Simulation of Fifth Generation RF Network Planning For Base Station Antennas by Using 4x4 MU-MIMO

(1)

2163

Simulation of Fifth Generation RF Network Planning For Base Station Antennas by Using 4x4 MU-MIMO

1Reshma Begum.Shaik, ²Dr. G. Sasikala

1Research Scholar, School of Electrical and Communication Engineering, VelTech Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai-600 062

2Associate Professor, School of Electrical and CommunicationEngineering, VelTech Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai-600 062

Abstract:

This paper presents a design of base station antenna with4X4 MU-MIMO (multi-user multiple input multiple output) Sector Antenna subscriber sites and Radio Waves 4ft high Performance Dual-Polar ParabolicHPD4-5.2NS network sites with study constructions for micro-base-station applications. In this paper design a Dual-Polar Parabolic network sites are 5825 to 5875 MHz, 4-FT height for point to point (PTP) link and point to multi point (PMP) link ePMP 4x4 MU-MIMO Sector Antenna for subscriber module at ePMP 3000, 5.8 GHz (5825 to 5875 MHz) Access Point RF frequency band. This 5G mobile network planning and this improves the performance of the network in terms of coverage and capacity by using 4X4 MIMO antennas for indoor propagation model. Measured results show that the antenna has a 80MHz RF channel bandwidth with Antenna Gain is 15 dBi, Antenna Beam width is 90.0° and Performance 99.9999 % for 10.0 Mbps. This can be used for base stations in the next 5G generation wireless communication system. Link Planner has been used to simulate network coverage and throughput performance of 4X4 MU-MIMO configurations of the deployed networks. It improving the throughput with the high performance dual-polarized parabolic antennas in previous work.

KEYWORDS: 4X4 MU-MIMO, High Performance Dual-Polarized Parabolic, Micro Base Station, Fifth Generation, PTP, ePMP.

I. INTRODUCTION

Mobile communication is developing rapidly and made an exceptional improvement in data transmission and voice. This improves by using MIMO antennas. Multi-client MIMO is an arrangements of numerous information and various yield innovation for remote correspondence framework, in which a lot of supporters or remote terminals, each with at least one receiving wires, speak with one another. The sign got in a solitary multi-passage client. Numerous yield frameworks, the sign received of various clients in Multi-Input Multi-Output (MU-MIMO). The frameworks endure commotion and inter antenna.

Interference as well as influenced by the multiuser interference (MUI).

MU-MIMO the technique is considered promising for the downlink radio (DL) transmission due to the significant Spectral improvement of the efficiency coming from its spatial division. For the transmission of DL in the time split duplex mode (TDD). The new features of MU-MIMO, that is the ability to transmit multiple spatial flows from the access point (AP) to different points in parallel using a multi-user beam formation scheme. Before discussing 5G technology studying the difference between SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO technology. Single user multi-input multi-output (SU-MIMO) innovation permits various information and yield streams with each gadget in turn, while MU-MIMO permits synchronous correspondence with different gadgets. As the 802.11ac Wave 2 remote switches and passages arrive at the market, any individual who underpins a Wi-Fi system ought to ask about MU-MIMO shown in figure1.

(2)

2164

Fig. 1: SU-MIMO & MU-MIMO SYSTEM

A 1x1 switch or customer connector bolsters by one transmit stream and one get stream.

A 2x2 gadget bolsters two flows to each route, and a 3x3 gadget underpins three SU- MIMO likewise requires the Wi-Fi gadgets to have numerous radio wires so as to help the sending and receiving of multiple transmissions.

