Chapter 18- Foreign Policy
Chapter 18- Foreign Policy
(FP)
(FP)
• (1). Outline history of(1). Outline history of US Foreign Policy (FP) US Foreign Policy (FP)fromfrom isolationism isolationism thru thru Cold WarCold War toto post- post-Cold War
Cold War era era..
• (2). Define the following key (2). Define the following key FPFP terms: terms: Monroe Doctrine, globalism, containment Monroe Doctrine, globalism, containment Truman Doctrine, NATO, 3rd World, détente, enlargement
Truman Doctrine, NATO, 3rd World, détente, enlargement,, and and neo- neo-isolationism
isolationism. .
• (3). Define(3). Definenational interestnational interest;; contrast decision making for contrast decision making for FPFP w/that for w/that fordomestic domestic policypolicy..
• (4). Discuss the(4). Discuss theenumerated & enumerated & implied powersimplied powers set by the set by the ConstitutionConstitution for making for making FP.FP.
• (5). Examine the (5). Examine the inherent advantageinherent advantage of the of the President President in making in making foreign policyforeign policy..
• (6). Outline the role of the(6). Outline the role of the White House, the Bureaucracy, the CongressWhite House, the Bureaucracy, the Congress, , and and the the PublicPublic in shaping American
in shaping American foreign policy. foreign policy.
• (7). Discuss the(7). Discuss theUS National SecurityUS National Security structure and keystructure and key DOD DOD organizationsorganizations& leaders& leaders..
• (8). Discuss Foreign Policy challenges facing the U.S. in the Post-Cold War era.(8). Discuss Foreign Policy challenges facing the U.S. in the Post-Cold War era.
• (9). Assess the future direction of(9). Assess the future direction ofUS National Security PolicyUS National Security Policy andand Military StrategyMilitary Strategy,, required military
required military Force Levels, Mission Creep, Multi-nationalism, WMDForce Levels, Mission Creep, Multi-nationalism, WMD, , andand BMDBMD..
• (10). Discuss current foreign policy issues and their political impact on the U.S.(10). Discuss current foreign policy issues and their political impact on the U.S. -
- War on Terrorism; - War with Iraq;War on Terrorism; - War with Iraq; - North Korea; - Arab-Israeli conflict - North Korea; - Arab-Israeli conflict - Domestic economic slump; - the uncertain future;
2
1798-1941 The Isolationist Era
1942-1945 World War II
(start of “Globalism
”)1990-present
Post-Cold War
1946-1989
The Cold War
US Foreign Policy
(FP)
A
Brief History
Brief History
New category after 9/11/2001
Brief History of U.S. Foreign Policy
Brief History of U.S. Foreign Policy
•
Isolationism
*
A foreign policy built on the principle of avoiding formal military and political alliances with other countries.
•
The
Isolationist Era
– 1st 150 yrs of US History
• Adherence to guidance of Washington’s Farwell address
• Stressed avoiding political connections overseas • Pursue commercial trade ties only
– US militarily weak & focused on expansion westward
– Not interested in global role (2 oceans of separation)
•
What
FP Doctrine*
asserted US interests for the first time
outside America, primarily throughout Western
4
The Monroe Doctrine
A
basic principle of U.S. foreign policy
that
dates back to a
warning
President James Monroe
issued in 1823 that the
United States would resist
Monroe Doctrine
Monroe Doctrine
(1823)
(1823)
•
Invoked 1895: early Invoked 1895: early FPFP involvement outside US involvement outside US– AimAim: Protect US interest in : Protect US interest in Western HemisphereWestern Hemisphere
•
US involvement overseas primarily in US involvement overseas primarily in LATAMLATAM6
6
World War I
World War I
•
US deviated from
Isolationism
briefly during
WWI
WW1 (W. Wilson)=> make world “safe for democracy”
After WW1=> isolationism returns w/vengeance
Senate rejects League of Nations & Versailles treaty
World War II
8
“
“
Air Raid Pearl Harbor”
Air Raid Pearl Harbor”
7 December 1941
7 December 1941
Impact on American Public Opinion?
