feature-by-feature comparison

Top PDF feature-by-feature comparison:

Stylus Studio 2010 XML Feature Comparison Matrix

Stylus Studio 2010 XML Feature Comparison Matrix

Stylus Studio 2010 XML Feature Comparison Matrix Compare editions of Stylus Studio to determine the one that best meets your needs. Its is recommended Stylus Studio XML Enterprise Suite for advanced data integration projects. Please note that Stylus Studio XML Home Edition is restricted to student and non-commercial home usage.

21 Read more

Fast Video Object Segmentation by Pixel-Wise Feature Comparison

Fast Video Object Segmentation by Pixel-Wise Feature Comparison

The goals of Fast VOS by Pixel-Wise Feature Comparison (PiWiVOS) are to be simple and fast enough to be used in Real-Time applications. Furthermore, in the same aim to be used in real-world environments, our method is directly addressed to the multi-object VOS problem. One can easily see that almost all the existing VOS models, presented in Section 3.3, start solving the foreground-background segmentation problem, to then move to the multi-object task by merging their results. Even those methods that are prepared and trained for multi-object segmentation directly, need a forward pass for each of them or an RNN to predict them one by one. All the previously presented approaches are object-wise methods.
Show more

60 Read more

Feature list and feature comparison guide for v2.0 products

Feature list and feature comparison guide for v2.0 products

The code coverage analysis functions are implemented by the optional Atollic TrueANALYZER add-on product. This product is available for most targets, and these features are subject t[r]

44 Read more

Ethernet Switch Product Feature Comparison

Ethernet Switch Product Feature Comparison

To learn more about the Avaya Ethernet Switch product line, contact your Avaya Account Manager or Avaya Authorized Partner.. Roadmapped & Hardware-ready) n = Scale - = Not support[r]

8 Read more

Feature Comparison MAXIMIZER CRM. Published By. DATA SHEET Feature Comparison 1

Feature Comparison MAXIMIZER CRM. Published By. DATA SHEET Feature Comparison 1

With flexible on-premise, our cloud and your cloud deployment options, tailored-to- fit flexibility, state-of-the art security infrastructure, industry-specific editions and anywhere/ an[r]

12 Read more

SQL Server In-Memory OLTP and Columnstore Feature Comparison

SQL Server In-Memory OLTP and Columnstore Feature Comparison

Columnstore index immediately. Those rows are marked with a delete label or flag, which signifies that the rows are deleted. Over time, when many rows have been deleted, they still occupy space in the Columnstore. One way to remove those deleted rows is to rebuild the indexes after a certain period. DB2 provides an automated index maintenance that removes the deleted rows automatically from the index. This feature is not currently available with SQL Server 2014, but it is available in the upcoming version of SQL Server.

20 Read more

Crystal Reports XI Feature Comparison by Version and Edition

Crystal Reports XI Feature Comparison by Version and Edition

CDO, Microsoft Internet Information Server, Microsoft System Management Server, Microsoft Windows NT Event Logs, Microsoft Outlook, Paradox, XML/XSD, Lotus Domino, Microsoft FoxPro, Web [r]

5 Read more

Outlook and OWA Feature Comparison Chart

Outlook and OWA Feature Comparison Chart

Feature: OWA 2010 SP1 Outlook Show messages from other folders (conversation view) Yes No 2003 Conversation view Yes (improved) No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes Access to [r]

7 Read more

Volunteer Software Feature Comparison

Volunteer Software Feature Comparison

Generate reports based on any profile data including custom fields ✓. Save frequently used searches* ✓[r]

6 Read more

Suite 64 Voicemail Feature Comparison

Suite 64 Voicemail Feature Comparison

The Voicemail System can be programmed to grant the Multi-Extension Mailbox feature, which allows multiple telephones to access to the same mailbox from different PBX extensions. For example, the CEO of the company may have two phones: extension 201 on his/her executive desk and 211 on his/her conference table. The CEO can access one mailbox, mailbox 201 from either extension with Voicemail System. In addition, when a message is received in mailbox 201, a voicemail message waiting indication is provided to extensions 201 and 211. The Auto Record feature is also available from both extensions.
Show more

13 Read more

Product Feature Comparison Matrix

Product Feature Comparison Matrix

Full activity information from all calendar views Manage and track tasks related to Projects/Opportunities Track tasks and activities tied to contact and capture a history Calendar pop-u[r]

6 Read more

Incremental Feature Subsetting useful for Big Feature Space Problems

Incremental Feature Subsetting useful for Big Feature Space Problems

Recent literature [32, 34, 35, 37, 38] contains numerous references to the use of hybrid feature selection algorithms. Based on a filter ranking, these algorithms perform an incremental wrapper selection over feature ranking [29]. In order to reduce computational time, improve generalization accuracy, and enhance intelligence of the learned models [23], researchers are looking at working on the big feature space by reducing the searchspace in the most efficient way [34]. There are algorithms based on Incremental Attribute Learning (IAL) that incrementally imports features into systems. It is necessary to know which feature should be introduced in an earlier step [34]. On similar lines, incremental learning of association rules has also been attempted. During anomaly detection in backbone networks [39], research shows that the classification cost, in terms of items that need to be classified, can be reduced by several orders of magnitude by using association rules incrementally. Researchers have also worked on methods of fusing the knowledge during incremental learning via clustering in a distributed environment. [6]. Here, the original dataset is divided into several batches by a random selection of samples and presumed that each batch of data is available at a different location. Knowledge of each batch of data is extracted incrementally to obtain the batch-knowledge of the respective batches.
Show more

