• No results found

A Profit Maximization Mechanism for Cloud Service Provider and Its Users

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "A Profit Maximization Mechanism for Cloud Service Provider and Its Users"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

CSEIT1831108 | Received : 10 Jan 2018 | Accepted : 25 Jan 2018 | January-February-2018 [(3) 1 : 446-452 ]

International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology © 2018 IJSRCSEIT | Volume 3 | Issue 1 | ISSN : 2456-3307

446

A Profit Maximization Mechanism for Cloud Service Provider

and Its Users

1

P. Radha,

2

Mohammed Alisha,

3

Dr. D. Mohan Reddy

1PG Scholar, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Amalapuram Institute of Management Sciences and College of Engineering, Mummidivaram, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, India

2Associate Professor & Head of the Department, Computer Science and Engineering, Amalapuram Institute of Management Sciences and College of Engineering, Mummidivaram, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh,

India

3Professor & Principal, Amalapuram Institute of Management Sciences and College of Engineering,

Mummidivaram, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, India

ABSTRACT

The present world appropriated computing winding up so outstanding in perspective of an intense and profitable way to deal with gives figuring resources and organizations to customers on ask. A cloud pro communities see point advantage is a champion among the most basic examinations and it is principally directed by the plan of a cloud advantage organize under given market ask. In any case, standard single resource renting design can't guarantee the idea of all sales and besides wastes a ton of benefits. To vanquish that deficiency utilize Double-Quality-Guaranteed (DQG) resource renting design this solidifies whole deal renting with without a moment's hesitation renting. An M/M/m+D lining model and the execution markers expect basic part income driven lift. For security reason we are using characteristic based encryption contrive. The result demonstrates guaranteed the organization idea of all sales, security also obtain more advantage. Keywords : Cloud computing, queuing model, SLA (service-level agreement), multiserver system, profit maximization, waiting time, guaranteed service quality.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Directly a day’s conveyed computing is rapidly transforming into an effective and profitable strategy for figuring resources and handling organizations. Cloud gives dynamic resource pools, virtualization, and high availability. In the sys - tem every client needs to enrol at first to get access into the segment. Once marked in they can have the functionalities like File movement request to server and Access re-mission status. BSP (Business Service Provider) can get to customer request which may be in spread and give underwriting in perspective of the request, storing point of confinement and give work

intending to customer request on system

(2)

customers on a remuneration as-you-use preface. In business consideration the advantage is that the essential issue to be exist inside the field of the specific condition. Plainly, the essential of advantage support in dispersed computing condition is required. The present the sixty billion servers are working in this world. Thus the server required a great deal of vitality. Usually between the customer and server makes them comprehend i.e., advantage level assertion. In this organization level comprehension, portrayed the Quality of organization need to oblige the customer and the most extraordinary required execution time. In case the master association harms this organization level seeing no charge is suited the specific organization. So there will be the loss of the advantage. Here valuation of the perfect speed and size of the data the SLA is given and here and evaluating model is developed consistent with perfect size and speed and organization charge is processed. In this way the organization supplier or provider can grow the advantage. Issue Definition: Generally, Service providers need to set a higher cost to get a higher general income; yet doing this would reduce the buyer faithfulness. From this time forward, picking a sensible assessing infrastructure is more basic for authority communities. Advantage intensification is portrayed to find a perfect blend of the server appraise and as far as possible with the true objective that the advantage is extended. We use an M/M/m lining model, Double-quality-guaranteed renting design, separately for perfect multiserver configuration, advantage nature of all sales and diminishing the benefit wastage.

1.1 Scope and Objective Scope: In this paper, we

need to exclusively consider the benefit

augmentation drawback in an extremely

homogeneous cloud air, because of the investigation of a heterogeneous climate is far extra troublesome than that of a similar air. In any case, it is meant to ex-tend our examination to a heterogeneous climate inside what's to come.

1.2 Objective:

1) To reduce the resource wastage within the on

2) To improve the quality of service with in-creased profit.

3) To avoid potential competition. 4) Maintain customer’s goodwill. 5) Avoid risk.

II.

EXISTING SYSTEM

In Many existing exploration they just consider the power utilization cost. The asset rental cost is influences the benefit of specialist organizations. The conventional single-quality-unguaranteed (SQU) or single asset leasing plan can't ensure the nature of all solicitations yet squanders an extraordinary measure of assets because of the vulnerability of infrastructure workload.

Disadvantages: - The holding up time of the service ask for is too long - Sharp increment of the leasing cost or the power cost such expanded cost may stabilizer the pickup from punishment decrease. In this way, the single leasing plan isn't a decent plan for specialist co-ops.