Fig. 2: 4X4 MIMO FOR SU-MIMO & MU-MIMO SYSTEM

Contrast with SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO, MU-MIMO gives better execution and give greater limit. Appeared in figure 2 Here configuration base station arrange by utilizing 4x4 MIMO radio wires, MIMO mode is MU-MIMO. Fifth age current base station(BS) reception apparatuses structure with broadband and high Performance Dual-Polar Parabolic are favored over antenna applications since they can diminish the establishment cost of the framework, improve framework limit and sign nature of administration to a huge degree to accomplish high disengagement from port to port, radiation example of the table, high gain thus on. MIMO advancement is additionally part of the time alluded to as Next-Gen AC that alludes to the 802.11ac show Measures more prepared than 802.11ac, (for instance, 802.11b, g and n) don't bolster MU-MIMO. MU-MIMO (which speaks to various customers, various data, and distinctive execution) was made to help circumstances in which a few customers attempt to arrive at a remote framework meanwhile. With the typical appearance of 802.11ax, MU-MIMO's advancement capacities are developing.

MU-MIMO is the following MIMO advanced (SU-MIMO) from a solitary customer, which is for the most part alluded to as MIMO. The MIMO development was made to help increment the measure of radio links in a remote switch that is utilized to both acknowledge and transmit, improving the limit as for remote affiliations

(3)

2165

II. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

The main aim of this thesis is to plan the fifth generation of the RF network in the prediction planning tools and observe its performance in terms of capacity, coverage and QoS. It provides reliable, secure, cost-effective system. This is possible only with high performance antennas like MIMO antennas. By increasing this antenna array size, then this can improves the performance of antennas.

III. PROBLEM STATEMENT

Earlier mobile generation base station (BS) antennas are designed by using 2X2 MIMO antennas. It has been found that the Radio Waves 4ft high Performance Dual-Polar Parabolic array is performs better for 4x4 MU-MIMO transmission strategies than 4x4 SU-MIMO mode. It increases the performance in terms of coverage, capacity and Qos.

Increasing and changing mode of MIMO array size means through data transmission speed and quality also increases. It was shown in above figure 2.

IV. PROPOSED ANTENNA SYSTEM

In this research we are going to design the base station (BS) antennas to achieve high performance. Base station antennas with different structures are proposed in recent literatures. Here designing the BS antenna with 4x4 MIMO Dual-Polar Parabolic antennas and 4x4 MU_MIMO mode. These antennas improve the transmission (base station) and receiver (mobile terminals) performance. Base stations, one is network sites and second one is subscriber site antennas. Network sites provide the point to point (PTP) connection and subscriber site use to transmit the data from point to multipoint (PMP).Sector Antenna subscriber sites Sector Antenna with sturdy constructions for micro-base-station applications which frequency band is 80MHz .Here we are using adaptive beam forming and TDD technique.

V. LITERATURE REVIEW

The objective of LTE to supply a high rate, low inertness and parcel upgraded radio access innovation supporting adaptable data measure organizations with capacity of one hundred Mbps downlink speed and fifty Mbps transmission speed. LTE utilizes each FDD and TDD as duplexing strategies to oblige each kind of range assets. The inclusion estimation is finished kindly of the $64000 surroundings information at its ostensible stage to get higher estimations. Concocting system and circumstance utilized during this LTE thinking of is in 1800MHz recurrence inclusion, the govt. delegated recurrence for cell administrators [3].

In [2] the LTE framework capacity and inclusion square measure explored and a model is moved toward the base of the release eight of 3GPP LTE guidelines. From that point onward, the recurrence planning of LTE is also examined. The outcomes cowl the impedance limited inclusion count, the traffic ability figuring and oftenest task. The usage is accomplished on the WRAP PC code stage for the LTE Radio structuring. The capacity of the LTE arrange is outline with the side effects of normal transmission rate, top transmission rate and furthermore the endorser's numbers bolstered by the framework.

The inclusion of the LTE framework is moreover determined on the base of Base Station parameters and entirely unexpected proliferation models LTE arrange relies upon its 3 components: inclusion, ability and quality. Capacity is predicated on partner evaluation of conceived calls and blockage that has been evacuated by right advancement. Quality has been improved by killing impedance from every outside and inside [1]

MIMO (Multiple Inputs, Multiple Outputs) is a radio wire innovation for remote interchanges during which various reception apparatuses are utilized in every transmitter and beneficiary. In a MIMO framework, degrees of spatial opportunity are presented that

(4)

2166

can expand the limit and reduction the bit blunder rates and advance the speed of the information. It has been demonstrated that the limit of a MIMO framework develops directly with the base number of radio wires on the transmission and gathering sides.

