• No results found

Fixed Points of Expansive Type Mappings in 2-Banach Spaces

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Fixed Points of Expansive Type Mappings in 2-Banach Spaces"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ISSN 2291-8639

Volume 3, Number 1 (2013), 60-67 http://www.etamaths.com

FIXED POINTS OF EXPANSIVE TYPE MAPPINGS IN 2-BANACH SPACES

PRABHA CHOUHAN1,∗, NEERAJ MALVIYA2

Abstract. In present paper, we define expansive mappings in 2-Banach space and prove some common unique fixed point theorems which are the extension of results of Wang et al. [12] and Rhoades [9] in 2-Banach space.

1. Introduction

The research about fixed points of expansive mapping was initiated by Machuca (see [6]). Later Jungck discussed fixed points for other forms of expansive mapping (see [5]). In 1982, Wang et al. (see [12]) presented some interesting work on expan-sive mappings in metric spaces which correspond to some contractive mapping in [10]. Also, Zhang has done considerable work in this field. In order to generalize the results about fixed point theory, Zhang (See [14]) published his work Fixed Point Theory and Its Applications, in which the fixed point problem for expansive mapping is systematically presented in a chapter. As applications, he also inves-tigated the existence of solutions of equations for locally condensing mapping and locally accretive mapping. On the other hand Gahler ([2],[3]) investigated the idea of 2-metric and 2-Banach spaces and proved same results. Subsequently several authors including Iseki [4], Rhoades [8], White [13], Panja and Baisnab [7] and Saha et al [11] studied various aspects of the fixed point theory and proved fixed point theorems in 2-metric spaces and 2-Banach spaces. Recently, the study about fixed point theorem for expansive mapping is deeply explored and has extended too many others directions. Motivated and inspired by the above work, in this paper we investigate fixed point for expansive mapping in 2-Banach spaces. The presented theorems extend, generalize and improve many existing results in the literature [9] [12].

2. Preliminaries

Definition 2.1. Let X be a real linear space andk ., .k be a non-negative real valued function defined onX×X satisfying the following conditions:

i)kx, yk= 0 if and only ifxandy are linearly dependent inX, ii) kx, yk=ky, xk for allx, y∈X

iii)kx, ayk=|a| kx, yk a being real,x, y∈X iv)kx, y+zk=kx, yk+kx, zk for allx, y, z∈X

2010Mathematics Subject Classification. 47H10, 54H25.

Key words and phrases. 2-normed space, 2-Banach space, Expansive mapping, Fixed point.

c

2013 Authors retain the copyrights of their papers, and all open access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.

(2)

Then k ., . k is called a 2-norm and the pair (X,k ., . k) is called a linear 2-normed space.

Some of the basic properties of 2-norms are that they are non negative satisfying kx, y+axk=kx, yk, for allx, y∈X and all real numbersa.

Definition 2.2. A sequence{xn}in a linear 2-normed space (X,k., .k) is called

Cauchy sequence if

lim

m,n→∞kxm−xn, yk= 0 for ally inX.

Definition 2.3. A sequence {xn} in a linear 2-normed space (X,k., . k) is said

to be convergent if there is a pointxin X such that

lim

n→∞kxn−x, yk= 0 for ally in X. If {xn} converges tox, we write{xn} →xasn→ ∞.

Definition 2.4. A linear 2-normed spaceX is said to be complete if every Cauchy sequence is convergent to an element ofX. We then callX to be a 2- Banach space.

Definition 2.5. LetX be a 2-Banach space andT be a self-mapping ofX. T is said to be continuous atxif for every sequence{xn} in X, {xn} →x as n→ ∞ implies{T(xn)} →T(x) as n→ ∞.

Example 2.6. LetX isR3 and consider the following 2-norm onX as

kx,yk=

det  

i j k

x1 x2 x3

y1 y2 y3

  ,

wherex= (x1, x2, x3) andy= (y1, y2, y3). Then (X,k., .k) is a 2-Banach space.

Example 2.7. LetPn denotes the set of all real polynomials of degree≤n, on

the interval [0,1]. By considering usual addition and scalar multiplication,Pn is a

linear vector space over the reals. Let{xo, x1, ..., x2n}be distinct fixed points

in [0,1] and define the following 2-norm on Pn:k f, g k= P2n

k=0 | f(xk)g(xk) |, whenever f and g are linearly independent and k f, g k= 0, if f, g are linearly dependent. Then (Pn,k., .k) is a 2-Banach space.