Globalism Era
Globalism Era
=>
=>
The
The
Cold War
Cold War
•
Globalism
Globalism
:
:
–
US should be prepared to use military force around the
US should be prepared to use military force around the
globe to protect its political & economic interests
globe to protect its political & economic interests
•
Following WWII =>
Following WWII =>
who emerges as primary
who emerges as primary
thereat to US political & military interest?
thereat to US political & military interest?
•
Presidential doctrine formulated as a result?
Presidential doctrine formulated as a result?
•
Truman Doctrine
Truman Doctrine
:
:
–
US would actively oppose communists’ attempts to
US would actively oppose communists’ attempts to
overthrow or conquer non-communist nations
overthrow or conquer non-communist nations
•
US Foreign Policy that emerged from the
US Foreign Policy that emerged from the
Truman
Truman
Doctrine
10
Containment
A bedrock principle of
U.S. foreign policy
from
mid 1940s to early 1990s that emphasized the need
to
contain any further Soviet territorial &
communist ideological expansion
.
What was the
economic
instrument of
Containment?
Marshall Plan:
US commitment to rebuild Europe
12
NATO
Cold War
Military Alliances
Cold War
Cold War
Heats Up
Heats Up
•
As Soviets become more aggressive
As Soviets become more aggressive
–
US becomes more concerned
US becomes more concerned
•
Conduct major
Conduct major
National Security
National Security
reassessment
reassessment
–
NSC-68
NSC-68
:
:
National Security Strategy
National Security Strategy
for
for
Containment
Containment
•
Concludes a major increase in Concludes a major increase in defense spendingdefense spending required required•
Truman administration balks at high price tag
Truman administration balks at high price tag
–
So
So
NSC-68
NSC-68
filed in bottom drawer of someone’s safe
filed in bottom drawer of someone’s safe
14
Korean War
Korean War
US versus USSR-
US versus USSR-
The Indirect Approach
The Indirect Approach
•
Competition at margins=>Competition at margins=> the the 3rd World3rd World– US primary US primary Foreign PolicyForeign Policy goal: goal:
•
Prevent potential “Prevent potential “falling dominoes” falling dominoes”•
Major test of this goal: Major test of this goal: Vietnam War:Vietnam War:– US US ((IkeIke)) supports French in supports French in SE AsiaSE Asia
– AimAim: : Contain Soviet expansion in Contain Soviet expansion in SEASEA
•
US view of most US view of most global crisesglobal crises & conflicts? & conflicts?•
Most viewed as
Most viewed as
Soviet/communist
Soviet/communist
inspired:
inspired:
– USSRUSSR => => ChinaChina => => North VietnamNorth Vietnam => =>
South Vietnam’s guerilla insurgents South Vietnam’s guerilla insurgents
16
Counter Insurgency (CI)
Counter Insurgency (CI)
•
JFK
JFK
sends
sends
Special Forces
Special Forces
&
&
SEAL
SEAL
advisors to conduct CI
advisors to conduct CI
“
“
Americanization”
Americanization”
of Vietnam War
of Vietnam War
(1965-1968)
(1965-1968)
•
Conventional US Troops take over fighting for SVN
Conventional US Troops take over fighting for SVN
– Reach high point of 540,000 US troops by 1969Reach high point of 540,000 US troops by 1969
18
18
The
The
“Tet”
“Tet”
Offensive- 1968
Offensive- 1968
•
The “light at the end of the tunnel” becomes a speeding
train’s headlight:
– Americans become disillusioned with continuing the War as it’s bought home to them up front & personal
Exit Strategy
Exit Strategy
•
US involvement reached high point by late 1968
US involvement reached high point by late 1968
–
America became acutely divided over war
America became acutely divided over war
–
Following
Following
Tet Offensive
Tet Offensive
most Americans just wanted out
most Americans just wanted out
•
Seeking a way out of
Seeking a way out of
quagmire
quagmire
–
Nixon
Nixon
comes to power
comes to power
with
with
“secret plan”
“secret plan”
to get out
to get out
•
“
“
Vietnamization
Vietnamization
” =>
” =>
allow
allow
“Peace with Honor”
“Peace with Honor”
•
February 1973
February 1973
=>
=>
Peace Accords signed
Peace Accords signed
–
War turned over to
War turned over to
SVN & US military forces withdraw
SVN & US military forces withdraw
–
1975: Peace
1975: Peace
w/o
w/o
Honor & the “Vietnam Syndrome”
Honor & the “Vietnam Syndrome”
•
Nixon sought Soviet help to get US out of Vietnam
Nixon sought Soviet help to get US out of Vietnam
20
Détente’
•
A
policy
of
Nixon
administration followed to develop
more cordial relations with the Soviet Union
.