MU-MIMO was made to help situations in which different clients attempt to get the remote system simultaneously. The idea of the 802.11 convention is that clients are served arranged by appearance. At the moment when many customers begin to arrive at the change at or near a similar time, the obstruction may occur because the switch benefits the request of the main client, while the second (and the third, the fourth, and so on) successively they stop. Although these occasions can be lowercase, it can include more devices (cell phones, tablets, PC, etc.) and clients that request assets. MU-MIMO helps this by taking into account numerous clients to change capacity without blocking

The innovation of MU-MIMO separates the accessible transfer speed into independent and singular flows that share the association in a similar way. A MU-MIMO switch can come in 2x2, 3x3 or 4x4 assortments, which suggest the quantity of streams (two, three or four) that are done with the switch.

Fig. 3: DUAL-POLAR PARABOLIC ANTENNAS

In this paper, describing the some characteristics of an effective MIMO base station antenna. Evaluating the performance of four popular designs of existing base station antennas, a 4-foot double-polarized matrix for PTP and a pair of two 4x4 MIMO base station antennas for PMP to determine the performance of the MIMO base station antennas.

There are a few principles with respect to this. In the first place, the streams are spatial, which infers that if two gadgets are near one another, paying little mind to whether they have to have a comparable stream. Envision the circumstance of the cafeteria by and by, however this time the four lines that were made are as of now centered around a compass.

In the event that you are physically on the south line, you should stay aware of every others, with the exception of on the off chance that you move east, north, or west. In an office domain, if your nearby associate is doing a video meeting while at the same time attempting to download a prologue to super-broad offers, you should delay, except if you move to the contrary side of the working environment.

This circumstance acknowledges that the switch/section has empowered MU-MIMO and the pillar forming support. Second, advancement works for downlink affiliations. This is phenomenal for home clients who are probably going to require quicker speeds for 4K video transmissions and Internet games, however less significant for business laborers who need quicker moves for the production of substances (for example video move). or then again two-way videoconferencing applications.

(5)

2167

Along these lines, what's to come is splendid for MU-MIMO, as it grows its abilities and more gadgets can exploit the advantages.

VI. RF PLANNING METHODOLOGY

Follows some steps to design radio frequency network inputs and outputs The main inputs to LINK Planner are:

1. Cell site name, position, maximum height of the antenna and definition of the site;

network or Subscriber (entry by the user).

2. Equipment details and license restrictions (selected by the user).

3. Performance objectives required for each link or network (input by the user).

4. Profile of the terrain along the path of each link (obtained using a Cambium tool).

5. Details of any obstruction or reflection that may affect the performance of a link (obtained from maps, survey data and Google Earth (TM)).

6. The main result of LINK Planner is a performance summary that shows how well 7. It is predicted that the link will be made in response to the selected combination of

entries.

8. Shows the performance and availability of the expected and required performance at each end of the link.

VII. ANTENNA DESIGN

In this research, design base station antennas. Here examine different base station antennas, like Network Site, Subscriber Site, Access Point, Subscriber Module, Link, and Path. Network sites antenna design with Radio Waves 4ft high Performance Dual-Polar Parabolic HPD4-5.2NS and Subscriber Site design with ePMP 4x4 MU-MIMO Sector Antenna (for ePMP3000AP) and access point is designed with antenna beam width90°

ePMP 4x4 MU-MIMO Sector Antenna. MIMO antenna mode of transmission is MU- MIMO.

Radio planning stage with LINK Planner taking Hyderabad digital map as input shown in fig6 &7 offline map and fig 8 is online map. Site locations shown map with below table2.

Here selecting the channel bandwidth is 80MHz and MIMO antenna product type is ePMP Force 300-25. In previous research we design SU-MIMO mode of transmission for 45 MHz and MIMO antenna product type is ePMP Force 300-15.so it improves the capacity of the system throughput.

