• No results found

FUZZY -CONTINUOUS MULTIFUNCTION

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "FUZZY -CONTINUOUS MULTIFUNCTION"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

195 |

P a g e

FUZZY

-CONTINUOUS MULTIFUNCTION

Anjana Bhattacharyya

1

Department of Mathematics, Victoria Institution (College)

78 B, A.P.C. Road, Kolkata – 700009(India)

ABSTRACT

This paper deals with a new type of fuzzy multifunction, viz., fuzzy upper (lower) -continuous multifunction. Several characterizations and properties of this newly defined multifunction have been studied here. Also the mutual relationships of this fuzzy multifunction with fuzzy upper (lower) -precontinuous multifunctions [8] have been established here.

Keywords: Fuzzy nbd of a fuzzy set,

-nbd of a subset of a topological space,

-frontier of a subset

of a topological space, fuzzy compact space.

2000 Ams Subject Classification Code

Primary 54a40, Secondary 54c99

I

INTRODUCTION

A fuzzy mu ltifunction, introduced by Papageorgiou [21] in 1985 is a function from an ordinary topological space

to a fuzzy topological space (fts, for short) in the sense of Chang [10]. In this paper we use the definition of upper

inverse of fuzzy mu ltifunction given by Papageorgiou [21] and the lower inverse of fuzzy mult ifunction given by

Mukherjee and Mala kar [18].

Throughout this paper, or simply will stand for an ordinary topological space, while by or simp ly by

will always be denoted a fuzzy topological space. A fuzzy set [26] in is a function from into the unit

interval i.e ., . The support [26] of a fu zzy set in will be denoted by and is defined by

. The fu zzy point [22] with the singleton support and the value at

will be denoted by . For a set in (resp., a fuzzy set in ), and will respectively stand for closure

and interior o f in (resp., fu zzy closure and fuzzy interior of in [10]). For a fuzzy set in , the comp le ment

of in will be denoted by and is defined by , for each [26]. and will

respectively stand for the constant fuzzy sets taking values 0 and 1 on . For two fuzzy sets , in , we write

1

(2)

196 |

P a g e

[26] iff , for all while means is quasi-coincident [22] (q-coincident, for short)

with if there is some such that . The negation of the last two statements are written as

and respectively. A fuzzy set in is called a fuzzy neighbourhood (fuzzy nbd, for short) [22] of a

fuzzy set in if there is a fuzzy open set in such that .

A subset of (resp., a fuzzy set in ) is called se miopen[15], α -open [20], β-open [1], regular open [24],

preopen [16], -open [11] (resp., fu zzy semiopen [4], fu zzy α-open [9], fu zzy β-open [12], fu zzy regula r open [4],

fuzzy preopen [19], fuzzy -open) respectively if , ,

, , (resp., ,

, , , , ) respectively.

The comple ments of above mentioned sets in (resp., in ) are called semic losed [15], α-c losed [20], β-c losed [1],

preclosed [16], regular c losed [24], -closed [11] (resp., fuzzy semiclosed [4], fu zzy α-closed [9], fuzzy β-c losed

[12], fuzzy regular closed [4], fu zzy preclosed [19], fuzzy -closed ) respectively. The intersection of all semic losed, α-closed, β-closed, preclosed, -closed sets in (resp., fuzzy sets in ) containing are called semic losure [15],

α-closure [20], β-α-closure [1], p reα-closure [16], -closure [11] (resp., fu zzy semic losure [4], fuzzy α -closure [9], fu zzy

