Selective modulation of human natural killer
cells in vivo after prolonged infusion of low
dose recombinant interleukin 2.
M A Caligiuri, … , T R Klumpp, R J Soiffer
J Clin Invest.
1993;
91(1)
:123-132.
https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI116161
.
The immunologic consequences of prolonged infusions of rIL-2 in doses that produce
physiologic serum concentrations of this cytokine were investigated. rIL-2 in doses of
0.5-6.0 x 10(6) U/m2 per d (3.3-40 micrograms/m2 per d) was administered by continuous
intravenous infusion for 90 consecutive days to patients with advanced cancer. IL-2
concentrations (25 +/- 25 and 77 +/- 64 pM, respectively) that selectively saturate
high-affinity IL-2 receptors (IL-2R) were achieved in the serum of patients receiving rIL-2
infusions of 10 micrograms/m2 per d and 30 micrograms/m2 per d. A gradual, progressive
expansion of natural killer (NK) cells was seen in the peripheral blood of these patients with
no evidence of a plateau effect during the 3 mo of therapy. A preferential expansion of
CD56bright NK cells was consistently evident. NK cytotoxicity against tumor targets was
only slightly enhanced at these dose levels. However, brief incubation of these expanded
NK cells with IL-2 in vitro induced potent lysis of NK-sensitive, NK-resistant, and
antibody-coated targets. Infusions of rIL-2 at 40 micrograms/m2 per d produced serum IL-2 levels
(345 +/- 381 pM) sufficient to engage intermediate affinity IL-2R p75, which is constitutively
expressed by human NK cells. This did not result in greater NK cell expansion compared to
the lower dose levels, but did produce in vivo activation of NK cytotoxicity, as evidenced by
[…]
Research Article
Find the latest version:
Selective Modulation of Human Natural Killer Cells In Vivo
After Prolonged
Infusion of Low Dose Recombinant
Interleukin 2
MichaelA.
Caligiuri,I
ChristineMurray,*Michael J.Robertson,* EuniceWang,*Keith Cochran, * ChristineCameron, *PeterSchow,* MaryE.Ross,' Thomas R.Klumpp,*Robert J. Soiffer,*Kendall A.Smith,t and Jerome Ritz*
*Division of Tumor Immunology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine,Harvard MedicalSchool, Boston, Massachusetts 02115; tDepartment of Medicine, Dartmouth MedicalSchool, Hanover, NewHampshire 03756;and
IDepartments
of Medicine and Molecular MedicineandImmunology, Roswell Park CancerInstitute, Buffalo,New York 14263Abstract
Theimmunologicconsequencesofprolongedinfusions of rIL-2 in doses thatproducephysiologicserumconcentrations of this cytokine wereinvestigated. rIL-2 in doses of0.54.0 x 106
U/im2per d(3.3-40
,gg/m2
perd)wasadministered by continu-ous intravenous infusion for 90 consecutivedays to patientswith advanced cancer.IL-2 concentrations (25±25 and 77±64
pM, respectively) thatselectively saturate high-affinity IL-2 receptors(IL-2R) wereachieved in theserumofpatients
re-ceivingrIL-2infusions of 10
Agg/m2
per d and30gg/m2
per d. Agradual, progressive expansion of naturalkiller(NK)cells was seen in theperipheralbloodofthesepatientswithno evi-dence ofaplateau effectduring
the 3mooftherapy.A preferen-tialexpansion ofCD56"'b"t
NK cellswasconsistentlyevident. NK cytotoxicity against tumor targets was only slightly en-hancedatthesedoselevels.However, brief incubation of these expanded NK cells withIL-2 invitro induced potentlysis ofNK-sensitive,NK-resistant,and
antibody-coated
targets.Infu-sions ofrIL-2at40
,g/m2
per dproduced
serumIL-2levels(345±381 pM) sufficienttoengageintermediate
affinity
IL-2R p75, which isconstitutively expressed by human NK cells.This did not result in greater NK cellexpansion compared
tothe lower dose levels, but did produce in vivo activation ofNKcytotoxicity, as evidenced by lysis of NK-resistant targets. There was no consistent change in the numbers of CD56
-CD3+Tcells,CD56+
CD3+
MHC-unrestricted Tcells,
orB cellsduring infusions ofrIL-2atanyofthedosagesused.Thisstudy demonstrates thatprolonged infusions ofrIL-2 in doses that saturateonly
high
affinity
IL-2Rcan selectively expandhuman NK cellsforanextendedperiod of time withonly mini-mal toxicity. Further activation ofNK cytolytic activity can also be achieved invivo,butit requiresconcentrationsofIL-2 that bind intermediate
affinity
IL-2R p75. Clinical trials areunderway
attempting
toexploit
thediffering
effects of various concentrations ofIL-2on human NK cells in vivo. (J. Clin.Invest. 1993. 91:123-132.) Key words: IL-2 * natural killer cells-immunotherapy-IL-2 receptor *cytotoxicity
Introduction
IL-2 plays a central role in thevertebrate immune response
(
1).
Producedby
Tlymphocytes
activatedthrough
exposureto Addresscorrespondence to JeromeRitz, M.D., Dana-Farber CancerInstitute,44BinneySt., Boston, MA 02115.
Receivedfor publication 13 May 1992.
cognate antigen, IL-2 promotes proliferation and
differentia-tion ofhelper T cells, cytotoxic T cells, and B cells ( 1, 2).
Consequently, IL-2 participatesinboth cell-mediated
immu-nity and humoral immunity, and is probably necessary for bothprimary and secondary adaptive immune responses. IL-2 mayalso augmentinnateor"natural"immunity by
stimulat-ing natural killer (NK)' cells(3, 4) and monocytes (5, 6).
Furthermore, IL-2 can induce theclassic signsofdelayed-type
hypersensitivity even in the absence of specific antigen (7). Commensurate with thecrucial involvement ofIL-2 in im-muneresponses,congenital absenceof IL-2 production in
hu-mans causesaseverecombined immune deficiency with life-threatening infections ( 8, 9). Replacement therapy with
recom-binant IL-2 (rIL-2) can be effective treatment for this
dis-order(8).
The diverse effects ofIL-2 are mediatedthrough specific
cell surfacereceptors on lymphocytes, monocytes, and other
celltypes( 10).The IL-2Riscomprised ofatleasttwosubunits (10). Theintermediate affinity IL-2R is a70-75-kD protein thatbindsIL-2withanequilibriumKdof -1 nM; IL-2R p75 caninitiateintracellular signal transduction afterIL-2binding
(11).The lowaffinityIL-2R(p55orCD25)isa 55-kDprotein
thatbindsIL-2withaKdof - 10 nM.IL-2Rp55 has not been
showntomediateinternalizationofIL-2 orsignal transduction by itself. Expressed togetheron thecell surface, the p75 and
p55 chainscanassociate noncovalentlytoformaheterodimer thatbindsIL-2with high
affinity
(Kd, - 10pM).MostrestingTcellsand B cells express neither IL-2R p75 nor p55 and do notrespondtoexogenous IL-2 ( 10). However,after activation by
antigen
ormitogens,Tcells and B cells expresshigh affinityIL-2Rheterodimersandproliferate inanIL-2-dependent fash-ion (10, 11). By comparison, almost all resting NK cells in humanperipheral blood constitutivelyexpressisolated IL-2R
p75 chains (12-14).Thus, NK cells can be activated by
nano-molarconcentrations ofIL-2inthe absenceofadditional
stim-uli. SinceNKcells
comprise
- 10% ofPBL, as many as 109circulating lymphocytes are potentially immediately
respon-sivetoIL-2.
Thepredominant therapeuticuseofIL-2 to date has been as animmunostimulant in patients withcancer( 15,16). Based on the
paradigms
ofcytotoxic chemotherapy, IL-2has been administered inprogressively higherdoses todefine the maxi-mally tolerated dose ( 17, 18), and bolus intravenous infusionsof15-150 x
106
U(1-10mg)ofIL-2 have been usedinmostsubsequent clinical
trials
( 15, 16). Approximately 15-20% ofpatientswith advanced renal cell carcinoma or melanoma
dem-1.Abbreviations usedinthispaper:ADCC,antibody-dependent cellu-larcytotoxicity; E/T, effector to target (ratio); NK, natural killer (cells); PE, phycoerythrin; rIL-2,recombinant interleukin 2. J.Clin.Invest.
©TheAmericanSociety for ClinicalInvestigation, Inc.