VIII. SIMULATION RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This research LINK Planner tool is used to design RF network for base station (BS) antennas and checking the simulation result. It gives predicted result for that designed base station, like coverage, capacity and quality of performance. Here to design RF network by taking Hyderabad Digital Map as an input source. These base stations are connected to two types, one is PTP (point to point), and another one is PMP (point to multi point) links. For PTP link connected between two towers only. Those towers are called network sites. Green color link is PTP link connection and red color dots are network (Hub) sites. This connection is possible only for one site base station.

(6)

2168

Fig. 4: RF NETWORK PLANNING (a) OFFLINE MAP (b) GOOGLE MAPS PMP link connection is between more than one base station towers. In this one site is works like Hub site another sites are subscriber sites. Blue color link is PTP link connection and blue color dots are subscriber sites.

(7)

2169

Fig. 5: SITE AND LINK COLORS

To design RF network planning by taking Hyderabad Digital Map as a input. Here RF network (cell sites) by taking one particular area. Those sites longitude and latitude, height PTP and PMP links given below table1.

NETWORK SITES

Name Latitude Longitude

Maximum

Height (m) PTP Links PMP Hub

site-1 17.50584N 078.51031E 10 1 Yes

site-5 17.46441N 078.51287E 8 1 No

SUBSCRIBER SITE

Name Latitude Longitude Maximum Height (m) PMP Links

site-2 17.51230N 078.49353E 10 1

site-3 17.49945N 078.50016E 10 1

site-4 17.51119N 078.51754E 10 1

Table 1: LOCATION OF THE SITES IN MAP

Here, five sites are planned, two sites use for PTP link (site-1 and site-5), site-1 declared as Hub site for PMP connection taking the three sites (site-2,site-3, andsite-4) are shown in table2.

PTP LINK

Name

Range

(km) Product

Aggregate Throughput

(Mbps)

Link Availability

Left Height

(m)

Left Gain (dBi)

Right Height

(m)

Right Gain (dBi)

Link Loss (dB) site-1

to

site-5 4.593

ePMP

2000 275.129 100 10 35 8 35 121.1

Table 2: PTP LINK BASE STATION COVERAGE

(8)

2170

Fig. 6: (a) PATH PROFILE OF THE SITE1 TO 5, (b) CAPACITY PERFORMANCE CHARTS OF THE SITE1 &5

Network sites are designed by using Radio Waves 4ft high Performance Dual-Polar Parabolic HPD4-5.2NS.this antenna height is 4feet. Here using the 5G frequency band 5.8GHz, channel band width is 80MHz, optimization is IP. Adaptive symmetric model, duplex mode is TDD. These antennas are design for outdoor coverage. That network sites are 1 &5, performance of capacity shown in above fig6.

Table 3: PREDICTED AVAILABILITY OF IP

In this research site-1 site-2 declare as a network sites and simulation result given in table3 and table4. Here, only giving the two sites results. It gives 99.9999% coverage for network sites.

In these three sites one site taken as subscriber sites from here we gave connection to Hub site to increase the performance and capacity to full fill client requirements, Hub site act as access point base station. RF network planning is done with in 5km area.

PTP LINK SIMULATION RESULT FOR SITE-1 AND SITE-5

Link name site-1 to site-5

Country India

ePMP PTP Mode PTP

Polarization Dual

Product ePMP 2000

Antenna Type &Description

Radio Waves 4ft High Performance Dual-Polar Parabolic HPD4-5.2NS

Antenna Beamwidth 3.0°

Antenna Gain 35 dBi

Antenna Height 10.0 meters AGL

Frame Period 5 ms

Maximum Mod Mode MCS15 (64QAM 0.83)

Max aggregate IP throughput 275.13 Mbps

Link Length 4.593 km

(9)

2171

RF Frequency Band 5.8 GHz (5825 to 5875 MHz)

