself contains these two points. For the suffi-ciency, suppose that for any two soft pointsxαandyβ, there

is aγ-soft semiconnected subset(C,E)xα,yβ ofXe such that xα,yβ∈(C,E)xα,yβ. Letaµ be a fixed soft point and{Caµ,xα:

xα∈eXe}be a class of allγ-soft semiconnected subsets ofXe

which contain the pointsaµ andxα. ThenXe= ∪

xα∈eXe Caµ,xα

and ∩

xα∈X

Caµ,xα6=e/0. Therefore by Corollary4.8,Xeisγ-soft

semiconnected.

Theorem 4.12. Let(X,τ,E,γ)be an operation-soft

topolog-ical space and{(Fi,E):i∈∆} a family ofγ-soft

semicon-nected sets. If a pair((Fi,E),(Fj,E))is not aγ-soft

semisep-aration for any i,j∈∆, then∪{(e Fi,E):i∈∆}isγ-soft

semi-connected.

Proof. Suppose∪{(e Fi,E):i∈∆}is notγ-soft semiconnected.

Then there existγ-soft semiseparated sets(A,E),(B,E)such

that∪{(e Fi,E):i∈∆}= (A,E)∪(e B,E). Since(Fi,E)is γ

-soft semiconnected for eachi∈∆and(Fi,E)⊂(e A,E)∪(e B,E),

by Theorem4.3,(Fi,E)⊂(e A,E)or(Fi,E)⊂(e B,E). Now, put ∆a={i∈∆:(Fi,E)⊂(e A,E)},∆b={i∈∆:(Fi,E)⊂(e B,E)}.

Then∆a6=e/0,∆b6=e/0 and∆a∪∆e b=∆. Letia∈∆aandib∈∆b,

then(Fia,E)⊂(e A,E)and(Fib,E)⊂(e B,E). By Proposition3.4,

we obtain(Fia,E)and(Fib,E)areγ-soft semiseparated sets.

This is contrary to our hypothesis.

References

[1] Abdulkadir Aygunoglu, Halis Aygun: Some notes on

soft topological spaces. Neural Comput and Applic. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-011-0722-3.

[2] J. Biswas and A.R. Prasannan, An introduction to weaker

and stronger form of soft open sets byγ-operation, Inter. J. Pure and Appl. Math., 116 (2) 2017, 285-298.

[3] Bozena Kostek: Soft set approach to the subjective

assess-ment of sound quality. in: IEEE Conferences. 1 (1998), 669-674.

[4] D. Chen, E.C.C. Tsang, D.S. Yeung: Some notes on the

parameterization reduction of soft sets, in: International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, vol. 3, 2003,pp. 1442-1445.

[5] D. Chen, E.C.C. Tsang, D.S. Yeung, X. Wang: The

parameterization reduction of soft sets and its applica-tions. Computers and Mathematics with Applicaapplica-tions. 49 (2005), 757-763.

[6] Feng Feng, Young Bae Jun, Xianzhong Zhao: soft

semir-ings. Computers and Mathematics with Applications. 56 (2008), 2621-2628.

[7] P. Gomathi sundari and B. Jaya Bharathi, Soft semiopen

sets via operations (submitted).

[8] P. Gomathi sundari and B. Jaya Bharathi, Some weak

forms of soft open sets via operations (submitted). [9] Z. Kong, L. Gao, L. Wang, S. Li: The normal parameter

reduction of soft sets and its algorithm, Computers and Mathematics with Applications 56 (2008), 3029-3037. [10] E. F. Lashin, A. M. Kozae, A. A. Abo Khadra and T.

Medhat: Rough set for topological spaces, Internat. J. Approx. Reason. 40 (2005), 35-43.

[11] D. Molodtsov: Soft set theory-first results. Computers

and Mathematics with Applications. 37 (1999), 19-31. [12] P.K. Maji, R. Biswas, A.R. Roy: Soft set theorys.

Com-puters and Mathematics with Applications. 45 (2003), 555-562.

[13] P.K. Maji, A.R. Roy: An application of soft sets in a

decision making problem. Computers and Mathematics with Applications. 44 (2002), 1077-1083.

[14] Milind M. Mushrif, S. Sengupta, A.K. Ray: Texture

Clas-sification Using a Novel, Soft Set Theory Based Classifi-cation Algorithm, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. (2006), 246-254.

[15] D. Pei, D. Miao: From soft sets to information systems,

(6)

Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of Granular Computing, vol. 2, IEEE, 2005, pp. 617-621.

[16] S. Hussain and B. Ahmad: Some properties of soft

topo-logical spaces. Computers and Mathematics with Appli-cations. 62 (2011), 4058-4067.

[17] M. Shabir, M. Naz: On soft topological

spaces.Computers and Mathematics with Applica-tions. 61 (2011), 1786-1799.

[18] Z. Xiao, L. Chen, B. Zhong, S. Ye: Recognition for soft

information based on the theory of soft sets, in: J. Chen (Ed.), Proceedings of ICSSSM-05, vol. 2, IEEE, 2005, pp. 1104-1106.

[19] I. Zorlutuna, M. Akdag, W. K. Min, S. Atmaca: Remarks

on soft topological spaces. To appear in Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics.

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ISSN(P):2319−3786 Malaya Journal of Matematik

References

Related documents

In the present study, a new self-sustained enzymatic cascade was developed for the production of FDCA from MMF—combining aryl-alcohol oxidase (AAO) [ 16 ], unspecific

GO2 can directly utilize various untreated lignocellulolytic biomasses to produce low-cost bioflocculants, which showed the high efficiency to harvest two green microalgae in a

engagement on the development of infant play, adaptive behavior, and child emotion availability,.. in the

In addition, investigating the nature of the media (acidic, alkaline, or neutral) that facilitates the bacterial attach- ment to the lining mucosa layer in UTIs

model consists of a pair of 2-d equations of Kirchho type for the static equi- librium or dynamic motion, as appropriate, of the transverse displacements of the references surfaces

abbreviations: RIC – Radiation-induced coagulopathy; AC - activated carbon; ARS – acute radiation syndrome; ES – enterosorbent; APTT – activated partial thromboplastin time; PC

This study has demonstrated that: a) the MXR defence system in earthworm E. fetida is at least partly mediated by the P-gp efflux transporter; b) the identified sequence