0021-9738/93/01/0123/10 $2.00
onstrateobjectivetumorresponses after
"high
dose" IL-2 ther-apy. Unfortunately, such treatment is associated with life-threatening toxicities, including severe hypotension,pulmo-naryedema, renalfailure,cardiacarrhythmias,andneurologic dysfunction ( 19, 20).It is unclear whether beneficial responses canbeinduced by lower, more
physiologic
doses of IL-2 that would notleadtosuchseveresystemic toxicity.Werecentlypublishedthepreliminary resultsofaphaseI
trialofrIL-2 givenin low doses(0.5-6.0 X 105
U/M2
perd;
3.3-40,ug/m2perd) bycontinuous intravenous infusion for 3 mo topatients with advancedcancer
(21
).Toxicity
was mod-estandgenerallydidnotimpair
the normaldaily
activities of these ambulatory patients. Almost all patientsreceiving
be-tween 1.5 X 105 U/M2perd(10,g/m2
perd)
and 6.0 X105
U/m2
per d(40gg/m2
perd) demonstratedsignificant
periph-eralbloodlymphocytosiscausedbytheselectiveexpansion
ofcirculating NKcells. In this report, we describe in detail the
immunologic
consequencesofprolonged
low-dose rIL-2infu-sion. Our resultsdefine a range of IL-2 doses that
produces
serum IL-2 concentrations sufficient to saturatehigh affinity
IL-2 receptors and induces a marked selectiveexpansion
ofcirculating
NKcells.Methods
Descriptionofthe clinicalstudy.21 patientswith advancedcancer
re-ceived prolonged continuous intravenous infusions of rIL-2atdoses thatrangedfrom 0.5X 105U/rM2perd(3.3
Ag/m2
perd)to6.0X105 U/M2perd(40,4g/m2
perd)(specificactivity 1.5x 107U/mgpro-tein).Atleast threepatients received2 10wkof rIL-2infusionateach
of thefour dose levels tested. Recombinant human IL-2wassupplied byHoffmann-LaRoche(Nutley, NJ). This clinical trialwascarriedout
with the approval of the Human Subjects Protection Committee, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA). All patients gave in-formedconsentforparticipationin this study. Patient characteristics andtoxicities have been described elsewhere (21). Blood specimens
werecollected atweekly orbiweekly intervals in heparinized60-cm3 syringes,and PBMCwere immediatelyseparatedbyFicoll-Hypaque densitygradientcentrifugation.Cellswerewashed threetimes and
re-suspended in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco Laboratories, Grand Island, NY) supplementedwith 5% human antibodyserum for phenotypic and functionalassays. Aliquotsof PBMCwerealso cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen for lateruse inproliferation andcytotoxicityassays.
Bloodspecimenswerealsoobtained periodically for determinations of complete bloodcounts, serumchemistries,andserumIL-2 levels.
Analysisofcellsurfaceantigens. Single- and two-color
immunofluo-rescenceanalysiswasperformed usingFITC-andphycoerythrin
(PE)-conjugated murine mAb as previously described (22). CD2, CD3,
CD4,CD5, CD8, CD20,CD25, CD56, and anti-IL-2R p75 antibodies weresupplied by Coulter Immunology (Hialeah, FL).
FHTC-conju-gatedanti-IL-2Rp75 mAb TU-27waskindlyprovided by Dr. Kazuo
Sugamura,Tohoku School of Medicine (Sendai, Japan).CD16mAb
3G8waskindly providedby Dr. Jay Unkeless, Mount Sinai School of
Medicine (NewYork). Flow cytometry was performed on an Epics V orEpics Elite (CoulterElectronics, Hialeah, FL) and results were
dis-playedassinglecolorhistogramsor as two-color orthographic
projec-tions plottinglog greenfluorescenceversus log red fluorescence.
Back-groundfluorescencewasdetermined by incubating cells with
fluoro-chrome-conjugated murinemAbof irrelevant specificity.
Cytotoxicityassays.NKcytolyticactivitywasmeasuredusing
stan-dard4-h5'Cr-releaseassaysaspreviouslydescribed(23). 5,000
5'Cr-la-beled target cellswereaddedtowellsof V-bottom 96-well microtiter plates,andeffector cellswereplatedintriplicatetoyield various
effec-tor totarget(E/T) ratios. PatientPBMCwereassayed forcytotoxicity immediately after separation fromperipheralbloodorafterovernight (18-h) incubation at 37°C in media alone or in media containing
variousconcentrations ( 10 pM-10 nM) ofrIL-2.Target cells included K562 (anNK-sensitive human myeloid leukemia cellline),COLO 205 (an NK-resistant human colon adenocarcinoma cell line), and P815(an NK-resistant murine mastocytoma cellline). Antibody-de-pendent cellularcytotoxicity (ADCC) assayswereperformed against P815 cellspreincubated with either medium aloneorwith a 1:100 dilutionof polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse lymphocyteserum(Accurate Chemical & Scientific Corp., Westbury, NY) as previously de-scribed (23).
Proliferation assays. Cryopreservedpatient PBMC werethawed, stainedwithPE-conjugatedCD56mAb,and sorted into CD56+ and CD56- subsetsby standard methods using flow cytometry. PBMC fromhealthyvolunteer donorswereisolatedbyFicoll-Hypaque den-sitygradient centrifugation, enrichedforNKcells by negative selection using immunomagneticbeads, and sorted into CD56dim and
CD56bright
subsetsby flow cytometry aspreviouslydescribed(23). Lymphocyte subsetswereplatedat30,000 cells per well in 96-well U-bottom micro-titer plates and culturedat37°C;1
ACi
of tritiated thymidinewasadded to each well after4 d. Samples were collected 18 h later using a cell harvester, andthymidine incorporationwasdetermined usingaliquid scintillation counter aspreviously described (23).Measurement of serum IL-2 concentrations. Serum sampleswere
assayed for IL-2 using an IL-2 enzymeimmunoassay kit from Ad-vanced Magnetics, Inc. (Cambridge, MA). Each sample was assayed in duplicate(undiluted ordiluted 1:2, 1:4, and 1:8) and comparedto a
standard curve using homogeneous rIL-2 (Takeda Chemical Indus-tries, Ltd.,Osaka, Japan).Thelowerlimit of detection in this assay is
10 pM.
Results
Changesinlymphocytesubsets
during
continuousinfusionrIL-2. Phenotypic analyses of T cell, B cell, and NK cell popula-tions were performed every 7-14 d while patients were receiv-ing rIL-2. Quantitative changes in circulating NK (CD56+)
cellsaresummarized inFig. 1A. Atthe lowest dose level, (0.5 x I05U/iM2 per d or 3.3
Ag/m2
per d), there was no apprecia-blechange in NK cell number. However, at dose levels of 1.5, 4.5, and 6.0 x 01 U/m2 per d ( 10, 30, and 40 Ag/m2 per d,respectively), there were consistent increases in the NK cell population during the course of IL-2 infusion. In the peripheral blood of three patients who completed 2 10 wk of therapy at 1.5 X 105 U/iM2 per d, the absolute number of total NK cells increasedfrom a mean of 134/,ul at week 0 to 410/,ul at week 12. Inpatients who completed 2 10 wk of therapy at 4.5 X
I0'
U /m2 per d, the absolute number of total NK cells increased
from a mean of
165/AI
at week 0 to2,425/,l
at week 12. Similarly, at a dose of 6.0 X 105 U/M2 per d, the absolute numberof NK cells increased from 247/l
atweek 0 to 1,337/Iul
atweek 12. Inthesepatients,
theincrease incirculating
NK cells occurred gradually throughout the entire period of IL-2 infusion, and there was no evidence to suggest decreased re-sponsiveness over time. It is also noteworthy thata dose-depen-dentincrease in NK cells was observed in patients who received 1.5 x105 U/M2 per d or 4.5x 105 U/M2 perd,whileafurther increase in dose to 6.0x105 U/iM2per ddidnotresult in any additional expansion in the NK cell population. Infact, onlya fiveto sixfold increase in NK cells was noted at 6.0x I0 5 U/ m2 per d compared to an average 15-fold increase in patients treatedwith 4.5 x 105 U/iM2 per d.The absolute number of CD3 + T cells remainedessentially
the same for all patients at each of the final three dose levels, with a mean value of 1,170/,l at week 0 and a mean value of
per-25o A NKCells
Figure
1.(A)
Absolute number of NK cells in" 2000 / peripheral bloodof
pa-tientsreceiving
continu-U, 15O / ousinfusionof rIL-2at
each of four dose levels.
low.
