• No results found

Pupil Premium Review

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Pupil Premium Review"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

2015-16 Pupil Premium Review

There were:

• 142 students in receipt of Free school meals (FSM) or students who have been in receipt of FSM at some point in the last 6 years

• 9 students who are classified as Looked After (LAC)

• 8 Service Children

Total pupils on roll 940 Total number eligible for PPG 159 Amount of PPG received per pupil £935

Total amount received £151,300 The school has allocated pupil premium funding in the following areas:-

Staffing

• Appointed an English teacher to work with small groups in KS4.

• Allocated time for Maths TA 1 day a week.

• Implemented staff interventions in English and Maths at KS4.

• Enabled more time to be allocated to the leadership of our support for this target group.

• Created a 'pupil premium action group’ appointed a learning mentor to support this group to support this group through provision of homework club and 1-1 monitoring.

• We have a counsellor 2 days a week.

• Fr Matthew who provides pastoral care support including

• support clubs at dinnertime.

Mentoring

• 1-2 tuition for years 7-9 in English and Maths.

• mentoring to years 9,10 and 11 across all subject areas.

Holiday Course

• Easter Exam preparation for year 11 in MFL.

• Whitsun Year 11 Exams preparation in English/Maths.

(2)

Accommodation

• Introduced a breakfast club for pupils who are at school 8.30-8.45.

Key skills Courses

• Year 11 Revision skills day. Internally organised.

• Year 10 and 11 targeted students went to Skills Fair at the NEC.

• Developed on existing programme of Revision Skills involving outside agency.

• Instituted a parent/pupil information evening to help parents understand how to assist their children.

• Key stage 2-3 Transition

• Extra half days to enable smoother transition

Resources

• The purchase of ICT hardware for individual pupils.

• Software products to improve literacy and numeracy.

• Revision Booklets for public exams.

• Accelerated reading scheme.

• Lexius reading software.

Transport

• Taxi fares to support attendance at Homework clubs and after school lessons.

• Coaches to the Skills Fair

• Incurred costs for total access to the curriculum

• Trips involving History, MFL, English, RE, Drama, Geography and Science

Monitoring the progress of pupils

• Undertaken programmes of book trawls.

• Learning walks to check progress of the pupils.

• Staff Training Day was devoted to both peer marking and improved feedback to students.

• Theme of School lesson observations emphasised on the participation and progress of working with PPG students.

• Feedback from pupils who have participated in the numerous activities to support their education has been extremely positive. Parental questionnaires have been used to identify individual need and preferences.

(3)

IMPACT of PUPIL PREMIUM FUNDING

There has been a year on year improvement in achievement

Year 11 Pupil Premium Results

Performance Indicator 2013/2015 2014/2015 2015/2016

A* - C including English/Maths 30% 52% 55%

Capped 8 including English/Maths

- 276 295.5%

Capped 8 + English/Maths 232.2 349.44 372.3%

3 + LOP English 32% 63.6% 70%

4 + LOP English 0% 22.7% 40%

3 + LOP Maths 47% 65% 65%

4 + LOP Maths 0% 15% 15%

Capped 8 + English/Maths - Average Score

- 986.349 981.1

Average Grade per Student – Best 8

D D C-

Average Point per Student – Best 8

33 34.59 37.01

Impact of extra 1-2 tuition in English and Maths of Pupil premium students throughout KS3

Grammar KS2 Test Decimal

Year 9

English Improvement KS2 Maths

Test Decimal

Year 9

Maths Improvement

PPG 4.62 6.54 1.92 4.75 6.56 1.80

Non PPG 4.86 6.53 1.67 4.96 6.89 1.92

Difference -0.24 0.01 -0.21 -0.33

This table indicates pupils came with a gap and this has considerably closed in English, making nearly 2 levels of progress over the 3 years. Maths gap has increased slightly, however when looking deeper at the results it has been disproportionately affected by 3 extreme results and if they are taken out it would mean that Maths would have had eliminated the gap. Therefore we need to look more individually at the PPG and specifically on those who are not progressing at the same rate of the others.