Example 2.8. Let X isQ3, the field of rational number and consider the fol-lowing 2-norm onX as:

kx,yk=

det  

i j k

x1 x2 x3

y1 y2 y3

  ,

(3)

3. Main Results

Definition 3.1. Let (X,k ., . k) be a 2-Banach space with 2-norm k ., . k . A mapping T ofX into itself is said to be expansive if there exists a constanth >1 such that

kT x−T y, ak≥hkx−y, akf or all x, y∈X

Example 3.2. Let X = R2 and consider the following 2-norm on X as kx, yk=|x1y2−x2y1|wherex= (x1, x2) andy= (y1, y2). Then (X,k., .k) is a 2-Banach space. Define a self mapT onX as followsT x=βxwhere β >1 for all

x∈X, clearlyT is an expansive mapping.

Theorem 3.3. Let (X,k., .k) be a 2-Banach space andS,T be surjective mapping ofX into itself satisfying.

kSx−T y, ak+khkx−T y, ak+ky−Sx, aki≥a1kx−Sx, ak

+b1ky−T y, ak+c1kx−y, ak (3.3.1)

for allx, y, a∈X, x6=y wherea1, b1, c1, k≥0, satisfya1< k+ 1, b1< k+ 1, c1> 2k+ 1. ThenS andT have a common unique fixed point inX.

Proof: We define a sequence{xn}as follows forn= 0,1,2,3, ...

(3.3.2) x2n =Sx2n+1, x2n+1=T x2n+2

Ifx2n =x2n+1=x2n+2 for somen then we see thatx2n is a fixed point of S and T. Therefore, we suppose that no two consecutive terms of sequence{xn}are equal.

Now we putx=x2n+1and y=x2n+2 in (3.3.1) we get

kSx2n+1−T x2n+2, ak+k

h

kx2n+1−T x2n+2, ak+kx2n+2−Sx2n+1, ak

i

≥a1kx2n+1−Sx2n+1, ak+b1kx2n+2−T x2n+2, ak+c1kx2n+1−x2n+2, ak

⇒kx2n−x2n+1, ak+k

h

kx2n+1−x2n+1, ak+kx2n+2−x2n, ak

i

≥a1kx2n+1−x2n, ak

+b1kx2n+2−x2n+1, ak+c1kx2n+1−x2n+2, ak

⇒kx2n−x2n+1, ak+k

h

kx2n+2−x2n, ak

i

≥a1kx2n+1−x2n, ak+b1kx2n+2−x2n+1, ak

+c1kx2n+1−x2n+2, ak

⇒kx2n−x2n+1, ak+k

h

kx2n+2−x2n+1, ak+kx2n+1−x2n, ak

i

≥a1kx2n+1−x2n, ak

+b1kx2n+2−x2n+1, ak+c1kx2n+1−x2n+2, ak ⇒(1 +k−a1)kx2n−x2n+1, ak≥(b1+c1−k)kx2n+1−x2n+2, ak

⇒kx2n+1−x2n+2, ak≤ ((1+b k−a1)

1+c1−k) kx2n−x2n+1, ak

⇒kx2n+1−x2n+2, ak≤k1kx2n−x2n+1, ak

(4)

Similarly, we can calculate

kx2n+2−x2n+3, ak≤k2kx2n+1−x2n+2, akforn= 0,1,2, ... wherek2=

(1+k−a1)

(b1+c1−k) <1 (As a1+b1+c1>1 + 2k) and so on

So, in general

⇒kxn−xn+1, ak≤kkxn−1−xn, akforn= 1,2,3...

wherek= max{k1, k2}thenk <1

(3.3.3) ⇒kxn−xn+1, ak≤kn kx0−x1, ak

We can prove that {xn} is a Cauchy sequence (using (3.3.3)). So there exists a pointxinX such that

(3.3.4) {xn} →x as n→ ∞

Existence of fixed point: SinceS and T are surjective maps, so there exist two pointsy andy0 in X such that

(3.3.5) x=Sy and x=T y0

Consider

kx2n−x, ak=kSx2n+1−T y0, ak

≥ −khkx2n+1−T y0, ak+ky0−Sx2n+1, ak

i

+a1kx2n+1−Sx2n+1, ak+b1ky0−T y0, ak

+c1kx2n+1−y0, ak

⇒kx2n−x, ak ≥ −k

h

kx2n+1−T y0, ak+ky0−x2n, ak

i

+a1kx2n+1−x2n, ak

+b1ky0−T y0, ak+c1kx2n+1−y0, ak

As{x2n},{x2n+1}are subsequences of{xn} as n→ ∞,{x2n} →x, {x2n+1} →x

(Using 3.3.4)