1O
/Values
wereobtained
3£ 2
by
multiplying
theab-A ' * solute
lymphocyte
0 count
by
thepercento 4 8 12 CD56+ cells within the
B TCells
lymphocyte
population
identified by flow cyto-metricanalysis. Each point represents the meanvalueforatleast
threepatients
complet-aE 1000 a Cf 2
aA
* A ing210
wkoftreat-. ° ment at aspecificdose
0 ._._._. level. The dose levels
Weeks on rlL-2 12 used in this study were
Weeks on rlL-2 X1,UM , 0.5 x 105 U/i2 per d; &, 1.5x 105U/M2perd;m, 4.5 x 105U/M2perd;o, 6.0x 105 U/iM2perd.(B) Absolute number of T cells inperipheralbloodof patientsreceivingcontinuous infusion of rIL-2ateach of four dose levels. Values were obtained bymultiplyingthe absolutelymphocyte countby the percent CD5 + cells identifiedbyflowcytometric analy-sis. Eachpointrepresents themeanvalueforatleast threepatients completing> 10 wkoftreatment at aspecificdose level. Thedose levels used in this study were o, 0.5x 105U/M2perd;A, 1.5x 105
U/m2perd; *, 4.5 x 105U/m2perd;o, 6.0x 105U/M2perd.
formed to assess whether T cell activation occurred in vivo
during infusion oflow dose rIL-2. Proliferation studies
per-formedin vitrofailedtodemonstrateanyspontaneous prolifer-ation ofpatient T cells,yet showed normal responsesafterin vitro activation with either PHAoranti-CD2antibodies(data
not shown). Although no patient exhibited a persistent
in-creaseincirculating Tcells,transient increases inTcellswere
noted in severalpatients duringrIL-2infusion. Forexample,at
the finaltwodoses,atransient increase in absoluteTcell
num-ber(arbitrarily defined byatwofold increase frompretherapy value)wasnoted infourpatients, followed byareturntonear
baseline values within 14 d. Each episode ofT cell increase occurredwithin thefirst5wkofinitiatingtheinfusion,with the exceptionofonepatientwhodemonstratedasecondincrease duringweeks 9 and 10.Phenotypic analyses performed during theseincreases did notreveal anyselectivechanges ineither CD4or CD8T lymphocyte subsets. Absolute numbers of B
lymphocytes (CD20+ cells) remained relatively unchanged duringthe entireperiodof IL-2 infusion. Themeanvalue for
absolute numbersofBcellsatthe threehighestdose levelswas
901,ul
atweek 0and12O/h1
atweek 12. Inaddition,therewerenosignificant changes inserum IgG, IgM,orIgA levelseither
duringorafter thecontinuousin vivo infusion of rIL-2(data
notshown).
IL-2 induced expansion of
CD56bri'gh
NK cells. TheCD56b"Ot
subsetofNK cells representsonly- 10%of humanNKcells and < 1%of all restinghumanPBL,yetis theonly lymphocyte population that constitutivelyexpressesthehigh affinityIL-2Randexhibitsaprofoundproliferativeresponseto
low concentrationsof rIL-2invitro(24-26). As showninFig. 2 forarepresentative patient, phenotypic examinationof
pe-mu
z
-i
.1
mU C.)
Week 3
NKH1+ 21%
1
_-Week 6 NKH1+ 57%
Week 8 (off tx)
NKH1+ 35%
CD56 Fluorescence Intensity
Figure2. Expression of
the CD56 antigenby PBLobtainedfroman
individualpatientat
in-dicatedtimepoints
be-fore,during,andafter
the continuousinfusion
of4.5x 105U/m2per
dof rIL-2.Freshly
iso-latednonadherent PBL
werestained with
PE-conjugated mAb NKH I(CD56)and
an-alyzed by flow cytome-try.PercentCD56+cells
is indicatedintheupper
right.Note the promi-nentexpansionof
CD56bfl60t
cells during therIL-2infusion, andsubsequent regression
oftheCD56brihlt
popu-lationafter
discontinua-tionof IL-2. Thelast
analysiswasperformed aftera2-wk
interrup-tionin IL-2 therapy.
ripheral blood NK cells during IL-2 infusionatdoses of 1.5-6.0
X 105 U/M2perd revealedagradual increase in the CD56b lgt
population compared to the CD56dim cells. While the
CD56b1Ot
cells accounted for< 10% ofCD56+ cellsinallpa-tients before the infusion ofrIL-2, thispopulation accounted for the majority of CD56+ cells after the 12-wk continuous infusion of rIL-2atthetwohighest doses. Insomecases,there was a2 100-fold increase in the absolute number of CD56
blOlt
cells. Thediscontinuation ofrIL-2infusionwasinvariably
fol-lowed byadecrease in the number ofCD56bflsht cells in periph-eral blood withindaystoweeks(Fig. 2, A-D).
CD16 (FcyRIII) is expressed by the majority ofhumanNK cellsand is the receptorthattriggersNKcellADCC(27, 28). In normal peripheral blood, the
CD56bight
population ex-presseslittleornoCD16 and mediatesADCC relatively poorly(25, 29). In patients receivingcontinuousinfusion IL-2, the expanded CD56b
'lt
cells demonstratedlittlechangeinCD16 antigen density, and thevastmajoritycoexpressesCD16 (Fig.3). Nevertheless,asignificant fraction of the CD56+ cells in all
patientswerealso CD16negative. Additional two-color immu-nofluorescence analysis demonstrated that the CD56+ cells consistently lacked CD3, CD4, and CD5, while> 95% of these
lymphocytesexpressed CD2 and - 40% expressed CD8 (data notshown).
ExpressionofIL-2receptorsonexpandedNKcells. During
the courseofrIL-2 infusion wealso examinedexpression of
bothp55 and p75 subunits oftheIL-2receptorbyNKcells and Tcellsusing direct two-color immunofluorescence analysis. As shownforarepresentative patientin Fig. 4, fewNKcells
ex-pressed IL-2R p55 by flow cytometric analysis either beforeor
duringrIL-2infusion.In contrast,expression of IL-2R p75was
evidentonalmostallCD56+ cells beforetreatment,and there appearedtobeanincreaseinantigen density during the period
of IL-2 infusion.Simultaneousanalysis ofT cells failedto dem-Pre-treatment
WEEK 12 IL-2
L
A
4.4% 17.0% - 8.6%Y
CD56-PE CD56-PE CD56-PE
Figure 3.Coexpression of CD56 and CD 16(Fcy RIII) byperipheralbloodNKcells inarepresentative patient receivingcontinuous IL-2 infusion of 4.5x105U/M2perd.Nonadherent PBL obtainedattheindicated timepointswerestained withPE-conjugated anti-CD56 mAb and FITC-conjugated anti-CD 16 mAb and analyzed by flow cytometry. Note thepredominanceof CD16+CD56dimNKcellspriortotherapyand the
ex-pansion of bothCDl6+6 CD56bh' andCD16-CD56b'Otcellsduringthe rIL-2 infusion.
onstratesignificant expression of either IL-2R p55 or IL-2R p75 on CD3+ cells as a result of IL-2 infusion (data not
shown). Furthermore, Northern blot analysis performed on
purified
populations
ofTcellsfrom selectedpatients receiving low dose rIL-2 infusion showed only minimal expression ofIL-2R p75 mRNA when compared with NK cells isolated
underidenticalconditions,orcompared withTcellsafter CD3 activation(data notshown).
Effects of
rIL-2infusion
onnon-MHC-restrictedcytotoxic Tlymphocytes. Asmall subsetof resting CD3+ cells expresses theCD56antigenatlowdensity;theseuniqueTcells comprise- 2% of normal PBL(30). CD56+ CD3+ cells exhibit the
morphology of large granular lymphocytes, mediate spontane-ous non-MHC-restricted cytotoxicity when
freshly
isolated,and demonstrateaugmented lysis of NK-resistanttumorcell lines after short-term incubation in nanomolar concentrations of rIL-2 (30). While detected in
virtually
allpatients
invaryingpercentagesbefore theinitiation oftherapy, this population did
notexpand during continuous low doserIL-2 infusion. This
canbe bestappreciated inone
patient
withanunusuallyhighpercentageofCD56+ CD3+ non-MHC-restrictedTcells be-foretreatment
(Fig.