(4)

Attendance of students

Attendance

of students Year

2013 2014 2015 2016 PPG 88.0% 92.4% 92.5% 93.5%

Non PPG 94.8% 96.1% 96.% 97%

Whole

School 94.4% 95.1% 95.7% 96%

Gap -6.8% -3.7% -3.5% -3.5%

Narrowing the gap with Pupil Premium students at KS 4

Percentage of pupils attaining 5 or more A*-C grades including English and Maths at Key Stage 4

2013 2014 2015 2016

Cohort 63% 55% 63% 69%

PPG 24% 32% 50% 55%

Non PPG 68% 59% 65% 71.2%

Gap -44% -27% -15% -16.2%

Percentage of pupils attaining 5 or more A*-C grades at Key Stage 4

2013 2014 2015 2016

Cohort 78% 73% 73% 80.3%

PPG 53% 30% 54% 60%

Non PPG 80% 74% 76% 83.3%

Gap -34% -44% -22% -23.3%

(5)

School PPG

(16students) National

Progress 8 -0.2 0.5

Attainment 8 49.06 52.56

English progress -0.1 0.6

English Attainment 10.71 10.95

Maths Progress -0.5 -0.6

Maths Attainment 9.18 10.39

Ebacc Progress -.5 0.7

Ebacc Attainment 12.65 14.78

Open Progress 0.1 0.6

Open Attainment 16.53 16.44

If two dis-engaged students ( 41% and 58% attendance) taken out of the data it would look like the following

School PPG

(14 students) National

Progress 8 0.19 0.5

Attainment 8 53.63 52.56

English progress 0.3 0.6

English Attainment 11.86 10.95

Maths Progress -0.22 -0.6

Maths Attainment 10.14 10.39

Ebacc Progress -0.11 0.7

Ebacc Attainment 14.64 14.78

Open Progress 0.7 0.6

Open Attainment 18.93 16.44 Average points score overall

2013 2014 2015 2016

PPG 33 33.5 35.20 37.59

Non PPG 41.5 41.5 41.9 42.83

Cohort 40.5 40.5 41 42.14

Gap -8.5 -8.5 -6.7 -4.5

(6)

Future Plans 2016-17

• We will be assessing whether further staff recruitment is needed in areas such as English, Maths and Science to aid further progression.

• We will continue to offer 1-2 tuition, holiday classes, transport, revision materials, mentoring etc. and liaise closely with parents to identify needs.

• We will increase our expenditure on staff training to promote the progress of these pupils.

• We will be arranging motivational speakers to visit the school.

• We will monitor closely and more frequently the progress of pupils.

References

Related documents

Establishing the Context for Expedited Reinstatement in the SSDI Program: The Substantial Gainful Activity, Trial Work Period, and Extended Period of Eligibility

Additional small group teaching- Eng lead and DHT 1:1 provision Additional adult in Yr 6 to target PP children. Allocation of skilled practitioner to support pre and over

Priority Action Resources Monitoring Procedure Time Scale Lead Evaluation (impact) Designate 2 Learning Assistants. to work with Pupil Premium

The aim of this study was to explore the views and experiences of practitioners, social care offi- cers, and carers who have been involved in the enhanced healthcare programme, in

On the basis of our observations of persistent immune activation in blood and tissues at 16 to 18 weeks after AMtb vaccination of SIV-unexposed infant macaques, we asked whether

Ignition system components that the digital multimeter can test are the primary and secondary ignition coil resistance, spark plug wire resistance, hall effect

The Government believes that the Pupil Premium, which is additional to main school funding, is the best way to address the current underlying inequalities between children eligible

• to review attainment and progress within their subject, including specific pupil groups, e.g. Pupil Premium, SEN, Most