• No results found

Improvement of an Ostrowski Type Inequality for Monotonic Mappings and its Application for Some Special Means

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Improvement of an Ostrowski Type Inequality for Monotonic Mappings and its Application for Some Special Means"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

INEQUALITY FOR MONOTONIC MAPPINGS AND ITS APPLICATION FOR SOME SPECIAL MEANS

S. S. Dragomir

School of Communications and Informatics, Victoria University of Technology, P.O.Box 14428, MCMC, Melbourne, Victoria 8001, Australia

[email protected]

M. L. Fang

Department of Mathematics, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, P. R. China

[email protected]

Abstract. We first improve two Ostrowski type inequalities for monotonic func-tions, then provide its application for special means.

Keywords– Ostrowski’s Inequality, Trapezoid Inequality, Special Means.

1. Introduction.

In [1], Dragomir established the following Ostrowski’s inequality for monotonic mappings.

Theorem 1. Let f : [a, b]R be a monotonic nondecreasing mapping on [a, b]. Then for all x[a, b], we have the following inequality

Œ Œ Œ Œ

Œf(x)

1 ba

Z b

a

f(t)dt

Œ Œ Œ Œ Œ

1 ba

(

[2x(a+b)]f(x) +

Z b

a

sgn(tx)f(t)dt

)

b 1

−a[(x−a)(f(x)−f(a)) + (b−x)(f(b)−f(x))]

”

1 2 +

|x((a+b)/2)| ba

•

(f(b)f(a)). (1.1)

And the constant 1/2 is the best possible one.

In [2], Dragomir, Peˇcari´c and Wang generalized Theorem 1 and proved

Supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China

(2)

Theorem 2. Let f : [a, b] R be a monotonic nondecreasing mapping on [a, b] and t1, t2, t3 (a, b) be such that t1 ≤t2 ≤t3. Then

Œ Œ Œ Œ Œ

Z b

a

f(x)dx[(t1−a)f(a) + (t3−t1)f(t2) + (b−t3)f(b)]

Œ Œ Œ Œ Œ

(bt3)f(b) + (2t2−t1−t3)f(t2)(t1−a)f(a) +

Z b

a

T(x)f(x)dx

(bt3)(f(b)−f(t3)) + (t3−t2)(f(t3)−f(t2))

+(t2−t1)(f(t2)−f(t1)) + (t1−a)(f(t1)−f(a))

max{t1−a, t2−t1, t3−t2, b−t3}(f(b)−f(a)), (1.2)

where T(x) =sgn(t1−x), for x [a, t2], and T(x) =sgn(t3−x), for x∈[t2, b].

In the present paper, we firstly improve the above results, and then provide its application for some special means.

2. Main Result.

We shall start with the following result.

Theorem 3. Let f : [a, b]R be a monotonic nondecreasing mapping on [a, b] and let t1, t2, t3 [a, b] be such that t1 ≤t2 ≤t3. Then

Œ Œ Œ Œ Œ

Z b

a

f(x)dx[(t1−a)f(a) + (t3−t1)f(t2) + (b−t3)f(b)]

Œ Œ Œ Œ Œ max{(bt3)(f(b)−f(t3)) + (t2−t1)(f(t2)−f(t1)),

(t3−t2)(f(t3)−f(t2)) + (t1 −a)(f(t1)−f(a))} (2.1)

max{t1−a, t2−t1, t3−t2, b−t3}(f(b)−f(a)). (2.2)

Proof. Since f(x) is a monotonic nondecreasing mapping on [a, b], we have

Œ Œ Œ Œ Œ

Z b

a

f(x)dx[(t1−a)f(a) + (t3−t1)f(t2) + (b−t3)f(b)]

Œ Œ Œ Œ Œ

=

Œ Œ Œ Œ Œ

Z t1

a

(f(x)f(a))dx+

Z t3

t1

(f(x)f(t2))dx+

Z b

t3

(f(x)f(b))dx

Œ Œ Œ Œ Œ

=

Œ Œ Œ Œ

”Z t1

a

(f(x)f(a))dx+

Z t3

t2

(f(x)f(t2))dx

•

"Z t2

t1

(f(t2)−f(x))dx+

Z b

t3

(f(b)f(x))dx#ŒŒŒŒ

Œ max{(bt3)(f(b)−f(t3)) + (t2−t1)(f(t2)−f(t1)),

(t3−t2)(f(t3)−f(t2)) + (t1−a)(f(t1)−f(a))}

max{t1−a, t2−t1, t3−t2, b−t3}(f(b)−f(a)).