β-closure [12], fuzzy prec losure [19], fu zzy -closure) respectively and are denoted by , , , ,

respectively. The -interior [25] of a subset of is the union of all regular open sets of contained in and is

denoted by . A subset of is called -open if [25]. The comp le ment of a -open set in is

called -c losed. For a set in , . A subset of is called 

-preopen [2] if . A fuzzy set is called a quasi-neighbourhood (q-nbd, for short) [21] of a fu zzy set

if there is a fuzzy open set in such that . If, in addit ion, is fuzzy regular open, then is ca lled fu zzy

regular open q-nbd of . A fuzzy point is said to be a fuzzy -c luster point of a fuzzy set in an fts if every

fuzzy regular open q-nbd of is q-coincident with [13]. The union of all fu zzy -cluster points of is called

the fuzzy -closure of and is denoted by [13]. A fu zzy set in an fts is called fuzzy -preopen [5] if

. The comple ment of a fuzzy -preopen set is called fuzzy -prec losed [5]. The intersection of all

fuzzy -prec losed sets containing a fuzzy set in an fts is called fuzzy -prec losure of and is denoted by

[5]. A fuzzy set in is -prec losed iff [5].

The set of all semiopen, α-open, β-open, preopen, -open, -preopen sets in are denoted by , ,

, , , respectively. A semiopen (resp., α-open, β-open, preopen, -open, -preopen) set

in containing a point will be denoted by (resp., , , ,

(3)

197 |

P a g e

denoted by . A subset of a topological space is called a -nbd of a point [11] if there exists

such that .

II SOME WELL KNOWN DEFINITIONS, THEOREM AND LEMMAS

In this section we recall, some definitions, lemmas and theorem for ready references.

Definiti on 2.1 [21]. Let be an ordinary topological space and be an fts. We say that is a

fuzzy mu ltifunction if corresponding to each , is a unique fu zzy set in .

Henceforth by we shall mean a fuzzy mu ltifunction in the above sense.

Definiti on 2.2 [21, 18]. For a fuzzy mult ifunction , the upper inverse and the lower inverse are

defined as follo ws :

for any fu zzy set in , , .

The ore m 2.3 [18].For a fu zzy mult ifunction , we have , for any fu zzy set in .

Definiti on 2.4[10]. Let be a fuzzy set in an fts . A collection U of fu zzy sets in is called a fuzzy cover of if

U } = 1 for each . If, in addition, the me mbers of U are fu zzy open, then U is called a

fuzzy open cover of . In particular, if , we get the definition of fuzzy cover (resp., fuzzy open cover) of the

fts .

Definiti on 2.5 [14].A fu zzy cover U of a fu zzy set in an fts is said to have a finite subcover U 0 if U 0 is a

fin ite subcollection of U such that U 0 . Clearly, if , in particu lar, then the require ments on U 0 is U

0 .

Definiti on 2.6 [10].An fts is said to be fuzzy co mpact if every fuzzy open cover of has a finite subcover.

Definiti on 2.7 [18]. A fuzzy mu ltifunction is said to be fuzzy upper (lo wer) se mi-continuous if

(resp., ) is open in for every fu zzy open set in .

Definiti on 2.8 [8]. A fu zzy mult ifunction is said to be fuzzy

(i) upper -precontinuous (resp., upper quasi continuous) if for each and each fuzzy open set in

with , there e xists (resp., ) such that ,

(ii) lower -precontinuous (resp., lower quasi continuous) if for each and each fuzzy open set in

(4)

198 |

P a g e

(iii)upper (lowe r) -precontinuous (resp., upper (lo wer) quasi continuous) if it has this property at each point of

.

Le mma 2.9 [3, 11]. Let and be subsets of a topological space . If and , then

.

Le mma 2.10 [11]. Let , and , then .

III

FUZZY UPPER AND LOWER

-CONTINUOUS MULTIFUNCTIONS : SOME

CHARACTERIZATIONS

Now we define fuzzy upper (lower) -continuous multifunction and characterize these fuzzy mu ltifunctions in several ways.

Definiti on 3.1.A fu zzy mult ifunction is said to be fuzzy

(i) upper -continuous at a point if for each fuzzy open set in with , there exists

such that ,

(ii) lower -continuous at a point if fo r each fuzzy open set of with , there exists

such that , for a ll ,

(iii)upper (lowe r) -continuous if has this property at each point of .