– Aimed in part in enlisting Soviet support to assist US in getting North Vietnam back to peace table & serious negotiations
– So that US could get out of Vietnam “with honor.”
•
Détente’
lasted until 1979
– Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in late 1979 (Carter) brought US-Soviet Détente’ to an abrupt end.
Reagan &
Reagan &
“The Evil Empire”
“The Evil Empire”
•
Reagan pursues
Reagan pursues
hard line
hard line
with the Soviets
with the Soviets
– A corrupt USSR system living on barrowed economic timesA corrupt USSR system living on barrowed economic times
– Serious reform long past due to save it from collapseSerious reform long past due to save it from collapse
•
1985:
1985:
Mikhail Gorbachev
Mikhail Gorbachev
=>
=>
comes to power & attempts
comes to power & attempts
reform =>
reform =>
Perestroika
Perestroika
&
&
Glasnost
Glasnost
– ProblemProblem: Soviet system too corrupt & broken to salvage: Soviet system too corrupt & broken to salvage
•
Reagan’s
Reagan’s
SDI
SDI
=>
=>
outspending the Soviets into defeat
outspending the Soviets into defeat
– Unable to keep up with strategic arms race & go broke tryingUnable to keep up with strategic arms race & go broke trying
•
Year of Revolution
Year of Revolution
& fall of Eastern Europe - 1989
& fall of Eastern Europe - 1989
– Fall of Fall of Berlin WallBerlin Wall – symbol of Soviet Communism – symbol of Soviet Communism
•
US Military operations in
US Military operations in
Third World
Third World
continued:
continued:
– Grenada, Panama, Iraq #1 Grenada, Panama, Iraq #1
– (Clear lack of Soviet support for its former ally- Iraq)(Clear lack of Soviet support for its former ally- Iraq)
22
After the Cold War
After the Cold War
•
New World Order
New World Order
–
–
–
Strategic reassessment
Strategic reassessment
(Bush I)
(Bush I)
tries to figure out what
tries to figure out what
US should do during the post Cold War era
US should do during the post Cold War era
–
Still trying to decide when Clinton is elected in 1992
Still trying to decide when Clinton is elected in 1992
•
Policy of
Policy of
Enlargement
Enlargement
(Clinton)
(Clinton)
=>
=>
–
Expand democracy & free markets globally
Expand democracy & free markets globally
•
Also use military force as required (& we did):
Also use military force as required (& we did):
–
Somalia 1993
Somalia 1993
–
Haiti 1994
Haiti 1994
–
Bosnia & NATO peacekeeping- 1995
Bosnia & NATO peacekeeping- 1995
–
Serbia bombing – 1999
Serbia bombing – 1999
Foreign Policy Under George W. Bush
Foreign Policy Under George W. Bush
•
Neo-isolationism
Neo-isolationism
:
:
from
from
2000
2000
until
until
9/11/2001
9/11/2001
–
Theory
Theory
: US should take a step back
: US should take a step back
•
Avoid always acting as world’s policemanAvoid always acting as world’s policeman–
Reality
Reality
: Campaign rhetoric gives way to real world once
: Campaign rhetoric gives way to real world once
in office
in office
•
The world is still very dangerous & America is not immuneThe world is still very dangerous & America is not immune•
ON ON 9/11/20019/11/2001 that reality hit home hard => that reality hit home hard => revised policyrevised policy•
The
The
Bush Doctrine
Bush Doctrine
:
:
–
America’s post 9/11/2001 Policy & Strategy-
America’s post 9/11/2001 Policy &
Strategy-•
FocusFocus:: Counter Terror Counter Terror Policy & National Security StrategyPolicy & National Security Strategy–
Preemptive strikes & “
Preemptive strikes & “
preventative war
preventative war
”
”
24
Foreign Policy
Foreign Policy
(FP)
(FP)
Versus
Versus
Domestic Policy
Domestic Policy
(DP)
(DP)
•
National Interest
National Interest
& its various degrees & levels
& its various degrees & levels
– Vital vs. Important- (who decides?)Vital vs. Important- (who decides?)•
Text:
Text:
“Two presidencies”
“Two presidencies”
– At At HomeHome( ( weakweak president) vs. president) vs. AbroadAbroad ( (strongstrong one)- why? one)- why?