5).The percentageof CD56+Tcellspro-gressively diminishesasthe absolute numberofCD56+ CD3-NK cellsselectively expandsduring continuous infusion low
dose rIL-2therapy. Similar resultswereobtained with all
pa-tientstreated onthis study (not shown).ThusCD56+ CD3+
lymphocytes, like conventional CD56-CD3+Tcells, do not appear to expresshigh affinityIL-2R or toproliferateinvivoin the presenceoflowconcentrationsofIL-2.
Effects
of
IL-2infusion
oncytolyticactivityofNK
cells.Thecytolytic
activity ofPBMCagainstbothNKsensitive(K562) andNKresistant (COLO 205)target cells wasexaminedperi-odically during
thecourseofrIL-2infusion.Agradual increaseincytotoxicity against K562 target cells was detected during
IL-2 therapy, generally
correlating
withthe degreeofexpansion ofcirculating
NKcells(21).Patientstreated at thehighestdose level (6.0 x 105U/iM2
per d) exhibited low but significant killing ofCOLO 205target cellsduringrIL-2infusion.NKcells incubatedinvitro with nanomolar concentrations ofIL-2 de-velop non-MHC-restrictedcytotoxicity againsttumorcelltar-getsgenerally resistanttolysis by restingNKcells lymphokine-activated killer (LAKactivity) (31, 32).Furtherstudieswere
undertakentodeterminewhether thecytolytic activity ofNK
cells expanded in vivo by low dose rIL-2 infusion could be
further enhanced by incubation withrIL-2invitro. Fig. 6
dem-onstratesresults obtained using PBMC froma representative patient after 8 wk of continuous rIL-2 infusion at6.0 x I05
U/M2
perd. PBMC incubated overnight in mediumalone dem-onstrated only minor cytotoxicity against NK-resistanttargetcells, and thepresenceof low concentrations ofIL-2(10pM)
didnotenhancecytotoxicity. Cytotoxicitywasenhancedafter incubation ofPBMCwith 100 pM IL-2, butthiswasevident onlyat the
higher effector/target
cell ratios. Incubation with higher concentrations ofIL-2( 1-10 nM)producedmarkedly enhancedkilling
oftheNK-resistanttarget, even at loweffec-tor/targetratios.
ADCCby PBMCwasalsotestedduring thecourseof rIL-2 infusion. PBMC isolatedbefore lowdoserIL-2infusionfailed
todemonstrateany
significant lysis
of the P815 murine masto-cytomacelllinein the absence(Fig.
7A)orpresence(Fig.7B) ofthe polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse lymphocyteserum;further incubation with varying concentrations ofexogenous rIL-2 alsofailedtoinducekilling
of P815target cells. Afterinvivo expansion of CD56+cellsby low dose rIL-2infusionfor6-8 wk, nosignificant cytotoxicitywasseenin the absence ofpoly-clonal rabbit anti-mouselymphocyte serum.
Despite
further stimulation withrIL-2 invitro,minimalcytotoxicity
occurred evenatthehighest
concentration ofIL-2(10
nM)(Fig.
7C).
After addition of polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse lymphocyte
serumand exogenous IL-2
(Fig.
7D), however,theexpanded
CD56+ cells exhibited a
high
degree ofADCC. Aswith NKactivityand
lymphokine-activated
killeractivity, high
concen-trations ofIL-2 (
1-10 nM)
wererequired
todemonstrate en-hancedADCC.Proliferative
responsesof
NKcellsexpanded
invivoby
rIL-2infusion.
SinceNKcellnumbers progressively increasedinpatients receiving
low dose continuous infusionrIL-2,
it seemedlikely
thattheseexpanded
NKcellswouldproliferate
vigorouslyto exogenous IL-2. Surprisingly,
CD56+
cells iso-latedbyflowcytometriccellsorting fromthe bloodofpatients
PRE
IL-2
v . ... .... I . . . * ... II Ill I I I IIII**
.X la la ees90
CD56
-PE
WEEK
5
IL-2
*-~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~l
ol N I r- Z.gf 11 ...1
CD56
-PE
Figure4. Expressionofp55 andp75 IL-2Rby peripheralbloodCD56+NK cells fromarepresentativepatientbefore andduring (week 5)
continuous rIL-2 infusion of 4.5 x I05U/rm2perd. NonadherentPBLwerestainedwith
PE-conjugated
anti-CD56 mAbandeither FITC-con-jugatedanti-IL-2Rp55(AandB)orFITC-conjugatedanti-IL-2Rp75 (CandD)andanalyzed byflow cytometry. Actual values forpercentdouble-positivecells is indicatedintheupperright quadrantof eachhistogram.
on low dose IL-2 therapy showed very little proliferation to
exogenousIL-2 in vitro (Table I). These expanded NK cells
demonstratedalmostnoproliferationtoIL-2 in concentrations of 10pM (Table I),and anti-IL-2Rp55 mAb failedto
abro-gate theirproliferation tohigher concentrations ofIL-2 (not shown). Although some proliferation was consistently seen
when expanded NK cellswerecultured with 1 nMor 10 nM IL-2, thedegree of proliferationwasmuchless than thatseen
withCD56b
i"'t
NK cells freshly isolated from normaldonors (Fig. 8). Indeed, the proliferative response ofNK cellsex-panded in vivo closely resembles that ofnormalCD56dlm NK cells.
SerumconcentrationsofIL-2duringrIL-2infusion.Serial
measurementsofserumIL-2 concentrationswerecarriedout
in 11 patientswhiletheywerereceiving continuous infusions
of IL-2. As shown in Fig. 9, IL-2wasundetectable
(concentra-A
2.4%
p55+
CD56+
-_m~~c
W-
S.-
qm.-B
4.4% p55+ CD56+
I IH--I- r_-~
A
4-
:-LO~
Le)
I Ln
IL
UL
JL
10
a.
Al[LO
I I
-Pre IL-2
U-IL
cv,
a
WEEK 2
CD56-PE
CD56-PE
WEEK 11
CD56-PE
Figure 5. Relative decrease in peripheralbloodCD56+ CD3+cytotoxic T cells inasingle patient receiving continuous rIL-2 infusionat4.5x 105
U/M2perd. Nonadherent PBLwereobtainedattheindicated time points duringrIL-2 therapy, stained with PE-conjugated anti-CD56 mAb andFITC-conjugated anti-CD3 mAb, and analyzed by flowcytometry. DespiteanunusuallyhighpercentageofCD56+ CD3+cellsin the
pe-ripheral blood of this patient before IL-2 therapy, thislymphocyte populationfailedtodemonstrateanyexpansion during prolonged rIL-2
infu-sion, whileCD56+CD3-NK cellsweremarkedlyincreased (lower right quadrant ofeach histogram).
tion< 10pM)intheserumofpatients treatedatthe first dose levelof0.5x 105 U/m2perd. Atadoseof 1.5x 105 U/m2per
d, the mean serum IL-2 concentration during infusion was
25±25 pM, butoneof three patients didnothaveconsistently detectable levels. Atadose of 4.5x 105 U/M2perd, themean
serumIL-2concentration during infusionwas77±64 pM.At
thehighest dose used, 6.0x I05 U/iM2perd, therewasgreater variation in serumIL-2 concentration seenbetweenpatients.
Onepatient hada meanconcentration of 39±4pM,asecond
patient had a mean concentration of 383±216 pM, and the
thirdpatient treatedatthis dose hada meanconcentration of
776±336pM. Of these three patients, theonewith the lowest
serum IL-2concentration had themostprofound increasein NKcell number during rIL-2 infusion, while theonewith the
highestserumIL-2concentration showed the least increase in
NKcells.
During the courseof thistrial, one patient failedto show
any increase in NK cell number as seen in the majority of
patients treatedatsimilar doses. Thepatientwastreatedat1.5
x 105 U/M2 per d, yet had undetectable (< 10 pM) serum
concentrations ofrIL-2throughoutthe infusion. This is in
con-trast tothetwootherpatientstreatedatthisdose,who showed
100- Figure 6. Lysisof
NK-> 80- resistanttargetcellsby
lymphocytes expanded
60 invivobyrIL-2
infu-o sion. Nonadherent PBL
Q 40 - /t (64%CD56+ cells)
wereisolated from the
20.- ...