The ore m 3.2. For a fu zzy mult ifunction , the follo wing are equivalent :

(a) is fu zzy upper -continuous,

(b) for any fu zzy open set of ,

(c) is -closed in for any fuzzy c losed set of ,

(d) , for any ,

(e) for each point and each fuzzy nbd of , is a -nbd of ,

(f) for each point and each fuzzy nbd of , there e xists a -nbd of such that ,

(g) , for any ,

(h) , for any .

Proof (a )  (b):Let be a fu zzy open set of and . Then by (a), there e xists such

(5)

199 |

P a g e

and so we have 

.

(b)  (c) :It fo llows fro m the fact that , for any .

(c)  (d) :Let . Then is fu zzy closed in and so by (c), is -closed in and so

 .

(d)  (c) : Let be a fuzzy c losed set of . Then and so by (d),

is -closed in .

(b)  (e) : Let and be a fuzzy nbd of . Then there e xists a fuzzy open set of such that

 . Since (by (b)), is a γ-nbd of .

(e)  (f) : Let and be a fu zzy nbd of . Put . By (e ), is a -nbd of and .

(f)  (a) :Let and be a fu zzy open set such that . Then is a fu zzy nbd of . By (f), there

e xists a -nbd of such that . There fore, there e xists such that and so

.

(c)  (g) :Let . Then is fu zzy closed in and so by (c), is -closed in

 .

(g)  (h) :Let . Then . By (g),

 =

 .

(h)  (b) :Let be a fu zzy open set of . By (h),

 .

(6)

200 |

P a g e

(a) is fu zzy lo wer -continuous,

(b) , for any fu zzy open set of ,

(c) is -closed in for any fu zzy closed set of ,

(d) , for any ,

(e) , for any subset of ,

(f) , fo r any ,

(g ) , for any ,

(h ) for each and each fuzzy q-nbd of , is a -nbd of ,

(i) for each and each fuzzy q-nbd of , there e xists a -nbd of such that

, for all .

Proof (a)  (b ): Let be a fuzzy open set of and . Then by (a), there e xists such that

, for all . Therefo re, we obtain

 and so we have

 .

(b)  (c) :It fo llows fro m the fact that , for any .

(c)  (d) :Let . Then is fu zzy closed in . By (c), is -closed in 

.

(d)  (c) : Let be a fuzzy c losed set of . Then . By (d),

is -closed in .

(c)  (e) : Let be a subset of . Then is fu zzy closed in . By (c), is -closed in 

 

(7)

201 |

P a g e

(e)  (d) :Let . Then . By (e),  .

(c)  (f) :Let . Then is fuzzy c losed in . By (c), is -closed in 

(f)  (g) :Let . Then . By (f),

 =

 .

(g)  (b) :Let be a fu zzy open set of . By (g),

 .

(b)  (h) :Let Let and be a fu zzy q-nbd of . Then there e xists a fuzzy open set of such that

 . Since (by (b)), is a γ-nbd of .

(h)  (i) : Let and be a fu zzy q-nbd of . Put . By (h), is a -nbd of and for a ll

.

(i)  (a) :Let and be a fuzzy open set such that . Then is a fu zzy q-nbd of . By (i), there

e xists a -nbd of such that , for all  . Therefo re, there e xists such that

and so , for all .

Definiti on 3.4 [18]. For a fu zzy mu ltifunction , the fuzzy graph mu ltifunction of is

defined as = the fu zzy set of , where is the fuzzy set in , whose value is 1 at and 0

other points of . We shall write for .

Le mma 3.5 [6]. The following hold for a fu zzy mult ifunction :

(a)

and

(b)

for every subset of and every fuzzy set of .

(8)

202 |

P a g e

Proof. Let be fu zzy lo wer -continuous. Let and be any fuzzy open set of such that .