•
Five Sources
of Presidential
Foreign Policy
power:
– 1. The Constitution & president’s enumerated vs. implied powers
– 2. President’s “inherent” advantages in Foreign Policy
– 3. Role of precedent in presidential dealings in Foreign Policy
– 4. Supreme Court Rulings regarding presidential FP actions
– 5. Behavior of Congress when the President takes decisive action
1.
1.
The Constitution and Foreign Policy
The Constitution and Foreign Policy
•
Article I
Article I
=>
=>
enumerated
enumerated
Congressional powers include:
Congressional powers include:
– Provide for common defenseProvide for common defense – Regulate commerceRegulate commerce
– Define & punish Piracies & Felonies on high seasDefine & punish Piracies & Felonies on high seas
– Declare WarDeclare War
– Raise & support Armies & maintain a NavyRaise & support Armies & maintain a Navy
– Make rules & regulations for land & naval forces (Make rules & regulations for land & naval forces (UCMJUCMJ))
– Power of the purse => (fund Power of the purse => (fund or not or not fund military deployments)fund military deployments)
•
Article II
Article II
=>
=>
enumerated
enumerated
Presidential powers:
Presidential powers:
– Commander in ChiefCommander in Chief (title or job description?) (title or job description?)
– Power to Power to make treatiesmake treaties (subject to Senate’s ratification) (subject to Senate’s ratification)
26
26
2.
2.
The President’s
The President’s
Inherent Advantages
Inherent Advantages
•
Foreign Policy success depends on (what?):
Foreign Policy success depends on (what?):
–
Speed
Speed
(quickly seize the initiative)
(quickly seize the initiative)
–
Discretion
Discretion
(secrecy)
(secrecy)
–
Flexibility
Flexibility
(shift priorities as needed & compromise)
(shift priorities as needed & compromise)
•
Presidential
Presidential
initiatives
initiatives
depend on the
depend on the
venue
venue
used:
used:
–
Foreign Policy
Foreign Policy
(FP)
(FP)
vs
vs
.
.
Domestic Policy
Domestic Policy
(DP)-
(DP)-–
Difference between the two
Difference between the two
WRT
WRT
presidential freedom
presidential freedom
of action?
of action?
–
FP:
FP:
Unless
Unless
Congress acts to halt
Congress acts to halt
president’s actions
president’s actions
•
((Military Force DeploymentMilitary Force Deployment) – ) – it standsit stands- - versus: versus:–
DP:
DP:
Until
Until
Congress agrees to act
Congress agrees to act
president’s initiative
president’s initiative
3.
3.