Regulation India

Modulation Adaptive

RF Channel Bandwidth 40 MHz

System Gain 154.00 dB

Total Path Loss 121.09 dB

System Gain Margin 32.91 dB

Prediction Model ITU-R

Annual Link Availability 100.00%

Access Point Mode TDD PTP

Mean Aggregate Data Rate 275.1 Mbps

DL/UL Ratio 50/50 50/50

Max EIRP 36.0 dBm

Output Power 2.0 dBm

Frame Size 1518 Bytes

Mean IP Throughput Predicted 137.59 Mbps

Mean IP Throughput Required 5.00 Mbps

Minimum IP Throughput Required 10.00 Mbps

Minimum IP Throughput Availability

Predicted 100.0000% (unavailable for 1 secs/year) Losses

Refractivity Index ITU-R P.453-9

Free Space Path Loss 121.03 dB

Diffraction Loss ITU-R P.526-10

Propagation ITU-R P.530-12

Excess Path Loss 0.00 dB

Cable Loss 1.0 dB

Predicted Receive Power -51 dBm ± 7 dB

Predicted Link Loss 121.09 dB ± 7.00 dB

Table 4: RF NETWORK PERFORMANCE RESULTS OF SITE1&5 Mode

Max Aggregate

User IP Throughput

(Mbps)

Max UserIP Throughpu

t in Either Direction (Mbps)

site-1 IP Fade Throughput Margin Availability

(dB) (%) *

Receive time in Mode (%)

Fade Margin

(dB)

site-5 IP

Throughput Availability

(%) *

Receive time in Mode (%)

MCS15 (64QAM

0.83)

275.13 137.59 11.91 99.9987 99.9987 11.91 99.9987 99.9987 MCS14

(64QAM 0.75)

247.68 123.84 14.91 99.9993 0.0006 14.91 99.9993 0.0006 MCS13

(64QAM 0.67)

220.19 110.12 16.91 99.9994 0.0001 16.91 99.9994 0.0001

(10)

2172

MCS12 (16QAM

0.75)

165.18 82.63 20.91 99.9995 0.0001 20.91 99.9995 0.0001 MCS11

(16QAM 0.5)

110.15 55.11 24.91 99.9995 0.0000 24.91 99.9995 0.0000 MCS10

(QPSK 0.75)

82.56 41.31 26.91 99.9995 0.0000 26.91 99.9995 0.0000 MCS9

(QPSK 0.5)

55.09 27.57 29.91 99.9995 0.0000 29.91 99.9995 0.0000

Table 5: RF NETWORK PTP LINK SITE1&5 MODULATION PERFORMANCE RESULTS Subscriber sites are design by using 4X4 MIMO antenna and MIMO mode of transmission is 4X4 MU-MIMO which provides the user requirements. Subscriber antenna model is ePMP 4x4 MU-MIMO Sector Antenna (for ePMP3000AP). Here only three subscriber antennas are connected by using 4x4 MIMO to Hub site. Site2, site3 and site4 are subscriber base station sites. Those sites latitude and longitude given in above table1. This Subscriber sites connected to Hub site by using point to multipoint (PMP) link connectors.

HUB SITE

Name Latitude Longitude

Maximum Height (m)

Number of Access Points

Number of Subscriber Modules

Connected Subscribers

Unconnected Subscribers

site-1 17.50584N 078.51031E 10 4 3 0 3

(a) MCS7

(64QAM 0.83)

137.64 68.86 15.91 0.0005 0.0005 15.91 0.0005 0.0005 MCS6

(64QAM 0.75)

123.87 61.96 16.91 0.0005 0.0000 16.91 0.0005 0.0000 MCS5

(64QAM 0.67)

110.15 55.11 18.91 0.0005 0.0000 18.91 0.0005 0.0000 MCS4

(16QAM 0.75)

82.56 41.31 23.91 0.0005 0.0000 23.91 0.0005 0.0000

MCS3 (16QAM

0.5)

55.09 27.57 26.91 0.0005 0.0000 26.91 0.0005 0.0000

MCS2 (QPSK 0.75)

41.29 20.67 30.91 0.0005 0.0000 30.91 0.0005 0.0000

MCS1 (QPSK

0.5)