Then there exists such that . Then . Let

. Then  so that for so me open set in and

some fu zzy open set in with . Now   . Since is fuzzy

lower -continuous, there exists such that , for all  . Then by Le mma

2.5(b), . Moreover, and hence the proof.

Conversely, let be fuzzy lowe r -continuous. Let and be any fuzzy open set in such that . Then

there e xists such that . No w is open in such that

and so . Since is fuzzy lowe r -continuous, there e xists

such that , for a ll . By Le mma 2.5(b ), we obtain

. Hence , for all  is fu zzy lo wer -continuous.

The ore m 3.7. Let be an α-open cover of a topological space . A fuzzy mu ltifunction is

fuzzy upper -continuous iff the restrict ion is fu zzy upper -continuous.

Proof. Let . Then there e xists such that . Let be a fuzzy open set of such that

. Since is fuzzy upper -continuous, there e xists such that . Put

. Then by Le mma 1.9, and . There fore, is fu zzy upper 

-continuous.

Conversely, let and , a fu zzy open set of such that . Since is an α-open cover of ,

there e xists such that . Since is fuzzy upper -continuous and , there

e xists such that . Then by Lemma 1.10 (as α-open sets are -open),

and  is fuzzy upper -continuous.

The ore m 3.8. Let be an α-open cover of a topological space . A fuzzy mu ltifunction is

fuzzy lower -continuous iff the restrict ion is fu zzy lower -continuous.

Proof. Let . Then there e xists such that . Let be a fu zzy open set of such that

(9)

203 |

P a g e

. Put . Then by Lemma 1.9, and , for all . Therefore,

is fu zzy lo wer -continuous.

Conversely, let and , a fuzzy open set of such that . Since is an α-open cover of ,

there e xists such that . Since is fu zzy lower -continuous and , there e xists

such that , for all . Then by Lemma 1.10 (as α-open sets are -open),

and , for a ll  is fu zzy lo wer -continuous.

Definiti on 3.9. For a fuzzy multifunction , fuzzy mult ifunction , ,

, [6], , [6], [8] are defined by

, , , ,

, , , fo r a ll .

Le mma 3.10. Let be a fuzzy mu ltifunction. Then we have , for each fuzzy open

set of .

Proof. Let be a fuzzy open set of . Let . Then  [Indeed, if ,

then , for each   ) = (since is fuzzy

open  is fuzzy -open in )  , a contradiction.]  .

Similarly we can prove that

Le mma 3.11. Let be a fu zzy mult ifunction. Then we have , ,

, , , , for each fuzzy open set

of .

The ore m 3.12. For a fuzzy mu ltifunction , the following are equiva lent :

(a) is fu zzy lo wer -continuous.

(b) is fu zzy lo wer -continuous.

(c) is fu zzy lo wer -continuous.

(d) is fu zzy lo wer -continuous.

(e) is fu zzy lo wer -continuous.

(10)

204 |

P a g e

(g) is fu zzy lo wer -continuous.

(h) is fu zzy lo wer -continuous.

Proof. The proof follows fro m Le mma 2.10 and Le mma 2.1 1.

IV SOME RELATIONSHIP

In this section it has been shown that fuzzy upper (lowe r) -continuous multifunction may not be fuzzy upper

(lowe r) semi-continuous, fuzzy upper (lo wer) quasi continuous, fuzzy upper (lo wer) -precontinuous mult ifunctions.

We first reca ll some theore ms for ready references.

The ore m 4.1 [7]. A fu zzy mult ifunction is fuzzy upper (lower) quasi continuous iff (resp.,

) is semiopen in for every fuzzy open set of .

The ore m 4.2 [18]. A fuzzy multifunction is fuzzy upper (lowe r) semi-continuous iff (resp.,

) is open in for every fuzzy open set of .