III.

PROPOSED SYSTEM

(3)

IV.

LITERATURE SURVEY

1) Profit Optimization in SLA-Aware Cloud Services with a Finite Capacity Queuing Model.

Authors: - Yi-Ju Chiang and Yen Chieh Ouyang In this paper, a cloud server farm provided with finite capacity is modelled as an M/M/R/K queuing system. Revenue losses due to infrastructure control and eager client practices. The real three essential issues are tackled. Initial, an exchange off between meeting infrastructure exhibitions and lessening working expenses is led. Second, the impacts of infrastructure limit control and usage on different exhibitions of holding up time, misfortune likelihood, and last entry rate are illustrated. At long last, the proposed ideal benefit control approach enables a cloud supplier to settle on the ideal choice in the quantity of servers and system capacity so upgrade benefit and fulfil the SLAs.

2) Cost Aware Cloud Service Request cloud scheduling for SaaS Providers.

Authors:- Zhipiao Liu, Shangguang Wang, Qibo Sun, Hua Zou and Fangchun Yang. This paper, SaaS suppliers are concerned, how to process the dynamic client benefit asks for more cost-viably with no SLA infringement is an obstinate issue. To manage this test, set up a cloud benefit ask for show with benefit level assertion imperatives, and afterward display a cost mindful service ask for booking approach in light of hereditary calculation.

3) InterCloud: Utility-Oriented Federation of Cloud Computing Environments for Scaling of Application Services.

Authors: - Rajkumar Buyya , Rajiv Ranjan, R.N. Calheiros. This paper presents vision, challenges, and engineering components of InterCloud for utility - situated alliance of Cloud processing conditions. This InterCloud condition bolsters scaling of uses over different merchant mists. The subsequent structure encourages the unified service of infrastructure segments and ensures clients with ensured nature of services in extensive, united and very powerful conditions. Additionally gives upgraded degrees of

versatility, adaptability, and straightforwardness for service.

4) Performance Analysis of Cloud Computing Centres Using M/G/m/m+r Queuing Systems.

Authors:- Hamzeh Khazaei, Jelena Misic, and V.B. Misic. Execution assessment of server ranches is a vital part of cloud computing which is of significant enthusiasm for both cloud suppliers and cloud clients. In this paper, creators proposed an explanatory method in light of an inexact Markov chain demonstrate for execution assessment of a cloud computing focus. General Service time for demands and in addition extensive number of servers which makes show adaptable as far as versatility and assorted variety of service time.

5) Tradeoffs between profit and customer satisfaction for service provisioning in the cloud. Authors:- J. Chen, C. Wang, B. B. Zhou, L. Sun, Y. C. Lee, and A. Y. Zomaya. In this paper explored the service provisioning issue at business benefit level in the cloud. A utility show is created for estimating consumer loyalty utilizing utility hypothesis utilized from financial matters. In light of the utility model, creators gave another kind of SLAs between a business specialist organization and its clients. This paper has two planning calculations for a specialist co-op to make tradeoffs between its benefit and consumer loyalty. By utilizing adaptable fulfilment targets, calculations empower specialist co-ops to powerfully improve their benefit as indicated by workload changes and asset value variances.

V.

METHODOLOGY

(4)

Implementation of Modules: - Cloud customer module - Business Service Module

- Infrastructure Service Provider Module - Cloud computing.

- Queuing mode

Cloud customer Module: A client requires benefits so they submit demand to specialist organization and specialist organization conveys services as indicated by its request. The client gets wanted outcome from the specialist organization alongside measure of the service, the service quality and service level agreement (SLA).

Business Service Providers Module: Service supplier pay infrastructure supplier for managing their physical assets is income, and business specialist co-op takes charges from clients for procedure of their service ask for is fetched. The hole amongst income and cost is turned into a benefit. Amid this module the service providers thought of as cloud merchants because of they’re going to assume a vital part in the middle of cloud clients and foundation providers, and he can build up relate degree backhanded alliance between cloud end client and infrastructure providers.

Infrastructure Service Provider Module: In

Fig1.three-level cloud structure, relate degree infrastructure supplier the basic equipment and

programming offices. A business specialist

organization pay rents for assets to infrastructure suppliers and readies a gathering of services as virtual machine (VM). Foundation supplier gives two ways asset leasing plans that are here and now leasing and long haul leasing. By and large, the leasing of long haul is less expensive than here and now leasing. Queuing model : A client send demands that is approaching service solicitations cannot quickly prepared after they arrived, right off the bat ask for set in the line then it took care of by accessible server. Lining model takes after first come-first-serves (FCFS) system.