Precedent
Precedent
•
President’s aggressive interpretation of
President’s aggressive interpretation of
FP
FP
powers
powers
–
Any presidential action establishes precedent
Any presidential action establishes precedent
•
If left unchallenged or challenge is unsuccessful=>If left unchallenged or challenge is unsuccessful=>•
Implied powerImplied power is is successfully successfully establishedestablished as result as result–
Successors use as spring board for further expansion
Successors use as spring board for further expansion
•
Truman to present=>
Truman to present=>
–
Implied power
Implied power
as
as
CINC
CINC
(Korean War- Text: Box 18-1)
(Korean War- Text: Box 18-1)
–
Title confers
Title confers
implied
implied
power
power
to order troops into combat
to order troops into combat
–
Now accepted as precedent (though grudgingly)
Now accepted as precedent (though grudgingly)
–
Also depends on the perceived power &
Also depends on the perceived power &
popularity (poll numbers) of the president
28
4.
4.
Supreme Court Rulings
Supreme Court Rulings
•
US v. Curtiss
US v. Curtiss
-Wright Export Corporation (1936)
-Wright Export Corporation (1936)
– Court Decision: President’s FP powers go Court Decision: President’s FP powers go beyond beyond ConstitutionConstitution – Impact:Impact: expanded expanded implied implied Presidential powersPresidential powers in Foreign Policy in Foreign Policy
•
US v. Belmont
US v. Belmont
(‘37)=>
(‘37)=>
executive agreement
executive agreement
(vs.
(vs.
Treaty
Treaty
)
)
– Result:Result: executive agreementsexecutive agreements trend up- over 90%trend up- over 90% (See (See Box 18-2Box 18-2))•
Furthermore Court usually
Furthermore Court usually
refuses to hear
refuses to hear
challenges on FP
challenges on FP
– Effect:Effect: de facto Court support for presidential FP prerogatives de facto Court support for presidential FP prerogatives
5.
5.
Behavior of Congress
Behavior of Congress
•
Partisan & institutional divisions
Partisan & institutional divisions
in Congress=>
in Congress=>
–
Results in their lack of unified action to challenge
Results in their lack of unified action to challenge
•
Belief in
Belief in
strong Presidential leadership
strong Presidential leadership
in FP
in FP
•
Electoral considerations
Electoral considerations
–
(What if President is right? – avoid voters’ displeasure)
(What if President is right? – avoid voters’ displeasure)
•
Post WWII vs. post Vietnam
Post WWII vs. post Vietnam
Congressional behavior
Congressional behavior
•
End of Vietnam War & Cold War
End of Vietnam War & Cold War
=>
=>
–
More Congressional activism in Foreign Policy
More Congressional activism in Foreign Policy
30
Next Assignment
Next Assignment
•
Thanksgiving Holiday
Thanksgiving Holiday
(Wednesday: no class)
(Wednesday: no class)
–
Travel safely!
Travel safely!
•
Chapter 18b:
Chapter 18b:
Foreign Policy
Foreign Policy
(Next Monday)
(Next Monday)
–
Learning Objectives 6-10
Learning Objectives 6-10
•
Preparation for
Preparation for
Course Review
Course Review
(Wednesday 11/30)
(Wednesday 11/30)
– Also Department wide standardized test administered as wellAlso Department wide standardized test administered as well
•
RESEARCH PAPER IS also DUE 11/30!!!
RESEARCH PAPER IS also DUE 11/30!!!
•
Complete Instructor Evals – today before you
Complete Instructor Evals – today before you
leave!
American Public Congress
Foreign Policy Bureaucracies White House Staff
President
Who Makes U.S. Foreign Policy?
Who Makes U.S. Foreign Policy?