The ore m 4.3 [8]. A fu zzy mult ifunction is fuzzy upper (lowe r) -precontinuous iff (resp.,

) is -preopen in for every fuzzy open set of .

Re mark 4.4. Since open set, semiopen set and -preopen set are -open, it is clear fro m Theore m 3.1, Theore m 3.2 and Theorem 3.3 that fuzzy upper (lowe r) quasi continuous, fuzzy upper (lower) se mi -continuous and fuzzy upper

(lowe r) -precontinuous multifunctions are fuzzy upper (lower) -continuous. But the converses are not true, in

general, as seen from the following e xa mp les.

Example 4.5. fuzzy upper -continuity fuzzy upper se mi-continuity

Let , , , where , for all . Then

and ) are ordinary topological space and an fts respectively. Let be a fuzzy

mu ltifunction defined by where , for all . Now

and so is not fuzzy upper semi-continuous.

But    is -open in .

Again   is 

-open in which shows that is -open in for a ll fu zzy open set of  is fuzzy upper -continuous.

(11)

205 |

P a g e

Let , , , where , for all . Then

and ) are ordinary topological space and an fts respectively. Let be a fuzzy

mu ltifunction defined by where , for all . Now

and ,  is fu zzy lo wer -continuous. But

and so is not fuzzy lower semi-continuous.

Example 4.7. fuzzy upper -continuity fuzzy upper quasi-continuity

Consider Exa mple 3.5. Here  is not fuzzy upper quasi-continuous, though

is upper -continuous.

Example 4.8. fuzzy lower -continuity fuzzy lowe r quasi-continuity

Consider Exa mple 3.6. He re  is not semiopen in  is not fuzzy

lower quasi-continuous, though it is fuzzy lower -continuous.

Example 4.9. fuzzy upper -continuity fuzzy upper -precontinuity

Consider Exa mple 3.5. Here . Now and

,  is not -p reopen in  is not fuzzy upper -precontinuous,

though is fu zzy upper -continuous.

Example 4.10. fu zzy lo wer -continuity fuzzy lower -precontinuity

Consider Exa mp le 3.6. He re . No w   is fuzzy lowe r 

-precontinuous, though is fuzzy lowe r -continuous.

V FUZZY UPPER (LOWER)

-CONTINUOUS MULTIFUNCTION: SOME

CHARACTERIZATIONS AND APPLICATIONS

In this section fuzzy upper (lo wer) -continuous mult ifunction is characterized by fuzzy upper (lowe r) nbd of a

fuzzy set and also some applications of these fuzzy mu ltifunctions have been given.

Definiti on 5.1. A fuzzy set in an fts is said to be a fuzzy lowe r (upper) nbd of a fuzzy set in if there e xists a

fuzzy open set of such that (resp., ) and .

The ore m 5.2. A fu zzy mult ifunction is fu zzy upper -continuous on iff for each point and each

(12)

206 |

P a g e

Proof. Let be fuzzy upper -continuous. Then for any and for any fuzzy upper nbd of , there

e xists a fuzzy open set of such that and  . Since is fuzzy upper -continuous,

there exists such that   . Therefore,

 is a -nbd of .

Conversely, let for any and any fuzzy open set of with , we have . Therefore, is a

fuzzy upper nbd of . Then by hypothesis, is a -nbd of . Then there exists such that

  is fuzzy upper -continuous.

The ore m 5.3. A fu zzy mult ifunction is fu zzy lower -continuous on iff for each point and each

fuzzy lower nbd of , is a -nbd of .

Proof. Let be fuzzy lo wer -continuous on . Then for any and for any fuzzy lowe r nbd of , there

e xists a fuzzy open set of such that and  . Since is fuzzy lower -continuous,

there e xists such that . Therefore,  is a -nbd of .

Conversely, let for any and any fuzzy open set of with , we have . Therefore, is a

fuzzy lower nbd of . Then by hypothesis, is a -nbd of . Then there exists such that

 is fuzzy lower -continuous.