Thus (2.1) and (2.2) are proved.

(3)

Corollary 1. Letf be defined as in Theorem 3. Then

Œ Œ Œ Œ Œ

Z b

a

f(x)dx[(xa)f(a) + (bx)f(b)]

Œ Œ Œ Œ Œ

max{(bx)(f(b)f(x)),(xa)(f(x)f(a))}

max{xa, bx}max{(f(x)f(a)),(f(b)f(x))}

”

1

2(b−a) +

Œ Œ Œ Œx−

a+b 2

Œ Œ Œ Œ •

(f(b)f(a)).

For x= (a+b)/2, we get trapezoid inequality.

Corollary 2. Let f be defined as in Theorem 3. Then

Œ Œ Œ Œ Œ

Z b

a

f(x)dx f(a) +f(b)

2 (b−a)

Œ Œ Œ Œ Œ

≤b−2a max

š’

f

’

a+b 2

“

−f(a)

“

,

’

f(b)f

’

a+b 2

““›

(2.3)

12(ba)(f(b)f(a)).

For t1 =a, t2 =x, t3 =b, we get Theorem 1.

3. Application for Special Means.

In this section, we shall give application of Corollary 2. Let us recall the fol-lowing means.

1. The arithmetic mean:

A =A(a, b) := a+b

2 , a, b 0. 2. The geometric mean:

G=G(a, b) :=√ab, a, b 0. 3. The harmonic mean:

H =H(a, b) := 2

1/a+ 1/b, a, b≥0. 4. The logarthmic mean:

L =L(a, b) := b−a

lnblna, a, b≥0, a6=b; If a=b, then L(a, b) =a. 5. The identric mean:

I =I(a, b) := 1 e

’

bb aa

“1/(b−a)

(4)

6. The p-logarthmic mean:

Lp =Lp(a, b) := ”

bp+1ap+1 (p+ 1)(ba)

•1/p

, a 6=b; If a =b, then Lp(a, b) =a,

where p6=1,0 anda, b > 0.

The following simple relationships are known in the literature

H GLI A.

We are going to use inequality (2.3) in the following equivalent version:

Œ Œ Œ Œ Œ

1 ba

Z b

a

f(t)dt f(a) +f(b) 2

Œ Œ Œ Œ Œ

1

2max

š’

f

’

a+b 2

“

−f(a)

“

,

’

f(b)f

’

a+b 2 )

“›

(3.1)

1

2(f(b)−f(a)),

where f : [a, b]Ris monotonic nondecreasing on [a, b].

5.1. Mapping f(x) =xp

Consider the mapping f : [a, b](0,)R, f(x) =xp, p >0. Then

1 ba

Z b

a

f(t)dt=Lpp(a, b),

f(a) +f(b)

2 =A(a

p, bp),

f(b)f(a) =p(ba)Lpp11. Then by (3.1), we get

Œ

ŒLpp(a, b)A(ap, bp)ŒŒ1 2max

š’

a+b 2

“p

−ap, bp

’

a+b 2

“p›

=1 2

”

bp

’

a+b 2

“p•

= 1 2(b

pap) 1

2

’’

a+b 2

“p −ap

“

21p(ba)Lpp11 p(b−a)a

p−1

4 . (3.2)

Remark 1. The following result was proved in [2].

|Lpp(a, b)A(ap, bp)| ≤ 1

2p(b−a)L

p−1

(5)

3.2. Mapping f(x) =1/x

Consider the mapping f : [a, b](0,)R, f(x) =1/x. Then 1

ba

Z b

a

f(t)dt=L−1(a, b), f(a) +f(b)

2 =

A(a, b) G2(a, b),

f(b)f(a) = b−a G2(a, b).