10 Read more

Comparison of Feature Reduction Techniques for the Binominal Classification of Network Traffic

Comparison of Feature Reduction Techniques for the Binominal Classification of Network Traffic

- Scenario 1b (5 features selected by HVS) gives the best performance for a reduced feature set, according to all criteria (accuracy, FPR, FNR, and testing execution time), except for the learning time, which is not a critical criterion, since the learning process is made off-line once for all. Compared to scenario 1a (complete feature set), the reduction of the number of features by 72% (from 18 to 5) yields a decrease in accuracy by only 0.2% (from 0.9847 to 0.9828). This good performance may be explained by the coherence of the two phases (feature selec- tion and classification both based on neural networks). The figures of scenario 1c show that an acceptable per- formance is kept even with only input features. Scenario 2c slightly outperforms it, however, in accuracy, FPR and execution time.
Show more

9 Read more

Feature Modeling and Variability Modeling Syntactic Notation Comparison and Mapping

Feature Modeling and Variability Modeling Syntactic Notation Comparison and Mapping

To organize this paper we describe the related back- ground in Section 2, the grounded theory of feature mod- eling in SPLE, FODA, CBFM, OVM and recent state of CVL. The related work of this research is discussed in Section 3. The comparison and mapping analysis are dis- cussed in Section 4, and also relation of FODA, CBFM and OVM with CVL. Study case of this comparison and mapping using R3ST software prototype are explained in Section 5. And finally we conclude and discuss the fea- ture work in Section 6.

8 Read more

Feature Extraction Comparison in Handwriting Recognition of Batak Toba Alphabet

Feature Extraction Comparison in Handwriting Recognition of Batak Toba Alphabet

This paper focuses on the recognition of the handwriting of the Batak Toba script with various background noise on writing and with various feature extraction. Giving various kinds of noise on the background of writing aims to imitate the existing writing on ancient manuscripts of the Batak Toba. Handwriting recognition of the Batak Toba script is done with various feature extractions to see the exact feature extractions represent the Batak Toba script.

7 Read more

A Comparison of Fuzzy Clustering Algorithms Applied to Feature Extraction on Vineyard

A Comparison of Fuzzy Clustering Algorithms Applied to Feature Extraction on Vineyard

As a second step, the following fuzzy clustering algorithms were applied to this subset: Fuzzy C-Means (FCM), Possibilistic C-Means (PCM), Fuzzy Pos- sibilistic C-Means (FPCM), Robust Fuzzy Possibilistic C-Means (RFCM) and Fuzzy C-Means with Gustafson-Kessel algorithm (FCM-GK). The algorithms were selected due to their theoretical advantages as well as to asses the draw- backs when applied under field conditions. For this comparison 8 clusters was used as reference.

10 Read more

Feature and Importance

Feature and Importance

IPv6 is necessary for protocol design, simulating, improving network performance and building application. In this paper we describe the basic knowledge about the IPv6. Then, we analyze the features and the importance of IPv6. NAT is also described in this paper. IPv6 address space is so large that it's not possible to list every address for probing. This method lays a stable foundation for the succeeding probing program to improve efficiency, completeness and avoid redundancy. Tunnelling is the one of the best feature of IPv6. We propose the method of finding the tunnels based on IPv6 path MTU (maximum transfer unit) discovery mechanism to improve the veracity of the result.
Show more

9 Read more

Feature & Specification

Feature & Specification

• Office File Format : MS-Word, Power Point, Excel, Acrobat Viewer, HTML Viewer (Viewer Only) • etc : HTML, XML, JAVA, Flash.. MagicNet transmits media files (photo, audio and movie file[r]

10 Read more

Feature Description

Feature Description

When the AAR/ARS Partitioning feature is used in a hotel/motel or a hospital environment, different facilities access is provided through ARS for guest/patient voice terminals and administrative staff member voice terminals. For example, within a hotel or motel, the guests and staff voice terminals might be partitioned into two user groups. When a guest places an inter-state call, the guest user group’s ARS tables may specify that the call be routed using AT&T QUOTE Service, a telephone billing information system that is used to bill back or allocate long-distance charges. A similar call placed by a staff member might be routed over a Direct Distance Dialing (DDD) trunk.
Show more

763 Read more

Comparison of Feature Selection Strategies for Classification using Rapid Miner

Comparison of Feature Selection Strategies for Classification using Rapid Miner

The intension of feature selection is to decide a subset of features for enhancing the prediction accuracy or minimizing the size of the structure without drastically reducing prediction accuracy of the classifier built using only the selected features [10]. The filter approach operates independently of any learning algorithm. These methods rank the features by some criteria and omit all features that do not achieve a sufficient score. Due to its computational efficiency, the filter methods are very popular to high-dimension data [11]. Some popular filter methods are F-score criterion [12], mutual information [13], information gain [14] and correlation [15]. The wrapper approach involves with the predetermined learning model, selects features on measuring the learning performance of the particular learning model [15-16]. Although wrappers may produce better results, they are expensive to run and can break down with very large numbers of features. This is due to the use of learning algorithms in the evaluation of feature subsets every time [17]. Filter and wrapper are two complementary approaches, then the hybrid approach attempts to take advantage of the filter and wrapper approaches by exploiting their complementary strengths [18-20].
Show more

8 Read more

Show all 10000 documents...