Definiti on 5.4 [11]. A topological space is said to be -compact if for every covering of by -open sets in

has a finite subcovering.

The ore m 5.5. Let be a fuzzy upper -continuous surjective mu ltifunction and be a fuzzy co mpact

set in for each If is -compact, then is fu zzy co mpact.

Proof. Let A = be a fuzzy open cover of . Now for each , is fuzzy compact in and so

there is a finite subset of such that . Let . Then

where is a fuzzy open set of . Since is fuzzy upper -continuous, there exists such that

. Then U = { is a cover of by -open sets of . Since is -compact, there e xists finite ly

many points in such that . As is surjective,

 is fuzzy co mpact.

Definiti on 5.6 [17]. An fts is said to be an -space if every fuzzy regular open cover of has a finite

(13)

207 |

P a g e

Re mark 5.7. As every fu zzy regular open set is fuzzy open, we set the following theorem.

The ore m 5.8. Let be a fuzzy upper -continuous surjective mu ltifunction and be a fuzzy co mpact

set in for each . If is -compact, then is -space.

The ore m 5.9. When is product related to , a fu zzy mu ltifunction is fu zzy upper -continuous if its

fuzzy graph mult ifunction is fuzzy upper -continuous.

Proof. Let be fuzzy upper -continuous. Let and be any fuzzy open set in such that . Then

and is easily seen to be open in . By hypothesis, there exists such that

. Now for any and for any , , i.e.,

, for all  , for any   is fuzzy upper -continuous.

Definiti on 5.10 [2]. The -frontier of a subset of a topological space , denoted by , is defined by

.

The ore m 5.11. Let be a fuzzy mult ifunction. Let : is not fuzzy upper -continuous at ,

and is fu zzy open in . Then .

Proof. Let be such that is not fuzzy upper -continuous at . Then there exists a fuzzy open set of with

such that , for all 

 , but . Therefore,

.

Conversely, let and be a fuzzy open set of with such that . If possible, let

be fuzzy upper -continuous at . Then there exists such that . Then

  , a contradiction and hence is not

fuzzy upper -continuous at .

The ore m 5.12. Let be a fuzzy mult ifunction. Let : is not fuzzy lowe r -continuous at ,

and is fu zzy open set of . Then .

Proof. Let be such that is not fuzzy lower -continuous at . Then there exists a fuzzy open set of with

such that i.e ., , for all 

 , but . Therefore,

(14)

208 |

P a g e

Conversely, let and be a fuzzy open set of with such that . If possible, let be

fuzzy lowe r -continuous at . Then there exists such that . Then

  , a contradiction and hence is not

fuzzy lower -continuous at .

REFERENCES

[1] Abd El-Monsef, M.E., El-Deeb, S.N. and Mahmoud, R.A.; β-open sets and β-continuous mappings, Bull. Fac. Sci. Assiut Univ. 12 (1983), 77 – 90.

[2] Abd El-Monsef, M.E. and Nasef, A.A.; On mu ltifunctions, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 12 (2001), 2387-2394.

[3] Andrijevič, D. ; On -open sets, Mat. Bech. 48 (1996), 59-64.

[4] Azad, K.K. ; On fuzzy semicontinuity, fuzzy almost continuity and fuzzy wea kly continuity, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 82 (1981), 14-32.

[5] Bhattacharyya, Anjana and Mukherjee, M.N. ; On fuzzy -almost continuous and *-almost continuous functions, J. Tripura Math. Soc. 2 (2000), 45-57.

[6] Bhattacharyya, Anjana ; Concerning almost quasi continuous fuzzy mu ltifunctions, Universitatea Din Bacău Studii Şi Cercetări Ştiinţifice, Seria : Mate matică Nr. 11 (2001), 35-48.