27.52 13.77 32.91 100.0000 0.0000 32.91 100.0000 0.0000

(11)

2173

PMP LINKS AND ACCESS POINTS SM

Name Product

SM Latitude

SM

Longitude SM Antenna

SM Height

(m) site-3

ePMP Force

300-25 17.49945N 078.50016E 8° ePMP Force 300-25 10 site-4

ePMP Force

300-25 17.51119N 078.51754E 8° ePMP Force 300-25 10 site-2

ePMP Force

300-25 17.51230N 078.49353E 8° ePMP Force 300-25 10 (b)

ACCESS POINTS Product Band

Bandwidth

(MHz) Latitude Longitude Antenna

Height (m) ePMP

3000

5.8

GHz 80 MHz 17.50584N 078.51031E 90° ePMP 4x4 MU-MIMO Sector Antenna 10 ePMP

3000

5.8

3000

5.8

3000

5.8

GHz 80 MHz 17.50584N 078.51031E 90° ePMP 4x4 MU-MIMO Sector Antenna 10 (c)

Table 6: (a) HUB SITE, (b) SUBSCRIBER SITE ACCESS POINTS AND PMP LINKS AND (c) ACCESS POINTS

The results of uplink and downlink propagation results are obtained from the subscriber.

The throughput 554.16 Mbps (100%) is predicted totally by DL. The throughput 84.33 Mbps is predicted totally by UL and the mean throughput 638.49 Mbps is predicted for 256QAM 0.75 Dual modulations. By using MU-MIMO mode of transmission coverage range and through IP data rate is increased in fifth generation cellular system.

Fig. 7: PATH PROFILE BETWEEN HUB SITE5 AND SUBSCRIBER SITE2 Predicted simulation Performance of site -1 and site-2 antennas shown in above fig7.Here site-1 is network antenna and site-2 is subscriber antenna. PMP simulation result parameters given in below table 8.

(12)

2174

Link budget equation: Received Power (dB) = Transmitted Power (dB) + Gains (dB) − Losses (dB)

Transmitter Output =Power multiplied by the gain or loss of the antenna system HUB SUMMARY

Hub Name site-1

Number of Access Points 4

Number of Connected Subscribers 3

Total Predicted DL Throughput 991.95 Mbps

Total Predicted UL Throughput 160.50 Mbps

Total Throughput 1152.45 Mbps

ACCESS POINT SUMMARY

Equipment Type ePMP 3000

Antenna Type 90° ePMP 4x4 MU-MIMO

Modeled Beamwidth 90°

Antenna Tilt 0.0° (uptilt)

Max Range 10 kilometers

MIMO Mode of transmission 4x4 Multi-User

Total Predicted DL Throughput 554.16 Mbps

Total Predicted UL Throughput 84.33 Mbps

Total Predicted Throughput 638.49 Mbps

DL/UL Ratio 75/25

Antenna Azimuth 90.00° from True North

90.00° from True North, 90.64° from Magnetic North

SUBSCRIBER MODULE SUMMARY

Name site-2

Product ePMP Force 300-25

Range 1.920 km

Antenna Gain 22.4 dBi

Driver Mode TDD

Transmitter Output Power 18.0 dBm

Synchronization Source GPS

Cable Loss 0.8 dB

Free Space Path Loss 113.46 dB

Excess Path Loss 0.00 dB

Max EIRP 38.0 dBm

Output Power 18 dBm

Mode of Availability 100%

Table 7: RF NETWORK LINK BUDGET PMP SIMULATION RESULT OF HUB SITE5 AND SUBSCRIBER SITE2 PERFORMANCE

(13)

2175

Fig. 8: SIMULATION PERFORMANCE OF SITE-2 UP LINK/DOWN LINK RESULTS Performance of access point (AP) site to subscriber modules(SM) site simulated performance results are shown in above figure 8. It gives received time mode of the signal is 99.9999%, fade margin is 13.7dB, mode availability 99.9999% ,SMs per DL modulation437.97Mbps (100%), SMs per UL modulation data rate is 76.17Mbps(100%) and total mean predicted throughput 513..96Mbps.MU-MIMO link status and coverage capacity given below table 8.