32
Foreign Policy Power
The White House
The White House
&
&
NSC
NSC
•
Role of President & Vice President
Role of President & Vice President
–
Varies w/administration
Varies w/administration
–
Generally=> President has called all the shots
Generally=> President has called all the shots
–
Recently
Recently
VP delegated a great deal of power & influence
VP delegated a great deal of power & influence
•
Certainly true of this AdministrationCertainly true of this Administration•
National Security Council
National Security Council
(NSC)*
(NSC)*
–
Plays
Plays
key role
key role
in formulating American Foreign Policy
in formulating American Foreign Policy
•
NSC advisor
NSC advisor
& his or her staff’s role
& his or her staff’s role
–
Plays as either
Plays as either
Honest broker
Honest broker
or
or
policy advocate
policy advocate
–
Depends on President’s preference & NSC advisor
Depends on President’s preference & NSC advisor
34
• Created in 1947
• Members include:
• The
President
&
Vice President
•
Secretary of State
&
Secretary of Defense
•
Director
of
CIA
&
Chair of Joint Chiefs of Staff
•
(Advisors to statutory members- subject to change)
• The staff is headed up by the
National Security Advisor
• Other relevant Cabinet Secretaries invited as required
Defense
Department
State
Department
CIA & Intel
Community
Foreign Policy Bureaucracy
NSC Staff (Coordinator)
36
The Foreign Policy Bureaucracy
The Foreign Policy Bureaucracy
•
Roles of
Roles of
Department of State
Department of State
(DOS)
(DOS)
vs. Defense (
vs. Defense (
DOD)
DOD)
– Current Current Iraq IIIraq II example: DOD example: DOD took the lead over State
took the lead over State
– Major debate ensuedMajor debate ensued
• (Winning the (Winning the PeacePeace vice just vice just Winning the
Winning the WarWar))
– Personality driven debate (who Personality driven debate (who
has the most influence?)
has the most influence?)
•
Uniformed Armed Svs’ role
Uniformed Armed Svs’ role
– ChairmanChairman & Joint Chiefs & Joint Chiefs
• (CJCS & JCS(CJCS & JCS chiefs) chiefs)
– Military judgments in a political Military judgments in a political
world (The Challenge?)
Intelligence community
Intelligence community
•
Intelligence community
Intelligence community
& selected agencies
& selected agencies
–
Major current power shifts creating disruptions
Major current power shifts creating disruptions
–
DNI
DNI
&
&
CIA-
CIA-
who’s on first? (TBD )
who’s on first? (TBD )
•
Expertise & experience must be
Expertise & experience must be
taken into account
taken into account
–
Recent Intel failure illustrates problem when not=>
Recent Intel failure illustrates problem when not=>
–
Telling the boss always what he wants to hear?
Telling the boss always what he wants to hear?
•
Impact? (Tends to downplay unpleasant or hard news)Impact? (Tends to downplay unpleasant or hard news)•
Also all Agencies compete with each other for
Also all Agencies compete with each other for
power, influence, & $$$ (Budget share)
power, influence, & $$$ (Budget share)
–
Result
Result
:
:
Tends to drive US FP to also include what in
Tends to drive US FP to also include what in
their recommendations?
38
Congress & Foreign Policy
•
Constitution (
Article I
)
assigns Congress
explicit powers
• Result: Considerable theoretical influence in foreign policy
•
Before WWI & II, Congress tended to assert greater role
in
Foreign Policy
•
During the
1950s and 1960s
Congress typically deferred
to the Executive Branch
• (Since WWII & start of Cold War)
•
During
1970s and 1980s
Congressional activism
in
foreign policy grew (Post Vietnam & Watergate)
•
Post 9/11
Congress tended to defer to President (at first)
Congress & Foreign Policy (2)
•
So extent of power & influence
So extent of power & influence
varies over time
varies over time
–
Cold War
Cold War
vs.
vs.
post-Watergate
post-Watergate
&
&
post-Vietnam War
post-Vietnam War
vs.
vs.
–
Post 9/11
Post 9/11
(…and back to the future)
(…and back to the future)
•
3 ways Congress influences Foreign Policy
3 ways Congress influences Foreign Policy
:
:
–
1.
1.
Substantive legislation
Substantive legislation
•
$$$ appropriations shape policy => power$$$ appropriations shape policy => power–
2.
2.
Procedural legislation
Procedural legislation
•
How laws & regulations must be applied How laws & regulations must be applied wrt wrt PolicyPolicy–
3. Efforts to shape
3. Efforts to shape
Public Opinion
Public Opinion
40
Public Opinion & Foreign Policy
•
Two options for the Public to shape Foreign Policy
Two options for the Public to shape Foreign Policy
:
:
– 1. Join 1. Join interest groupsinterest groups & lobby Congress & President & lobby Congress & President– 2. 2. VoteVote for candidates aligned with their political views for candidates aligned with their political views
•
Public seldom able to effect
Public seldom able to effect
day to day
day to day
polices (Iraq II)
polices (Iraq II)
– Often policy makers decide with little regard to the Public –Often policy makers decide with little regard to the Public –why?why?