Fig2. The multiserver system model, where service requests are first place in a queue before they are processed by any servers. In Fig2 multiserver system consists of long term rented servers and short-term servers. The short term server is modelled as an M/M/m queuing system.

Cloud Computing: Cloud computing is Internet-based computing. The client will just utilize stockpiling, computing power, or uniquely made improvement conditions, while not stressing however these work inside. The mode figuring at interims that IT-related abilities are given as an service, allowing clients to get to innovation empowered services from the web (in the cloud) without data of, or service over the advancements behind these servers.

VI.

SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE

(5)

cooperation of the resulting components to help SLA-situated asset service. Service Request Examiner And Admission control : Once an service ask for is submitted, at that point the Service Request Examiner and Admission service system deciphers the submitted ask for QoS necessities before essential regardless of whether to just acknowledge or reject the demand. Accordingly, it guarantees that there's no over-burdening of assets whereby a few service demands can't be culminated with progress owing to confined assets advertised. It moreover wants the latest standing data concerning asset comfort (from the VM Monitor system) and work process (from the Service Request Monitor instrument) in order to shape asset designation decisions viably. At that point, it relegates solicitations to VMs and decides asset privileges for apportioned VMs. Virtual Machine : Multiple virtual machines might be begun and ceased on request, physical machine to satisfy acknowledged service demands, in this way giving most adaptability to tack shifted allotments of assets on indistinguishable physical machine to totally extraordinary particular necessities of service demands. Furthermore, various VMs will in the

meantime run applications bolstered totally

extraordinary working infrastructures situations on one physical machine since each VM is completely detached from each other on indistinguishable physical machine.

VII.

Algorithm

Double Quality Guaranteed Scheme

Step 1: A multiserver system is running with m servers and waiting for events.

Step 2: queue Q is initialized as empty

Step 3: Event-when service request arrives and server is available then assign service request to that server. Step 4: if server is not available then put service request at end of the queue Q and record its waiting time.

Step 5: Event-when server becomes idle and queue is empty then waiting for new service request. Step 6: if

queue is not empty then take first service request and assign to that idle server.

Step 7: Event - deadline of a request is achieved then rent a temporary server to execute the request and release that server when request is completed. 6.1 Mathematical Module S = (I, F, O, C) S = System I = Set of inputs = user requests, package O = Generated output = Plan granted F = Set of functions F1 = Cloud User login, registration, upload file, view policy terms, choose package, cost. F2 = BSP login, view user requests and accept them, publish infrastructure services and view graph modulations. F3 = ISP login, provide the infrastructure services, view broker requests, maintain users. Venn diagram ISP: Infrastructure service provider BSP: Business service provider.

Fig4. Simple view of system

VIII.

Expected Result

Below fig5.shows performance measurement

according to File size, Download speeds in KB/s and download time.

Fig 5. Performance measures

(6)

Fig6. Comparison between DQG and SQU scheme we can achieve more profit than the existing. Single-Quality-Unguaranteed (SQU) renting scheme on the basis of guaranteeing the service quality completely. The main computing capacity is provided by the long-term rented servers due to their low price so as to minimize the price. Above Fig6.depicts that the optimal profit obtained using DQG renting scheme is always greater than that using the SQU renting scheme in terms of both of quality of service.

IX.

CONCLUSION

An ideal design issue of benefit expansion is figured in which many variables are taken into consideration, for example, the market request, the rental cost of servers, the cost of vitality utilization, the workload of solicitations, the server-level understanding and so forth. A valuing model is created for cloud computing which takes many components, for example, Double-Quality-Guaranteed leasing plan for specialist co-ops. A transient leasing with long-term leasing consolidates in this plan, which can decrease the asset wastage. An M/M/m+D lining model is work for multiserver infrastructure with shifting infrastructure measure. Cloud gives the security to database by utilizing extraordinary key. A progression of correlations of DQG and SQU the Double-Quality-Guaranteed leasing plan accomplish more benefit than single quality-unguaranteed leasing plan.

X.

REFERENCES

[1]. E. Korpeo gIu, A. S en, and K. G uler, "Non-cooperative joint re- plenishment under asymmetric information," European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 227, no. 3, pp. 434-443, 2013.

[2]. C. Liu, K. Li, C. Xu, and K. Li, "Strategy configurations of multiple users competition for cloud service reservation," IEEE Transactions on Parallel and CloudSystems, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 508-520, 2016.

[3]. M. J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein, "A course in game theory," MIT press, 1994.