,
4blood
ofarepresenta-0 SE tivepatient after 8wk
20 30 40 of rIL-2 infusionat6.0
E:T ratio X105U/m2perd,
cul-tured for 18h ineither media aloneormediacontaining 10 pM, 100 pM, 1 nM,or 10 nM rIL-2asindicated, and tested for lysis of5'Cr-labeledCOLO 205
tar-get cells atvariousE/T ratios. Resultsrepresentthemeanpercent lysis for triplicate samples. COLOtargetcells:--- ---,media; 0
-, 10 pM; -, 100 pM; -o -, 1 nM; , 10 nM.
measurableserumlevels of rIL-2 and hadmorethana
seven-fold increase inthe absolute NK cell number during the 3mo
of rIL-2therapy. A second patient demonstrated increases in NKcell number during the infusion, butataratewhichwas
significantly slower than the majority of patients. This patient
wastreatedatthehighest dose level (6.0x 105U/M2perd),
and had serumrIL-2 concentrations thatwere thehighest in
thestudy, ranging between 419 and 1,230 pM. In addition, this patient uniquely exhibitedaprofound increase in both
neutro-phil and eosinoneutro-philcounts,aswellas asignificant decrease in
plateletcount,suggesting that additional activation via the IL-2Rp75 mayhave resulted inamultitude of stimulatory and
inhibitory hematologic effects, possibly through the release of additionalcytokines (33-35).
The relationship between the IL-2 dose administered,
serum IL-2 levels attained, and the calculated percentage of IL-2receptoroccupancy areshown in Table II. Since the Kd for
the three classes of IL-2binding sites differ by three orders of magnitude, there isamarked difference in the proportion of
receptorsoccupiedateach IL-2dose level. Thus, thehigh affin-ity IL-2receptor(Kd, 10pM) is> 90% saturated when the IL-2
concentration is 100pM, while< 10%of the intermediate
af-finity receptorsareoccupied atthis concentration. However, 26% of the intermediate affinity receptors are occupied at a
serumIL-2 levelof 345 pM.
Discussion
We haveinvestigated the immunologicconsequencesof
main-taining near-physiologic serumconcentrations of IL-2 for
ex-tendedperiods by prolongedintravenous infusions of the cyto-kine. The doses ofrIL-2 administeredcould produce serum
IL-2concentrations(10-100pM)thatselectivelysaturatehigh affinity IL-2R heterodimers, as well as concentrations ( 1-nM) thatcanengageisolated intermediateaffinityIL-2Rp75. Suchtherapyinduceda profoundand selectiveexpansion of NK cellswithoutanysubstantialchangeinthe absolute
num-ber ofT cells, B cells, or monocytes. A clear dose-response effectwas seenbetween 1.5 x 105 U/M2perd and 4.5 x
105
2
-4
* . x Ils
I
PRE IL-2
Targets + Media
so- A
60
-40
-20
-0-.
9
-0--O
-0-5
media 10pM
100PM
1nM 10 nM
10
B Targets + Antibody
60
-40
-20
-5
E:T ratio
10
6-8 WEEKS IL-2
C Targets + Media
80 D Targets + Antibody
0 5
E:T ratio
Figure7.ADCC mediated bylymphocytes expanded in vivo by rIL-2 infusion. PBL obtained from three -0 patients before(A andB)orafter (CandD)IL-2
therapywerecultured for 18 h in media aloneor
me-diacontainingIL-2atthe indicated concentrations
A4 and then tested forcytotoxicity againstP815 cells preincubatedwithmediaalone(AandC)or polyclo-nalrabbit anti-mouselymphocyteserumreactivewith P815
(B
andD).
PBL beforetherapy
contained14%,13%, or 26% CD56+ cells,respectively.PBLobtained after 6-8 wk of rIL-2 infusionat6.0x I0 U/im2per dcontained 50%,77%,or79%CD56+cells. Each
10 point represents themeanvalueofpercentlysisby
PBLfrom the threepatients.
U/m2perd, which resulted inserum IL-2 concentrations of
- 25pMand 77pM,respectively. Increasingthe IL-2 dose
from 4.5x 10 5 U/rm2perdtoaslightly higher dose of6.0xI05 U/M2perd didnotresult in further NK cell expansion. Serum IL-2levelsatthis highest dosewerevariable, whichmayinpart
reflect poorrenal excretion of IL-2 as a consequence of
pre-vious chemotherapy-induced nephrotoxicity. Intwo of three patients, this dose producedserumIL-2levelssufficientto en-gageintermediate affinity IL-2R (Kd, 1 nM). Commensurate
with this, the circulating NK cells from these patients demon-strated higher levels of NK cytotoxicity compared with NK cells frompatients receiving the lower doses of IL-2. The obser-vation that absolute peripheral blood NK cell numberswere
actually lower after continuous infusion of 6.0x I05 U/rm2per
d ofrIL-2 thanafterinfusion of4.5x l0 U/M2perdis
intrigu-ing. Activation ofNK cells through IL-2R p75causesthe
upreg-TableI. Proliferation ofNKCellsExpandedIn VivobyrIL-2
Infusion
Proliferation (cpm)in the presenceofIL-2 concentrationof:
Week
Patient onIL-2 None 10 pM 100 pM 1nM 10 nM
1 6 231 149 448 4,351 N.D.
2 12 238 230 403 8,391 13,102
3 11 284 467 485 2,834 2,948
4 12 580 295 3,528 10,680 4,664
TotalCD56+NKcellsfrom theperipheral blood of patientsreceiving rIL-2infusionsof 6x l0 U/M2per d for 6-12 wk were cultured in vitrowith medium alone or medium containing various concentra-tions of IL-2 asindicated. Tritiated thymidine incorporation was determinedasdescribed in Methods. Results are mean cpm from triplicatewells. N.D., not done.
ulation of certain NK cell adhesion molecules (22),andthus the higher serum IL-2 concentrations produced by the 6.0
x 105 U/rm2perd dose might have induced the extravasation
ofexpandedNKcellsinto tissues.Alternatively, secondary
cy-tokines may have been produced byNK cellsor monocytes stimulatedthroughIL-2Rp75, resultinginbothsystemic toxic-ity andaninhibitory effectonNKcellexpansion. Ofnote,the number of circulating cytotoxic effectors induced by chronic lowdose IL-2therapy insomeinstancesequaled the number of
effectors that can be generatedex vivousing high dose IL-2 ( 15 ). Furthermore, this expanded NK populationwasevident
formonths and showednosign of diminution throughout the
courseofIL-2infusion. Despite the dramatic increaseinNK
cell numbers,NKcytotoxicity againsttumortargetswasonly slightly enhancedatdose levels of 1.5 x 105 U/rm2perdand 4.5x 105 U/rm2perd. Thus, prolonged low-dose IL-2 infusion
50X00
Figure
8. IL-2-inducedf 40000 proliferation of normal
CD56""' NKcells,
o 30 _ normal
CD56"m
NKcells,and NK cells
ex-pandedin vivoduring
o10000- _ rIL-2infusions. Sorted
0 _ _ o _
CD5614"g"
(A)andA B C CD56dIm(B)NKcell
subsets fromhealthy
donorsorsorted totalCD56'NKcells(C)frompatients receiving
rIL-2 infusionsat6.0x iOs U/M2perd for 6-12 wkwereisolated
byflow cytometry and cultured for5dinmediumcontaining 1nM
IL-2.Tritiatedthymidine incorporationwasdeterminedasdescribed inMethods. Datarepresentmean±SDofcpmfor NK cells derived
fromfour normal donors(AandB)orfour IL-2patients (C).
Back-groundcpminthepresenceof medium alone(278±35forA,
322±119 forB,and245±27 forC)have beensubtracted.
0
._U
0
0-0
w
0
0
4-80
-60
40
20
-i
os
cz
J.