LINKS TO SUBSCRIBER MODULE MU-

MIMO Grouping

OK

SM

Name Product

SM Latitude

SM

Longitude SM Antenna

SM Height (m) Yes site-2

ePMP Force

300-25 17.51230N 078.49353E 15° ePMP Force 300-25 10 Yes site-3

ePMP Force

300-25 17.49945N 078.50016E 15° ePMP Force 300-25 10 Table 8: LINKS TO SUBSCRIBER MODULES

This RF network is designed and planed in software toll like Link Planner. After planning this predicted output result gives to hardware engineers to mount base station sites on the specified location. That output is in the form of estimated bill of material (BOM). After installing the site again cheek the coverage and capacity performance in the form of optimization.

PTP NETWORK

Part Number Description Quantity

(no part number)

Radio Waves 4ft High Performance Dual-Polar Parabolic

HPD4-5.2NS 2

C000000L033 Gigabit Surge Suppressor (56V) 2

C050900A431

ePMP 2000: 5 GHz AP with Intelligent Filtering and Sync

(ROW) (India cord) 2

EW-

E1EP20AP- ePMP 2000 AP Extended Warranty, 1 Additional Year 2

(14)

2176

WW

PMP NETWORK

C050910A401 ePMP 3000 5 GHz Access Point Radio (ROW) (India cord) 4 C050910D301 ePMP 4x4 MU-MIMO Sector Antenna (for ePMP3000AP) 4

PMP SUBSCRIBER MODULE

C050910C401

ePMP 5 GHz Force 300-25 High Gain Radio (ROW) (India

cord) 3

EW- E1EPF300-

WW ePMP Force 300 Extended Warranty, 1 Additional Year 3 Table 9: BILL OF MATERIAL FOR INSTALLATION OF BASE STATION ANTENNAS Comparing the result of 4x4 Multi-User MIMO Mode of transmission with respect to 2×2 MIMO and 4x2 Single User MIMO Mode of transmission and check the which mode of transmission gives good predicted the total output coverage

2x2 MIMO site result

4x4 SU- MIMO site result

4x4 MU- MIMO site result

Significance of parameters

Country India India India Place of site

Antenna Type

&Description 2×2 MIMO 4x4 SU-MIMO 4x4 MU-MIMO Model of MIMO antenna

RF Frequency Band

1710MHz-1785 MHz, 1805 MHz-1880

MHz

5.8 GHz (5825 to 5875 MHz)

Radio frequency band that is used for communications transmission and broadcasting (3kHZ to300GHZ).and reduce the interference caused by the communication system.

RF Channel

Bandwidth 5 MHz 40 MHz 80 MHz

RF channel Bandwidth will increase the down loading speed to down load files or videos from one website to another.

MIMO Mode

of transmission 2×2 MIMO 4x2 Single User 4x4 Multi-User

In MU-MIMO RF signal ability to send/ receive several users simultaneously, instead of just one in SU-MIMO ability to send/

receive single user at a time (“single user”).

predicted the total output

coverage

96.2% 99.9995% 99.9999%,

It shows predicted received time mode of the signal.

Link Range 5.26km 0.224 km 1.920 km It shows distance between cell site to other cell site

Cable Loss 2dB 0.8 dB 0.8 dB The loss introduced by

the cable varies with frequency

(15)

2177

Max EIRP 22 dBm 36 dBm 38.0 dBm

EIRP is the product of transmitter power and the antenna gain and it is the measured radiated power of an antenna in a specific direction

Predicted

Receive Power 43 dBm -54 dBm ± 5 dB -51 dBm ± 7 dB

The Predicted Receive Power shown is that the most receive power once mistreatment merchan dise in adaptive Modulation mode that adapt the transmit power with modulation mode. there's continuously little va riation like - + 5 dBm

Propagation Cost-hata ITU-R ITU-R It give the specific direction Antenna Gain 18 dBi 28.58 dBi 22.4 dBi If gain increases performance of

network is also increases

Transmitter

Output Power 18.0 dBm 18.0 dBm 18.0 dBm

Tx O/p power increased by the gain or loss of the antenna system.