Then by (3.1), we get

Œ Œ Œ

ŒGA2((a, ba, b)) −L

1(a, b)

Œ Œ Œ

Œ12max š

1 a

2 a+b,

2 a+b−

1 b

›

=1 2

ba a(a+b) =

1 2

ba

ab

1 2

ba b(a+b)

1

2

ba G2(a, b)

1 2

ba b(a+b). Thus we get

0ALG2 1 2

b

a+b(b−a)L. (3.3)

Remark 2. The following result was proved in [2]. 0AGG2 1

2(b−a)L.

3.3. Mapping f(x) = lnx

Consider the mapping f : [a, b](0,)R, f(x) = lnx. Then 1

ba

Z b

a

f(t)dt= lnI(a, b),

f(a) +f(b)

2 = lnG(a, b), f(b)f(a) = b−a

L(a, b). Then by (3.1), we get

|lnI(a, b)lnG(a, b)| ≤1 2max

š

lna+b

2 lna,lnb−ln a+b

2

›

=1 2ln

a+b 2a =

1 2

ba L(a, b)

1 2 ln

2b a+b. Thus we get

1 I

G

r

a+b 2b e

1

2Lb−a(a,b). (3.4)

Remark 3. The following result was proved in [2]. 1 I

G ≤e

(6)

References

[1] S. S. Dragomir,Ostrowski’s inequality for monotonic mapping and applications, J. KSIAM (to appear).

[2] S. S. Dragomir J. Peˇcari´c and S. Wang,The Unified Treatment of Trapezoid, Simpson, and Ostrowski Type Inequality for Monotonic Mappings and Applications, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 31(2000), 61-70.

[3] S. S. Dragomir and S. Wang, An Inequality of Ostrowski-Gr¨uss’ Type and Its Applications to the Estimation of Error Bounds for Some Special Means and for Some Numerical Quad-rature Rules, Computers Math. Applic.,33 (11)(1997), 15-20.

[4] S. S. Dragomir and S. Wang,Applications of Ostrowski inequality to the estimation of error bounds for some special means and some numerical quadrature rules, Appl. Math. Lett.,11 (1) (1998), 105-109.

[5] M. Mati´c J. Peˇcari´c and N. Ujevi´c,Improvement and Further Generalization of Inequalities of Ostrowski-Gr¨uss Type, Computers Math. Applic.,39 (3/4) (2000), 161-175.

[6] D. S. Mitrinovi´c, J. Peˇcari´c and A. M. Fink, Classical and New Inequalities in Analysis, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1993.

[7] D. S. Mitrinovi´c, J. Peˇcari´c and A. M. Fink, Inequalities Involving Functions and Their Integrals and Derivatives, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1991.

References

Related documents

In [11], Wu and Preneel found a linear expression which has a substantial probability advantage by considering the LFSR equation and the bit carries of three Modular

[...] beim Erwachsenen wie beim Kind bleibt das Bedürfnis nach einem Zeichensystem, das sich nicht auf Begriffe, sondern auf Gegenstände als solche und auf die ganze

Soon after release of the first test version, we find that the time to problem correction decreases more intensely. Since more problems are reported during the actual period,

et al. i n with we consider only markers on the same chromosome. If the centromere.. model is the Poisson process, which imposes no chiasma could be observed, any joint tetrad

However, the single power-conversion ac–dc converter provides a simple structure, a low cost, and low voltage stresses because it has no PFC circuit composed of the inductor,

Distribution Node The Distribution node shows the occurrence of symbolic values, such as mortgage type or gender. Histogram Node The Histogram node shows the occurrence

A quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of growth and fatness data from a three generation pig experiment is presented. The population of 199 F2 animals was derived from a

peats one to three be present to interact with Tup1 ( Tzamarias and Struhl 1995). Thus it is possible that no Mig1-Tup1 interaction occurs. Unlike the case with flocculence and