-i
I06
80
20X
v v v -v- v
0. 5 0. 51.5 1.5 1.5 4.5 4. 5 4. 5 6. 0 6. 0 6. 0
IL-2 Dose Level
Figure9. SerumrIL-2concentrationsin 11patients receiving
contin-uousintravenous infusions ofrIL-2for 90 d.Patients 1 and2 re-ceived 0.5x10'U/rm2perd; patients 3, 4, and 5 received 1.5x 10'
U/m'perd; patients 6, 7, and 8 received 4.5x 105U/M2perd; and
patients 9, 10, and 11received 6.0x 105U/M2perdofrIL-2.Each
pointrepresentsaseparate measurement.Serum levelsweredrawn
randomly throughoutthe infusions. IL-2wasnotdetectable in the
serumofanypatientbefore the initiation of rIL-2therapy.
canproduce prominentNKcellexpansion without activation
of substantial NK cytolytic activity. However, brief in vitro incubation ofexpandedNKcells with concentrations ofIL-2 sufficientto bind IL-2R p75 resultedin marked cytotoxicity against NK-sensitive, NK-resistant, and antibody-coatedtarget cells. This is consistent with theexpression ofisolated interme-diateaffinity p75 detectedon expandedNK cellsby flow
cy-tometry.Theabilitytoexpand theNKpopulationatlow,
non-toxic doses ofrIL-2 and thento activatehighly specific anti-body-directed target cell killing using a higherdose of rIL-2
(Fig. 7)suggestsfuturestrategiesforimmunotherapy. Despite inducingup to 15-fold increases in the absolute number ofcirculatingNKcells, lowdosecontinuous infusion IL-2 caused no significant increase in B cells, CD56- CD3+ conventional T cells, or CD56+ CD3+ MHC-unrestricted T
cellsin mostpatients.The selective NK cellexpansion reported herewasexpected basedontheknown distribution of IL-2Ron
normalresting human lymphocytes (24).Thevastmajorityof Tcells and B cellsexpressneitherintermediatenorhigh affinity IL-2Rbinding sites until activated by antigen,and these lym-phocytesarethereforelargely unresponsivetoexogenousrIL-2
Table II. Relationship betweenIL-2 Dose, Serum IL-2 Concentration, and IL-2R Occupancy
Percent receptoroccupancy
Serum
IL-2dose (IL-2) High Intermediate Low
Ag/m2perd pM
3.3 <10 -
-10 25 71 2 <1
30 77 88 7 1
40 345 97 26 3
CalculationbasedontheKdof each class ofreceptor:high affinity, Kd
= 10pM; intermediate affinity, Kd= 1nM; low affinity, Kd = 10 nM(1 1).
(IL-2)
Percent
RC.
= x100, whereRo.
isthereceptoroccupancy.( 10, 24).Incontrast, - 90% ofNKcellsexpressIL-2Rp75in
the absenceof IL-2Rp55anddemonstrateenhancedcytolytic activityinresponsetoconcentrations(- 1-10nM)ofrIL-2
thathalf-saturate intermediateaffinity IL-2R. Anovelsubset
ofNKcells,identifiedby high density expressionofthe CD56 antigen, appearstoexpress constitutively high affinityIL-2R
p55 /75heterodimers,aswellas anexcessofisolated
interme-diateaffinityIL-2Rp75.These CD56" t' NKcellscan
prolifer-ate to concentrations(- 10-100 pM)of rIL-2 that saturate
only high affinityIL-2R. Incontrast,althoughbriefincreasesin
Tcell number occurred in severalpatients duringthe infusion ofrIL-2,thenumber ofTcellsgenerallyreturnedtobaseline levels within 2-3wk; acumulative increase in T cell number
wasnotobserved. Transientproliferation ofTcellsduring rIL-2infusion isnotunexpected,since T cellsarepresumably acti-vatedintermittently invivo afterencountering cognate
anti-gen.Afterantigen stimulation,Tcellsexpresshigh affinity
IL-2R p55/p75 heterodimers andproliferate in the presenceof picomolarconcentrations of IL-2.However, high affinity
IL-2RaredownregulatedonTcells 10-14 d after activation( 10), and thus Tcell expansion would notbe expected to persist despitethe continuedpresenceofexogenousrIL-2. In contrast toactivatedTcells,activatedNKcells donotappearto
pro-ducesignificantamountsofIL-2 (27, 36);thusNKcellsare
probably incapableof autocrine stimulationthroughtheIL-2
pathway. However,theexpandedNKcells inourpatients dem-onstratestableor even enhanced surfacestainingwith IL-2R
p75 mAb, and their cytolytic activity can be augmented by nanomolar concentrations ofIL-2 invitro.Thus,wehave no
evidence to suggestthat these NK cells downregulate IL-2R
p75afterprolongedexposuretoexogenousIL-2.
Mostpreviouscancerimmunotherapytrials have involved
very high doses of rIL-2 (- 15-150 X 106 U or 1-10 mg)
administeredintravenouslyoverseveraldaysorintermittently
over several weeks ( 15, 16). The immunologic and clinical effects ofhighdose IL-2therapycontrastmarkedlywith those
seen inourtrial. Highdosetherapy commonlycauses a pro-foundlymphopeniafollowedbyreboundlymphocytosis
com-prisedof bothTcells andNKcells( 17, 37, 38).Most human
NK cells (12-14) and monocytes (6) constitutively express isolated IL-2Rp75 chains,and nanomolar concentrations of IL-2caninduce thesecretionof severalcytokines bythese cells
(6, 28, 36, 39). The T cell activation detected inpatients
re-ceiving highdoseIL-2islikelycausedby secondary cytokines
derived from activated NKcells andmonocytes, rather than
directly caused by rIL-2 itself. Indeed, PBMC from patients receiving highdose IL-2infusions demonstrate enhanced
ex-pressionof mRNA for severalcytokines, includingIL-1, IL-5, IL-6, INF-'yand tumor necrosisfactor,and elevatedblood lev-els of these cytokines canbe detected in somepatients after IL-2therapy (33-35). Furthermore,suchcytokinesmay
con-tribute to theseveretoxicitiesofhighdose IL-2therapy,
includ-ing hypotension (40)and the vascular leaksyndrome (41 ).In thisregard,the selectiveNKcell modulation and mildtoxicity
thatwedescribeafter infusion of low dose IL-2maydelineate the direct effects ofIL-2asopposedto theconfoundingeffects ofsecondary cytokines.
AlthoughselectiveNKcellexpansionwasexpectedinthis
trial,thephysiologicbasisfor themarkedlyincreasedNKcell
numberduringlow doserIL-2infusionis notentirelyclear.A
preferential expansionof CD56'"t NKcellswasseen in this
study,as wellasother IL-2 trials(42, 43).Sincefreshlyisolated
10 0
0
0o
9
10 0
o 0
5o 0 0
oS2
CD56b"ht
NK cells from normal donorsexpresshigh affinity IL-2R and proliferate vigorously to low concentrations of IL-2 invitro, we initially speculated thatCD56b'60t
circulating NK cells also selectivelyproliferatedin vivoduring IL-2 administra-tion. However, several observations argue against thishypothe-sis.
CD56bfl"t
NKcells in the peripheralbloodofhealthy per-sons express little or no surface CD16, while the expandedCD56b'r*t
NK cells from our IL-2 patients are largelyCD16-positive. Furthermore,CD56bflht NK cells from normal persons express functional
high affinity
IL-2R, whereas mostexpanded
CD56bfght
NK cells appear to lackhigh affinity IL-2R, bothby flow cytometricanalysis and byinvitrofunctionalstudies using various concentrations of IL-2. Finally,
CD5b6lrhtNKcells from normalpersonsproliferatevigorously
to low concentrations ofexogenous IL-2 in vitro, while NK
cells expanded in vivo demonstrate very little proliferation
even inresponse tonanomolar concentrations ofIL-2. Itis possiblethat boththeCD56b
l't
andCD56dimNKcells that accumulate in the peripheral blood ofpatients receivingprolongedinfusionsoflow dose IL-2arisefrom immatureNK cell progenitors that canproliferate to low concentrations of IL-2. Theregulation ofhuman NKcelldifferentiation remains poorlyunderstood.TheearliestNKcellprogenitorsarealmost
certainly generated in the bone marrow, but it is uncertain whether theseprogenitors differentiate into fullymature
effec-torcells in the marrow, orwhether NK precursors leave the
marrowandundergo differentiation elsewhere (27, 28). How-ever, human andanimal data indicatethat immature NK cell
progenitorscanbe stimulated withexogenous IL-2 toproduce
mature NK cells (44-47). Thus, the expanded NK cells in
patients receiving prolonged infusions oflow dose IL-2could reflectproliferation of bothmature
peripheral
bloodCD56b'rt
NK cells and immature NK cell precursors
possessing high
affinity
IL-2R.Ofnote, NK cells in thesepatients
progressively
expanded
during
continuousrIL-2 infusionandsubsequently
decreased in number after discontinuation ofIL-2treatment.
Furthermore, reinstitution of IL-2 therapy resulted in recur-rent NKcell
expansion.