Therefore

kx−x, ak ≥ −khkx−x, ak+ky0−x, aki+a1kx−x, ak+b1ky0−x, ak

+c1kx−y0, ak

⇒0≥(b1+c1−k)kx−y0, ak

⇒kx−y0, ak= 0 (As2k+ 1< a1+b1+c1< k+ 1 +b1+c1, so that k < b1+c1)

(3.3.6) ⇒x=y0

In an exactly similar way (Usingb1< k+ 1) we can prove that,

(3.3.7) x=y

(5)

Uniqueness: Letz be another common fixed point ofS andT, that is

Sz=z and T z=z

kx−z, ak =kSx−T z, ak

≥ −khkx−T z, ak+kz−Sx, aki+a1kx−Sx, ak+b1kz−T z, ak

+c1kx−z, ak

⇒kx−z, ak≥ −khkx−z, ak+kz−x, aki+a1kx−x, ak+b1kz−z, ak+c1kx−z, ak

⇒kx−z, ak≥(−2k+c1)kx−z, ak ⇒(1 + 2k−c1)kx−z, ak≥0

⇒kx−z, ak= 0 (As c1>2k+ 1)

⇒x=z

This completes the proof of the theorem 3.3

Corollary 3.4. Let (X,k ., . k) be a 2-Banach space and S and T be two surjective mappings ofX into itself such that for everyx, y, a∈X

kSx−T y, ak≥ a1kx−y, ak (3.4.1)

wherea1>1. ThenS andT have a common unique fixed point inX.

Proof: If we putk, a1, b1= 0 andc1=a1 in theorem 3.3 then we get above corol-lary 3.4.

Corollary 3.5. Let (X,k ., . k) be a 2-Banach space and T be a surjective mapping ofX into itself such that for everyx, y, a∈X

kT x−T y, ak≥ a1kx−y, ak (3.5.1)

wherea1>1. ThenT has a unique fixed point inX.

Proof: If we put S =T in corollary 3.4 then we get above corollary 3.5 which is an extension of theorem 1 of Wang et al. [12] in 2-Banach space.

Corollary 3.6. Let (X,k., .k) be a 2-Banach space andS, T be two surjective mappings ofX into itself satisfying.

kSx−T y, ak≥a1kx−Sx, ak+a2ky−T y, ak+a3kx−y, ak (3.6.1)

for eachx, y∈X,withx6=y wherea1, a2, a3≥0 anda3>1. Then S andT have a common unique fixed point inX.

(6)

Corollary 3.7. Let (X,k ., . k) be a 2-Banach space and T be a surjective mapping ofX into itself satisfying.

kT x−T y, ak≥a1kx−T x, ak+a2ky−T y, ak+a3kx−y, ak (3.7.1)

for eachx, y∈X withx6=ywherea1, a2, a3≥0 anda3>1. ThenT has a unique fixed point inX.

Proof: If we put S =T in corollary 3.6 then we get above corollary 3.7 which is an extension of theorem 2 of Wang et al. [12] in 2-Banach space.

The following theorem 3.8 is an example in which the fixed point need not be unique and continuity of self maps are required and it extend the theorem 3 of Rhoades [9] in 2-Banach spaces.

Theorem 3.8. Let (X,k ., .k) be a 2-Banach space and S, T be two continuous mappings ofX into itself satisfying.

kSx−T y, ak≥a1min{kx−y, ak,kx−Sx, ak,ky−T y, ak} (3.8.1)

for everyx, y∈X, x6=y Wherea1>1. ThenS andT have a common fixed point inX.

Proof: We define a sequence{xn}as follows forn= 0,1,2,3, ...

x2n =Sx2n+1, x2n+1=T x2n+2 Now we putx=x2n+1and y=x2n+2 in (3.8.1) we get

kSx2n+1−T x2n+2, ak ≥a1min

kx2n+1−x2n+2, ak ,kx2n+1−Sx2n+1, ak ,kx2n+2−T x2n+2, ak

=a1min

kx2n+1−x2n+2, ak ,kx2n+1−x2n, ak ,kx2n+2−x2n+1, ak

⇒ kx2n−x2n+1, ak ≥a1min

kx2n+1−x2n+2, ak ,kx2n−x2n+1, ak

Case I

kx2n−x2n+1, ak≥a1kx2n+1−x2n, ak

⇒1≥a1

Which is contradiction.

Case II

kx2n+1−x2n+2, ak≤ a11 kx2n−x2n+1, ak

(7)

wherek=a1

1 <1 (As a1>1) So, in general

⇒kxn−xn+1, ak≤kkxn−1−xn, akforn= 1,2,3...