– Public Public lack detailed knowledge & expertiselack detailed knowledge & expertise
– ApathyApathy (most don’t even know or care where crisis spot is) (most don’t even know or care where crisis spot is)
• More concerned with domestic & economic issuesMore concerned with domestic & economic issues
•
Public usually rallies around President once conflict starts
Public usually rallies around President once conflict starts
– Initial resistance to deployment => then active supportInitial resistance to deployment => then active support•
But with time support will wane if casualties grow and/or
But with time support will wane if casualties grow and/or
progress seems to take too long at too high a price
progress seems to take too long at too high a price
Impact of
Impact of
Public Opinion
Public Opinion
on
on
Foreign Policy
Foreign Policy
•
Public Opinion provide
Public Opinion provide
decision makers
decision makers
with very little
with very little
guidance,
guidance,
but…
but…
•
Two
Two
indirect effects of Public Opinion:
indirect effects of Public Opinion:
– 1. 1. Constrains future policiesConstrains future policies which can be considered which can be considered
• Example: Example: Vietnam legacyVietnam legacy => => Vietnam syndromeVietnam syndrome
– 2. Determines Washington’s FP 2. Determines Washington’s FP prioritiespriorities (with the media)(with the media) – Iraq II example=> looters initially brushed off by SECDEFIraq II example=> looters initially brushed off by SECDEF
• Media alerted public & public became concerned re. Iraqi MuseumMedia alerted public & public became concerned re. Iraqi Museum
• As result FBI went to Iraq to track down stolen antiquitiesAs result FBI went to Iraq to track down stolen antiquities
•
Recent Public concern for Intel failure
Recent Public concern for Intel failure
wrt WMD
wrt WMD
– Forced Administration to adjust reason for invasion (democracy)Forced Administration to adjust reason for invasion (democracy)
42
Challenges of the
Challenges of the
Post–Cold War Era
Post–Cold War Era
•
Major debate continues:
Major debate continues:
–
What should the US role be in the post-Cold War era?
What should the US role be in the post-Cold War era?
•
Disagreements over Goals & Strategies & Change:
Disagreements over Goals & Strategies & Change:
–
Terror strike of
Terror strike of
9/11/2001
9/11/2001
changed everything
changed everything
–
Debate now centers on strategy to prevent 2nd attack
Debate now centers on strategy to prevent 2nd attack
–
Preventive War
Preventive War
&
&
pre-emptive
pre-emptive
strikes (
strikes (
Bush Doctrine
Bush Doctrine
)
)
•
((Containment strategyContainment strategy no longer viable option)- why?no longer viable option)- why?•
Soviet Union no longer exists & suicide bombers can’t be Soviet Union no longer exists & suicide bombers can’t be logically deterredlogically deterred
–
Homeland Security &
Homeland Security &
Defense
Defense
at what expense?
at what expense?
44
DOD Budget (as % of GDP)
DOD Budget (as % of GDP)
%
of
G D P
Korean War
9/11
Vietnam War (High point)
Future Challenges to US Foreign Policy
•
Disagreements
about the
goals
and
strategies
of American foreign policy for 21
stcentury
•
An ever
changing foreign policy agenda
•
Cold War => Post Cold War => Bush Doctrine
•
Unilateral
versus
multilateral*
FP
approach
46
Unilateralism:
The tendency of the
US to
act alone
in foreign affairs
without consulting other
countries.