Thus, theNKcell subset of lympho-cytes appearstorespondto IL-2invivo ina mannersimilarto the response of certainmyeloid
cell subsetstohematopoietic
growth
factors,
suchaserythropoeitin
orgranulocytecolony-stimulating
factor (48).Extending
thisspeculation further,
NKcellproduction
underphysiologic
conditionsmight
also be regulatedin afashionmoreanalogoustomyeloid
cellsthan to TandBlymphocytes. Monocytes, granulocytes, anderythro-cytes areterminally differentiated cells,so aneedfor increased numbers ofmaturemyeloid cells ismetby increasedmarrow
production ofthese cells. In contrast, adaptive immune re-sponses
require
theclonalexpansion
ofspecific
Tcells and Bcells, and these lymphocytes
proliferate extensively
after acti-vation via theirantigen-specific,
clonotypicreceptors.There is currently little evidencetosuggest that NK cells haveclonally distributed, highlyvariable receptors (27, 28),sothat there is no obviousadvantage toexpanding individualclones of ma-ture NK cells.Therefore,the demandfor increasednumbersofNKcells could be metbyincreasingmarrowproductionfrom immatureprogenitors. Thismightalsoexplain the apparently
limitedproliferative potential of the vast majorityof mature
peripheral
blood NK cells(29, 36).Our resultsindicatethat smallsubpopulations of lympho-cytescanbeselectivelyandprofoundlyexpanded byprolonged
infusion oflow dose rIL-2. This
study
stronglysuggeststhatTcellsexpress functional
high affinity
IL-2Rforonly
alimited time after antigen activation, while NK cells can respondtoIL-2 without known previous antigen activation and for an
apparently unlimited period of time. Attemptsmustnow be
made toidentify patientswho mightbenefit from the
expan-sion ofthese cytotoxic lymphocytes. For example,
patients
withcertain hematologic malignancieshave ahigh risk of recur-rent disease despite myeloablative chemoradiotherapy and bone marrowtransplantation.Recentstudies have shown thatprolonged low doserIL-2 therapy can bewell tolerated after either autologous or Tcell-depleted allogeneicbone marrow
transplantation
(49). Intermittent infusions of higher doses of IL-2might alsobeadministeredtoactivate expandedNKcellsvia IL-2R p75, in hopesof improvingtheantitumor activity of
these cells. Furthermore, this approach could be combined
with serotherapy using mAbreactive withtumorcells or
vi-ruses,sincemostoftheexpanded NK cellsexpressthe
FcyRIII
(CD16) and can mediate ADCC. Clinical trials to evaluate these approaches are currently underway. Thedesign of our IL-2 regimenwasbased on thepharmacokinetics of IL-2, the binding affinities oftheIL-2R, and theknowndistribution of
IL-2R on lymphocyte subsets. Further rational clinical trials withIL-2 and other cytokines could be undertakenusing fun-damental
principles
ofimmunologyandendocrinology ratherthan the paradigms of cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Acknowledgments
This researchwassupported by National Institutes of Healthgrants
CA41619,CA01572,andAI17643. M. A.Caligiuriwassupported by
anawardfrom the Dr. Louis SklarowMemorial Fund,aninstitutional researchgrantfrom theAmerican CancerSociety,and the Coleman Leukemia Research Fund. M. J. Robertson is supported by the Claudia Adams BarrProgram in Cancer Research.
References
1.Smith, K. A. 1988. Interleukin-2: inception, impact, and implications. Science(Wash.DC). 240:1169-1175.
2. Mingari,M.C., F.Gerosa, G. Carra, R. S. Accolla,A.Moretta, R. H. Zubler, T.A.Waldmann, and L. Moretta. 1984. Humaninterleukin-2promotes proliferationof activatedBcells viasurface receptors similartothoseof activated
Tcells. Nature(Lond.).312:641-643.
3. Henney, C. S.,K.Kuribayashi,D. E.Kern,andS.Gillis. 1981.
Interleukin-2augments natural killeractivity. Nature (Lond.). 291:335-338.
4.Trinchieri, G.,M.Matsumoto-Kobayashi, S. C. Clark,J.Seehra,L.
Lon-don, and B. Perussia. 1984. Response of resting human peripheral blood natural killer cellstointerleukin 2. J. Exp.Med. 160:1147-1-169.
5.Malkovsky, M.,B.Loveland,M.North, G.L.Asherson,L.Gao,P.Ward, andW.Fiers. 1987. Recombinant interleukin-2 directlyaugmentsthe cytotoxic-ity of human monocytes. Nature(Lond.). 325:262-265.
6.Espinoza-Delgado,I.,J. R.Ortaldo,R.Winkler-Pickett,K.Sugamura, L. Varesio, and D.L. Longo.1990. Expressionand roleofp75interleukin2receptor
onhumanmonocytes.J.Exp.Med. 171:1821-1826.
7.Kaplan, G.,R.Kiessling, S. Teklemariam, G. Hancock, G. Sheftel, C.K.
Job,P.Converse,T.H.M.Ottenhoff,M.Becx-Bleumink,M.Dietz, and Z.A.
Cohn. 1989. The reconstitution of cell-mediated immunity in thecutaneous
lesions of lepromatousleprosy by recombinant interleukin 2. J. Exp. Med.
169:893-907.
8. Pahwa, R.,T.Chatila, S. Pahwa, C. Paradise,N. K.Day,R.Geha, S.A.
Schwartz,H.Slade,N.Oyaizu,andR. A.Good. 1989. Recombinant interleukin
2therapy in severe combined immunodeficiency disease. Proc. Natl.Acad.Sci. USA.86:5069-5073.
9.Weinberg,K.,andR.Parkman.1990. Severecombinedimmunodeficiency due to aspecificdefect in theproduction of interleukin-2.N. Engi.J.Med. 322:1718-1723.
10.Smith,K. A.1989.Theinterleukin2receptor.Ann.Rev.Cell Biol.
5:397-425.
11.Wang, H.-M.,and K. A.Smith. 1987. Theinterleukin2receptor:
12.Siegel, J. P., M. Sharon,P. L.Smith, andW.J. Leonard.1987. The IL-2 receptorflchain(p70): role in mediating signals for LAK, NK, andproliferative activities. Science(Wash. DC). 238:75-78.
13.Kehrl, J. H.,M.Dukovich,G. Whalen, P. Katz,A.S.Fauci,and W. C. Greene. 1988. Novelinterleukin2(IL-2)receptor appearstomediate IL-2-in-duced activation of natural killer cells.J.Clin. Invest. 81:200-205.
14.Phillips, J. H., T.Takeshita,K.Sugamura,andL. L.Lanier. 1989. Activa-tion of natural killer cells via thep75 interleukin 2 receptor. J. Exp. Med. 170:291-296.
15.Rosenberg, S. A.,M.T.Lotze, L. M.Muul,S.Leitman,A.E.Chang,S. E. Ettinghausen,Y. L.Matory, J. M.Skibber,E.Shiloni,J. T.Vetto,etal. 1985. Observationsonthesystemic administration of autologous
lymphokine-acti-vated killer cells and recombinant interleukin-2 topatients with metastatic cancer.N.Engl. J.Med.313:1485-1492.
16.Rosenberg, S. A.,M. T.Lotze, J. C.Yang,P. M.Aebersold,W.M. Line-han, C. A.Seipp, andD.E.White. 1989.Experiencewith theuseof high-dose interleukin-2 in the treatment of 652cancerpatients.Ann.Surg.210:474-485.
17. Lotze, M.T., Y. L.Matory, S. E. Ettinghausen, A. A.Rayner,S. 0. Sharrow, C.A. Y. Seipp,M.C. Custer,and S.A. Rosenberg. 1985.Invivo administration ofpurified human interleukin 2:II.Half-life,immunologic ef-fects, andexpansion ofperipherallymphoidcellsin vivo withrecombinant IL 2. J.Immunol. 135:2865-2875.
18.Atkins, M. B., J.A.Gould, M.Allegretta,J.J.Li,R.A.Dempsey,R.A.
Rudders, D.R.Parkinson,S.Reichlin,and J. W. Mier. 1986. Phase I evaluation of recombinantinterleukin-2 in patientswith advancedmalignantdisease. J. Clin.Oncol.4:1380-1391.
19. Margolin, K. A., A. A. Rayner, M.J. Hawkins, M. B. Atkins,J.P. Dutcher,R.I.Fisher,G. R.Weiss,J. H.Doroshow,H.S.Jaffe,M.Roper,etal. 1989. Interleukin-2 andlymphokine-activatedkiller celltherapy of solidtumors:
analysis oftoxicity and managementguidelines. J.Clin. Oncol.7:486-498. 20.Siegel, J. P., andR. K.Puri. 1991.Interleukin-2toxicity.J. Clin.Oncol. 9:694-704.