As opposition the

ability created into a 50Ω load connected at the antenna port, this

relates to the

ability really radiated once the antenna is connected

Table 10: RF NETWORK PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR 2X2 AND 4X4 MIMO ANTENNA

Result Analysis: In this paper, the MIMO 4X4 antenna is predicted, the total output coverage is 99.9999%, and using the MU-MIMO 4x4 transmission mode, from the past figure, zone of the absolute processing region. The direction profile speaks to the normal sign quality in the whole region. From the simulation, it can be determined that 99.9999%

of the areas of the city of Hyderabad can be covered by the 5G service. This MIMO antennas using for micro-base-station applications.

IX. CONCLUSION

Authoritative objectives of the examination of 5G radio system arranging are to show the appropriate 5G features, to portray the major models for radio proliferation arranging, to assess inclusion and system component count. The project aids the headway of various instruments used in RNP. With this view, adhering to the standard radio framework organizing methodology, interface level test system was utilized which offers novel capacities of utilizing the two forecasts and live system information all through the system arranging and improvement process. In future research work planning the 5G cellular RF network with MASSIVE MU-MIMO transmission mode.

X. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

All praises to almighty Allah, whose enormous blessings give me strength and make me able to complete this thesis. Our Heretiest thanks to LINKPLANNER, Solution Manager, Cambium Networks for providing numerous help and support in this work. Special thank my honorable supervisor Dr. G. Sasikala for her guidance throughout my paper.

(16)

2178

XI. REFERENCES

[1] Khalid Hamid Bilal, LTE Radio Planning Using Atoll Radio Planning and Optimization Software, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) · October 2014.

[2] Liang Zhang, “Network Capacity, Coverage Estimation and Frequency Planning of 3GPP Long Term Evolution”, Master Thesis, Linköping University, 2010.

[3] M. Hata, “Empirical formula for propagation loss in land mobile radio services,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 317–325, Aug1980.

[4] J. B. Andersen, T. S. Rappaport, and S. Yoshida, “Propagation mea- surements and models for wireless communications channels,” IEEE CommunicationsMagazine,vol.33,no.1,pp.42–

49,Jan1995.

[5] “Investigation of prediction accuracy, sensitivity, and pa- rameter stability of large- scale propagation path loss models from 500 MHz to 100 GHz.” [Online].

Available: B. Thoma et al., “Simulation of bit error performance and outage probability of pi/4 DQPSK in frequency-selective indoor radiochannels using a measurement-based channel model,”

in IEEE Global Telecom- munications Conference (GLOBECOM), Dec 1992, pp. 1825–1829 vol.3.

[6] Q. H. Abbasi et al., “Condition number variability of ultra wideband MIMO on body channels,” in 2016 International Workshop on Antenna Technology (iWAT), Feb 2016, pp.167–169.

[7] R. W. Heath and D. J. Love, “Multimode antenna selection for spatial multiplexing systems with linear receivers,” IEEE Transactions on SignalProcessing,vol.53,no.8,pp.3042–3056,Aug2005.

[8] http://wireless.engineering.nyu.edu/presentations/NTIA- propagation-presentation-JUNE-15- 2016v1-3.pdf

[9] He Huang, Ying Liu, Senior Member, IEEE, and Shuxi Gong, Member, IEEE

[10] Yejun He and Wei Tian Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Base Station Antennas and Propagation Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Antennas and Propagation College of Information Engineering, Shenzhen University, 978-1-5090-4372-9/17 2017 IEEE

[11] Cambium network CO. LTD, 5.25 - 5.85 GHz HighPerformance Dual Pole Parabolic Reflector Antenna

[12] Yejun He and Chao Li and Jie Yang Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Base Station Antennas and Propagation Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Antennas and Propagation College of Information Engineering, Shenzhen University, 978-1-5386-6343-2/18 2018 IEEE