(3.8.2) ⇒kxn−xn+1, ak≤kn kx0−x1, ak

We can prove that{xn}is a Cauchy sequence (using (3.8.2). So there exists a point

xinX such that

(3.8.3) {xn} →x as n→ ∞

Existence of Fixed Point: IfSandT are continuous then existence part follows very easily. As shown below

x= lim

n→∞x2n= limn→∞Sx2n+1=Sn→∞lim x2n+1=Sx(as n→ ∞ {x2n+1} →x)

Similarly

x= lim

n→∞x2n+1= limn→∞T x2n+2 =Tn→∞lim x2n+2=T x(as n→ ∞ {x2n+2} →x)

This completes the proof of the theorem 3.8

Corollary 3.9. Let (X,k ., . k) be a 2-Banach space and T be a continuous mapping ofX into itself satisfying.

kT x−T y, ak≥a1min{kx−y, ak,kx−T x, ak,ky−T y, ak} (3.9.1)

for everyx, y∈X, x6=y Wherea1>1. ThenT has a fixed point inX.

Proof: If we putS =T in theorem 3.8 then we get above corollary 3.9 which is an extension of theorem 3 of Wang et al. [12] in 2-Banach space.

Remark 1: If mappings are continuous in theorem 3.3 then existence of fixed

point follows very easily as proved in theorem 3.8.

Remark 2: In corollary 3.9, we proved the fixed point is unique by using only

a3 > 1 and there is no need of a1 < 1 and a2 < 1, so it extend and unify the theorem 2 of Wang et al. [12].

References

[1] Cho Y.J. Khan M.S. and Sing S.L. Common fixed points of weakly commuting mappings, Univ.u. Novom Sadu, Zb.Rad. Period.-Mat.Fak.Ser.Mat, 18 1(1988)129-142.

[2] Gahler S. 2-metric Raume and ihre topologische strucktur, Math.Nachr., 26(1963), 115-148. [3] Gahler S. Uber die unifromisieberkeit 2-metrischer Raume, Math.Nachr. 28(1965), 235 - 244. [4] Iseki K. Fixed point theorems in 2-metric space, Math.Seminar.Notes, Kobe Univ.,3(1975),

133 - 136.

[5] Jungck G., Commuting mappings and fixed points The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol.83, no.4,PP.261-263, 1976.

[6] Machuca R., A coincidence theorem The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol.74, no.5,P. 569, 1967.

[7] Panja C. and Baisnab A.P., Asymptotic regularity and fixed point theorems, The Mathemat-ics Student, 46 1(1978), 54-59.

(8)

[9] Rhoades B.E., Some fixed point theorems for pairs of mappings, Jnanabha 15 (1985), 151-156. [10] Rhoades B.E., A comparison of various definitions of contractive mappings. Tran. Am.

Math.Soc.226, 257-290 (1977)

[11] Saha M. Dey D. Ganguly A. and Debnath L. Asymptotic regularity and fixed point theorems on a 2-Banach space Surveys in Mathematics and its Applications Vol.7(2012), 31-38. [12] Wang S. Z., Li B. Y., Gao Z. M., and Iseki K., Some fixed point theorems on expansion

mappings, Math. Japonica 29 (1984), 631-636.

[13] White A. 2-Banach spaces, Math.Nachr., 42(1969), 43 - 60.

[14] Zhang S., Fixed point theory and its applications, Chongqing press, Chongqing China, 1984.

1

Scope College of Engineering Bhopal (M.P.), India

2

NRI Institute of Information Science and Technology, Bhopal (M.P.) India ∗

References

Related documents

Recently, Silva-Carrillo, Hernández, Hardy, González-Rodríguez and Castillo- Vargasmachuca (2012) demonstrated that for spotted rose snapper Lutjanus guttatus , fish meal

Scheme II: BP neural network + multispectral re- mote sensing bio factors ( RS factors, RSF ) + sub lot survey factors: Multispectral remote sensing bio fac- tors ( DVI, RVI,

While it is still unclear which theoretical insult(s) are upstream of Ca 2+ dysregulation in IBM, our data sug- gest that this phenomenon is propagated by reduced expression

To check the precision of the developed method, three different dilutions of stock mixture solution were made and the precision (intra-day and inter-day precision) of the

Situations where classical explicit schemes fail to give a solution compatible with the property that solution of Riccati equation is a definite positive matrix have been

The aim of this study was to characterise the spectrum of Fusarium species isolates obtained from different plant hosts (like asparagus, garlic, pineapple, banana, rhubarb,

In the first phase of the analysis, event studies were performed in an effort to determine the impact of announcements of cultural diversity on firm performance,