21.Caligiuri, M. A., C.Murray,R. J.Soiffer, T. R. Klumpp, M. Seiden, K. Cochran, C. Cameron, C. Ish, L. Buchanan, D. Perillo, et al. 1991. Extended continuousinfusionlow-doserecombinant interleukin-2 in advanced cancer: prolonged immunomodulation without significant toxicity. J. Clin. Oncol. 9:2110-2119.
22. Robertson, M. J., M. A. Caligiuri, T. J. Manley, H. Levine, and J. Ritz. 1990. Human natural killer cell adhesion molecules: differential expression after activation and participation in cytolysis.J.Immunol. 145:3194-3201.
23. Robertson, M. J., R. J. Soiffer, S. F. Wolf, T. J. Manley, C. Donahue, D. Young, S.H. Herrmann, and J. Ritz. 1992. Response of human natural killer (NK) cellsto NKcellstimulatoryfactor(NKSF):cytolytic activity and prolifera-tion ofNKcellsisdifferentiallyregulated by NKSF. J. Exp. Med. 175:779-788. 24.Caligiuri,M. A., A.Zmuidzinas, T. J. Manley, H. Levine, K. A. Smith, and J.Ritz. 1990. Functional consequencesofinterleukin 2 receptor expression
onrestinghumanlymphocytes: identification ofanovel naturalkiller cell subset with highaffinity receptors.J.Exp.Med. 171:1509-1526.
25. Nagler, A., L. L. Lanier, S.Cwirla,and J. H.Phillips. 1989. Comparative studies of human FcR III-positive andnegativenaturalkiller cells.J.Immunol.
143:3183-3191.
26. Nagler, A., L. L. Lanier, and J. H. Phillips. 1990. Constitutive expression ofhighaffinity interleukin2 receptorsonhumanCD16- natural killer cells in vivo.J.Exp. Med. 171:1527-1533.
27.Trinchieri, G. 1989. Biology ofnatural killer cells. Adv. Immunol. 47:187-337.
28. Robertson, M. J., and J. Ritz. 1990. Biology and clinical relevance of human naturalkillercells.Blood.76:2421-2438.
29. Baume, D. M., M. J. Robertson, H.Levine,T. J. Manley, P. W. Schow, and J.Ritz. 1992.Differentialresponses tointerleukin-2define functionally dis-tinct subsets of human natural killer cells. Eur. J.Immunol.22:1-6.
30.Schmidt,R.E.,C.Murray,J.F.Daley, S. F.Schlossman, and J. Ritz. 1986.Asubsetof natural killer cells in peripheral blood displays a mature T cell phenotype.J.Exp.Med. 164:351-356.
31. Schmidt, R. E., J.M. Michon, J. Woronicz, S. F. Schlossman, E. L. Reinherz, and J. Ritz. 1987. Enhancement of natural killer function through activation of theT I1Erosette receptor.J.Clin. Invest. 79:305-308.
32.Phillips,J.H., and L. L. Lanier. 1986. Dissection of the
lymphokine-acti-vated killer phenomenon: relative contribution of peripheral blood natural killer cells and T lymphocytes to cytolysis. J. Exp. Med. 164:814-825.
33.Kasid, A., E. P. Director, and S. A. Rosenberg. 1989. Induction ofendoge-nouscytokine mRNA incirculatingperipheral blood mononuclear cellsbyIL-2 administration to cancer patients. J. Immunol. 143:736-739.
34. Heslop, H. E., D. J. Gottlieb, A. C. M. Bianchi, A. Meager, H. G. Prentice, A. B. Mehta, A. V.Hoffbrand, and M. K. Brenner. 1989. In vivo induction of gammainterferon andtumornecrosis factorbyinterleukin-2 infusionfollowing intensive chemotherapy or autologous bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 74:1374-1380.
35.Schaafsma,M.R., J. H. F.Falkenburg, J. E.Landegent,N.Duinkerken,S. Osanto, P.Ralph, K.Kaushansky,G.Wagemaker,J. V.Damme,R.Willemze, and W.E.Fibbe. 1991. In vivo production ofinterleukin-2, granulocyte-macro-phagecolony-stimulatingfactor, macrophagecolony-stimulatingfactor,and IL-6 duringintravenous administration ofhigh-doseinterleukin-2 incancerpatients. Blood. 78:1981-1987.
36. Robertson, M. J., andJ.Ritz. 1992. RoleofIL-2receptors inNKcell activation andproliferation. InNKCellMediatedCytotoxicity: Receptors, Sig-nalling,and Mechanisms. E. Lotzova, andR. B.Herberman, editors. CRC Press, BocaRaton, FL. 183-206.
37.Phillips, J. H.,B. T.Gemlo,W. W.Myers,A. A.Rayner,and L. L.Lanier. 1987. Invivo and invitroactivation of natural killer cells in advancedcancer
patientsundergoing combined recombinantinterleukin-2andLAKcelltherapy. J. Clin.Oncol.5:1933-1941.
38.Boldt,D.H.,B.J.Mills,B. T.Gemlo,H.Holden,J.Mier,E.Paietta,J. D. McMannis, L. V. Escobedo, I.Sniecinski,A. A.Rayner,etal.1988.Laboratory correlatesof adoptiveimmunotherapywith recombinant interleukin-2 and lym-phokine-activated killer cells in humans. Cancer Res. 48:4409-4416.
39. Musso,T., I.Espinoza-Delgado,K.Pulkki,G. L.Gusella,D. L.Longo,
and L.Varesio. 1992. IL-2 induces IL-6productionin human monocytes. J Immunol. 148:795-800.
40. Mier, J. W., G. Vachino, J.W. M.VanDerMeer, R. P. Numerof,S. Adams, J. G.Cannon,M. A.Bernheim,M. B.Atkins,D. R.Pinkerson,and C.A.
Dinarello. 1988. Inductionof circulatingtumornecrosisfactor(TNF a)asthe mechanismofthefebrileresponsetoIL2 incancerpatients.J.Clin.Immunol. 8:426-436.
41.Thijs, L. G., C.E.Hack,R.J.M.Strack,vanSchijndel,J. H.Nuijens,G. J. Wolbink, A. J. M.Eerenberg-Belmer, H.vanderVall,andJ.Wagstaff. 1990. Activationof the complement systemduringimmunotherapywith recombinant IL-2:relation to thedevelopmentof sideeffects. J. Immunol. 144:2419-2424.
42.Ellis, T. M., S. P.Creekmore,J.D.McMannis,D.P.Braun,J.A.Harris,
and R. I. Fisher. 1988.Appearance andphenotypiccharacterization of circulat-ing Leu 19+ cells incancerpatientsreceivingrecombinant interleukin 2. Cancer Res.48:6597-6602.
43.Weil-Hillman,G., P.Fisch,A.F.Prieve,J.A.Sosman,J.A.Hank,and P. M. Sondel. 1989.Lymphokine-activated killeractivityinducedbyin vivo interleukin 2therapy:predominantrolefor lymphocyteswith increased expres-sion of CD2 and Leu 19 butnegativeexpressionofCD16antigens.Cancer Res. 49:3680-3688.
44.Yoda, Y.,Z.Kawakami,A.Shibuya,and T. Abe. 1988. Characterization ofnatural killer cells cultured from human bonemarrowcells.Exp.Hematol.
16:7 12-717.
45.Keever, C. A.,K.Pekle, M. V.Gazzola,N. H.Collins,J.H.Bourhis,and A.Gillio. 1989.Naturalkiller andlymphokine-activatedkiller cell activities from human marrow precursors: II. The effects of IL-3 and IL-4. J. Immunol.
143:3241-3249.
46.Migliorati, G.,L.Cannarile,R. B.Herberman,A.Bartocci,E.R.Stanley,
andC. Riccardi. 1987. Role of interleukin 2(IL-2)andhemopoietin-1(H-I)in thegenerationofmousenaturalkiller(NK)cells fromprimitivebone marrow precursors. J. Immunol. 138:3618-3625.
47.Van denBrink,M.R.M., S. S.Boggs,R. B.Herberman,and J.C. Hiser-odt. 1990. Thegenerationof natural killer(NK)cellsfromNKprecursor cells in ratlong-term bonemarrow cultures.J.Exp.Med. 172:303-313.
48.Clark, S.C.,and R.Kamen.1987. The humanhematopoietic
colony-stim-ulating factors. Science(Wash. DC).236:1229-1237.
49.Soiffer,R.J., C.Murray,K.Cochran,C.Cameron,E.Wang,P.W.Schow,
J.F. Daley, and J. Ritz. 1992. Clinicalandimmunologiceffectsofprolonged
infusion of low-dose recombinant interleukin-2followingautologousand