[7] Bhattacharyya, Anjana : Upper and lower weakly quasi continuous fuzzy mu ltifunctions, Analele Universităţii Oradea, Fasc. Matematica, Tom XX (2013), Issue No. 8, 5-17.

[8] Bhattacharyya, Anjana : On upper and lower -precontinuous fuzzy multifunctions, International Journal of Advancements in Research and Technology Vol. 2, Issue 7 (2013), 328-333

.

[9] Bin Shahna, A.S. ; On fuzzy strong semicontinuity and fuzzy precontinuity, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 44 (1991), 303-308.

[10] Chang, C.L. ; Fuzzy topological spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 24 (1968), 182-190.

[11] El-Atik, A.A. ; A study of some types of mappings on topological spaces, Master’s Thesis, Faculty of

Science, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt, 1997.

[12] Fath Alla, M.A. ; On fuzzy topological spaces, Ph.D. Thesis, Assiut Univ., Sohag, Egypt (1984)

.

[13] Ganguly, S. and Saha, S. ; A note on -continuity and -connected sets in fuzzy set theory, Simon Stevin 62 (1988), 127-141.

[14] Ganguly, S. and Saha, S. ; A note on compactness in fuzzy setting, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 34 (1990), 117-124.

(15)

209 |

P a g e

[16] Mashhour, A.S., Abd El-Monsef, M.E. and El-Deeb, S.N. ; On precontinuous and weak precontinuous mappings, Proc. Phys. Soc. Egypt 53 (1982), 47-53.

[17] Mukherjee, M.N. and Ghosh, B. ; On nearly compact and -rig id fuzzy sets in fuzzy topological spaces,

Fuzzy Sets and Systems 43 (1991), 57-68.

[18] Mukherjee, M .N. and Mala kar, S. ; On almost continuous and weakly continuous fuzzy multifunctions,

Fuzzy Sets and Systems 41 (1991), 113-125.

[19] Nanda, S. ; Strongly co mpact fuzzy topological spaces, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 42 (1991), 259-262. [20] Njåstad, O. ; On some c lasses of nearly open sets, Pacific J. Math. 15 (1965), 961-970.

[21] Papageorgiou, N.S. ; Fu zzy topology and fuzzy mu ltifunctions, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 109 (1985), 397-425. [22] Pu, Pao Ming and Liu, Ying Ming ; Fuzzy topology I, Neighbourhood structure of a fuzzy point and

Moore-Smith convergence, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 76 (1980), 571-599.

[23] Raychaudhuri, S. ; Concerning -almost continuity and -preopen sets, Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sinica 21(4) (1993), 357-366.

[24] Stone, M.H. ; Applications of the theory of Boolean ring to general topology, TAMS 41 (1937), 375. [25] Veličko, N.V. ; H-closed topological spaces, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. 78 (1968), 103-118.

[26] Zadeh, L.A. ; Fu zzy sets, Inform. Control 8 (1965), 338-353

.

References

Related documents

demand in the market can be described as the continuum   0,1 and interpreted as the firm’s market share. Using our knowledge about the demand of consumers and cartel prices we

In Figure 10, the errors and their range for all three methods are mapped, clearly showing unbiased results of the estimations (because mean of errors approach to

Despite their nearly ubiquitous distribution in tropical marine environments and their high prevalence in the aquarium trade, the majority of pomacentrids, with the

Inter-individual variability for IDeg is available for a Type 2 DM treatment population: the total GIR of glucose clamp studies performed with IDeg at a concentration of 0.4 IU/kg

Impact Of Taxation On The Performance Of Small And Medium Enterprises In Aba, Abia State, Nigeria.. Archives of Business Research, 7 (SP),

This study aims at identifying the touch points that are relevant to the satisfaction of commercial banks’ customers in Nigeria and above all evaluating the

The aim of this study was to verify the hypothesis: there are more injuries in judo than in wres- tling; judo involves injuries of upper extremities in comparison to wrestling