Multilateralism:
Three or more
Nations
cooperate together
to
solve some common
foreign policy problem
Unilateralism vs. Multilateralism
The United States will face complex problems in:
•
Nuclear proliferation
(North Korea & Iran)
•
Military interventions
(The Middle East & exiting Iraq)
•
Economic policy
(Trade imbalance w/China &
ME Oil prices)•
Globalization
(Global interdependence & domestic impact)
•
“Inter-mestic” issues
(Foreign Policy impact at home)
•
Human rights
(American ideals vs. US National interests)
•
Homeland Security
(Balancing security with liberties)
48
The Last Assignment:
The Last Assignment:
•
Review & prepare for Final Exam
Review & prepare for Final Exam
–
25 question
25 question
standardized test
standardized test
will also be administered
will also be administered
•
Questions & answers to Midterm & Test II
Questions & answers to Midterm & Test II
–
Review: come prepared to ask your questions
Review: come prepared to ask your questions
•
(last chance to clarify any uncertainty)(last chance to clarify any uncertainty)•
Essay Question Prep Review
Essay Question Prep Review
(Handout last week)
(Handout last week)
•
Turn in your Research Paper on Wednesday 11/30
Turn in your Research Paper on Wednesday 11/30
Chapter 18:
Chapter 18:
KEY TERMS
KEY TERMS
• Cold War: A phrase used to describe the high level of tension and distrust that characterized relations between the Soviet Union and the United States from the late 1940s until the early 1990s.
• Containment: A bedrock principle of U.S. foreign policy from the 1940s to the 1980s that emphasized the need to prevent communist countries, especially the Soviet Union, from expanding the territory they controlled.
• Detente: A policy the Nixon administration followed to develop more cordial relations with the Soviet Union.
• Engagement: The policy of encouraging U.S. trade and investment in a country in an effort to encourage it to pursue policies more to America’s liking.
• Enlargement: The policy President Bill Clinton proposed as a substitute for containment. It calls on the United States to promote the emergence of market democracies; that is, countries that combine a free market economic system with a democratic political system.
• Executive agreements: International agreements that, unlike treaties, do not require the approval of two-thirds of the Senate to become binding on the United States.
• Foreign Service Officers: Career professional diplomats who work for the Department of State.
• Free trade: An economic policy that holds that lowering trade barriers will benefit the economies of all the countries involved.
• Globalism: The idea that the United States should be prepared to use military force around the globe to defend its political and economic interests.
50
Chapter 18:
Chapter 18:
KEY TERMS
KEY TERMS
(2)
(2)
• Intermestic issues: Issues such as trade, the environment, and drug trafficking that affect both domestic and foreign interests.
• Isolationism: A foreign policy built on the principle of avoiding formal military and political alliances with other countries.
• Marshall Plan: A multibillion-dollar U.S. aid program in the late 1940s and early 1950s that helped Western European countries rebuild their economies in the wake of World War.
• Monroe Doctrine: A basic principle of U.S. foreign policy that dates back to a warning President James Monroe issued in 1823 that the United States would resist further European efforts to intervene in the affairs of the Western Hemisphere.
• Multilateralism: An approach in which three or more countries cooperate for the purpose of solving some common problem.
• National interest: The idea that the United States has certain interests in international relations that most Americans agree on.
• National Missile Defense (NMD): A weapons system that, if it can be made to work, would potentially protect the United States and possibly its allies against attack by long-range
ballistic missiles.
• Neo-conservativism: Recent resurgence of Conservative ideology, especially toward Foreign Policy.
• Neo-isolationism: The idea that the United States should reduce its role in world affairs and return to a foreign policy similar to the one it pursued before World War II.
Chapter 18:
Chapter 18:
KEY TERMS
KEY TERMS
(3)
(3)
•
Sovereignty: The power of self-rule.•
Third World: A term loosely defined to mean the developing countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.•
Truman Doctrine: A policy, announced by President Truman in 1947, that the United States would oppose communist attempts to overthrow or conquer non-communist countries.•
Two presidencies: The argument that presidents have much greater influence over the content of foreign policy than the content ofdomestic policy.
•
Unilateralism: The tendency of the United States to act alone in foreign affairs without consulting other countries.•
World Trade Organization (WTO): The international trade