[4]. S. S. Aote and M. U. Kharat, "A game-theoretic model for dy-namic load balancing in cloudsystems," in Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Control, ser. ICAC3 '09. ACM, 2009, pp. 235-238.

[5]. N. Li and J. Marden, "Designing games for cloudoptimiza-tion," Selected Topics in Signal Processing, IEEE Journal of, vol. 7,no. 2, pp. 230-242, April 2013.

[6]. S. Penmatsa and A. T. Chronopoulos,

"Game-theoretic static load balancing for

cloudsystems," Journal of Parallel and CloudComputing, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 537 - 555, 2011.

[7]. G. Scutari and J.-S. Pang, "Joint sensing and power allocation in nonconvex cognitive radio games: Nash equilibria and cloudalgorithms," Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 4626-4661, July 2013.

[8]. J. Cao, K. Hwang, K. Li, and A. Y.

ZomayaOptimal multi-server configuration for profit maximization in cloud comput-ing,IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 10871096, Jun. 2013.

[9]. R. Buyya, C. S. Yeo, S. Venugopal, J. Broberg, and I. Brandic Cloud computing and emerging it platforms: Vision, hype, and reality for

(7)

utility,FutureGener. Comput.Sy., vol. 25, no. 6, pp.599616, 2009.

[10]. J. Chen, C. Wang, B. B. Zhou, L. Sun, Y. C. Lee, and A. Y. Zomaya Tradeoffs between profit and customer satisfaction for service provisioning in the cloud,in Proc. 20th Int. Symp. High Perform.Distrib. Comput.,pp.229238,2011. [11]. B. Yang, F. Tan, Y.-S. Dai, and S. Guoou, L.

Sun, Y. C. Lee, and A. Y. Zomaya, Performance evaluation of cloud service considering fault recovery,in Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Cloud Comput.,pp. 571576,2009.

[12]. M. Mazzucco and D. DyachukOptimizing

cloud providers revenues via energy efficient server allocation,Sustainable Com-put.:Inf. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 112, 2012.

[13]. Jing Mei, Kenli Li, Aijia Ouyang, Keqin Li, A Profit Maxi-mization Scheme with Guaranteed Quality of Service in Cloud Computing,IEEE Transactions On Computers, Vol. 64,2015. [14]. Y. J. Chiang and Y.C. Ouyang, Profit

optimization in SLA-aware cloud services with a finite capacity queuing model,Math. Probl.Eng., vol. 2014, pp. 111, 2014.

[15]. Z.Liu, S. Wang, Q. Sun, H. Zou, and F. Yang Cost-aware cloud service request scheduling for SaaS providers,Comput. J., vol. 57, pp. 291301, 2013

[16]. R. Buyya, R. Ranjan, and R. N. Calheiros Intercloud:Utilityoriented federation of cloud computing environments for scaling of application services, in Algorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing,. New York, NY, USA: Springer,pp. 1331,2010.

ABOUT AUTHORS:

P.RADHA is currently

pursuing her M.Tech

Computer Science &

Engineering at Amalapuram Institute of Management Sciences and College of Engineering, Mummidivaram.

MOHAMMED ALISHA is currently working as a Associate Professor and Heading the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at Amalapuram Institute of Management Sciences and College of Engineering, Mummidivaram. He is a Post Graduate in Computer Science and Engineering and had 12 years of Experience. His Research interests include Spatial Data Mining, Web Designing, Java Programming, Computer Networks and Data Warehousing.

Dr. D. MOHAN REDDY

received the B.Tech. Degree from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad, India and he received the M.E from Anna University, Chennai and Ph.D

from Sri Venkateswara

Figure

Fig 1. The three-tier cloud structure
Fig 5. Performance measures

References

Related documents

International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology CSEIT183142 | Received 07 Jan 2018 | Accepted 20 Jan 2018 | January February

International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology CSEIT1831137 | Received 15 Jan 2018 | Accepted 03 Feb 2018 | January February

International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology CSEIT1831154 | Received 15 Jan 2018 | Accepted 03 Feb 2018 | January February

International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology CSEIT1831210 | Received 15 Jan 2018 | Accepted 05 Feb 2018 | January February

International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology CSEIT1831210 | Received 20 Jan 2018 | Accepted 07 Feb 2018 | January February

International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology CSEIT1831432 | Received 16 Feb 2018 | Accepted 28 Feb 2018 | January February

International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology CSEIT1831163 | Received 15 Jan 2018 | Accepted 03 Feb 2018 | January February

International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology CSEIT1833187 | Received 05 Jan 2018 | Accepted 30 Jan 2018 | January February 2018